Practicalities of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Target-controlled Infusion in Children

Electroencephalographic Indices for Clinical Endpoints during Propofol Anesthesia in Infants: An Early-phase Propofol Biomarker-finding Study

BACKGROUND

Unlike expired sevoflurane concentration, propofol lacks a biomarker for its brain effect site concentration, leading to dosing imprecision particularly in infants. Electroencephalography monitoring can serve as a biomarker for propofol effect site concentration, yet proprietary electroencephalography indices are not validated in infants. The authors evaluated spectral edge frequency (SEF95) as a propofol anesthesia biomarker in infants. It was hypothesized that the SEF95 targets will vary for different clinical stimuli and an inverse relationship existed between SEF95 and propofol plasma concentration.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled infants (3 to 12 months) to determine the SEF95 ranges for three clinical endpoints of anesthesia (consciousness-pacifier placement, pain-electrical nerve stimulation, and intubation-laryngoscopy) and correlation between SEF95 and propofol plasma concentration at steady state. Dixon's up-down method was used to determine target SEF95 for each clinical endpoint. Centered isotonic regression determined the dose-response function of SEF95 where 50% and 90% of infants (ED50 and ED90) did not respond to the clinical endpoint. Linear mixed-effect model determined the association of propofol plasma concentration and SEF95.

RESULTS

Of 49 enrolled infants, 44 evaluable (90%) showed distinct SEF95 for endpoints: pacifier (ED50, 21.4 Hz; ED90, 19.3 Hz), electrical stimulation (ED50, 12.6 Hz; ED90, 10.4 Hz), and laryngoscopy (ED50, 8.5 Hz; ED90, 5.2 Hz). From propofol 0.5 to 6 μg/ml, a 1-Hz SEF95 increase was linearly correlated to a 0.24 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.29; P < 0.001) μg/ml decrease in plasma propofol concentration (marginal R2 = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

SEF95 can be a biomarker for propofol anesthesia depth in infants, potentially improving dosing accuracy and utilization of propofol anesthesia in this population.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Oxygen concentration titration guided by oxygen reserve index during pediatric laryngeal surgery with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether adjusting the oxygen concentration guided by the Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI) during pediatric laryngeal surgery with High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen (HFNO) could achieve postoperative PaO2 close to physiological levels while ensuring adequate oxygenation in surgery.

METHODS

Sixty pediatric patients undergoing laryngeal surgery or examination were randomly assigned to two groups. The ORI group received oxygen concentration adjustments every 5 min to maintain a target ORI value of 0.21, whereas the control group did not undergo any adjustments. Postoperative PaO2, time weighted average fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), and mean Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) were compared between groups. Finally, some analyses were conducted to examine the relationship of ORI with PaO2.

RESULTS

In general, the postoperative PaO2 was 164.9 ± 48.8 mmHg in ORI group and 323.0 ± 87.7 mmHg in control group (P < 0.01). The time weighted average FiO2 in the ORI group was 85.9 [81.8-92.7] %. There was no significant difference in mean SpO2 between the two groups (ORI vs. control: 98.4 [97.7-99.2] vs. 98.8 [97.7-99.5]; P = 0.36). According to the analyses, the optimal cut value for ORI was determined to be 0.195 when PaO2 was 150 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric laryngeal surgery with HFNO, reducing oxygen concentration guided by ORI helped achieve postoperative PaO2 levels closer to physiological norms without compromising intra-operative oxygenation.

Effective dose of propofol combined with intravenous esketamine for smooth flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in two distinct age groups of preschool children

BACKGROUND

There is limited research on the combined use of propofol and esketamine for anesthesia induction during flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) in pediatric patients, and the effective dosage of propofol for FLMA smooth insertion remains unclear. We explored the effective dose of propofol combined with intravenous esketamine for the smooth insertion of FLMA in two distinct age groups of preschool children.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observer-blind, interventional clinical study. Based on age, preschool children scheduled for elective surgery were divided into group A (aged 1-3 years) and group B (aged 3-6 years). Anesthesia induction was started with intravenous administration of esketamine (1.0 mg.kg- 1) followed by propofol administration. The FLMA was inserted 2 min after propofol administration at the target dose. The initial dose of propofol in group A and group B was 3.0 mg.kg- 1 and 2.5 mg.kg- 1, respectively. The target dose of propofol was determined with Dixon's up-and-down method, and the dosing interval of propofol was 0.5 mg.kg- 1. If there was smooth insertion of FLMA in the previous patient, the target dose of propofol for the next patient was reduced by 0.5 mg.kg- 1; otherwise, it was increased by 0.5 mg.kg- 1. The median 50% effective dose (ED50) for propofol was estimated using Dixon's up-and-down method and Probit analysis, while the 95% effective dose (ED95) was estimated through Probit analysis. Vital signs and adverse events during induction were recorded.

RESULTS

Each group included 24 pediatric patients. Using Dixon's up-and-down method, the ED50 of propofol combined with esketamine for smooth insertion of FLMA in group A was 2.67 mg.kg- 1 (95%CI: 1.63-3.72), which was higher than that in group B (2.10 mg. kg- 1, 95%CI: 1.36-2.84) (p = 0.04). Using Probit analysis, the ED50 of propofol was calculated as 2.44 (95% CI: 1.02-3.15) mg.kg- 1 in group A and 1.93 (95% CI: 1.39-2.32) mg.kg- 1 in group B. The ED95 of propofol was 3.72 (95%CI: 3.07-15.18) mg.kg- 1 in group A and 2.74 (95%CI: 2.34-5.54) mg.kg- 1 in group B. In Group B, one pediatric patient experienced laryngospasm.

