Extrafasicular and Intraperineural, but No Endoneural, Spread after Deliberate Intraneural Injections in a Cadaveric Study

Peripheral nerve microanatomy: new insights into possible mechanisms for block success

Postmortem histology and in vivo, animal-based ultra-high-definition microultrasound demonstrate a complex array of non-communicating adipose tissue compartments enclosed by fascia. Classic nerve block mechanisms and histology do not consider this tissue. Injected local anesthetic agents can occupy any of these adipose compartments, which may explain the significant differences in outcomes such as success rates, onset time, block density, duration of nerve block, and secondary continuous block failure. Furthermore, these adipose tissue compartments may influence injection pressures, making conclusions about needle tip location unreliable. This educational review will explain the neural anatomy associated with these fatty compartments in detail and suggest how they may affect block outcomes.

Identification of spread after deliberate intraneural injection in five mammalian species

INTRODUCTION

This research endeavors to investigate the phenomenon of intraneural spread across distinct locations: subcircumneurium, extrafascicular intraneural, intrafascicular intraneural, and intraperineurium after deliberate intraneural injections across five mammalian species. The study also aims to propose determinants influencing this spread. Furthermore, the investigation strives to ascertain the optimal animal species and needle configuration for extrapolating intraneural injection outcomes to human contexts.

METHODS

This study examined 60 sciatic nerves from 30 fresh and untreated cadavers of rats, rabbits, dogs, pigs, and sheep. The specimens were organized into five groups, each comprising an equal number of nerves. Histological assessments were performed on 30 nerves, involving fascicle metrics. The remaining 30 nerves underwent intentional intraneural injections, facilitated by 19G and 23G needles under ultrasound and direct visualization guidance.Heparinized erythrocytes combined with a methylene blue solution were used as a marker to analyze the extent and patterns of intraneural spread. Needle orifice measurements were obtained, and these data were overlaid onto images of both nerves and needles. This enabled a comparative evaluation of sizes and an assessment of marker diffusion.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that sciatic nerves in rats, rabbits, and dogs were oligofascicular, characterized by larger fascicles, whereas pigs and sheep exhibited polyfascicular nerves comprised of numerous smaller fascicles. Fascicular diameters were variable across species, with dogs presenting the largest measurements. While intraneural spread was observed and documented, intrafascicular marker spreading was rare, occurring only in one rabbit specimen. Needle orifice attributes were scrutinized and visually depicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the formidable challenges associated with the practical realization of intrafascicular injection, the utilization of animal models possessing monofascicular or oligofascicular nerves, such as rats, rabbits, and dogs, in conjunction with needles featuring aperture dimensions surpassing those of the fascicles, likely contributes to the compromised reliability of investigations into intraneural injection outcomes.

Nerve block, nerve damage, and fluid injection pressure: overturning the myth

Histological and micro-ultrasound evidence rebuffs deep-rooted views on the nature of nerve block, nerve damage, and injection pressure monitoring. We propose that the ideal position of the needle tip for nerve block is between the innermost circumneural fascial layer and outer epineurium, with local anaesthetic passing circumferentially through adipose tissue. Thin, circumferential, subepineural expansion that is invisible to the naked eye was identified using micro-ultrasound, and could account for variability of outcomes in clinical practice. Pressure monitoring cannot differentiate between intrafascicular and extrafascicular injection. High injection pressure only indicates intraneural extrafascicular spread, not intrafascicular spread, because it is not possible to inject into the stiff endoneurium in most human nerves.

No evidence of fascicular injury following a low-volume intraneural injection of the median nerve: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The test dose or hydrolocation technique allows rapid detection of spread location. Though its primary aim is to enhance safety in peripheral nerve blocks, evidence on the potential risks of an intraneural test aliquot is lacking. We conducted a cadaveric study to evaluate the risk of fascicular injury following a low-volume (<1 mL) intraneural injection of the median nerve.

