Predictors of Patient Medication Compliance on the Day of Surgery and the Effects of Providing Patients with Standardized yet Simplified Medication Instructions

Impact of a prescriber and patient educational intervention on discharge analgesia prescribing and hospital readmission rates following elective unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty

Introduction

Pain management after elective, unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) should use a multimodal approach. At discharge, challenges include ensuring correct prescribing practices to optimise analgesia and rationalise opioid use as well as ensuring patients are adequately educated to take these medications safely and effectively in the community. This audit cycle reports on a prescriber and patient education intervention using printed guidelines, educational outreach and prescription standardisation along with a patient information sheet to address the high unplanned readmission rate following THA and TKA at our institution.

Methods

Two cohorts of patients were identified before (2016) and after (2019) the introduction of the educational package. The primary outcome was the unplanned hospital readmission rate in the 42 days following discharge. Secondary outcomes were the compliance with the set prescribing standards and the prescription of strong opioid medications (morphine or oxycodone) on discharge.

Results

There was a reduction in the readmission rate from 20.4% to 10.0% (p=0.004). Readmission rates for pain and constipation were also reduced. The prescribing of tramadol (p<0.001) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p<0.001) both increased while the number of patients who received a strong opioid at discharge decreased (p<0.001) as did the number of patients who received a sustained release strong opioid (p<0.001).

Conclusion

We have observed significant improvement in discharge prescribing which coincided with a reduction in unplanned readmissions after elective TKA and THA. Our approach used prescriber guidelines, education and standardisation with printed information for patients to enhance understanding and recall.

Effect of patient information leaflet on working pattern and patient satisfaction level in a busy Indian day care operative theater complex

Background and Aims:

In a day care setting, communication of preprocedure instructions prior to general anesthesia (GA) is critical. Verbal information may be inadequate at times leading to unnecessary rescheduling. The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of patient information leaflet (PIL) and its impact on rescheduling and patients’ satisfaction levels.

Material and Methods:

Adult ASA I-III patients scheduled for elective day care Head Neck procedures such as direct laryngoscopy, examination under anesthesia, and biopsy under GA were recruited. In the outpatient department (OPD), the attending surgeons verbally instructed the patients as well as handed them the PIL. The process was streamlined over a month and thereafter patients’ satisfaction levels and rescheduling rates were captured over 2 months. This was compared to the data from the pre-PIL phase.

Result:

Prior to PIL, 12% cases were rescheduled due to avoidable causes. After introducing of the PIL, only 8% case were rescheduled (P = 0.02). There was a significant improvement seen in patient satisfaction with 89% patients reporting that the PIL was good or better while 77% were willing to recommend it to the others.

Conclusion:

PIL is an effective way of imparting perioperative instructions to patients which will improve not only satisfaction but also reduce patient rescheduling. The institution is in the process of implementing PIL to provide instructions to patient posted for day care procedures.

Impact of a revised postoperative care plan on pain and recovery trajectory following pediatric tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

A previous cohort of adenotonsillectomy patients at our institution demonstrated moderate-severe post-tonsillectomy pain scores lasting a median (range) duration of 6 (0-23) days and postdischarge nausea and vomiting affecting 8% of children on day 1 following surgery. In this subsequent cohort, we evaluate the impact of changes to our discharge medication and parental education on post-tonsillectomy pain and recovery profile.

METHODS

In this follow-on, prospective observational cohort study, all patients undergoing tonsillectomy at our institution during the study period were discharged with standardized analgesia. Parents received a revised education package and a medication diary which were not provided to the previous cohort. Pain scores, rates of nausea and vomiting, medication usage and unplanned representation rates were collected by telephone from parents.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were recruited. Moderate-severe pain lasted a median (range) of 5 (0-12) days. Twenty-nine (42%) had pain scores ≥4/10 beyond postoperative day 7. By postoperative day 5, only 37 (53%) parents continued to administer regular analgesia. The median number of oxycodone doses used was 5 (0-22), and only 28 (41%) parents had disposed of leftover oxycodone within 1 month of surgery. Twenty-four (35%) patients experienced nausea or vomiting postdischarge. The median (range) time for return to normal activities was 6 (0-14) days. Thirty-two/sixty-nine (46%) patients had unplanned medical representations. Most occurred between postoperative day 5 and 7. Pain contributed to 16 (35%) representations.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite extensive changes to our discharge protocols parents continued to report a prolonged period of pain, post operative nausea and vomiting, and behavioral changes. Further work is required to examine barriers to compliance with simple analgesia and education in appropriate methods of opioid disposal.

The role of preoperative instructions in parents' understanding of preoperative fasting for outpatient pediatric urology procedures

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of modifications in preoperative instructions on parental understanding of preoperative fasting guidelines.

