Comparison of Anesthetic Management and Outcomes in Patients Having Either Transnasal or Transoral Endoscopic Odontoid Process Surgery

Clinical effect and prognosis of transoral or endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: A retrospective cohort study

Background

The clinical applications of endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations are limited. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect and prognostic factors of traditional and endoscope-assisted transoral release, as well as posterior reduction and fixation, in treating irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective study on 59 patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation who underwent either traditional or endoscope-assisted transoral release, posterior fixation, and fusion between January 2018 and January 2023. Various data, including surgical time, blood loss, drainage volume, oral intake, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status (assessed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] score and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), were recorded. Imaging parameters such as the atlantodontoid interval (ADI), space available for the cord (SAC), and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were analyzed and compared. In addition, the correlation between ODI, JOA and patient age, course of disease, preoperative ADI, SAC and CMA were analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were observed in age, sex, BMI, preoperative ADI, preoperative SAC, or preoperative CMA. All patients achieved excellent reduction with no significant differences between the two groups. Patients in the endoscopic group experienced significantly reduced blood loss, earlier oral intake, and shorter hospital stays compared to those in the open group (P < 0.05). The ODI and JOA scores improved significantly in both groups at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Postoperative ADI, SAC, and CMA values in both groups were significantly better than preoperative values (P < 0.001). The patient age, course of disease and the preoperative ADI were negatively correlated with the postoperative ODI and the JOA improvement ratio (P < 0.01), and the preoperative SAC and preoperative CMA had positive correlations with the postoperative ODI and the JOA improvement ratio (P < 0.01) at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

Patient age, course of disease, preoperative ADI, SAC and CMA are correlated with the operative prognosis of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. The endoscope-assisted transoral approach, compared to the traditional transoral approach, is minimally invasive, resulting in less operative blood loss, earlier oral intake and a shorter length of hospital stay, which could be offered as an alternative for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Combined transnasal/transoral endoscopic odontoid resection in pediatric patients: Otolaryngologic considerations to airway management, endoscopic exposure, and complication management

BACKGROUND

Anterior brainstem compression from odontoid pathology can occur in patients with craniocervical disorders. Occasionally, odontoid resection is required. In adults, odontoid resection has evolved toward transnasal-only endoscopic techniques. Pediatric patients, however, pose special challenges due to abnormal anatomy and smaller working spaces. A combined transnasal/transoral endoscopic odontoid resection (TN/TO EOR) can overcome this limitation. We present a case series with emphasis on otolaryngologic considerations to airway management, endoscopic approach, and management of complications.

METHODS

A single center, retrospective review of patients aged ≤18 undergoing combined transnasal/transoral endoscopic odontoid resection between 2011 and 2022 is presented. Clinical and surgical variables consisting of diagnosis, intubation approach, other airway procedures performed, symptoms, complications, blood loss, and time to extubation, return to oral feeding, and discharge were recorded.

RESULTS

19 patients aged 10.7 ± 4.3 (range: 3-18) were included. Diagnoses included congenital syndrome (n = 6), complex Chiari malformation (n = 11), and congenital syndrome with Chiari (n = 2). Patients commonly required indirect videolaryngoscopy for intubation, with or without fiberoptic endoscopic assistance. Seven underwent adenoidectomy, two underwent adenotonsillectomy, and one required adenoidectomy with midline palatal split and inferior turbinate outfracture. Four patients had undergone prior adenotonsillectomy. Presenting symptoms included extremity weakness (n = 9), dysphagia (n = 8), velopharyngeal insufficiency (n = 4), sleep disturbance (n = 5), and headaches (n = 8). Four patients had complications, including one re-operation for residual odontoid, one flap dehiscence, one cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repaired primarily, and one complicated course including temporary spinal cord injury. Blood loss was 50 ± 43 cc (median 30). Time to extubation was 1.1 ± 2.1 days (median 0; one patient underwent tracheotomy for respiratory failure), time to oral intake was 2.9 ± 3.7 days (median 1), and time to discharge was 7.1 ± 7.5 days (median 4).

CONCLUSIONS

A combined transnasal/transoral approach can be successfully used in pediatric patients to overcome difficult endoscopic access. Although complications exist, early extubation and return to oral intake occurs in the vast majority of cases. For pediatric TN/TO EOR, the otolaryngologist plays a key role in preoperative assessment, airway management, endoscopic exposure, and complication management.

Anterior release without odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral or endoscopic transnasal?