METHODS

Ten upper limbs from fresh unembalmed human cadavers were studied. In-plane ultrasound-guided intraneural injections of the median nerve were performed at mid, proximal, and distal locations using 1 mL of methylene blue and heparinized blood solution. Nerves were extracted and samples immersed in 10% buffered formalin for 4 weeks. Perpendicular 3 mm slices were obtained for H&E staining and light microscopy analysis. Our main objective was to assess the number of injured fascicles. Secondarily, we evaluated the pattern of intraneural spread. Fascicular injury was defined as the presence perineurium or axonal disruption and/or the presence of erythrocytes inside a nerve fascicle.

RESULTS

Thirty injections were performed in 10 median nerves. Sonographic swelling was confirmed in 100% of the cases. 352 histological sections were analyzed to assess study outcomes. The mean number of fascicles on each section of median nerve was 20±6 covering 49%±7% of the nerve area. No evidence of axonal disruption nor intra-fascicular erythrocytes was found in any of the analyzed sections.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-volume intraneural injections do not result in evident fascicular injury. Our findings support the use of a test dose in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Eighth Cervical Nerve Root Block During Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Decreases Pain Caused by Posterior Portal Placement but Increases Horner Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the intensity of pain on posterior portal placement between a C5-C7 root block (conventional interscalene brachial plexus block [ISBPB]) and a C5-C8 root block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized to receive either a C5-C7 root block (C5-C7 group, n = 37) or a C5-C8 root block (C5-C8 group, n = 36) with 25 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain intensity on posterior portal placement, which was graded as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), or 2 (severe pain). The secondary outcomes were the bilateral pupil diameters measured 30 minutes after ISBPB placement; the incidence of Horner syndrome, defined as a difference in pupil diameter (ipsilateral - contralateral) of less than -0.5 mm; the onset of postoperative pain; and the postoperative numerical rating pain score, where 0 and 10 represent no pain and the worst pain imaginable, respectively.

RESULTS

Fewer patients reported mild or severe pain on posterior portal placement in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (9 of 36 [25.0%] vs 24 of 37 [64.9%], P = .003). Less pain on posterior portal placement was reported in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (median [interquartile range], 0 [0-0.75] vs 1 [0-1]; median difference [95% confidence interval], 1 [0-1]; P = .001). The incidence of Horner syndrome was higher in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (33 of 36 [91.7%] vs 22 of 37 [59.5%], P = .001). No significant differences in postoperative numerical rating pain scores and onset of postoperative pain were found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A C5-C8 root block during an ISBPB reduces the pain intensity on posterior portal placement. However, it increases the incidence of Horner syndrome with no improvement in postoperative pain compared with the conventional ISBPB (C5-C7 root block).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Accuracy of injection pressure measurement at peripheral nerves using high-resolution 40 MHz ultrasound in an anesthetized porcine model

BACKGROUND

Fluid injection pressure measurement is promoted as a marker of needle tip position that discriminates between tissue layers. However, clinical ultrasound has insufficient resolution to identify the exact position of the needle tip. Our primary objective was to use 40 MHz ultrasound in anesthetized pigs in order to precisely locate the tip of the needle and measure opening injection pressure in muscle, at epineurium and in subepineurium.

METHODS

We surgically exposed the axillae of four anesthetized pigs. Two operators placed a 40 MHz ultrasound transducer over the pectoral muscle and imaged axillary, median and radial nerves. Injections (0.5 mL) were randomized to in-plane and out-of-plane needle trajectories and flow rates of 1, 6 and 12 mL/min.