METHODS

A prospective postoperative parental survey was conducted to assess parental understanding of preoperative fasting requirements in patients undergoing surgery before and after institution of instructions that included visual aids. Data regarding demographics, procedure type, and time to surgery from preoperative visit were also captured. Survey data were compared between pre- and post-intervention groups using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

173 parents in the pre-intervention group and 162 parents in the post-intervention group were included in the analysis. Parent identification of aspiration risk as the reason for fasting almost doubled after intervention (72.2% vs. 38.2%). There was some evidence of demographic differences between groups; however, in an adjusted model, there was strong evidence (p < 0.001) that parents in the post-intervention group were more likely to identify aspiration as the reason for preoperative fasting (OR 4.73; 95% CI 2.93-7.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of visual aids in preoperative instructions was associated with improvement in parents' understanding of the rationale behind preoperative fasting instructions. Further studies are needed to determine whether improved understanding is associated with improved adherence.

Impact of pictograms on medication adherence: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the potential effect of pictograms on patient adherence to medication therapies.

METHOD

PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched for relevant articles. Experimental studies testing the use of pictograms in patient counselling regarding medication therapy, which quantitatively measured adherence, were included.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. These were heterogeneous with respect to study setting, population size, and the medication regimen tested. All the studies had methodological quality limitations. The pictogram interventions differed with respect to complexity, intervention length, and the measured adherence outcome. Ten studies (58.8 %) reported a statistically significant effect, of the pictogram intervention in question, on patient adherence to medication therapies. Of these, 80 % involved populations at elevated risk for non-adherence.

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Pictograms used in combination with written and/or oral information can have a positive impact on patient populations that are highly at risk for non-adherence when counselled on the proper use of medicines.

Impact of procedural multimedia instructions for pH BRAVO testing on patient comprehension: a prospective randomized study

The positive impact on patient comprehension and improved procedural outcomes when multimedia is utilized to convey instructions preprocedurally has been previously shown for gastrointestinal procedures such as colonoscopy. However, in gastroesophageal reflux testing (GERD), we continue to utilize verbal and written instructions to establish this diagnosis when we use BRAVO pH testing. This is arguably a more complex procedure involving stopping medications, placement of a device, and maintaining an accurate diary for the duration of the testing. We hypothesize that by utilizing multimedia to relay complex textual information, patients will have improved comprehension of periprocedural instructions thereby improving data entry and satisfaction of expectations during the procedure. Prospective randomized study of 120 patients undergoing endoscopic placement of the BRAVO pH monitoring capsule for evaluation of GERD receive either written preoperative instructions (control) or written plus video instructions (video group). A composite comprehension score was calculated using procedure-specific parameters of data entry over the 48-hour monitoring period. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on the basis of a five-point Likert scale. Extent of patient satisfaction was defined by the fulfillment of patient expectations. Exclusion criteria included patients who did not have access to the video or did not complete follow-up. Seventy-eight patients completed all follow-up evaluations. The video group (n = 44) had a significantly higher mean comprehension score when compared to the control group (n = 34) (9.6 ± 1.4 vs. 7.4 ± 2.0, P = 0.01). Overall satisfaction with instructions was significantly higher in the intervention group (91% vs. 47%, p 0.01). We detected no significant difference in comprehension or satisfaction scores in subgroup analyses of the video group comparing patients <65 and ≥65 years of age and by education level. Compared to standard written instructions, video instructions improved patient comprehension based on data evaluation, and satisfaction. Therefore, clinicians should consider incorporation of multimedia instructions to enhance patient periprocedural expectations and understanding of reflux pH testing using the BRAVO procedure.

Designing and Running a Preoperative Clinic

Value in health care has been described as quality divided by cost, where quality is the sum of patient outcomes and experience. A well-run preoperative evaluation clinic (PEC) offers many opportunities to improve the value of the care delivered to patients by reducing the associated costs and improving the quality of care. Certain patient education and medical optimization strategies initiated in the PEC clinic are linked to an improvement in patients' long-term health outcomes. When designing a PEC, it is important to address the PEC's mission and scope with all stakeholders early in the process.

Bias, Confounding, and Interaction: Lions and Tigers, and Bears, Oh My!