PURPOSE

To compare transoral and endoscopic transnasal anterior release without odontoidectomy and posterior reduction and fixation to treat irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

METHODS

From June 2006 to January 2017, 35 consecutive patients with IAAD underwent transoral (Tr-Oral group) or endoscopic transnasal (Tr-Nasal group) release and posterior fixation and fusion in our department. Clinical neurological recovery (Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score) and radiological reduction parameters including atlantodontoid interval (ADI), space available for the cord (SAC) and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were analyzed and compared. The operation duration, blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stay and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

All 35 patients (18 and 17 patients in the Tr-Oral and Tr-Nasal groups, respectively) were followed up for a mean of 36.4 months (range, 21-60 months). All patients achieved excellent anatomical reduction and clinical neurological recovery, with no significant differences between the two groups. The JOA score, ADI, SAC and CMA were not significantly different between the two groups at various postoperative points. Although the Tr-Oral group had shorter operation time and less blood loss than the Tr-Nasal group, the Tr-Nasal group tended to have a significantly shorter hospital/ICU stay, earlier extubation and earlier oral intake than the Tr-Oral group.

CONCLUSION

The transoral and endoscopic transnasal approaches can achieve equivalent release and reduction effects when treating IAAD. Compared to the transoral approach, the endoscopic transnasal route is less invasive with earlier extubation and oral intake, shorter hospital/ICU stays and lower medical costs, which is conducive to enhanced recovery after surgery.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Odontoidectomy for basilar invagination and craniovertebral junction pathology traditionally has been performed using a transoral route. However, the endoscopic endonasal approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction may offer safer and more effective access when compared with transoral approaches. The objective of this study is to review the surgical outcomes and complications associated with endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of all adult patients who underwent an endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy at a single tertiary care center between January 2011 and May 2019.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy were included. The median age at admission was 67 years (range: 33-84 years) and 65% of the patients were female. One patient (1/17, 6%) had vertebral artery injury, which had to be coiled with no neurologic deficits, and 4 patients (4/17, 24%) had intraoperative CSF leaks with no postoperative leak. Fourteen (14/17, 82%) patients were extubated by postoperative day 1. Three patients (3/17, 18%) developed postoperative sinus infections and required antibiotics. Eight patients (8/17, 47%) developed transient postoperative dysphagia. One patient (1/17, 6%) had postoperative epistaxis and 1 patient (1/17, 6%) had postoperative lower cranial nerve symptoms. The median length of hospital stay was 13 days (range: 2-44 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the transoral approach has been the traditional route for anterior decompression of the craniovertebral junction, endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy is a feasible and well-tolerated procedure associated with satisfactory patient outcomes and low morbidity.

Neuroanesthesiology Update

This review provides a summary of the literature pertaining to the perioperative care of neurosurgical patients and patients with neurological diseases. General topics addressed in this review include general neurosurgical considerations, stroke, traumatic brain injury, neuromonitoring, neurotoxicity, and perioperative disorders of cognitive function.

Quality of Life After Combined Endonasal Endoscopic Odontoidectomy and Posterior Suboccipital Decompression and Fusion

BACKGROUND

Basilar invagination can result from systemic diseases that can weaken structural integrity of the craniocervical junction. Definitive treatment often requires ventral decompression and posterior decompression and fusion. Endonasal odontoidectomy is a relatively new minimal access procedure; quality of life (QOL) after this procedure has not been reported.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive database of endonasal odontoidectomy cases and identified patients having posterior decompression and fusion. Two QOL questionnaires were administered postoperatively: Sino-Nasal Outcome Test and 36-Item Short Form Survey. Comparisons with other endonasal or Chiari procedures were performed.

RESULTS

The study comprised 14 patients; 79% had Chiari malformation in addition to basilar invagination. Mean follow-up was 17.2 months. Symptomatic improvement occurred in 78.6% after surgery. Average postoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores were 39.2 ± 17.93, with worst scores in areas related to fatigue and sleep patterns but not nasal function. 36-Item Short Form Survey scores were lower in areas of physical function and general health but better for emotional health and pain. Compared with patients undergoing Chiari malformation surgery without endonasal odontoid resection or fusion, patients undergoing odontoidectomy had higher QOL in areas of role emotional, emotional well-being, and pain but worse QOL in general health and role physical.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing posterior decompression and fusion with endonasal odontoidectomy do well after surgery with respect to nasal function and emotional health. Patients who also have severe basilar invagination associated with systemic diseases demonstrate reduced QOL after surgery in areas of physical function and sleep leading to fatigue, irritability, and concentration difficulty, likely related to their systemic disease.