Pretransfusion Testing and Transfusion of Uncrossmatched Erythrocytes

Challenges in reliable preoperative blood ordering: A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Presurgical blood orders are important for patient safety during surgery, but excess orders can be costly to patients and the healthcare system. We aimed to assess clinician perceptions on the presurgical blood ordering process and perceived barriers to reliable decision-making.

METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study was conducted at a single large academic medical center. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, nurse practitioners working in preoperative assessment clinics, and transfusion medicine physicians to assess perceptions of current blood ordering processes. Interview responses were analyzed using an inductive open coding approach followed by thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three clinicians were interviewed. Clinicians felt that the current blood ordering process was frequently inconsistent. One contributor was a lack of information on surgical transfusion risk, related to lack of experience in ordering clinicians, insufficient communication between stakeholders, high turnover in academic settings, and lack of awareness of the maximum surgical blood ordering schedule. Other contributors included differing opinions about the benefits and harms of over- and under-preparing blood products, leading to variation in transfusion risk thresholds between clinicians, and disagreement about the safety of emergency-release blood.

CONCLUSION

Several barriers to reliable decision-making for presurgical blood orders exist. Future efforts to improve ordering consistency may benefit from improved information sharing between stakeholders and education on safe transfusion practices.

Evaluation of Pre-Transfusion Crossmatch Test Using Microscanner C3

A pre-transfusion crossmatch test is crucial for ensuring safe blood transfusions by identifying the compatibility between donor and recipient blood samples. Conventional tube methods for crossmatching have limitations, including subjectivity in result interpretation and the potential for human error. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a new crossmatch test using Microscanner C3, which can overcome these shortcomings. The crossmatch test results using the method were obtained in 323 clinical samples. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance rate of the crossmatch test using Microscanner C3 were 98.20%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 98.11%, and 99.07%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the new system offers a promising alternative to conventional tube methods for pre-transfusion crossmatch testing. Microscanner C3 could also increase the automation, standardization, and accuracy of crossmatch tests. The crossmatch test using Microscanner C3 is thought to increase the efficiency and reliability in identifying blood samples suitable for transfusion, thereby improving patient safety and optimizing the use of blood products in clinical settings.

Low titer group O whole blood and risk of RhD alloimmunization: Rationale for use in Finland

BACKGROUND

Prehospital low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) used for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage is often RhD positive. The most important complication following RhD alloimmunization is hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Preceding clinical use of RhD positive LTOWB, we estimated the risk of HDFN due to LTOWB prehospital transfusion in the Finnish population.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We collected data on prehospital transfusions in Tampere and Helsinki University Hospital areas. Using the mean of reported alloimmunization rates in trauma studies (24%) and a higher reported rate representing trauma patients of 13-50 years old (42.7%), we estimated the risk of HDFN and extrapolated it to the whole of Finland.

RESULTS

We estimated that in Finland, with the current prehospital transfusion rate we would see 1-3 cases of severe HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusions every 10 years, and fetal death due to HDFN caused by LTOWB transfusion less than once in 100 years.

DISCUSSION

The estimated risk of serious HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusion in the Finnish population is similar to previous estimates. As Finland routinely screens expectant mothers for red blood cell antibodies and as the contemporary treatment of HDFN is very effective, we support the prehospital use of RhD positive LTOWB in all patient groups.

Not as "D"eadly as once thought - the risk of D-alloimmunization and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn following RhD-positive transfusion in trauma

The use of blood products to resuscitate injured and massively bleeding patients in the prehospital and early in-hospital phase of the resuscitation is increasing. Using group O red blood cells (RBC) and low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) avoids an immediate hemolytic reaction from recipient's naturally occurring anti-A and - B, but choosing the RhD type for these products is more nuanced and requires the balancing of product availability and survival benefit against the risk of D-alloimmunization, especially in females of childbearing potential (FCP) due to the possible future occurrence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent models have estimated the risk of fetal/neonatal death from HDFN resulting from D-alloimmunization of an FCP during her trauma resuscitation at between 0-6.5% depending on her age at the time of the transfusion and other societal factors including trauma mortality, her age when she becomes pregnant, frequency of different RHD genotypes in the population, and the probability that the woman will have children with different fathers; this is counterbalanced by an approximately 24% risk of death from hemorrhagic shock. This review will discuss the different models of HDFN outcomes following RhD-positive transfusion as well as the results of recent surveys where the public was asked about their preferences for urgent transfusion in light of the risks of fetal/neonatal adverse events.