Epidemiologists seek to make a valid inference about the causal effect between an exposure and a disease in a specific population, using representative sample data from a specific population. Clinical researchers likewise seek to make a valid inference about the association between an intervention and outcome(s) in a specific population, based upon their randomly collected, representative sample data. Both do so by using the available data about the sample variable to make a valid estimate about its corresponding or underlying, but unknown population parameter. Random error in an experiment can be due to the natural, periodic fluctuation or variation in the accuracy or precision of virtually any data sampling technique or health measurement tool or scale. In a clinical research study, random error can be due to not only innate human variability but also purely chance. Systematic error in an experiment arises from an innate flaw in the data sampling technique or measurement instrument. In the clinical research setting, systematic error is more commonly referred to as systematic bias. The most commonly encountered types of bias in anesthesia, perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine research include recall bias, observational bias (Hawthorne effect), attrition bias, misclassification or informational bias, and selection bias. A confounding variable is a factor associated with both the exposure of interest and the outcome of interest. A confounding variable (confounding factor or confounder) is a variable that correlates (positively or negatively) with both the exposure and outcome. Confounding is typically not an issue in a randomized trial because the randomized groups are sufficiently balanced on all potential confounding variables, both observed and nonobserved. However, confounding can be a major problem with any observational (nonrandomized) study. Ignoring confounding in an observational study will often result in a "distorted" or incorrect estimate of the association or treatment effect. Interaction among variables, also known as effect modification, exists when the effect of 1 explanatory variable on the outcome depends on the particular level or value of another explanatory variable. Bias and confounding are common potential explanations for statistically significant associations between exposure and outcome when the true relationship is noncausal. Understanding interactions is vital to proper interpretation of treatment effects. These complex concepts should be consistently and appropriately considered whenever one is not only designing but also analyzing and interpreting data from a randomized trial or observational study.

Preoperative Evaluation Clinic Visit Is Associated with Decreased Risk of In-hospital Postoperative Mortality

BACKGROUND

As specialists in perioperative medicine, anesthesiologists are well equipped to design and oversee the preoperative patient preparation process; however, the impact of an anesthesiologist-led preoperative evaluation clinic (PEC) on clinical outcomes has yet to be fully elucidated. The authors compared the incidence of in-hospital postoperative mortality in patients who had been evaluated in their institution's PEC before elective surgery to the incidence in patients who had elective surgery without being seen in the PEC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an administrative database was performed. There were 46 deaths from 64,418 patients (0.07%): 22 from 35,535 patients (0.06%) seen in PEC and 24 from 28,883 patients (0.08%) not seen in PEC. After propensity score matching, there were 13,964 patients within each matched set; there were 34 deaths (0.1%). There were 11 deaths from 13,964 (0.08%) patients seen in PEC and 23 deaths from 13,964 (0.16%) patients not seen in PEC. A subanalysis to assess the effect of a PEC visit on deaths as a result of failure to rescue (FTR) was also performed.

RESULTS

A visit to PEC was associated with a reduction in mortality (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.96, P = 0.04) by comparison of the matched cohorts. The FTR subanalysis suggested that the proportion of deaths attributable to an unanticipated surgical complication was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.141).

CONCLUSIONS

An in-person assessment at the PEC was associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality. It was difficult to draw conclusions about whether a difference exists in the proportion of FTR deaths between the two cohorts due to small sample size.

A cross-sectional study of preoperative medication adherence and early postoperative recovery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of preoperative medication adherence on recovery length of stays and complication rates.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analytical study.

SETTING

Postanesthetic care unit (PACU) of a single-center tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS

Surgical patients admitted for surgery at our institution over a 4-month period.

INTERVENTION

A data collection tool was used to collect demographic data, length of stay in recovery, prespecified conditions likely to impact on PACU recovery (chronic pain, insulin-dependent diabetes, epilepsy, hypertension, on a methadone program, and Parkinson disease), medication compliance, and complications in PACU.

MEASUREMENTS

Differences among categorical variables were assessed for significance using the χ² test; continuous parametric data were compared using a time to survival analysis via Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regressions to account for possible confounders.

MAIN RESULTS

Preoperative medication compliance for the prespecified conditions was 65.1%. Patients with a preoperative condition spent more time in the PACU compared to patients without a preoperative condition. Time in PACU was not significantly longer for patients who took their medications compared to those who failed to take their medications. Patients with multiple prespecified conditions were more likely to incur a postoperative complication compared to patients without a prespecified condition. Patients with preoperative hypertension and insulin-dependent diabetes incurred higher complication rates in PACU for medication nonadherence compared to medication adherence.

CONCLUSION

This study taken together with accruing evidence suggests that preoperative medication omission remains an ongoing issue that can influence complication rates in the PACU. Patients with preoperative conditions stay longer in PACU, and medication omission was associated with higher rates of certain postoperative complications in PACU. This identifies patients likely to require more interventions and greater recovery resources. Further research into the impact of medication omission on recovery parameters after discharge from the PACU is warranted.

Confronting the challenges of effective pain management in children following tonsillectomy

Tonsillectomy is an extremely common surgical procedure associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The post-operative challenges include: respiratory complications, post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage, nausea, vomiting and significant pain. The present model of care demands that most of these children are managed in an ambulatory setting. The recent Federal Drug Agency (FDA) warning contraindicating the use of codeine after tonsillectomy in children represents a significant change of practice for many pediatric otolaryngological surgeons. This introduces a number of other safety concerns when deciding on a safe alternative to codeine, especially since most tonsillectomy patients are managed by lay primary caregiver's at home. This review outlines the safety issues and proposes, based on currently available evidence, a preventative multi-modal strategy to manage pain, nausea and vomiting without increasing the risk of post-tonsillectomy bleeding.