CONCLUSION

The effective dose of propofol when combined with intravenous esketamine for smooth insertion of FLMA in children aged 1-3 years is 2.67 mg.kg- 1, which is higher than that in children aged 3-6 years (2.10 mg. kg- 1).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100044317; Registration Date: 2021/03/16).

Comparison of Two Anesthetic Regimens on Extubation Time and Postoperative Recovery in Children Undergoing Ambulatory Adenoidectomy: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This aim of this study was to compare two anesthetic regimens in terms of extubation time and postoperative recovery in children undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

METHODS

The medical charts of 452 children aged between 3 and 8 years undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy were retrieved for analysis, of which 438 were eligible to participate in this study. A majority (n = 327) were children exposed to a conventional propofol-pronounced general anesthetic regimen (high-dose propofol plus low-dose remifentanil, labeled as group P), while n = 111 were administered a modified remifentanil-pronounced anesthetic regimen (low-dose propofol plus high-dose remifentanil, namely group R). Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for confounders, resulting in 69 matched patients in each group. The primary endpoint of this study was extubation time. The secondary endpoints were total intraoperative fluid volume, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative pain rating, the incidence of emergence agitation, nausea and vomiting, as well as the level of consciousness (fully awake or waking by gentle patting) when transferred out of PACU, and any major complications (wound bleeding, reintubation, readmission, and overnight stay).

FINDINGS

No major complications were observed in both groups. Compared to group P, group R had significantly shorter extubation time (8.2 ± 1.4 minutes vs 13.3 ± 2.4 minutes, P < .001), shorter length of stay in the PACU (14.1 ± 3.1 minutes vs 20.2 ± 3.4 minutes, P < .001), and a higher proportion of cases being fully awake when transferred out of the PACU (91% vs 46%, P < .001). Lastly, the pain rating, frequency of oropharyngeal airway usage, incidence of emergence agitation, and nausea and vomiting were comparable between the two groups (P > .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil-pronounced anesthesia was superior to propofol-pronounced anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy, given that the former was associated with a faster recovery time from anesthesia without jeopardizing patient safety.

A Transformer-Based Prediction Method for Depth of Anesthesia During Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Remifentanil

Accurately predicting anesthetic effects is essential for target-controlled infusion systems. The traditional (PK-PD) models for Bispectral index (BIS) prediction require manual selection of model parameters, which can be challenging in clinical settings. Recently proposed deep learning methods can only capture general trends and may not predict abrupt changes in BIS. To address these issues, we propose a transformer-based method for predicting the depth of anesthesia (DOA) using drug infusions of propofol and remifentanil. Our method employs long short-term memory (LSTM) and gate residual network (GRN) networks to improve the efficiency of feature fusion and applies an attention mechanism to discover the interactions between the drugs. We also use label distribution smoothing and reweighting losses to address data imbalance. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms traditional PK-PD models and previous deep learning methods, effectively predicting anesthetic depth under sudden and deep anesthesia conditions.

Total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: how do outcomes compare?

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical procedures that involve general anesthesia are performed with either volatile anesthetics or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. Both techniques are safe and provide appropriate conditions for surgery. Despite being a well established anesthetic, the use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) remains low. Possible explanations include the perceived increase risk of awareness, lack of target controlled infusion devices, increased turnover time for device set up and individual preference.

SUMMARY

There are some scenarios where patients could potentially benefit from propofol-based TIVA rather than a volatile anesthetic (e.g. postoperative nausea and vomiting) and some other clinical scenarios where the use of propofol-based anesthesia remains controversial since the strength of the evidence remains low.

PURPOSE

In this review we will summarize the clinical evidence comparing the effect of propofol-based TIVA and volatile anesthetic on postoperative outcomes such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain, quality of recovery, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and cancer outcomes.

Comparison between sevoflurane and propofol on immunomodulation in an in vitro model of sepsis

Introduction

Patients with sepsis often require sedation and/or anesthesia. Although the immunomodulatory effects of anesthetics have been increasingly recognized, the molecular mechanisms require better elucidation. We compared the effects of sevoflurane with propofol on the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory biomarkers released by monocytes/macrophages and blood/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neutrophils, the phagocytic capacity of monocytes/ macrophages, and neutrophil migration, as well as mediators associated with alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells obtained from rats with sepsis.

Methods

Polymicrobial sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture in nine male Wistar rats. After 48 h, animals were euthanized and their monocytes/alveolar macrophages, blood and BALF neutrophils, as well as alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells were extracted, and then exposed to (1) sevoflurane (1 minimal alveolar concentration), (2) propofol (50 μM), or (3) saline, control (CTRL) for 1 h.

Results

Sevoflurane reduced interleukin (IL)-6 mRNA expression in monocytes and alveolar macrophages (p = 0.007, p = 0.029), whereas propofol decreased IL-6 mRNA only in alveolar macrophages (p = 0.027) compared with CTRL. Sevoflurane increased IL-10 expression (p = 0.0002) in monocytes compared with propofol and increased IL-10 mRNA and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β mRNA (p = 0.037, p = 0.045) compared with CTRL. Both sevoflurane and propofol did not affect mRNA expression of IL-10 and TGF-β in alveolar macrophages. The phagocytic capacity of monocytes (p = 0.0006) and alveolar macrophages (p = 0.0004) was higher with sevoflurane compared with propofol. Sevoflurane, compared with CTRL, reduced IL-1β mRNA (p = 0.003, p = 0.009) and C-X-C chemokine receptor 2 mRNA (CXCR2, p = 0.032 and p = 0.042) in blood and BALF neutrophils, and increased CXCR4 mRNA only in BALF neutrophils (p = 0.004). Sevoflurane increased blood neutrophil migration (p = 0.015) compared with propofol. Both sevoflurane and propofol increased zonula occludens-1 mRNA (p = 0.046, p = 0.003) in alveolar epithelial cells and reduced Toll-like receptor 4 mRNA (p = 0.043, p = 0.006) in alveolar endothelial cells compared with CTRL. Only propofol reduced surfactant protein B mRNA (p = 0.028) in alveolar epithelial cells.