Incidence of Red Cell Antibody Formation Following Massive Transfusion Protocol: Experience of a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Injured patients in hemorrhagic shock have a survival benefit with massive transfusion protocol (MTP). While there are many published studies on the transfusion management of massively bleeding patients, the risk of alloimmunization in patients that have received products during an MTP activation is relatively unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the frequency of new antibody formation in MTP patients that received blood products from an uncrossmatched megapack.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective data review of patients who underwent an MTP activation for trauma resuscitation between May 2014 and July 2020. Data were collected from patients who met the following criteria: MTP was activated, the patients received at least one unit of packed red blood cells, one unit of fresh frozen plasma, one unit of platelets, and had a repeat type and screen within 6 weeks of transfusion. These inclusion criteria resulted in 28 patients over the 6-year timeframe.

RESULTS

Overall, the risk of alloimmunization secondary to MTP is 3.6% in our trauma patient population. The newly developed antibodies post-MTP are considered clinically significant, meaning they can cause hemolysis if exposed to donor red blood cells containing those antigens.

DISCUSSION

Blood products should be given preferentially over crystalloids to acutely bleeding patients to prevent ischemic injury during an MTP activation despite the risk of alloimmunization. In our single-institution study, the alloimmunization rate in massive transfusions where patients receive uncrossmatched red blood cells is similar to those receiving crossmatched red blood cells.

Does decreasing the incubation period used in the antibody screen affect its sensitivity?

BACKGROUND

Pre-transfusion testing (PTT) encompasses a set of mandatory laboratory tests performed before red blood cell transfusion. The antibody screen, one component of PTT, commonly includes a 10-20 min incubation. The primary aim of this study was to determine if this period can be reduced when using current immunohematology methodologies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Antibody screens were performed on reagent samples using Glass or Gel-based column agglutination technologies (CAT) and a solid phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) assay, with incubation periods of 1, 5, 10 and 15 min, and 20 min (SPRCA assay only). For each method, the shortest period producing a minimum of a 1+ reaction with all reagent samples was considered optimal. The sensitivity of each assay using the optimal period was calculated after performing antibody screens on 100 patient samples.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

It was demonstrated that the incubation period in the SPRCA and Glass CAT systems can be reduced to 5 and 10 min, respectively, while achieving high assay sensitivity (98.9% in both). The incubation period in the Gel CAT system cannot be reduced from 15 min. Significant association between titre and reaction strength was observed for all three screening methods (p < 0.001 for both CAT methods, p = 0.041 for SPRCA). This study demonstrates that the incubation period used in the antibody screen can be reduced when using systems employing the Glass CAT and SPRCA methods, without affecting assay sensitivity. If confirmed, it could result in faster completion of PTT.

Cost-effectiveness of routine type and screens in select urological surgeries

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining a preoperative type and screen (T/S) for common urologic procedures.

METHODS

A decision tree model was constructed to track surgical patients undergoing two preoperative blood ordering strategies as follows: obtaining a preoperative T/S versus not doing so. The model was applied to the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) data, from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2015. Cost estimates for the model were created from combined patient-level data with published costs of a T/S, type and crossmatch (T/C), a unit of pRBC, and one unit of emergency-release transfusion (ERT). The primary outcome was the incremental cost per ERT prevented, expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the two preoperative blood ordering strategies. A cost-effectiveness analysis determined the ICER of obtaining preoperative T/S to prevent an emergency-release transfusion (ERT), with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $1,500.00.

RESULTS

A total of 4,113,144 surgical admissions from 2006 to 2015 were reviewed. The overall transfusion rate was 10.54% (95% CI, 10.17-10.91) for all procedures. The ICER of preoperative T/S was $1500.00 per ERT prevented. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the risk of transfusion should exceed 4.12% to justify preoperative T/S.

CONCLUSION

Routine preoperative T/S for radical prostatectomy (rate = 3.88%) and penile implants (rate = .91%) does not represent a cost-effective practice for these surgeries. It is important for urologists to review their institution T/S policy to reduce inefficiencies within the preoperative setting.

