1
|
Chow C, Rosenquist R. Trends in spinal cord stimulation utilization: change, growth and implications for the future. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:296-301. [PMID: 37080580 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain impacts more than 100 million Americans and has a significant impact on the economy and quality of life. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has demonstrated efficacy in managing a growing number of chronic pain conditions. This in combination with an increasing number of physicians trained in SCS placement has produced significant changes in utilization, expense and sites of service related to SCS. In particular, there has been a large increase in SCS placement by non-surgeons, use of percutaneous leads and performance in ambulatory surgery centers instead of inpatient settings. There are also notable differences in SCS use related to age, race, insurance coverage and geography. There is a large potential market and use of these therapies is predicted to grow from $2.41 billion in 2020 to $4.12 billion US dollars globally by 2027. At the same time, there is increasing scrutiny around utilization of this therapy related to cost, complications, long-term efficacy and explant rates that has the potential to impact access to this therapy in the future. We must examine our indications, technique and management to optimize outcomes and utilization of SCS going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Chow
- Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sayed D, Grider J, Strand N, Hagedorn JM, Falowski S, Lam CM, Tieppo Francio V, Beall DP, Tomycz ND, Davanzo JR, Aiyer R, Lee DW, Kalia H, Sheen S, Malinowski MN, Verdolin M, Vodapally S, Carayannopoulos A, Jain S, Azeem N, Tolba R, Chang Chien GC, Ghosh P, Mazzola AJ, Amirdelfan K, Chakravarthy K, Petersen E, Schatman ME, Deer T. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain. J Pain Res 2022; 15:3729-3832. [PMID: 36510616 PMCID: PMC9739111 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s386879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Objective The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Methods The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented. Results After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain. Conclusion The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA,Correspondence: Dawood Sayed, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA, Tel +1 913-588-5521, Email
| | - Jay Grider
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Interventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Steven Falowski
- Functional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | - Christopher M Lam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Nestor D Tomycz
- AHN Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rohit Aiyer
- Interventional Pain Management and Pain Psychiatry, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - David W Lee
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Pain Medicine, Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | - Hemant Kalia
- Rochester Regional Health System, Rochester, NY, USA,Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Soun Sheen
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mark N Malinowski
- Adena Spine Center, Adena Health System, Chillicothe, OH, USA,Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Michael Verdolin
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pain Consultants of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Shashank Vodapally
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Alexios Carayannopoulos
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Newport Hospital, Lifespan Physician Group, Providence, RI, USA,Comprehensive Spine Center at Rhode Island Hospital, Newport Hospital, Providence, RI, USA,Neurosurgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sameer Jain
- Interventional Pain Management, Pain Treatment Centers of America, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Nomen Azeem
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA,Florida Spine & Pain Specialists, Riverview, FL, USA
| | - Reda Tolba
- Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates,Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George C Chang Chien
- Pain Management, Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, CA, USA,Center for Regenerative Medicine, University Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA,Va San Diego Healthcare, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Erika Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA,Department of Population Health - Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgical Procedures. Neuromodulation 2022:S1094-7159(22)00684-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
4
|
Haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia in the USA and the Netherlands: A closed claims analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37:743-751. [PMID: 32769504 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe complications after neuraxial anaesthesia are rare but potentially devastating. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify characteristics and preventable causes of haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia. DESIGN Observational study, closed claims analysis. SETTING Closed anaesthesia malpractice claims from the USA and the Netherlands were examined from 2007 until 2017. PATIENTS Claims of patients with haematoma (n = 41), abscess (n = 18) or meningitis (n = 14) associated with neuraxial anaesthesia for labour, acute and chronic pain that initiated and closed between 2007 and 2017 were included. There were no exclusions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We analysed potential preventable causes in patient-related, neuraxial procedure-related, treatment-related and legal characteristics of these complications. RESULTS Patients experiencing spinal haematoma were predominantly above 60 years of age and using antihaemostatic medication, whereas patients with abscess or meningitis were middle-aged, relatively healthy and more often involved in emergency interventions. Potential preventable causes of unfavourable sequelae constituted errors in timing/prescription of antihaemostatic medication (10 claims, 14%), unsterile procedures (n = 10, 14%) and delay in diagnosis/treatment of the complication (n = 18, 25%). The number of claims resulting in payment was similar between countries (USA n = 15, 38% vs. the Netherlands n = 17, 52%; P = 0.25). The median indemnity payment, which the patient received varied widely between the USA (&OV0556;285 488, n = 14) and the Netherlands (&OV0556;31 031, n = 17) (P = 0.004). However, the considerable differences in legal systems and administration of expenses between countries may make meaningful comparison of indemnity payments inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS Claims of spinal haematoma were often related to errors in antihaemostatic medication and delay in diagnosis and/or treatment. Spinal abscess claims were related to emergency interventions and lack of sterility. We wish to highlight these potential preventable causes, both when performing the neuraxial procedure and during postprocedural care of patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Singa RM, Buvanendran A, McCarthy RJ. A Comparison of Refill Procedures and Patient Outcomes Following Ultrasound‐Guided and Template‐Guided Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems With Recessed Ports. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:938-943. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.13086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert J. McCarthy
- Department of Anesthesiology Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali SS, Bragin I, Khan AY, Tokuno H, Tankha P. Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant and Revision Complicated by Syrinx Formation: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus 2019; 11:e5299. [PMID: 31588383 PMCID: PMC6771936 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be a safe, effective, and drug-free treatment option for many chronic pain conditions including refractory low back pain. The most commonly reported complication of SCS is equipment failure. We report a case of spinal cord injury (SCI) during SCS explant and revision. This 61-year-old female veteran complained of intermittent shock-like sensations 3-4 times a week for three months prior to her clinic visit. The device was initially implanted in 2009 secondary to neurogenic claudication with appropriate relief. The battery was replaced in 2015. Pain Management Service referred the patient to neurosurgery for replacement of the original SCS unit. Immediately following surgery she complained of severe left lower extremity pain concentrated in the medial thigh radiating into the groin and buttock. She also complained of pain, weakness and numbness in both legs (left more than right). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an edematous area in the left spinal cord between T11-T12. The patient was placed on steroids, ketamine infusion for pain control, and MRI the next day showed slight improvement of the edema and she was discharged home. Follow-up MRI two months later revealed mild diminution in the size of the cord edema. Her pre-operative shock-like sensations had not returned. While rare, spinal cord injury can occur and should be identified and managed expeditiously. Our case here reports for the first time an association between SCS explant/revision and syrinx formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer S Ali
- Neurology, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, USA
| | - Ilya Bragin
- Neurology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, USA
| | - Arjumond Y Khan
- Neurology, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, USA
| | - Hajime Tokuno
- Neurology, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, USA
| | - Pavan Tankha
- Pain Management, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Benzon HT, Grider JS, Provenzano DA. Considerations to Reduce Medicolegal Claims in Interventional Pain Procedures. Anesth Analg 2019; 129:19-22. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
8
|
Provenzano DA, Falowski SM, Xia Y, Doth AH. Spinal Cord Stimulation Infection Rate and Incremental Annual Expenditures: Results From a United States Payer Database. Neuromodulation 2019; 22:302-310. [PMID: 30865341 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Surgical site infections (SSIs) result in significant negative clinical and economic outcomes. The objective of this study is to estimate annual health expenditures associated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-related infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Truven MarketScan® databases were used to identify patients with an SCS implant (2009-2014) and a continuous health plan enrollment for at least 12-months before and after implant (index date). Annual expenditures were estimated for patients with a device-related infection vs. those without infection since index date. A generalized linear model estimated annual expenditures attributable to device-related infection. Multivariable expenditure models were conducted separately for patients in initial and replacement groups, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS