1
|
Ojiaku CA, Chung E, Parikh V, Williams JK, Schwab A, Fuentes AL, Corpuz ML, Lui V, Paek S, Bexiga NM, Narayan S, Nunez FJ, Ahn K, Ostrom RS, An SS, Panettieri RA. Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Decreases β 2-Agonist-induced Relaxation in Human Airway Smooth Muscle. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2020; 61:209-218. [PMID: 30742476 DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0301oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Helper T effector cytokines implicated in asthma modulate the contractility of human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells. We have reported recently that a profibrotic cytokine, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, induces HASM cell shortening and airway hyperresponsiveness. Here, we assessed whether TGF-β1 affects the ability of HASM cells to relax in response to β2-agonists, a mainstay treatment for airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma. Overnight TGF-β1 treatment significantly impaired isoproterenol (ISO)-induced relaxation of carbachol-stimulated, isolated HASM cells. This single-cell mechanical hyporesponsiveness to ISO was corroborated by sustained increases in myosin light chain phosphorylation. In TGF-β1-treated HASM cells, ISO evoked markedly lower levels of intracellular cAMP. These attenuated cAMP levels were, in turn, restored with pharmacological and siRNA inhibition of phosphodiesterase 4 and Smad3, respectively. Most strikingly, TGF-β1 selectively induced phosphodiesterase 4D gene expression in HASM cells in a Smad2/3-dependent manner. Together, these data suggest that TGF-β1 decreases HASM cell β2-agonist relaxation responses by modulating intracellular cAMP levels via a Smad2/3-dependent mechanism. Our findings further define the mechanisms underlying β2-agonist hyporesponsiveness in asthma, and suggest TGF-β1 as a potential therapeutic target to decrease asthma exacerbations in severe and treatment-resistant asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christie A Ojiaku
- 1Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Elena Chung
- 2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Vishal Parikh
- 2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | - Anthony Schwab
- 2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Ana Lucia Fuentes
- 2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Maia L Corpuz
- 4Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, California
| | - Victoria Lui
- 5Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sam Paek
- 5Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Natalia M Bexiga
- 5Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,6Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Technology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Shreya Narayan
- 5Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Francisco J Nunez
- 4Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, California
| | - Kwangmi Ahn
- 7National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rennolds S Ostrom
- 4Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, California
| | - Steven S An
- 5Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,8Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and.,9Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Reynold A Panettieri
- 1Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou J, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Time- and Dose-Dependent Effects of Desflurane in Sensitized Airways. Anesth Analg 2017; 124:465-471. [PMID: 28067710 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the bronchodilatory actions of volatile anesthetics, such as halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane, have been well documented in previous studies, the properties of desflurane remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of desflurane at different concentrations and durations in an ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pig model of airway hyper-responsiveness. METHODS Ovalbumin-sensitized animals (n = 176) were randomly assigned to 5 groups according to the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane they received: 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 MAC. Total lung resistance in vivo, airway smooth muscle tension in vitro, and intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) levels were measured to evaluate the effects of desflurane. RESULTS In 5 sensitized groups, total lung resistance increased from baseline to peak at approximately 8 minutes and then decreased slowly until about 17 minutes with extended administration of desflurane. Desflurane dose-dependently increased total lung resistance with or without incremental doses of acetylcholine and reduced muscle tension with increasing concentrations of carbacholine. Cyclic AMP levels were increased by desflurane: at the 60-minute time point, cyclic AMP concentrations (means ± SD) with 0.5 MAC (1.96 ± 0.40) and 1.0 MAC (2.11 ± 0.50) desflurane were higher than those at the 8-minute time point (1.11 ± 0.23 and 1.32 ± 0.32). CONCLUSIONS Desflurane exerted time- and dose-dependent effects and could be used at 0.5 and 1.0 MAC concentrations without significant bronchoconstriction in ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs. Cyclic AMP-mediated airway smooth muscle relaxation might be one mechanism by which desflurane induces bronchodilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zhou
- From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China; and †Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|