Modelling the outcomes of different red blood cell transfusion strategies for the treatment of traumatic haemorrhage in the prehospital setting in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The limited supply and increasing demand of group O RhD-negative red blood cells (RBCs) have resulted in other transfusion strategies being explored by blood services that carry potential risks but may still provide an overall benefit to patients. Our aim was to analyse the potential economic benefits of prehospital transfusion (PHT) against no PHT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The impact of three PHT strategies (RhD-negative RBC, RhD-positive RBC and no transfusion) on quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) of all United Kingdom trauma patients in a given year and the subset of patients considered most at risk (RhD-negative females <50 years old), was modelled.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort and the subset of patients, transfusing RhD-negative RBCs generated the most QALYs (141,899 and 2977, respectively), followed by the RhD-positive RBCs (141,879.8 and 2958.8 respectively), and no prehospital RBCs (119,285 and 2503 respectively). The QALY difference between RhD-negative and RhD-positive policies was smaller (19.2, both cohorts) than RhD-positive and no RBCs policies in QALYs term (22,600 all cohort, 470 for a subset), indicating that harms from transfusing RhD-positive RBCs are lower than harms associated with no RBC transfusion. A survival increase from PHT of 0.02% (entire cohort) and 0.7% (subset cohort) would still make the RhD-positive strategy better in QALYs terms than no PHT.

CONCLUSION

While the use of RhD-positive RBCs carries risks, the benefits measured in QALYs are higher than if no PHT are administered, even for women of childbearing potential. Group O RhD-positive RBCs could be considered when there is a national shortage of RhD-negative RBCs.

A novel model forecasting perioperative red blood cell transfusion

We aimed to establish a predictive model assessing perioperative blood transfusion risk using a nomogram. Clinical data for 97,443 surgery patients were abstracted from the DATADRYAD website; approximately 75% of these patients were enrolled in the derivation cohort, while approximately 25% were enrolled in the validation cohort. Multivariate logical regression was used to identify predictive factors for transfusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curves were used to assess the model performance. In total, 5888 patients received > 1 unit of red blood cells; the total transfusion rate was 6.04%. Eight variables including age, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status Classification (ASA-PS), grade of kidney disease, type of anaesthesia, priority of surgery, surgery risk, and an 18-level variable were included. The nomogram achieved good concordance indices of 0.870 and 0.865 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The Youden index identified an optimal cut-off predicted probability of 0.163 with a sensitivity of 0.821 and a specificity of 0.744. Decision curve (DCA) showed patients had a standardized net benefit in the range of a 5–60% likelihood of transfusion risk. In conclusion, a nomogram model was established to be used for risk stratification of patients undergoing surgery at risk for blood transfusion. The URLs of web calculators for our model are as follows: http://www.empowerstats.net/pmodel/?m=11633_transfusionpreiction.

Remote Dispensing of Emergency Release Red Blood Cells

OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute bleeding are frequently transfused with emergency release (ER) group O RBCs. This practice has been reported to be safe with a low rate of acute hemolytic transfusion reactions (AHRs).

METHODS

Records of patients who received ER RBCs over a 30-month period were examined at our hospitals. During this period, satellite refrigerators were on site in the emergency department (ED), which were electronically connected to the blood bank (electronically connected satellite refrigerator [ECSR]). Nurses accessing the refrigerator were required to give patient identification information, when known, prior to removal of the ER RBCs, allowing technologists the opportunity to check for previous serologic records and communicate directly with the ED if a serologic incompatibility was potentially present.

RESULTS

In total, 935 patients were transfused with 1,847 units of ER RBCs. Thirty of these patients had a current (22/30) or historic (8/30) antibody. In 15 cases, incompatible RBCs were interdicted. In six cases, the transfusion was considered urgent, and an AHR occurred in four of these six (overall 0.4%), including one fatal AHR due to anti-KEL1.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of KEL1-negative RBCs and ECSR merits consideration as approaches to mitigate the occurrence of ER RBC-associated AHRs.

Cost-Effectiveness of Routine Type and Screens in Select Endonasal Skull Base Surgeries

Objective The study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining preoperative type and screens (T/S) for common endonasal skull base procedures, and determine patient and hospital factors associated with receiving blood transfusions.

Study Design Retrospective database analysis of the 2006 to 2015 National (nationwide) Inpatient Sample and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Main Outcome Measures Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with transfusions. A cost-effectiveness analysis was then performed to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of obtaining preoperative T/S to prevent an emergency-release transfusion (ERT), with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $1,500.

Results A total of 93,105 cases were identified with an overall transfusion rate of 1.89%. On multivariate modeling, statistically significant factors associated with transfusion included nonelective admission (odds ratio [OR]: 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.78–3.02), anemia (OR: 4.42; 95% CI: 3.35–5.83), coagulopathy (OR: 4.72; 95% CI: 2.94–7.57), diabetes (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.14–1.84), liver disease (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.27–4.43), pulmonary circulation disorders (OR: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.71–6.29), and metastatic cancer (OR: 5.85; 95% CI: 2.63–13.0; p < 0.01 for all). The ICER of preoperative T/S was $3,576 per ERT prevented. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the risk of transfusion should exceed 4.12% to justify preoperative T/S.