Discussion

Sevoflurane, compared with propofol, increased anti-inflammatory biomarkers in monocytes, but not in alveolar macrophages, enhanced monocyte/alveolar macrophage phagocytic capacity and increased neutrophil migration in in vitro experimental sepsis. Both propofol and sevoflurane protected lung epithelial and endothelial cells.

Low-dose sevoflurane co-administered with propofol-based general anaesthesia obliterates intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in an infant

The influence of general anaesthetic agents on intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in neonates and infants has rarely been reported. Propofol-based anaesthesia is recommended to avoid suppression of neurophysiological monitoring. However, the administration of propofol in children undergoing prolonged procedures, especially those younger than six months, should be carefully controlled due to the potential risk of propofol infusion syndrome. Adding a small dose of inhalational anaesthetic can be an option to reduce propofol requirements. Recent guidelines in Japan suggest limiting inhalational anaesthetics to less than 0.5 minimum alveolar concentrations when co-administered with low-dose propofol during intra-operative neuromonitoring. However, there is still insufficient evidence regarding the impact of sevoflurane on neurophysiological monitoring when co-administered with propofol in infants. This report describes a case of a three-month-old infant undergoing spinal lipoma resection in which there was a dramatic suppression of neurophysiological monitoring with the addition of 0.35-0.45% sevoflurane to propofol-based anaesthesia.

A Narrative Review Illustrating the Clinical Utility of Electroencephalogram-Guided Anesthesia Care in Children

The major therapeutic end points of general anesthesia include hypnosis, amnesia, and immobility. There is a complex relationship between general anesthesia, responsiveness, hemodynamic stability, and reaction to noxious stimuli. This complexity is compounded in pediatric anesthesia, where clinicians manage children from a wide range of ages, developmental stages, and body sizes, with their concomitant differences in physiology and pharmacology. This renders anesthetic requirements difficult to predict based solely on a child's age, body weight, and vital signs. Electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring provides a window into children's brain states and may be useful in guiding clinical anesthesia management. However, many clinicians are unfamiliar with EEG monitoring in children. Young children's EEGs differ substantially from those of older children and adults, and there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on how and when to use the EEG for anesthesia care in children. This narrative review begins by summarizing what is known about EEG monitoring in pediatric anesthesia care. A key knowledge gap in the literature relates to a lack of practical information illustrating the utility of the EEG in clinical management. To address this gap, this narrative review illustrates how the EEG spectrogram can be used to visualize, in real time, brain responses to anesthetic drugs in relation to hemodynamic stability, surgical stimulation, and other interventions such as cardiopulmonary bypass. This review discusses anesthetic management principles in a variety of clinical scenarios, including infants, children with altered conscious levels, children with atypical neurodevelopment, children with hemodynamic instability, children undergoing total intravenous anesthesia, and those undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Each scenario is accompanied by practical illustrations of how the EEG can be visualized to help titrate anesthetic dosage to avoid undersedation or oversedation when patients experience hypotension or other physiological challenges, when surgical stimulation increases, and when a child's anesthetic requirements are otherwise less predictable. Overall, this review illustrates how well-established clinical management principles in children can be significantly complemented by the addition of EEG monitoring, thus enabling personalized anesthesia care to enhance patient safety and experience.

A new view on old problems in paediatric anaesthesia: premedication, postoperative agitation and dosing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to discuss recent developments in paediatric anaesthesia, which have evolved in an undulating fashion.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role and efficacy of pharmacological premedication is reevaluated. The anxiolytic and sedative properties of midazolam and α 2 -agonists have now been defined more precisely. Both classes of drugs have their unique profile, and there is no reason to condemn one or the other. Midazolam is an excellent anxiolytic, whereas dexmedetomidine is superior in the postoperative period and for sedation during diagnostic imaging.A total intravenous technique with propofol is often considered to be the standard for the prevention of emergence agitation; but alternatives do exist, such as a co-medication with dexmedetomidine or opioids. In clinical reality, a multimodal approach may often be advisable.The theoretical basis for propofol dosing has recently been adapted. In contrast to previous beliefs, the context-sensitive half-life of propofol seems to be quite short beyond the first year of life.

SUMMARY

Midazolam and dexmedetomidine are not interchangeable; each compound has its pros and cons. As an anxiolytic drug, midazolam indisputably deserves its place, whereas dexmedetomidine is a better sedative and particularly beneficial in the postoperative period. New data will allow more precise age-adapted dosing of propofol.

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Versus Ketamine-Propofol for Procedural Sedation in Adults Undergoing Short Surgical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and objective Moderate to deep sedation is a prerequisite during total intravenous anesthesia for short-duration surgeries, and it can be achieved by using individual drugs or in combination. Our study compared dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) versus ketamine-propofol (KP) in terms of sedation, procedural interference, hemodynamics, and incidence of side effects in patients undergoing short surgical procedures. Methods A total of 194 patients scheduled for short-duration elective surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups. Group DK received a loading dose of 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 1 mg/kg of ketamine followed by a maintenance infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.3 µg/kg/h. Group KP received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg of ketamine and 1 mg/kg of propofol followed by a maintenance infusion of propofol at 25 µg/kg/h. For procedural interference, a rescue ketamine bolus was administered at 0.25 mg/kg. Patients were monitored for the requirement of rescue ketamine bolus, procedural interference, hemodynamics, sedation, recovery time, and adverse effects. Results The procedural interference was higher in group KP than in group DK and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). The time to the first rescue bolus was 8.72 ± 4.47 minutes in group KP and 10.82 ± 4.01 minutes in group DK, with a difference of 2.1 minutes (p=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in the sedation scores between both groups except at time points of six minutes and 15 minutes. Conclusion For short-duration procedures, the DK combination is superior to the KP combination in terms of procedural interference and time to the first rescue bolus, while both groups were comparable with regard to safety and hemodynamics.