RESULTS

We identified 541 fascicles in 23 nerves. The ratio of fascicle area to nerve area remained constant at ~0.30 for all nerves. Axillary nerves were smaller than median and radial nerves, difference in diameter (95% CI) 1.61 (0.87 to 2.36) mm, p<0.001 and 1.59 (0.82 to 2.36) mm, p=0.001, respectively. Axillary nerves had less fascicles per nerve than median nerves, difference 7.63 (2.43 to 12.83) and radial nerves, difference 9.02 (3.64 to 14.40). We visualized the circumneurium and injection within the subcircumneural compartment. Intraneural injection increased nerve area (SD) from 5.7 (2.2) mm2 to 13.7 (5.5) mm2, difference 8.0 (5.4-10.6) mm2, p<0.001. Mean injection pressure was greater in subepineurium compared with muscle, geometric ratio 2.29 (1.30 to 4.10), p<0.001; and greater on epineurium compared with muscle, geometric ratio 1.73 (1.03 to 3.00), p=0.01. Twenty-two out of 23 injections in muscle, 14 out of 23 injections at epineurium and 11 out of 22 injections in subepineurium were <138 kPa (20 psi).

CONCLUSION

Needle tip position was not discernible using pressure monitoring. The circumneurium and subcircumneural injection compartment were observed but not intrafascicular injection.

Quantitative assessment of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block - A comparison of a single-point versus two-point injection technique: A randomised controlled, double-blinded trial

Background and Aims

Sciatic nerve block at the popliteal level for lower limb procedures provides unpredictable success rates even with ultrasonographic (USG) guidance. This study aimed to compare USG-guided single-point versus two-point injection techniques.

Methods

Sixty patients posted for foot surgeries under USG-guided sciatic nerve block were randomised into Group Single Point, receiving a single injection of 20 mL of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline just proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation, and Group Double Point, receiving two injections of 10 mL of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline, one at the point similar to the first group and a second injection 6 cm above the first point. Sensory blockade onset, time to complete sensory blockade, time to complete motor blockade, length of the nerve exposed and analgesia duration were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 20 software.

Results

Double-point injection technique showed a significantly faster time to complete motor blockade [14.46 (9.93) min], increased length of nerve exposed to local anaesthetic [23.23 (7.209) cm] and extended duration of analgesia [420.40 (99.34) min] compared to the single-point injection technique [20.89 (12.62) min, 18.78 (5.95) cm and 344.28 (125.97) min, respectively]. The onset of sensory blockade and the time to complete sensory blockade were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

USG-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with a double-point injection technique does not significantly shorten the time to complete the sensory block. However, the time to complete motor nerve block and duration of analgesia are prolonged significantly, which may be clinically beneficial for postoperative analgesia.

Impact of an extrafascial versus intrafascial injection for supraclavicular brachial plexus block on respiratory function: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

Introduction

Hemidiaphragmatic paresis after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block is reported to occur in up to 67% of patients. We tested the hypothesis that an injection outside the brachial plexus sheath reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis compared with an intrafascial injection while providing similar analgesia.

Methods

Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III patients scheduled for elective upper limb surgery received a supraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 mL of 1:1 mixture of mepivacaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.5%. The block procedures were randomized to position the needle tip either within the brachial plexus after piercing the sheath (intrafascial injection) or outside the brachial plexus sheath (extrafascial injection). The primary outcome was the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis 30 min after the injection, measured by M-mode ultrasonography. Additional outcomes included time to surgery readiness, and resting and dynamic pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively (Numeric Rating Scale, 0–10).

Results

The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis 30 min after the injection was 9% (95% CI 1% to 29%) and 0% (95% CI 0% to 15%) in the intrafascial and extrafascial groups respectively (p=0.14). Extrafascial injection was associated with a longer time to surgery readiness (intrafascial: 18 min (95% CI: 16 to 21 min); extrafascial: 37 min (95% CI: 31 to 42 min); p<0.001). At 24 hours, resting and dynamic pain scores were similar between groups.

Discussion

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with an extrafascial injection does not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis although it provides similar analgesia, when compared with an intrafascial injection. The longer time to surgery readiness is less compatible with contemporary operating theater efficiency requirements.

Trial registration number

NCT03957772.