Conclusion Routine preoperative T/S does not represent a cost-effective practice for these surgeries using nationally representative data. A selective T/S policy for high-risk patients may reduce costs.

Current State and Future Direction of Postpartum Hemorrhage Risk Assessment

In the United States, postpartum hemorrhage is a leading preventable cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. To reduce morbidity from postpartum hemorrhage, risk assessment is an important starting point for informing decisions about risk management and hemorrhage prevention. Current perinatal care guidelines from the Joint Commission recommend that all patients undergo postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment at admission and after delivery. Three maternal health organizations-the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, AWHONN, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Safe Motherhood Initiative-have developed postpartum hemorrhage risk-assessment tools for clinical use. Based on the presence of risk factors, each organization categorizes patients as low-, medium-, or high-risk, and ties pretransfusion testing recommendations to these categorizations. However, the accuracy of these tools' risk categorizations has come under increasing scrutiny. Given their low positive predictive value, the value proposition of pretransfusion testing in all patients classified as medium- and high-risk is low. Further, 40% of all postpartum hemorrhage events occur in low-risk patients, emphasizing the need for early vigilance and treatment regardless of categorization. We recommend that maternal health organizations consider alternatives to category-based risk tools for evaluating postpartum hemorrhage risk before delivery.

When and how should I transfuse during obstetric hemorrhage?

The incidence of maternal hemorrhage and blood transfusion has increased over time. Causes of massive hemorrhage, defined as a transfusion > 10 units of erythrocytes, include abnormal placental insertion, preeclampsia, and placental abruption. Although ratio-based transfusion has been described for managing massive hemorrhage, a goal-directed approach using laboratory or point-of-care data may lead to better outcomes. Autotransfusion, which involves the collection, washing, and filtration of maternal shed blood, avoids many of the complications associated with allogeneic blood transfusion. In this review, we provide an overview of transfusion practices related to the management of obstetric hemorrhage.

Group & save sampling in lumbar decompression: A review into current practice

The risks, benefits and technical aspects of surgery require careful consideration. One element of this is the requirement of postoperative blood transfusion. Patients who undergo elective lumbar decompression are at a low risk of requiring a postoperative transfusion yet undergo multiple preoperative group & save tests. For those who are at a low risk of bleeding, a single group & save sample may be adequate. This review analysed the postoperative blood loss and transfusion rate associated with lumbar decompression surgery without fusion in one institution. A subsequent cost analysis and review of the literature was performed. The aim was to assess whether single group & save sampling, within the context of lumbar decompression, was cost effective and amenable to the patient without impacting patient care. Average blood loss was estimated as a drop in Hb of 12.3g/dl. Six patients (14%) had Hb loss of over 20g/dl. No patients underwent a blood transfusion. Through examination of medical records, we found that 65% of patients (35) were suitable for single group & save sampling, estimating a saving of £2415.95 (53%). Selective group & save testing holds economic potential and safeguards patients from undergoing unnecessary testing. The next step after this review would be a prospective multi-centre study.

Enhancing the utilization of packed red blood cells stock in maternity hospitals

OBJECTIVES

To assess and enhance the efficiency of transfusion services in maternity hospitals.

METHODS

A case control study was conducted from January to December 2016. A corrective policy of replacing preoperative type and hold step with blood transfusion request (BTR) hold was used only on healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean sections (c-section). The crossmatch/transfusion (C:T) ratio and a cost comparison were the evaluating factors. Data were analyzed using an Excel spreadsheet and SPSS statistical software.

RESULTS

A total of 1,200 BTRs were analyzed, comprising 659 before implementation of the corrective policy and 541 blood transfusion requests after implementation of the corrective policy. From January to March, the C:T ratio of c-sections was nearly 7 times the American Association of Blood Banks recommended limit of 2.5. Most of the blood units (94%) were damaged due to repeated booking. After implementation, the cost-e ectiveness of erythrocyte transfusion was greatly enhanced as all the ordered blood units were used and the C:T ratio was reduced to the ideal limit of one. The number of destroyed units was drastically decreased from 450 units to zero; as a result, 83% of the transfusion costs were saved.

