1
|
Fiore G, Porto E, Pluderi M, Ampollini AM, Borsa S, Legnani FG, Giampiccolo D, Miserocchi A, Bertani GA, DiMeco F, Locatelli M. Prevention of Post-Operative Pain after Elective Brain Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59050831. [PMID: 37241063 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective: To analyze the effects of several drug for pain prevention in adults undergoing craniotomy for elective brain surgery. Material and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The inclusion criteria were limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for preventing post-operative pain in adults (aged 18 years or older) undergoing craniotomies. The main outcome measures were represented by the mean differences in validated pain intensity scales administered at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h post-operatively. The pooled estimates were calculated using random forest models. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB2 revised tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE guidelines. Results: In total, 3359 records were identified through databases and registers' searching. After study selection, 29 studies and 2376 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall risk of bias was low in 78.5% of the studies included. The pooled estimates of the following drug classes were provided: NSAIDs, acetaminophen, local anesthetics and steroids for scalp infiltration and scalp block, gabapentinoids and agonists of adrenal receptors. Conclusions: High-certainty evidence suggests that NSAIDs and acetaminophen may have a moderate effect on reducing post-craniotomy pain 24 h after surgery compared to control and that ropivacaine scalp block may have a bigger impact on reducing post-craniotomy pain 6 h after surgery compared to control. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that NSAIDs may have a more remarkable effect on reducing post-craniotomy pain 12 h after surgery compared to control. No moderate-to-high-certainty evidence indicates effective treatments for post-craniotomy pain prevention 48 h after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Fiore
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Edoardo Porto
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Mauro Pluderi
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Borsa
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Davide Giampiccolo
- Institute of Neuroscience, Cleveland Clinic London, Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7HY, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Anna Miserocchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Giulio Andrea Bertani
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco DiMeco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Marco Locatelli
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2023; 35:80-85. [PMID: 34469414 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative opioids are problematic following craniotomy as they can impede neurological examination because of excessive sedation and mask surgical complications. Multimodal anesthetic techniques including nerve blocks have been used successfully to deliver opioid-free anesthesia in other surgical populations; however, no clinical data evaluating opioid-free anesthesia for craniotomy exists within the current body of literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six prospectively identified patients underwent supratentorial craniotomy at Emory University Hospital using a multimodal opioid-free anesthetic (OFA) technique consisting of preoperative scalp block, dexmedetomidine and intravenous acetaminophen. These opioid-free patients were matched by age, sex, incision length, and incision location to 18 retrospectively identified control patients who underwent craniotomy using conventional, opioid-based anesthetic techniques. Postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were compared and analyzed for noninferiority. RESULTS Noninferiority of the OFA technique was demonstrated for opioid consumption at all measured intervals from postanesthesia care unit arrival to 24 hours postoperatively. Noninferiority was also demonstrated with respect to average postoperative pain scores from 0 to 12 hours, 0 to 24 hours, as well as length of postanesthesia care unit stay. Noninferiority was not shown for time to first rescue opioid postoperatively, pain scores for the 12 to 24 hours postoperative period, or time to emergence from anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of an OFA technique for patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy and suggests that larger prospective randomized controlled trials are indicated to examine the role of multimodal anesthetic techniques for craniotomy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yin F, Ma W, Liu Q, Xiong LL, Wang TH, Li Q, Liu F. Efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen (2 g/day) for reducing opioid consumption in Chinese adults after elective orthopedic surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:909572. [PMID: 35935863 PMCID: PMC9355325 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.909572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acetaminophen is an important component of a multimodal analgesia strategy to reduce opioid consumption and pain intensity after an orthopedic surgery. The opioid-sparing efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen has been established at a daily dose of 4 g. However, it is still unclear for the daily dose of 2 g of acetaminophen, which is recommended by the China Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation, in terms of its efficacy and safety.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen at a daily dose of 2 g for reducing opioid consumption and pain intensity after orthopedic surgery.Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 235 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to receive intravenous acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 h or placebo. Postoperative morphine consumption, pain intensity at rest and during movement, and adverse events were analysed.Results: For the mean (standard deviation) morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery, intravenous acetaminophen was superior to placebo both in the modified intention-to-treat analysis [8.7 (7.7) mg vs. 11.2 (9.2) mg] in the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, respectively. Difference in means: 2.5 mg; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 4.61; p = 0.030), and in the per-protocol analysis (8.3 (7.0) mg and 11.7 (9.9) mg in the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, respectively. Difference in means: 3.4 mg; 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 5.77; p = 0.005). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of pain intensity and adverse events.Conclusion: Our results suggest that intravenous acetaminophen at a daily dose of 2 g can reduce morphine consumption by Chinese adults within the first 24 h after orthopedic surgery, but the extent of reduction is not clinically relevant.Clinical Trial Registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02811991].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Yin
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Wei Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chenzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Chenzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Liu-Lin Xiong
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ting-Hua Wang
- Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Institute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Qian Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- *Correspondence: Qian Li, ; Fei Liu,