The study included 6615 patients. Multivariable expenditure models revealed that patients with infection have higher annual expenditures than patients without infection. Estimated incremental annual healthcare expenditures for patients with an infection were $59,716 (95% CI: $48,965-$69,480) for initial implanted patients and $64,833 (95% CI: $37,377-$86,519) for replacement patients. Only 26% of patients who were explanted for infection underwent a reimplant. CONCLUSIONS These results show the substantial expenditure burden associated with an SCS-related infection. Management of SCS-related infection is important from both clinical and economic standpoints. The economic and clinical data presented here reinforce the need for additional research and strategies for healthcare providers to minimize SCS infections. Future economic research is needed to further define the specific economic cost drivers associated with the extensive expenditure burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ying Xia
- Medtronic, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alissa H Doth
- Medtronic, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mora JC, Kaye AD, Romankowski ML, Delahoussaye PJ, Urman RD, Przkora R. Trends in Anesthesia-Related Liability and Lessons Learned. Adv Anesth 2018; 36:231-249. [PMID: 30414640 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2018.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Mora
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100254, Room 2036, Gainesville, FL 32610-0254, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Room 656, 1542 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Matthew L Romankowski
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100254, Room 2036, Gainesville, FL 32610-0254, USA
| | - Paul J Delahoussaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Room 659, 1542 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Rene Przkora
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Multidisciplinary Pain Medicine Fellowship, Anesthesiology Residency, University of Florida, PO Box 100254, Room 2036, Gainesville, FL 32610-0254, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Xia Y, Doth AH. Spinal Cord Stimulation Infection Rate and Risk Factors: Results From a United States Payer Database. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:179-189. [PMID: 30117635 PMCID: PMC6585777 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective Surgical site infections can cause negative clinical and economic outcomes. A recent international survey on Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) infection control practices demonstrated low compliance with evidence‐based guidelines. This study defines infection rate for SCS implants and identifies infection risk factors. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of the MarketScan® Databases identified patients with SCS implant (2009–2014) and continuous health plan enrollment for ≥12‐months (12 m) preimplant. For logistic regression analysis, patients were enrolled for 12 m postimplant. Kaplan–Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard survival analyses assessed time to infection, with infection rate reported at 12 m postimplant. Logistic regression characterized risk factors based on demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics. Results In the logistic regression (n = 6615), 12 m device‐related infection rate was 3.11%. Infection risk factors included peripheral vascular disease (OR, 1.784; 95% CI: 1.011–3.149; p = 0.0457) and infection in 12 m before implant (OR, 1.518; 95% CI: 1.022–2.254; p = 0.0386). The odds of patients experiencing an infection decreased by 3.2% with each additional year of age (OR, 0.968; 95% CI: 0.952–0.984; p < 0.0001). Survival analysis (n = 13,214) identified prior infection (HR, 1.770; 95% CI: 1.342–2.336; p < 0.0001) as a risk factor. Infection was less likely in older patients (HR, 0.974; 95% CI: 0.962–0.986; p < 0.0001). Expected risk factors including obesity, diabetes, and smoking were not identified as risk factors in this analysis. There was no significant difference between infection rate for initial and replacement implants. Conclusions The 3.11% SCS‐related infection rate within 12 m of implant emphasizes the need for improved infection control practices. Research is needed to limit SCS infections in younger patients and those with infection history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ying Xia
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Medtronic, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alissa H Doth
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Medtronic, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abrecht CR, Greenberg P, Song E, Urman RD, Rathmell JP. A Contemporary Medicolegal Analysis of Implanted Devices for Chronic Pain Management. Anesth Analg 2017; 124:1304-1310. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
12
|
