Off-label Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Cardiac Surgical Bleeding

Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia

OBJECTIVES

To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis.

DESIGN

Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis.

SETTING

Virginia hospitals performing HTx.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Retrospective Comparison of Recombinant Activated Factor VII Versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Cardiac Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidences of postoperative thrombotic complications, transfusion of blood products, and chest tube output in congenital cardiac surgical patients who received either recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC).

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study.

SETTING

Patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium databases, as well as from manual chart review. Adjusted p values were obtained from multivariate regression using age (days), surgeon (number), cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes), and need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (yes/no). A total of 55 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group, and 89 in the rFVIIa group. The median dose of rFVIIa was 77 mcg/kg (46-88), and the median dose of 4F-PCC was 31 IU/kg (24-43). The incidences of thrombotic complications were 8% in the 4F-PCC group and 30% in the rFVIIa group (adjusted p = 0.023). No difference was reported between the groups regarding chest tube output on days 1 and 2 or transfusion of blood products. Using a sensitivity analysis with propensity matching, the incidence of thrombosis was 10% in the 4F-PCC group (n = 38), and 31% in the rFVIIa group (n = 39) (p = 0.036). No difference was reported in terms of bleeding or transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggested that the administration of rFVIIa was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic complications when compared to 4F-PCC, without benefits in terms of bleeding and transfusions.

Recombinant Activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) for Bleeding After Thoracic Aortic Surgery: A Scoping Review of Current Literature

BACKGROUND

Bleeding after surgery on the thoracic aorta is a frequent complication, and can be associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) was developed initially for treating patients with hemophilia; however, it has been used increasingly "off-label" to achieve hemostasis after thoracic aortic procedures.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to present the available literature on the role of rFVIIa in the management of refractory postoperative bleeding after thoracic aortic surgery.

METHODS/RESULTS

An electronic database search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar in June 2023. The authors included studies that reported the use of rFVIIa in patients undergoing surgical repair of ascending or descending aortic aneurysm or dissection. Single-case reports were excluded. Ten publications with a pooled number of 649 patients (319 patients received rFVIIa and 330 in the control groups) were identified: 3 case series, 6 retrospective studies, and 1 nonrandomized clinical trial. All studies reported the potential role of rFVIIa in correcting coagulopathy and reducing postoperative blood loss in this group of patients. Overall, there was not enough evidence to suggest that rFVIIa was associated with higher rates of thromboembolic complications or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Limited evidence suggests that rFVIIa may be useful in managing postoperative refractory bleeding in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery. However, the impact of rFVIIa on thromboembolic complications and mortality rates remains unclear.