The effect of preoperative sleep quality on the target plasma concentration of propofol and postoperative sleep in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the effect of preoperative sleep quality on the target plasma concentration of propofol and postoperative sleep in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.

METHODS

Ninety-three outpatients aged 45 to 64 years with body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-30 kg/m² and ASA grades of I or II, who underwent painless gastroscopy, were selected. All patients were evaluated by the Athens insomnia scale (AIS) before the painless gastroscopy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the AIS score evaluated before painless gastroscopy: normal sleep group (group N, AIS score < 4 points, 47 cases) and sleep disorder group (group D, AIS score > 6 points, 46 cases). The target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol (Marsh model) was used for general anesthesia, the Bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia, and the BIS was maintained between 50 and 65 during the painless gastroscopy. The target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was recorded when the patient's eyelash reflex disappeared (T1), before the painless gastroscopy (T2), at the time of advancing the gastroscope (T3) and during the painless gastroscopy (T4), and the infusion rate per body surface area of propofol was calculated. The patient's AIS score was followed up by telephone at day 1, day 3, 1 week, and 1 month after the painless gastroscopy to assess the postoperative sleep of the patient. The occurrence of adverse reactions during the painless gastroscopy was recorded; the patient's satisfaction and the endoscopist's satisfaction with the anesthesia effect were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with group N, the Cp at each time point and the infusion rate per body surface area of propofol in group D was increased significantly (P < 0.05); compared with the AIS scores before the painless gastroscopy, the AIS scores of the two groups of patients were significantly increased day 1 after the painless gastroscopy (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in the AIS scores of the two groups at day 3, 1 week, and 1 month after the painless gastroscopy (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of adverse reactions and the patient's satisfaction and the endoscopist's satisfaction with the anesthesia effect between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative sleep disturbance will increase the Cp and the infusion rate per body surface area of propofol in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Propofol only affects the patients' sleep for day 1 after the painless gastroscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100045332) on 12/04/2021.

An intravenous anesthetic drug-propofol, influences the biological characteristics of malignant tumors and reshapes the tumor microenvironment: A narrative literature review

Malignant tumors are the second leading cause of death worldwide. This is a public health concern that negatively impacts human health and poses a threat to the safety of life. Although there are several treatment approaches for malignant tumors, surgical resection remains the primary and direct treatment for malignant solid tumors. Anesthesia is an integral part of the operation process. Different anesthesia techniques and drugs have different effects on the operation and the postoperative prognosis. Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic that is commonly used in surgery. A substantial number of studies have shown that propofol participates in the pathophysiological process related to malignant tumors and affects the occurrence and development of malignant tumors, including anti-tumor effect, pro-tumor effect, and regulation of drug resistance. Propofol can also reshape the tumor microenvironment, including anti-angiogenesis, regulation of immunity, reduction of inflammation and remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, most clinical studies have also indicated that propofol may contribute to a better postoperative outcome in some malignant tumor surgeries. Therefore, the author reviewed the chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, clinical application and limitations, mechanism of influencing the biological characteristics of malignant tumors and reshaping the tumor microenvironment, studies of propofol in animal tumor models and its relationship with postoperative prognosis of propofol in combination with the relevant literature in recent years, to lay a foundation for further study on the correlation between propofol and malignant tumor and provide theoretical guidance for the selection of anesthetics in malignant tumor surgery.

Implementation of an electroencephalogram-guided propofol anesthesia education program in an academic pediatric anesthesia practice

BACKGROUND

Propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is increasingly popular in pediatric anesthesia, but education on its use is variable and over-dosage adverse events are not uncommon. Recent work suggests that electroencephalogram (EEG) parameters can guide propofol dosing in the pediatric population. This education quality improvement project aimed to implement a standardized EEG TIVA training program over 12 months in a large pediatric anesthesia division.

METHODS

The division consisted of 63 faculty, 11 clinical fellows, 32 residents, and 28 nurse anesthetists at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The program was assessed for effectiveness (a significant improvement in EEG knowledge scores), scalability (training 50% of fellows and staff), and sustainability (recurring EEG lectures for 80% of rotating residents and 100% of new fellows and staff). The key drivers included educational content development (lectures, articles, and hand-outs), training a cohort of EEG TIVA trainers, intraoperative teaching (teaching points and dosing tables), decision support tools (algorithms and anesthesia electronic record pop-ups), and knowledge tests (written exam and verbal quiz during cases).

RESULTS

Over 12 months, 78.5% of the division (62/79) completed EEG training and test scores improved (mean score 38% before training vs 59% after training, p < .001). Didactic lectures were given to 100% of the fellows, 100% (11/11) of new staff, and 80% (4/5 blocks) of rotating residents.

CONCLUSION

This quality improvement education project successfully trained pediatric anesthesia faculty, staff, residents, and fellows in EEG-guided TIVA. The training program was effective, scalable, and sustainable over time for newly hired faculty staff and rotating fellows and residents.

Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method

Introduction: The use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has been well established as an anaesthetic technique over the last few decades. Significant variation in practice exists however, and volatile agents are still commonly used. This study aims to determine the motivations and barriers for using TIVA over the use of volatile agents by analysing the opinion of several international anaesthetists with specific expertise or interests. Methods and participants: The Delphi method was used to gain the opinions of expert panellists with a range of anaesthetic subspecialty expertise. Twenty-nine panellists were invited to complete three survey rounds containing statements regarding the use of TIVA. Anonymised data were captured through the software REDCap and analysed for consensus and prioritisation across statements. Starting with 12 statements, strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Stability was assessed between rounds. Results: Strong consensus was achieved for four statements regarding considerations for the use of TIVA. These statements addressed whether TIVA is useful in paediatric anaesthesia, the importance of TIVA in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, its positive impact on the environment and effect on patient physiology, such as airway and haemodynamic control. Conclusions: Using the Delphi method, this international consensus showed that cost, lack of familiarity or training and the risk of delayed emergence are not considered obstacles to TIVA use. It appears, instead, that the primary motivations for its adoption are the impact of TIVA on patient experience, especially in paediatrics, and the benefit to the overall procedure outcome. The effect of TIVA on postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient physiology, as well as improving its availability in paediatrics were considered as priorities. We also identified areas where the debate remains open, generating new research questions on geographical variation and the potential impact of local availability of monitoring equipment.

Consistency of remifentanil concentrations in propofol-Remifentanil infusions. A laboratory-based study

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in two-agent single-pump intravenous infusions for anesthesia and sedation in pediatric patients. Propofol-remifentanil is one such mixture. The poor miscibility of such admixtures when remifentanil is added in very high concentrations and when the admixtures are maintained in static conditions has been demonstrated; however, these physiochemical properties have not been examined in clinically relevant concentrations or settings.

AIM

To examine if propofol-remifentanil admixtures maintain consistent remifentanil delivery when mixed in clinically relevant remifentanil concentrations and subjected to the physical effects of an actively infusing, directly-engaged syringe driver system with an extension line, as occurs when propofol-remifentanil is administered to a patient.

METHODS

A propofol 10 mg.ml^-1 combined with remifentanil 5 mcg.ml^-1 solution was run using a Paedfusor^® propofol target-controlled infusion model for 10 kg and 20 kg children for 57 min at a target plasma concentration of 3 mcg.ml^-1 through a 30 ml syringe, 180 cm minimum volume extension line, lever lock cannula, interlink injection site, and 22 g intravenous cannula into sample pots. Samples were taken at the completion of the loading bolus, 1 and 2 min postcompletion of loading bolus, and every 5 min thereafter. The remifentanil concentration in these samples was then assayed using chromatography.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the concentration of remifentanil in the samples based on the duration of infusion to the endpoint of 1 h, or on the patient weight model used. The concentration remained 5 mcg.ml^-1 +/- 0.5 mcg.ml^-1 per sample. The measurement uncertainty for the assay at 0.5 mcg.ml^-1 is +/- 0.2 mcg.ml^-1 .

CONCLUSION

The concentration of remifentanil was 5 mcg.ml^-1 +/- 0.5 mcg.ml^-1 and was consistent across 57 min of infusion, and two different pediatric weight profiles.

Propofol context-sensitive decrement times in children

Plasma drug concentration is the variable linking dose to effect. The decrement time required for plasma concentration of anesthetic agents to decrease by 50% (context-sensitive half-time) correlates with the time taken to regain consciousness. However, the decrement time to consciousness may not be 50%. An effect compartment concentration is associated more closely with return of consciousness than plasma concentration. An alternative decrement time, the time required for propofol to decrease to a predetermined effect compartment concentration associated with movement (eg, 2 µg.ml^-1 ), was used to simulate time for the concentration to decrease from steady state at a typical targeted effect compartment concentration 3.5 µg.ml^-1 in children. These times were short and reflected a decrement time to consciousness (CST_AWAKE ) increase that was small with longer infusion time. CST_AWAKE ranged from 7.5 min in 1-year-old infant given propofol for 15 min to 13.5 min in a 15-year-old adolescent given a 2-hour infusion. Changes in decrement time with age reflect maturation of drug clearance. Neonates had prolonged increment times, 10 min after 15 min infusion and 18 min after 120 min infusion using a target concentration of 3.5 µg.ml^-1 . Decrement times to a targeted arousal concentration are context-sensitive. Use of a higher target concentration of 6 µg.ml^-1 doubled decrement times. Decrement times are associated with variability: delayed recovery beyond these simulated times is likely more attributable to the use of adjuvant drugs or the child's clinical status. An understanding of propofol decrement times can be used to guide recovery after anesthesia.

An Audit on Pharmacists' Knowledge and Experience in Pediatric Care

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine pharmacists' perceived knowledge and expertise required to deliver pharmaceutical care services to pediatric patients.

METHODS

Once ethical approval was obtained, a questionnaire was posted on local pharmacy groups. The questionnaire is composed of 4 domains: 1) Demographics, 2) Perceived knowledge of pediatric treatment and dosing, 3) Real-life pediatric cases, and 4) Future aspirations to enhance pediatric pharmacy.

RESULTS

A total of 200 questionnaires were completed and submitted online. Most participants (62.5%) practiced in a community setting. Most respondents (40%) reported that 41% to 60% of their patients were pediatrics. In general, respondents had a good perception of their knowledge and expertise to deliver pharmaceutical care services to pediatric patients. However, most respondents had a low knowledge score when faced with real-life pediatric cases. On a scale of 7 most respondents obtained the score of 2 (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study sheds light on an alarming lack of knowledge in pediatric pharmaceutics among pharmacies in Jordan. Further training and educational programs should be put in place to address this gap in knowledge.