Traumatic needle damage to nerves during regional anesthesia: presentation of a novel mechanotransduction hypothesis

Despite advances in needle positioning techniques, nerve damage still occurs after regional anesthesia. Recognized causes include local anesthetic toxicity, subperineural injection, high subepineural fluid injection pressures and subepineural hematoma after forceful needle--nerve contact.We hypothesize that subperineural injection is still possible, but less likely to be the cause of nerve damage because needle penetration of fascicles and mechanical damage is difficult to achieve. High-resolution (75 µm) 40 MHz micro-ultrasound images of pig axillae show short-bevelled 22 g, 0.7 mm wide block needles that are three times larger than the average fascicle. Fascicular bundles are extremely difficult to puncture because they spin away on needle contact. Histology from fresh cadavers after supposed intrafascicular injection shows fluid spread within perineurium and intrafascicular perineural septae, but no breach of endoneurium or axons.We propose that mechanotransduction, the cellular changes that occur in response to force, contributes to nerve damage. Piezo ion channel proteins transduce force into electrical activity by rapid entry of cations into cells. Excessive Ca2+ influx into cells has the potential to inhibit nerve regeneration. Cellular changes include regulation of gene expression. The forces associated with purposeful needle insertion are generally unknown. Our experiments in the soft embalmed Thiel cadaver showed a lognormal range of forces between 0.6 N and 16.8 N on epineural penetration.We hypothesize that forceful needle injury may cause nerve damage by activation of Piezo receptors and release of intracellular Ca2.

Accuracy of ultrasonography predicting spread location following intraneural and subparaneural injections: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasonography is useful for detecting intraneural injections. However, the reliability of the sonographic findings of intraneural and subparaneural injections in terms of true spread location and their association with intrafascicular deposits has not been systematically evaluated.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Our objectives were: i) to explore the reliability of sonographic findings of intraneural and subparaneural injections when validated with tests of true spread such as histology, dissection or imaging, and ii) to evaluate their association with intrafascicular deposits. A Scoping Review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs guidelines. Cinahl, PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on adults, cadavers and animal models. Paediatric studies were excluded.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The search strategy found 598 citations. Following screening, 19 studies were selected. Intraneural injections occurred in the brachial plexus, sciatic, femoral and median nerves. Subparaneural injections in popliteal, supraclavicular and interscalene blocks. Sixteen different ultrasound findings were used to label injection location. Subepineural deposits within individual nerves occurred occasionally following subparaneural injections, regardless of nerve expansion. Overall five studies reported intrafascicular deposits, two of which frequently, following intraneural and subparaneural injections. None of the currently used ultrasound findings was predictive of intrafascicular deposits.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that sonographic parameters of intraneural and subparaneural injections are reliable in terms of detecting spread location. Intrafascicular injectate deposition may occur, albeit infrequently, particularly in the proximal brachial plexus. Our findings support the judicious interrogation of sonographic parameters suggestive of incipient intraneural injection.

Comparison of the ulnar nerve blockade between intertruncal and corner pocket approaches for supraclavicular block: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The corner pocket (CP) approach for supraclavicular block (SCB) prevents ulnar nerve (UN) sparing due to needle proximity to the lower trunk. Improved ultrasound resolution has suggested that the intertruncal (IT) approach is a suitable alternative method. We compared efficiency of these two approaches on the UN blockade.

Methods

Sixty patients were randomized to undergo SCB using the ultrasound-guided CP or IT approach. For lower trunk blockade, 10 ml of local anesthetic agents (1 : 1 mixture of 0.75% ropivacaine and 1% lidocaine) were injected in the CP (CP approach) or between the lower and middle trunks (IT approach). Additional 15 ml was injected identically to block the middle and upper trunks in both groups. Sensory and motor blockade was evaluated after intervention.

Results

Complete sensory blockade (75.9% [22/29] vs. 43.3% [13/30], P = 0.023) and complete motor blockade (82.8% [24/29] vs. 50.0% [15/30], P = 0.017) of the UN at 15 min after SCB were significantly more frequent in the IT than in the CP group. Sensory block onset time of the UN was significantly shorter in the IT compared to the CP group (15.0 [10.0, 15.0] min vs. 20.0 [15.0, 20.0] min, P = 0.012).