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- *Correspondence: Qian Li, ; Fei Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shlobin NA, Rosenow JM. Nonopioid Postoperative Pain Management in Neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2022; 33:261-273. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Aurilio C, Pace MC, Sansone P, Giaccari LG, Coppolino F, Pota V, Barbarisi M. Multimodal analgesia in neurosurgery: a narrative review. Postgrad Med 2021; 134:267-276. [PMID: 34872428 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2021.2015221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Pain following brain surgery can compromise the result of surgery. Several pharmacological interventions have been used to prevent postoperative pain in adults undergoing brain surgery. Pain following craniotomy is considered to be moderate to severe during the first two post-operative days. Opioids have been historically the mainstay and are the current prominent strategy for pain treatment. They produce analgesia but may alter respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neuroendocrine functions. All these side effects may affect the normal postoperative course of craniotomy by affecting neurological function and increasing intracranial pressure. Therefore, their use in neurosurgery is limited, and opioids are used in case of strict necessity or as rescue medication. In addition to opioids, drugs with differing mechanisms of actions target pain pathways, resulting in additive and/or synergistic effects. Some of these agents include acetaminophen/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), alpha-2 agonists, NMDA receptor antagonists, gabapentinoids, and local anesthesia techniques. Multimodal analgesia should be a balance between adequate analgesia and less drug-induced sedation, respiratory depression, hypercapnia, nausea, and vomiting, which may increase intracranial pressure. Non-opioid analgesics can be an useful pharmacological alternative in multimodal regimes to manage post-craniotomy pain. This narrative review aims to outline the current clinical evidence of multimodal analgesia for post craniotomy pain control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Aurilio
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Caterina Pace
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Sansone
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Gregorio Giaccari
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Coppolino
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pota
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Manlio Barbarisi
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim DD, Ramirez MF, Cata JP. Opioid use, misuse, and abuse: a narrative review about interventions to reduce opioid consumption and related adverse events in the perioperative setting. Minerva Anestesiol 2021; 88:300-307. [PMID: 34636223 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.21.15937-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Opioids remain the most potent and predictable drug available for perioperative analgesia and moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. However, their efficacy has been questioned in other clinical settings. Moreover, opioids are associated with a wide variety of dose-dependent adverse events, limiting their use. The indiscriminate prescription of opioids has fueled the so-called "opioid epidemic" in the United States and other developed countries. Thus, there has been a significant effort to develop strategies to curtail their unnecessary prescription. Here, we summarize the history, current trends, and new directions in perioperative opioid prescription in an unbiased manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria F Ramirez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA - .,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy of an opioid-sparing analgesic protocol in pain control after less invasive cranial neurosurgery. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e948. [PMID: 34368598 PMCID: PMC8341305 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
An opioid-sparing protocol for postoperative pain management in less invasive cranial neurosurgery significantly lowered opioid usage while reducing pain scores. Introduction: Opioid overuse in postoperative patients is a worrisome trend, and potential alternatives exist which warrant investigation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in treating postoperative cranial surgery pain has been hampered by concern for inadequate pain control and increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. A safe and effective alternative to opioid-based pain management is critical to improving postoperative care. Objective: The objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether an NSAID-based opioid-sparing pain management protocol (OSP) is effective in analgesic control of less invasive cranial surgery patients at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperatively. Secondary aims included investigating differences in hemorrhagic complications. Methods: Five hundred sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent cranial surgery before and after implementation of the celecoxib-based OSP were eligible. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in each cohort. Results: The opioid-sparing cohort had lower pain scores at 6 hours (3.45 vs 4.19, P = 0.036), 12 hours (3.21 vs 4.00, P = 0.006), and 24 hours (2.90 vs 3.59, P = 0.010). Rates of postoperative hemorrhage were not significantly different (5% intervention vs 8% control, P = 0.527). The opioid-sparing pain management protocol provided comparable or better pain control in the first 24 hours after less invasive cranial surgery. Hemorrhage rates did not change with the use of an NSAID-based OSP. Conclusion: An effective alternative to the current standard opioid-based pain management is feasible for less invasive cranial surgery. Determinations of hemorrhage risk and more complex cranial surgery will require larger prospective randomized trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Diclofenac Is Superior to Paracetamol in Postoperative Pain Scores and Analgesic Consumption in Supratentorial Craniotomy With No Difference in Platelet and Clot Function: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2021; 34:321-326. [PMID: 33734127 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in neurosurgery remains controversial because of potential risk of hematoma formation secondary to platelet dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of diclofenac compared with paracetamol for the management of postcraniotomy pain. METHODS In all, 110 adult patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors were randomized to receive either intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg) or intravenous diclofenac sodium (1.5 mg/kg) 30 minutes before the end of surgery and postoperatively at 12-hour intervals up to 48 hours. The analgesic efficacy of diclofenac and paracetamol was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. We also examined the need for rescue analgesia, coagulation profiles using a Sonoclot analyzer, and incidence of intracranial hematoma formation. RESULTS At 24 hours postsurgery, NRS scores were lower in group D than in group P; median (interquartile range) and mean rank NRS score in group D was 3.00 (1.0), 43.71, respectively, compared with 3.00 (1.0), 59.29 in group P (P=0.004). Patients in group P received more rescue analgesia than those in group D. Coagulation profiles were similar between groups at 24 hours. Activated clotting time was longer in group D (128.76±12.61 s) than in group P (123.84±09.77 s; P=0.03) at 48 hours, although remained within normal limits in both groups; clot rate and platelet function were similar at 48 hours. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative tumor bed hematoma. CONCLUSION Compared with paracetamol, diclofenac sodium provided more effective postoperative analgesia at 24 hours with no evidence of adverse effects on coagulation profiles in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors.