Prospective evaluation of remifentanil-propofol mixture for total intravenous anesthesia: A randomized controlled study

Application of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) may be considered as unpractical when compared with inhalational anesthesia. Although it is mostly not recommended, mixing intravenous agents is popular in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to investigate the suitability of using remifentanil-propofol mixture (MIXTIVA) for TIVA. Adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of I-II scheduled for elective thyroidectomy were randomly allocated to 3 groups (n=32 for each) to receive TIVA with remifentanil and propofol infusions separately (control group, Group I) or with MIXTIVA infusion that contained remifentanil/propofol at a proportion of 2/1,000 or 3/1,000 (remifentanil concentration, 20 or 30 µg/ml in 1% propofol in Group II or Group III, respectively). The extubation time (the primary outcome of the study), the orientation time and number of patients in whom intraoperative hypotension, hypertension or bradycardia episodes were encountered during anesthesia were comparable among the groups. The mean remifentanil infusion rate in Group III was significantly higher than that in the other groups. The mean propofol infusion rates and mean bispectral index (BIS) scores during anesthesia were comparable among groups. Hypotension accompanied with a high BIS was encountered in one patient in Group III. In conclusion, compared to the standard TIVA technique using separate drug infusions, MIXTIVA infusion used for thyroidectomies did not result in any statistically significant difference in recovery and clinical outcomes. This technique may be considered as a practical implementation for busy ambulatory centers performing general anesthesia. The present study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial registration no. NCT04394897).

The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study

Background

Continuous infusion of propofol has been used to achieve sedation in children. However, the relationship between the effect-site concentration (C_e) of propofol and sedation scale has not been previously examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the C_e of propofol and the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score in children with population pharmacodynamic modeling.

Methods

A total of 30 patients (aged 3 to 6 years) who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil lasting more than 1 h were enrolled in this study. Sedation levels were evaluated using the UMSS score every 20 s by a 1 μg/mL stepwise increase in the C_e of propofol during the induction of anesthesia. The pharmacodynamic relationship between the C_e of propofol and UMSS score was analyzed by logistic regression with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling.

Results

The estimated C_e50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol to yield UMSS scores equal to or greater than n were 1.84 (1.54–2.14), 2.64 (2.20–3.08), 3.98 (3.66–4.30), and 4.78 (4.53–5.03) μg/mL for n = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The slope steepness for the relationship of the C_e versus sedative response to propofol (95% confidence interval) was 5.76 (4.00–7.52).

Conclusions

We quantified the pharmacodynamic relationship between the C_e of propofol and UMSS score, and this finding may be helpful to predict the sedation score at the target C_e of propofol in children.

Trial registration

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (No.: NCT03195686, Date of registration: 22/06/2017).

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in paediatric neurosurgery

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is commonly used in various surgical procedures in adults, but with technological and anaesthetic advancements, its use has extended to the paediatric population. The use of IONM in children poses a unique set of challenges considering the anatomical and physiological differences in this group of patients. The use of IONM aids in the localization of neural structures and enables surgeons to preserve the functional neural structures leading to decreased incidence of postoperative neurological deficits and better patient outcomes. In this article, we review the use of IONM in paediatric patients undergoing various spinal and cranial neurosurgical procedures. We discuss the patient characteristics, type of surgeries, and technical and anaesthetic considerations about IONM in this population.

Using Electroencephalography (EEG) to Guide Propofol and Sevoflurane Dosing in Pediatric Anesthesia

Sevoflurane and propofol-based anesthetics are dosed according to vital signs, movement, and expired sevoflurane concentrations, which do not assess the anesthetic state of the brain and, therefore, risk underdose and overdose. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures cortical brain activity and can assess hypnotic depth, a key component of the anesthetic state. Application of sevoflurane and propofol pharmacology along with EEG parameters can more precisely guide dosing to achieve the desired anesthetic state for an individual pediatric patient. This article reviews the principles underlying EEG use for sevoflurane and propofol dosing in pediatric anesthesia and offers case examples to illustrate their use in individual patients.

Applications and Limitations of Neuro-Monitoring in Paediatric Anaesthesia and Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Narrative Review

Safe management of anaesthesia in children has been one of the top areas of research over the last decade. After the large volume of articles which focused on the putative neurotoxic effect of anaesthetic agents on the developing brain, the attention and research efforts shifted toward prevention and treatment of critical events and the importance of peri-anaesthetic haemodynamic stability to prevent negative neurological outcomes. Safetots.org is an international initiative aiming at raising the attention on the relevance of a high-quality anaesthesia in children undergoing surgical and non-surgical procedures to guarantee a favourable outcome. Children might experience hemodynamic instability for many reasons, and how the range of normality within brain autoregulation is maintained is still unknown. Neuro-monitoring can guide anaesthesia providers in delivering optimal anaesthetic drugs dosages and also correcting underling conditions that can negatively affect the neurological outcome. In particular, it is referred to EEG-based monitoring and monitoring for brain oxygenation.

Why do We Use the Concepts of Adult Anesthesia Pharmacology in Developing Brains? Will It Have an Impact on Outcomes? Challenges in Neuromonitoring and Pharmacology in Pediatric Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Pediatric sedation and anesthesia techniques have plenty of difficulties and challenges. Data on the pharmacologic, electroencephalographic, and neurologic response to anesthesia at different brain development times are only partially known. New data in neuroscience, pharmacology, and intraoperative neuromonitoring will impact changing concepts and clinical practice. In this article, we develop a conversation to guide the debate and search for a view more attuned to the updated knowledge in neurodevelopment, electroencephalography, and clinical pharmacology for the anesthesiologic practice in the pediatric population.