Conclusions

The IT approach provided a more rapid onset of UN blockade than the CP approach. These results suggest that the IT approach is a suitable alternative to the CP approach and can provide faster surgical readiness.

Needle insertion forces and fluid injection pressures during targeting of nerves in a soft embalmed cadaver model

PURPOSE

Forceful needle-nerve contact and high subepineural pressures and are recognised causes of nerve damage. Pressure and force measurements are necessary to inform the mechanisms of nerve injury, build virtual simulator environments and provide operator feedback during simulation training. However, the range of pressures and forces encountered at tissue layers during targeted needle insertion and fluid injection are not known.

METHODS

We built a needle that recorded in-line pressure during fluid injection and continuously measured force at the needle tip. Two anaesthetists were randomised to insert a 21 g block needle at 48 nerve sites on both sides of 3 soft embalmed Thiel cadavers. Our objective was to measure pressure and force during the course of targeted nerve injection at epimysium, in perineural tissue, on epineurium and during subepineural injection. At each interface, we infused a 0.5 ml bolus of embalming solution at a rate of 12 ml min^-1 and recorded the pressure response. Force was measured continuously in the background throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

Pressure was greater at epineurium and within subepineurium than perineural tissue, geometric ratio (95% CI) 4.7 (3.0-7.3) kPa and 3.8 (2.5-5.7) kPa, respectively, both P < 0.0001. Force on nerve contact and on nerve penetration was greater than force in perineural tissue, geometric ratios (95% CI) 3.0 (1.9-4.7) N and 3.6 (2.2-7.5) N, respectively, both P < 0.0001. On nerve contact, 1 in 6 insertions were ≥ 5 N CONCLUSIONS: Despite valid infusion pressures, anaesthetists exerted excessive force on nerves.

Ultrasound-guided subparaneural popliteal sciatic nerve block: there is more to it than meets the eyes

The popliteal sciatic nerve block is routinely used for anesthesia and analgesia during foot and ankle surgery. This article reviews our current understanding of the anatomy of the sciatic nerve and discusses how fascial tissue layers associated with the nerve may affect block outcomes . The anatomy of the sciatic nerve is more complex than previously described. The tibial and common peroneal nerves within the sciatic nerve trunk appear to be centrally separated by the Compton-Cruveilhier septum and encompassed by their own paraneural sheaths. This unique internal architecture of the sciatic nerve appears to promote proximal spread of local anesthetic to the internal aspect of the sciatic nerve trunk after a subparaneural injection at or below the divergence of the tibial and common peroneal nerves.

Short-Term Effects of Deliberate Subparaneural or Subepineural Injections With Saline Solution or Bupivacaine 0.75% in the Sciatic Nerve of Rabbits

Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided techniques for peripheral nerve blockade have revealed that intraneural injections are relatively frequent and not necessarily associated with neurological deficits. Objectives: To evaluate the short-term effects of deliberate injections performed under direct vision in two different sites of the sciatic nerve (ScN). Material and Methods: Seventy-two New Zealand white rabbits randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups (n = 18) were employed. All procedures were conducted at a proximal femoral level where the ScN incorporates the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve (TN). Fixed volumes of 0.5 ml of saline solution (ES group) or bupivacaine 0.75% (EB group) were administered extrafascicularly inside the paraneurium of the ScN or intrafascicularly (IS and IB groups) under the epineurium of the TN. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and relative echogenicity (RE) of the entire ScN were determined by US before injections, after injections, and at 3 and 7 days. ScN samples were obtained for structural and ultrastructural histopathological studies. Proprioceptive, sensorial, and motor function were clinically evaluated on a daily basis. Results: The CSA of the ScN increased significantly immediately after injections when compared with pre-injection values in all groups (p < 0.05). The RE of the ScN decreased in relation to pre-injection values in all groups (p < 0.05). The CSA and RE of the ScN returned to normal values 7 days after injections in almost all groups. Injected nerves showed histological signs of mild perineural inflammation. Histopathological scores were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). The architecture of the ScN was preserved in all rabbits at 3 days and in 31/32 rabbits at 7 days. A focal area of damaged nerve fibers with degeneration of the axons and myelin sheath affecting the TN was observed in one rabbit of the IB group. Nerve function was not clinically impaired in any case. Conclusion: Despite the lack of severe nerve disruption observed in most rabbits, the evidence of a focal area of damaged nerve fibers in one rabbit injected intrafascicularly with bupivacaine confirms that intrafascicular injections should be avoided as they may increase the risk of nerve damage.