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu Y, Vagnerova K. Anesthetic Management of Asleep and Awake Craniotomy for Supratentorial Tumor Resection. Anesthesiol Clin 2021; 39:71-92. [PMID: 33563387 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Understanding how anesthetics impact cerebral physiology, cerebral blood flow, brain metabolism, brain relaxation, and neurologic recovery is crucial for optimizing anesthesia during supratentorial craniotomies. Intraoperative goals for supratentorial tumor resection include maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral autoregulation, optimizing surgical access and neuromonitoring, and facilitating rapid, cooperative emergence. Evidence-based studies increasingly expand the impact of anesthetic care beyond immediate perioperative care into both preoperative optimization and minimizing postoperative consequences. New evidence is needed for neuroanesthesia's role in neurooncology, in preventing conversion from acute to chronic pain, and in decreasing risk of intraoperative ischemia and postoperative delirium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UH2, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Kamila Vagnerova
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UH2, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patel KS, Laiwalla AN, DiCesare JAT, Garrett MC, Wang AC. Subcutaneous sumatriptan: association with decreases in postoperative pain and opioid use after elective cranial surgery. J Neurosurg 2021; 134:401-409. [PMID: 31899878 DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.jns192503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sumatriptan, a serotonin receptor agonist, has been used in the management of primary headache disorders and has been shown to affect trigeminal dural afferents. There is limited literature on the safety and efficacy of sumatriptan for postcraniotomy pain management. This study aimed to identify whether subcutaneous sumatriptan is a safe and efficacious pain management strategy after elective craniotomy. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent supratentorial or suboccipital craniotomy between 2016 and 2019 that was performed by a single provider at a single institution to identify patients given subcutaneous sumatriptan in the postoperative period. Pain scores and intravenous and oral opioid use were compared in patients with (n = 15) and without (n = 45) sumatriptan administration. RESULTS Patients with and without sumatriptan administration had no significant differences in baseline characteristics or surgery type. There were no sumatriptan-related complications. The average pain score decreased from 3.9 to 1.3 within 1 hour after sumatriptan administration (p = 0.014). In both adult and pediatric patients there was decreased postoperative pain (adults: pain score of 1.1 vs 7.1, p < 0.001; pediatric: 1.1 vs 3.9, p = 0.007) within the first 48 hours. There were decreases in intravenous opioid use, length of intravenous opioid use, maximum dose of intravenous opioid used, oral opioid use, length of oral opioid use, and maximum dose of oral opioid used in both adult and pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS The authors identified subcutaneous sumatriptan as a safe and efficacious tool for postoperative pain management after craniotomy. Large multicenter randomized controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the specific role of sumatriptan in postoperative pain management after craniotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal S Patel
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Azim N Laiwalla
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Jasmine A T DiCesare
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | | | - Anthony C Wang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tompkins DM, DiPasquale A, Segovia M, Cohn SM. Review of Intravenous Acetaminophen for Analgesia in the Postoperative Setting. Am Surg 2021; 87:1809-1822. [PMID: 33522265 DOI: 10.1177/0003134821989056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acetaminophen is a non-opioid analgesic commonly utilized for pain control after several types of surgical procedures. METHODS This scoping primary literature review provides recommendations for intravenous (IV) acetaminophen use based on type of surgery. RESULTS Intravenous acetaminophen has been widely studied for postoperative pain control and has been compared to other agents such as NSAIDs, opioids, oral/rectal acetaminophen, and placebo. Some of the procedures studied include abdominal, gynecologic, orthopedic, neurosurgical, cardiac, renal, and genitourinary surgeries. Results of these studies have been conflicting and largely have not shown consistent clinical benefit. CONCLUSION Overall, findings from this review did not support the notion that IV acetaminophen has significant efficacy for postoperative analgesia. Given the limited clinical benefit of IV acetaminophen, especially when compared to the oral or rectal formulations, use is generally not justifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Tompkins
- Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, 3673Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Arielle DiPasquale
- Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Michelle Segovia
- Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Stephen M Cohn
- Department of Surgery, 3673Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) for Postcraniotomy Pain; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials". World Neurosurg 2020; 140:458-459. [PMID: 32797975 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
13
|
Effect of Preoperative Patient Education on Opioid Consumption and Well-Being in Breast Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145:316e-323e. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
14
|
Abstract
This review is intended to provide a summary of the literature pertaining to the perioperative care of neurosurgical patients and patients with neurological diseases. General topics addressed in this review include general neurosurgical considerations, stroke, neurological monitoring, and perioperative disorders of cognitive function.