Deer TR, Provenzano DA, Hanes M, Pope JE, Thomson SJ, Russo MA, McJunkin T, Saulino M, Raso LJ, Lad SP, Narouze S, Falowski SM, Levy RM, Baranidharan G, Golovac S, Demesmin D, Witt WO, Simpson B, Krames E, Mekhail N. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Management. Neuromodulation 2017; 20:31-50. [PMID: 28042909 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 10/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of neurostimulation for pain has been an established therapy for many decades and is a major tool in the arsenal to treat neuropathic pain syndromes. Level I evidence has recently been presented to substantiate the therapy, but this is balanced against the risk of complications of an interventional technique. METHODS The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) of the International Neuromodulation Society convened an international panel of well published and diverse physicians to examine the best practices for infection mitigation and management in patients undergoing neurostimulation. The NACC recommendations are based on evidence scoring and peer-reviewed literature. Where evidence is lacking the panel added expert opinion to establish recommendations. RESULTS The NACC has made recommendations to improve care by reducing infection and managing this complication when it occurs. These evidence-based recommendations should be considered best practices in the clinical implantation of neurostimulation devices. CONCLUSION Adhering to established standards can improve patient care and reduce the morbidity and mortality of infectious complications in patients receiving neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Simon J Thomson
- Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Basildon & Thurrock University Hospitals, NHS, Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Shivanand P Lad
- Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Samer Narouze
- Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Didier Demesmin
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - William O Witt
- Cardinal Hill Pain Institute (emeritus), Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Brian Simpson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Elliot Krames
- Pacific Pain Treatment Center (ret.), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Deer TR, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Slavin K, Golovac S, Arle J, Rosenow JM, Williams K, McRoberts P, Narouze S, Eldabe S, Lad SP, De Andrés JA, Buchser E, Rigoard P, Levy RM, Simpson B, Mekhail N. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Safety Guidelines for the Reduction of Severe Neurological Injury. Neuromodulation 2017; 20:15-30. [PMID: 28042918 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neurostimulation involves the implantation of devices to stimulate the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral or cranial nerves for the purpose of modulating the neural activity of the targeted structures to achieve specific therapeutic effects. Surgical placement of neurostimulation devices is associated with risks of neurologic injury, as well as possible sequelae from the local or systemic effects of the intervention. The goal of the Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) is to improve the safety of neurostimulation. METHODS The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) is dedicated to improving neurostimulation efficacy and patient safety. Over the past two decades the INS has established a process to use best evidence to improve care. This article updates work published by the NACC in 2014. NACC authors were chosen based on nomination to the INS executive board and were selected based on publications, academic acumen, international impact, and diversity. In areas in which evidence was lacking, the NACC used expert opinion to reach consensus. RESULTS The INS has developed recommendations that when properly utilized should improve patient safety and reduce the risk of injury and associated complications with implantable devices. CONCLUSIONS On behalf of INS, the NACC has published recommendations intended to reduce the risk of neurological injuries and complications while implanting stimulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Konstantin Slavin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Arle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua M Rosenow
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kayode Williams
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Samer Narouze
- Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
| | - Sam Eldabe
- The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Shivanand P Lad
- Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jose A De Andrés
- Valencia School of Medicine, Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eric Buchser
- Anaesthesia and Pain Management Department, EHC Hosptial, Morges, and CHUV University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Brian Simpson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Deer TR, Pope JE, Hayek SM, Lamer TJ, Veizi IE, Erdek M, Wallace MS, Grider JS, Levy RM, Prager J, Rosen SM, Saulino M, Yaksh TL, De Andrés JA, Abejon Gonzalez D, Vesper J, Schu S, Simpson B, Mekhail N. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Guidance for Improving Safety and Mitigating Risks. Neuromodulation 2017; 20:155-176. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.12579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Salim M. Hayek
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland OH USA
| | | | - Ilir Elias Veizi
- Veterans Administration Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland OH USA
| | - Michael Erdek
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore MD USA
| | | | - Jay S. Grider
- UK HealthCare Pain Services, University of Kentucky College of Medicine; Lexington KY USA
| | | | - Joshua Prager
- Center for the Rehabilitation of Pain Syndromes (CRPS) at UCLA Medical Plaza; Los Angeles CA USA
| | | | | | - Tony L. Yaksh
- Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of California; San Diego CA USA
| | - Jose A. De Andrés
- Valencia School of Medicine, Hospital General Universitario; Valencia Spain
| | | | - Jan Vesper
- Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf; Germany
| | | | - Brian Simpson
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Hospital of Wales; Cardiff UK
| | | |
Collapse
|