CONCLUSION

The policy enhances the cost-effectiveness of erythrocyte transfusion and laboratory testing, and saves on additional, unnecessary costs.

Transfusion of Uncrossmatched Group O Erythrocyte-containing Products Does Not Interfere with Most ABO Typings

BACKGROUND

Group O erythrocytes and/or whole blood are used for urgent transfusions in patients of unknown blood type. This study investigated the impact of transfusing increasing numbers of uncrossmatched type O products on the recipient's first in-hospital ABO type.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Results of the first ABO type obtained in adult, non-type O recipients (i.e., types A, B, AB) after receiving at least one unit of uncrossmatched type O erythrocyte-containing product(s) for any bleeding etiology were analyzed along with the number of uncrossmatched type O erythrocyte-containing products administered in the prehospital and/or in hospital setting before the first type and screen sample was drawn.

RESULTS

There were 10 institutions that contributed a total of 695 patient records. Among patients who received up to 10 uncrossmatched type O erythrocyte-containing products, the median A antigen agglutination strength in A and AB individuals on forward typing (i.e., testing the recipient's erythrocytes for A and/or B antigens) was the maximum (4+), whereas the median B antigen agglutination strength among B and AB recipients of up to 10 units was 3 to 4+. The median agglutination strength on the reverse type (i.e., testing the recipient's plasma for corresponding anti-A and -B antibodies) was very strong, between 3 and 4+, for recipients of up to 10 units of uncrossmatched erythrocyte-containing products. Overall, the ABO type of 665 of 695 (95.7%; 95% CI, 93.9 to 97.0%) of these patients could be accurately determined on the first type and screen sample obtained after transfusion of uncrossmatched type O erythrocyte-containing products.

CONCLUSIONS

The transfusion of smaller quantities of uncrossmatched type O erythrocyte-containing products, in particular up to 10 units, does not usually interfere with determining the recipient's ABO type. The early collection of a type and screen sample is important.

Essentials of emergency transfusion-The complement to stop the bleed

Over the past decade, the shift toward damage control surgery for bleeding trauma patients has come with an increased emphasis on optimal resuscitation. Two lifesaving priorities predominate: to quickly stop the bleed and effectively resuscitate the hemorrhagic shock. Blood is separated into components for efficient storage and distribution; however, bleeding patients require all components in a balanced ratio. A variety of blood products are available to surgeons, and these products have evolved over time. This review article describes the current standards for resuscitation of bleeding patients, including characteristics of all available products. The relevant details of blood donation and collection, blood banking, blood components, and future therapies are discussed, with the goal of guiding surgeons in their emergency transfusion practice.

Use of Uncrossmatched Erythrocytes in Emergency Bleeding Situations

Transfusion of uncrossmatched erythrocytes is lifesaving in patients who are severely bleeding when crossmatched erythrocytes are unavailable. The hemolysis risk after uncrossmatched erythrocyte administration to appropriate patients is very low.

Vox Sanguinis International Forum on the use of prehospital blood products and pharmaceuticals in the treatment of patients with traumatic haemorrhage

While specific practices and transported blood products vary around the world, most of the respondents in this International Forum transported at least one blood product for the transfusion to bleeding patients en route to the hospital. The most commonly carried product was RBCs, while the use of whole blood will likely increase given the recent reports of its successful use in the civilian setting, and because of the change in the AABB's Standards regulating its use. It will be interesting to see if plasma use in the prehospital setting becomes more widely used given today's enhanced appreciated of the coagulopathy of trauma and plasma's beneficial effect in reversing it, and if blood products are transported to the scene of injury by more vehicles, that is, not just predominantly in helicopters. It was not surprising that TXA is being widely administered as close to the time of injury as possible given its potential benefit in these patients. This International Forum highlights the importance of focusing attention on prehospital transfusion management with a need to further high‐quality research in this area to guide optimal resuscitation strategies.

Acute haemolysis, DIC and renal failure after transfusion of uncross-matched blood during trauma resuscitation: illustrative case and literature review

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to report a patient with acute haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) after transfusing uncross-matched red blood cell (RBC) units and to identify the frequency of this complication.

BACKGROUND

Uncross-matched RBC units are commonly transfused in emergencies, but the frequency of acute HTR is unknown.

METHODS

We describe a male stabbing victim who received three units of uncross-matched RBC units complicated by acute intravascular HTR, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and renal failure. We identified 14 studies evaluating the frequency of acute HTR post-emergency transfusion of uncross-matched RBC units.

