Noncardiac chest pain during war

Disease and Non-Battle Injury in Deployed Military: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Disease and non-battle injury (DNBI) has historically been the leading casualty type among service members in warfare and a leading health problem confronting military personnel, resulting in significant loss of manpower. Studies show a significant increase in disease burden for DNBI when compared to combat-related injuries. Understanding the causes of and trends in DNBI may help guide efforts to develop preventive measures and help increase medical readiness and resiliency. However, despite its significant disease burden within the military population, DNBI remains less studied than battle injury. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the recently published literature on DNBI and to describe the characteristics of these recently published studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review is reported in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database. The systematic search for published articles was conducted through July 21, 2022, in Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Library, Defense Technical Information Center, Embase, and PubMed. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, the investigators independently screened the reference lists on the Covidence website (covidence.org). An article was excluded if it met any of the following criteria: (1) Published not in English; (2) published before 2010; (3) data used before 2001; (4) case reports, commentaries, and editorial letters; (5) systematic reviews or narrative reviews; (6) used animal models; (7) mechanical or biomechanical studies; (8) outcome was combat injury or non-specified; (9) sample was veterans, DoD civilians, contractors, local nationals, foreign military, and others; (10) sample was U.S. Military academy; (11) sample was non-deployed; (12) bioterrorism study; (13) qualitative study. The full-text review of 2 independent investigators reached 96% overall agreement (166 of 173 articles; κ = 0.89). Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted from each article. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis of pooled estimates of incidence rates for disease (D), non-battle injury (NBI), and combined DNBI was created using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Of the 3,401 articles, 173 were included for the full review and 29 (16.8%) met all inclusion criteria. Of the 29 studies included, 21 (72.4%) were retrospective designs, 5 (17.2%) were prospective designs, and 3 (10.3%) were surveys. Across all studies, the median number of total cases reported was 1,626 (interquartile range: 619.5-10,203). The results of meta-analyses for 8 studies with reported incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) for D (n = 3), NBI (n = 7), and DNBI (n = 5) showed pooled incidence rates of 22.18 per 1,000 person-years for D, 19.86 per 1,000 person-years for NBI, and 50.97 per 1,000 person-years for combined DNBI. Among 3 studies with incidence rates for D, NBI, and battle injury, the incidence rates were 20.32 per 1,000 person-years for D, 6.88 per 1,000 person-years for NBI, and 6.83 per 1,000 person-years for battle injury.

CONCLUSIONS

DNBI remains the leading cause of morbidity in conflicts involving the U.S. Military over the last 20 years. More research with stronger designs and consistent measurement is needed to improve medical readiness and maintain force lethality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Level III.

Gastrointestinal problems in modern wars: clinical features and possible mechanisms

Gastrointestinal problems are common during wars, and they have exerted significant adverse effects on the health of service members involved in warfare. The spectrum of digestive diseases has varied during wars of different eras. At the end of the 20th century, new frontiers of military medical research emerged due to the occurrence of high-tech wars such as the Gulf War and the Kosovo War, in which ground combat was no longer the primary method of field operations. The risk to the military personnel who face trauma has been greatly reduced, but disease and non-battle injuries (DNBIs) such as neuropsychological disorders and digestive diseases seemed to be increased. Data revealed that gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and noncardiac chest pain are common among military personnel during modern wars. In addition, a large number of deployed soldiers and veterans who participated in recent wars presented with chronic gastrointestinal complaints, which fulfilled with the Rome III criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). It was also noted that many veterans who returned from the Gulf War suffered not only from chronic digestive symptoms but also from neuropsychological dysfunction; however, they also showed symptoms of other systems. Presently, this broad range of unexplained symptoms is known as "Gulf War syndrome". The mechanism that underlies Gulf War syndrome remains unclear, but many factors have been associated with this syndrome such as war trauma, stress, infections, immune dysfunction, radiological factors, anthrax vaccination and so on. Some have questioned if the diagnosis of FGIDs can be reached given the complexity of the military situation. As a result, further studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal disease among military personnel.

Nonspecific motility disorders, irritable esophagus, and chest pain

This paper presents commentaries on whether Starling's law applies to the esophagus; whether erythromycin affects esophageal motility; the relationship between hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter and vigorous achalasia; whether ethnic- and gender-based norms affect diagnosis and treatment of esophageal motor disorders; health care and epidemiology of chest pain; whether normal pH excludes esophageal pain; the role of high-resolution manometry in noncardiac chest pain; whether pH-impedance should be included in the evaluation of noncardiac chest pain; whether there are there alternative therapeutic options to PPI for treating noncardiac chest pain; and the usefulness of psychological treatment and alternative medicine in noncardiac chest pain.

Headaches during war: Analysis of presentation, treatment, and factors associated with outcome

Background: Headache is often associated with physical trauma and psychological stress. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of headache on personnel deployed in war zones and to identify factors associated with return to duty (RTD).

Methods: Outcome data were prospectively collected on 985 personnel medically evacuated out of Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom for a primary diagnosis of headache between 2004 and 2009. Electronic medical records were reviewed to examine clinical and treatment patterns and the effect that myriad factors had on RTD.

Results: 33.6% of evacuees returned to duty. The most common headaches were post-concussion (34.1%) and migraine (30.0%). Headaches typically associated with trauma such as post-concussion (18.7%), occipital neuralgia (23.1%), and cervicogenic headache (29.7%) had the lowest RTD rates, whereas tension headache (49.6%) was associated with the best outcome. Other variables associated with negative outcome included presence of aura (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.88; p = 0.02), traumatic brain injury (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29–0.87; p = 0.01), opioid (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.63; p < 0.001), and beta-blocker (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.61; p = 0.002) use, and co-existing psychopathology ( p < 0.001 in univariable analysis).

Conclusion: Headaches represent a significant cause of unit attrition in personnel deployed in military operations, with physical trauma and co-existing psychopathology associated with poorer outcomes.

Diagnoses and factors associated with medical evacuation and return to duty among nonmilitary personnel participating in military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan

BACKGROUND

Nonmilitary personnel play an increasingly critical role in modern wars. Stark differences exist between the demographic characteristics, training and missions of military and nonmilitary members. We examined the differences in types of injury and rates of returning to duty among nonmilitary and military personnel participating in military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

METHODS

We collected data for nonmilitary personnel medically evacuated from military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2004 and 2007. We compared injury categories and return-to-duty rates in this group with previously published data for military personnel and identified factors associated with return to duty.

RESULTS

Of the 2155 medically evacuated nonmilitary personnel, 74.7% did not return to duty. War-related injuries in this group accounted for 25.6% of the evacuations, the most common causes being combat-related injuries (55.4%) and musculoskeletal/spinal injuries (22.9%). Among individuals with non-war-related injuries, musculoskeletal injuries accounted for 17.8% of evacuations. Diagnoses associated with the highest return-to-duty rates in the group of nonmilitary personnel were psychiatric diagnoses (15.6%) among those with war-related injuries and noncardiac chest or abdominal pain (44.0%) among those with non-war-related injuries. Compared with military personnel, nonmilitary personnel with war-related injuries were less likely to return to duty (4.4% v. 5.9%, p = 0.001) but more likely to return to duty after non-war-related injuries (32.5% v. 30.7%, p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Compared with military personnel, nonmilitary personnel were more likely to be evacuated with non-war-related injuries but more likely to return to duty after such injuries. For evacuations because of war-related injuries, this trend was reversed.