Association Between Intraoperative Remifentanil Dosage and Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Adolescent Idiopathic Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Remifentanil is a short-acting opioid that is often used as a component of total intravenous anesthesia. Remifentanil has been implicated in acute opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, resulting in increased postoperative pain and opioid consumption. This retrospective study sought to investigate the relationship between the dose of intraoperative remifentanil and cumulative postoperative opioid consumption through 72 hours following surgery for pediatric AIS patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of adolescent patients undergoing posterior spine instrumentation under total intravenous general anesthesia at a single major pediatric center between January 2015 and October 2017. The relationship between intraoperative cumulative weight-adjusted remifentanil dose and logarithmic transformation of cumulative weight-adjusted opioid consumption through 72 hours following surgery was examined by regression analysis. A priori determined potential confounding variables were collected, including demographic data, perioperative analgesic agents (ie, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and acetaminophen), surgical duration, vertebrae instrumented, and blood transfusion. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to adjust for these possible confounding variables.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, of which 78 had complete data for analysis. Univariable linear regression analysis revealed no association between remifentanil dose and opioid consumption through 72 hours following surgery (slope = 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.98; R2 = 0.0039; P = .588]). After adjustment for possible confounding factors, no relationship between remifentanil dose (regression coefficient (coeff.) -0.08; 95% CI, -1.59 to 1.43; P = .912) and opioid consumption through 72 hours was found (slope =0.90 [95% CI, -0.65 to 2.46]; R2 = 0.1634). Similar results were obtained when the model was repeated for opioid consumption in postanesthesia care unit (PACU).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study examining adolescent patients undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis, no association was found between the dose of intraoperative remifentanil and postoperative opioid consumption in the context of a propofol-based total intravenous anesthetic and multimodal analgesia. These results provide direction for future prospective controlled studies to further evaluate this relationship.

[Maximum dose of continuous infusion of mivacurium for thyroid surgery under total intravenous anesthesia: a sequential trial of monitoring neurological function in 30 patients]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the maximum dose of continuous mivacurium infusion for intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) and observe the adverse reactions during thyroid surgery under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA).

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing IONM during thyroid surgery received continuous infusion of mivacurium at the initial rate of 14.97 μg · kg^-1 · min^-1. The infusion rate was adjusted in the next patient based on the response of the previous patient in IONM. The depth of anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil during the surgery. The EC₅₀ and 95%CI of mivacurium were calculated with Brownlee's up- and-down sequential method. During the operation, body movement and skin flushing of patient was monitored, and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HP) were recorded immediately (T₀) and at 5 min (T₁) after injection of muscle relaxant for anesthesia induction, immediately (T₂) and at 10 min (T₃) and 20 min (T₄) after initiation of intraoperative infusion of the muscle relaxant.

RESULTS

The EC₅₀ for continuous infusion of mivacurium without affecting IONM was 18.9 μg · kg^-1 · min^-1(95%CI: 17.3-20.5 μg · kg^-1 · min^-1) during thyroid surgery under TIVA. One patient (3.3%) developed transient facial skin redness after induction. Intubation difficulties or body motions occurred in none of the patients during the surgery. Pair-wise comparison showed no significant variations in MAP or HR of the patients at the 5 time points (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing thyroid surgery under TIVA, the EC₅₀ for continuous infusion of mivacurium is 18.9 μg · kg^-1 · min^-1 (95%CI: 17.3-20.5 μg · kg^-1 · min^-1), which does not affect IONM or causes serious adverse reactions during the operation.

An approach to using pharmacokinetics and electroencephalography for propofol anesthesia for surgery in infants

Safe and effective techniques for propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in infants are not well imbedded into clinical practice, resulting in practitioner unfamiliarity and potential for over- and under-dosing. In this education article, we describe our approach to TIVA dosing in infants and toddlers (birth to 36 months) which combines the use of pharmacokinetic models with EEG multi-parameter analysis. Pharmacokinetic models describe propofol and remifentanil effect site concentrations (Ce) over time in different age groups for a given dosing regimen. These models display substantial biological variability between individuals within age groups, impeding their application to clinical practice. Nevertheless, they reveal that younger infants require a higher propofol loading dose, a lower propofol maintenance dose, and a higher remifentanil dose compared with older infants. Proprietary EEG indices (eg, Bispectral Index) can serve as a biomarker of propofol Ce in adults and children to guide dosing to the individual patient; however, they are not recommended for infants as their validity remains uncertain this population. In our experience, EEG waveforms and processed parameters can reflect propofol Ce in infants, reflected by spectral edge frequency (SEF), density spectral array (DSA), and waveform patterns. In our practice, we use a "lookup table" of age-based dosing regimens or target-controlled infusion (TCI) based on the pharmacokinetic models to deliver a target propofol Ce and co-administer remifentanil and/or regional technique for analgesia. We analyze Electroencephalogram (EEG) waveforms, SEF, and DSA to adjust the propofol dose or TCI target concentration to the individual infant. EEG analysis mitigates against biological variability inherent in the pharmacokinetic models and has improved our experience with TIVA for infants.

A Universal Pharmacokinetic Model for Dexmedetomidine in Children and Adults

A universal pharmacokinetic model was developed from pooled paediatric and adult data (40.6 postmenstrual weeks, 70.8 years, 3.1-152 kg). A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination was superior to a two-compartment model to describe these pooled dexmedetomidine data. Population parameter estimates (population parameter variability%) were clearance (CL) 0.9 L/min/70 kg (36); intercompartmental clearances (Q2) 1.68 L/min/70 kg (63); Q3 0.62 L/min/70 kg (90); volume of distribution in the central compartment (V1) 25.2 L/70 kg (103.9); rapidly equilibrating peripheral compartment (V2) 34.4 L/70 kg (41.8); slow equilibrating peripheral compartment (V3) 65.4 L/70 kg (62). Obesity was best described by fat-free mass for clearances and normal fat mass for volumes with a factor for fat mass (FfatV) of 0.293. Models describing dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics in adults can be applied to children by accounting for size (allometry) and age (maturation). This universal dexmedetomidine model is applicable to a broad range of ages and weights: neonates through to obese adults. Lean body weight is a better size descriptor for dexmedetomidine clearance than total body weight. This parameter set could be programmed into target-controlled infusion pumps for use in a broad population.