Intertruncal approach to the supraclavicular brachial plexus, current controversies and technical update: a daring discourse

We propose a new approach to local anesthetic injection for the supraclavicular brachial plexus block: an intertruncal approach by which local anesthetic is deposited in the two adipose tissue planes between the upper and middle and the middle and lower trunks. We present sonographic and microscopic images to illustrate the relevant anatomy. This approach offers potential advantages over the ‘corner pocket’ technique in that it results in consistent local anesthetic spread to the three plexus trunks and the needle endpoint lies farther away from the pleural surface which is important for the prevention of pneumothorax. It also offers an advantage over the ‘intracluster’ approach as it purposefully avoids intraneural injection respecting the integrity of the epineurium of individual trunks. Comparative studies are required to confirm that these anatomic and technical advantages result in improved outcomes.

Vulnerability of different nerves to intrafascicular injection by different needle types and at different approach angles: a mathematical model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We assume that intrafascicular spread of a solution can only occur if a large enough portion of the distal needle orifice is placed inside the fascicle. Our aim is to present and evaluate a mathematical model that can calculate the theoretical vulnerability of fascicles, analyzing the degree of occupancy of the needle orifice in fascicular tissue by performing simulations of multiple positions that a needle orifice can take inside a cross-sectional nerve area.

METHODS

We superimposed microscopic images of two routinely used nerve block needles (22-gauge, 15° needle and 22-gauge, 30° needle) over the microscopic images of cross-sections of four nerve types photographed at the same magnification. Fascicular tissue that was overlapped between 80% and 100% by a needle orifice was considered at risk to possible intrafascicular injection. The effect of three angular approaches was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were statistical differences between the vulnerability of fascicular tissue depending on nerve type, the bevel angle of the needle and the angle approach. Fascicular vulnerability was greater in nerve roots of the brachial plexus after using a 22-gauge 30° needle, as was choosing a 45° angle approach to the longitudinal axis of the nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that clinicians may want to consider needle insertion angle and bevel type as they perform peripheral nerve blocks. Furthermore, researchers may want to consider this mathematical model when estimating vulnerabilities of various nerves, needle types and angles of approach of needles to nerves.

Advances in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management: a narrative review

Regional anaesthesia has undergone several exciting advances in the past few decades. Ultrasound-guided techniques of peripheral nerve blockade have become the gold standard thanks to the associated improvements in efficacy, ease of performance and safety. This has increased the accessibility and utilisation of regional anaesthesia in the anaesthesia community at large and is timely given the mounting evidence for its potential benefits on various patient-centred outcomes, including major morbidity, cancer recurrence and persistent postoperative pain. Ultrasound guidance has also paved the way for refinement of the technical performance of existing blocks concerning simplicity and safety, as well as the development of new regional anaesthesia techniques. In particular, the emergence of fascial plane blocks has further broadened the application of regional anaesthesia in the management of painful conditions of the thorax and abdomen. The preliminary results of investigations into these fascial plane blocks are promising but require further research to establish their true value and role in clinical care. One of the challenges that remains is how best to prolong regional anaesthesia to maximise its benefits while avoiding undue harm. There is ongoing research into optimising continuous catheter techniques and their management, intravenous and perineural pharmacological adjuncts, and sustained-release local anaesthetic molecules. Finally, there is a growing appreciation for the critical role that regional anaesthesia can play in an overall multimodal anaesthetic strategy. This is especially pertinent given the current focus on eliminating unnecessary peri-operative opioid administration.