Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Septic Shock

Association between corticosteroid use and 28-day mortality in septic shock patients with gram-negative bacterial infection: a retrospective study

Purpose

Although corticosteroids are recommended in the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, evidence with respect to their effects on short-term mortality remains conflicting. We conducted this study to identify whether corticosteroids alter 28-day mortality in septic shock patients with gram-negative bacterial infection.

Materials and methods

A total of 621 patients with septic shock and gram-negative bacterial culture results were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses with log-rank tests were used to determine the relationship between corticosteroid use and the risk of 28-day mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess whether the conclusions were stable and reliable.

Results

Corticosteroid administration was associated with increased 28-day mortality in septic shock patients with gram-negative bacterial infection (log-rank test P = 0.028). The incidence of Stage 2 or 3 AKI and the rate of hospital mortality were higher among patients who received corticosteroids. The incidence of Stage 2 or 3 AKI in the early period significantly mediated the relationship between corticosteroid use and 28-day mortality [P =0.046 for the average causal mediation effect (ACME)]. Interaction tests indicated that the effect of corticosteroid use was maintained in patients with a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of <20 (P-value for interaction = 0.027).

Conclusion

Systemic corticosteroid use could be harmful in septic shock patients with gram-negative bacterial infection, especially in patients with relatively low NLR.

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid Cells-2 (TREM2) inhibits steroidogenesis in adrenocortical cell by macrophage-derived exosomes in lipopolysaccharide-induced septic shock

PURPOSE

Endogenously produced glucocorticoids exhibit immunomodulating properties and are of pivotal importance for sepsis outcome. Uncontrolled activation of the immune-adrenal crosstalk increases the risk of sepsis-related death. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) is richly expressed on macrophages and has been demonstrated to improve outcome of sepsis by enhancing elimination of pathogens. However, the role and mode of action of macrophage TREM2 on adrenocortical steroidogenesis remains unclear in septic shock.

METHODS

The acute septic shock model was established by intraperitoneally challenging wild-type (WT) and TREM2 knock-out (Trem2-/-) mice with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 30 mg/kg). The mice were assessed for TREM2 expression and local inflammation in adrenal gland and for synthesis of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in vivo. Bone marrow-derived macrophages or macrophage-derived exosomes were isolated from WT and Trem2-/- mice and were co-cultured with adrenocortical cells. The expression of steroidogenic enzymes and corticosterone production was assessed.

RESULTS

Genetic deficiency of TREM2 caused significantly higher corticosterone levels at the early stage of LPS-induced septic shock; whereas TREM2 deficiency neither increased CRH and ACTH nor exacerbated the inflammation in adrenocortical tissue during septic shock. Ex vivo study revealed that Trem2-/- macrophages significantly promoted the expression of steroidogenic enzymes and increased production of corticosterone. Furthermore, Trem2-/- macrophage-derived exosomes were able to mimic Trem2-/- macrophages in enhancing adrenocortical steroidogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

At the early stage of LPS-induced septic shock, corticosterone biosynthesis can be inhibited by macrophage TREM2 in adrenocortical cells, which might partially associate with macrophage-derived exosomes.

Impact of downstream effects of glucocorticoid receptor dysfunction on organ function in critical illness-associated systemic inflammation

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are stress hormones that regulate developmental and physiological processes and are among the most potent anti-inflammatory drugs to suppress chronic and acute inflammation. GCs act through the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a ubiquitously expressed ligand-activated transcription factor, which translocates into the nucleus and can act via two different modes, as a GR monomer or as a GR dimer. These two modes of action are not clearly differentiated in practice and may lead to completely different therapeutic outcomes. Detailed aspects of GR mechanisms are often not taken into account when GCs are used in different clinical scenarios. Patients, with critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency, treated with natural or synthetic GCs are still missing a clearly defined therapeutic strategy. This review discusses the different modes of GR function and its importance on organ function in vivo.

Mineralocorticoid Dysfunction during Critical Illness: A Review of the Evidence

The recent demonstration of the significant reduction in mortality in patients with septic shock treated with adjunctive glucocorticoids combined with fludrocortisone and the effectiveness of angiotensin II in treating vasodilatory shock have renewed interest in the role of the mineralocorticoid axis in critical illness. Glucocorticoids have variable interactions at the mineralocorticoid receptor. Similarly, mineralocorticoid receptor-aldosterone interactions differ from mineralocorticoid receptor-glucocorticoid interactions and predicate receptor-ligand interactions that differ with respect to cellular effects. Hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism or selective hypoaldosteronism, an impaired adrenal response to increasing renin levels, occurs in a subgroup of hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients. The suggestion is that there is a defect at the level of the adrenal zona glomerulosa associated with a high mortality rate that may represent an adaptive response aimed at increasing cortisol levels. Furthermore, cross-talk exists between angiotensin II and aldosterone, which needs to be considered when employing therapeutic strategies.