RESULTS

Acute HTR was shown by haemoglobinuria, free-plasma haemoglobin and methemalbumin, with anti-K and anti-Fy^a eluted from recipient red cells; acute DIC featured severe hypofibrinogenemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated fibrin D-dimer and multiple bilateral renal infarcts. Two of the three transfused units reacted with pre-existing RBC alloantibodies [anti-K (titre, 128), anti-Fy^a (titre, 512)], explained by transfusion 25 years earlier. Our literature review found the frequency of acute HTR following emergency transfusion of uncross-matched RBC units to be 2/3998 [0·06% (95% CI, 0·01-0·21%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Although emergency transfusion of uncross-matched blood is commonly practiced at trauma centres worldwide, with low risk of acute HTR (<1/1000), our well-documented patient case demonstrates the potential for acute HTR with severe complications.

National and International Guidelines for Patient Blood Management in Obstetrics: A Qualitative Review

In developed countries, rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) requiring transfusion have been increasing. As a result, anesthesiologists are being increasingly called upon to assist with the management of patients with severe PPH. First responders, including anesthesiologists, may adopt Patient Blood Management (PBM) recommendations of national societies or other agencies. However, it is unclear whether national and international obstetric societies' PPH guidelines account for contemporary PBM practices. We performed a qualitative review of PBM recommendations published by the following national obstetric societies and international groups: the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, United Kingdom; The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada; an interdisciplinary group of experts from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, an international multidisciplinary consensus group, and the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. We also reviewed a PPH bundle, published by The National Partnership for Maternal Safety. On the basis of our review, we identified important differences in national and international societies' recommendations for transfusion and PBM. In the light of PBM advances in the nonobstetric setting, obstetric societies should determine the applicability of these recommendations in the obstetric setting. Partnerships among medical, obstetric, and anesthetic societies may also help standardize transfusion and PBM guidelines in obstetrics.

Interhospital Variability in Perioperative Red Blood Cell Ordering Patterns in United States Pediatric Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative red blood cell (RBC) ordering and interhospital variability patterns in pediatric patients undergoing surgical interventions at US children's hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a multicenter cross-sectional study of children aged <19 years admitted to 38 pediatric tertiary care hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System in 2009-2014. Only cases performed at all represented hospitals were included in the study, to limit case mix variability. Orders for blood type and crossmatch were included when done on the day before or the day of the surgical procedure. The RBC transfusions included were those given on the day of or the day after surgery. The type and crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio (TCTR) was calculated for each surgical procedure. An adjusted model for interhospital variability was created to account for variation in patient population by age, sex, race/ethnicity, payer type, and presence/number of complex chronic conditions (CCCs) per patient.

RESULTS

A total of 357 007 surgical interventions were identified across all participating hospitals. Blood type and crossmatch was performed 55 632 times, and 13 736 transfusions were provided, for a TCTR of 4:1. There was an association between increasing age and TCTR (R(2) = 0.43). Patients with multiple CCCs had lower TCTRs, with a stronger relationship (R(2) = 0.77). There was broad variability in adjusted TCTRs among hospitals (range, 2.5-25).

CONCLUSIONS

The average TCTR in US children's hospitals was double that of adult surgical data, and was associated with wide interhospital variability. Age and the presence of CCCs markedly influenced this ratio. Studies to evaluate optimal preoperative RBC ordering and standardization of practices could potentially decrease unnecessary costs and wasted blood.

Preventable trauma death rate in Daegu, South Korea

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the preventable death rate in Daegu, South Korea, and assessed affecting factors and preventable factors in order to improve the treatment of regional trauma patients.

METHODS

All traumatic deaths between January 2012 and December 2012 in 5 hospitals in Daegu were analyzed by panel review, which were classified into preventable and non-preventable deaths. We determined the factors affecting trauma deaths and the preventable factors during trauma care.

RESULTS

There were overall 358 traumatic deaths during the study period. Two hundred thirty four patients were selected for the final analysis after excluding cases of death on arrival, delayed death, and unknown causes. The number of preventable death was 59 (25.2%), which was significantly associated with mode of arrival, presence of head injury, date, and time of injury. A multivariate analysis revealed that preventable death was more likely when patients were secondly transferred from another hospital, visited hospital during non-office hour, and did not have head injuries. The panel discovered 145 preventable factors, which showed that majority of factors occurred in emergency departments (49.0%), and were related with system process (76.6%).

CONCLUSION

The preventable trauma death rate in Daegu was high, and mostly process-related.