Recent advances in the technology of anesthesia

The practice of anesthesiology is inextricably dependent upon technology. Anesthetics were first made possible, then increasingly safe, and now more scalable and efficient in part due to advances in monitoring and delivery technology. Herein, we discuss salient advances of the last three years in the technology of anesthesiology.

Consumer technology and telemedicine have exploded onto the scene of outpatient medicine, and perioperative management is no exception. Preoperative evaluations have been done via teleconference, and copious consumer-generated health data is available. Regulators have acknowledged the vast potential found in the transfer of consumer technology to medical practice, but issues of privacy, data ownership/security, and validity remain.

Inside the operating suite, monitoring has become less invasive, and clinical decision support systems are common. These technologies are susceptible to the “garbage in, garbage out” conundrum plaguing artificial intelligence, but they will improve as network latency decreases. Automation looms large in the future of anesthesiology as closed-loop anesthesia delivery systems are being tested in combination (moving toward a comprehensive system).

Moving forward, consumer health companies will search for applications of their technology, and loosely regulated health markets will see earlier adoption of next-generation technology. Innovations coming to anesthesia will need to account for human factors as the anesthesia provider is increasingly considered a component of the patient care apparatus.

Neuromuscular-blocking agents for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients (0-12 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit of using neuromuscular-blocking agents to facilitate tracheal intubation in pediatric patients remains unclear due to variations in design, treatments, and results among trials. By combining the available evidence, we aimed to establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalized across various populations, settings, and treatments.

METHODS

A systematic search for randomized controlled trials, related to the use of neuromuscular-blocking agents for tracheal intubation in American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-II participants (0-12 years), was performed. We considered all randomized controlled trials that studied whether intubation conditions and hemodynamics obtained by using neuromuscular-blocking agents were equivalent to those that were achieved without neuromuscular-blocking agents. We combined the outcomes in Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan, The Cochrane Collaboration) by pairwise random-effects meta-analysis using a risk ratio (RR) for intubation conditions and mean difference for hemodynamic values (mean [95% Confidence Intervals]). Heterogeneity among trials was explored using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 22 eligible randomized controlled trials with 1651 participants. Overall, the use of a neuromuscular-blocking agent was associated with a clinically important increase in the likelihood of both excellent (RR = 1.41 [1.19-1.68], I²  = 76%) and acceptable (RR = 1.13 [1.07-1.19], I²  = 68%) intubating conditions. There is strong evidence that both unacceptable intubation conditions (RR = 0.35 [0.22-0.46], I²  = 23%) and failed first intubation attempts (RR = 0.25 [0.14-0.42], I²  = 0%) were less likely to occur when a neuromuscular-blocking agent was used compared with when it was not. Higher systolic or mean arterial pressures (mean difference = 13.3 [9.1-17.5] mm Hg, I²  = 69%) and heart rates (mean difference = 15.9 [11.0-20.8] beats/min, I²  = 75%) as well as a lower incidence of arrhythmias were observed when tracheal intubation was facilitated by neuromuscular-blocking agents.

CONCLUSION

The use of a neuromuscular-blocking agent during light-to-moderate depth of anesthesia can improve the quality as well as the success rate of tracheal intubation and is associated with better hemodynamic stability during induction of anesthesia.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations of general anesthesia in pediatric subjects

Introduction: The target concentration strategy uses PKPD information for dose determination. Models have also quantified exposure-response relationships, improved understanding of developmental pharmacokinetics, rationalized dose prescription, provided insight into the importance of covariate information, explained drug interactions and driven decision-making and learning during drug development.Areas covered: The prime PKPD consideration is parameter estimation and quantification of variability. The main sources of variability in children are age (maturation) and weight (size). Model use is mostly confined to pharmacokinetics, partly because anesthesia effect models in the young are imprecise. Exploration of PK and PD covariates and their variability hold potential to better individualize treatment.Expert opinion: The ability to model drugs using computer-based technology is hindered because covariate data required to individualize treatment using these programs remain lacking. Target concentration intervention strategies remain incomplete because covariate information that might better predict individualization of dose is absent. Pharmacogenomics appear a valuable area for investigation for pharmacodynamics and pharmacodynamics. Effect measures in the very young are imprecise. Assessment of the analgesic component of anesthesia is crude. While neuromuscular monitoring is satisfactory, depth of anaesthesia EEG interpretation is inadequate. Closed loop anesthesia is possible with better understanding of EEG changes.

Volatiles or TIVA: Which is the standard of care for pediatric airway procedures? A pro-con discussion

Anesthesia for pediatric airway procedures constitutes a true art form that requires training and experience. Communication between anesthetist and surgeon to establish procedure goals is essential in determining the most appropriate anesthetic management. But does the mode of anesthesia have an impact? Traditionally, inhalational anesthesia was the most common anesthesia technique used during airway surgery. Introduction of agents used for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) such as propofol, short-acting opioids, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine has driven change in practice. Ongoing debates abound as to the advantages and disadvantages of volatile-based anesthesia versus TIVA. This pro-con discussion examines both volatiles and TIVA, from the perspective of effectiveness, safety, cost, and environmental impact, in an endeavor to justify which technique is the best specifically for pediatric airway procedures.