Collapse
|
15
|
Iturri F, Valencia L, Honorato C, Martínez A, Valero R, Fàbregas N. Narrative review of acute post-craniotomy pain. Concept and strategies for prevention and treatment of pain. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 67:90-98. [PMID: 31761317 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this narrative review is to confirm that acute pain after craniotomy is frequent and presents with moderate to severe intensity. We also highlight the importance of not only treating post-craniotomy pain, but also of preventing it in order to reduce the incidence of chronic pain. Physicians should be aware that conventional postoperative analgesics (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, paracetamol, cyclooxygenase inhibitors 2, opioids) are not the only options available. Performing a scalp block prior to surgical incision or after surgery, the use of intraoperative dexmedetomidine, and the perioperative administration of pregabalin are just some alternatives that are gaining ground. The management of post-craniotomy pain should be based on perioperative multimodal analgesia in the framework of an "enhaced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Iturri
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, España
| | - L Valencia
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España.
| | - C Honorato
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - A Martínez
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - R Valero
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, España
| | - N Fàbregas
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Galvin IM, Levy R, Day AG, Gilron I. Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults following brain surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD011931. [PMID: 31747720 PMCID: PMC6867906 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011931.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain following brain surgery can compromise recovery. Several pharmacological interventions have been used to prevent pain after craniotomy; however, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding which interventions are most effective. OBJECTIVES The objectives are to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults undergoing brain surgery; compare them in terms of additional analgesic requirements, incidence of chronic headache, sedative effects, length of hospital stay and adverse events; and determine whether these characteristics are different for certain subgroups. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and two trial registries together with reference checking and citation searching on 28th of November 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA We included blinded and non-blinded, randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults undergoing neurosurgery, which had at least one validated pain score outcome measure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We calculated mean differences for the primary outcome of pain intensity; any pain scores reported on a 0 to 100 scale were converted to a 0 to 10 scale. MAIN RESULTS We included 42 completed studies (3548 participants) and identified one ongoing study. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) reduce pain up to 24 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD -1.16, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.76; 12 hours, MD -0.62, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.14; 24 hours, MD -0.66, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.13; 6 studies, 742 participants; all high-quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (additional analgesic requirements: MD 1.29 mg, 95% CI -5.0 to 2.46, 4 studies, 265 participants; nausea and vomiting RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.94, 2 studies, 345 participants; both low-quality evidence). Dexmedetomidine reduces pain up to 12 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD -0.89, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.51, moderate-quality evidence; 12 hours, MD -0.81, 95% CI -1.21 to -0.42, low-quality evidence). It did not show efficacy at 24 hours (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.16; 2 studies, 128 participants; low-quality evidence). Dexmedetomidine may decrease additional analgesic requirements (MD -21.36 mg, 95% CI -34.63 to -8.1 mg, 2 studies, 128 participants, low-quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting RR -0.43, 95% CI 0.06 to 3.08, 3 studies, 261 participants; hypotension RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.28, 3 studies, 184 participants; both low-quality evidence). Scalp blocks may reduce pain up to 48 hours (0 to 6 hours, MD -0.98, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.3, 10 studies, 414 participants; 12 hours, MD -0.95, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.37, 8 studies, 294 participants; 24 hours, MD -0.78, 95% CI -1.52 to -0.05, 9 studies, 433 participants, all low-quality evidence; 48 hours, MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.57 to -0.11, 4 studies, 135 participants, very low-quality evidence. When studies with high risk of bias were excluded, significance remained at 12 hours only. Scalp blocks may decrease additional analgesia requirements (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.97 to -0.25, 7 studies, 314 participants). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.32, 4 studies, 165 participants, very low-quality evidence). Scalp Infiltration may reduce pain postoperatively but efficacy was inconsistent, with a significant effect at 12 and 48 hours only (12 hours, MD -0.71, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.08, 7 studies, 309 participants, low-quality evidence; 48 hours, MD - 1.09, 95% CI -2.13 to - 0.06, 3 studies, 128 participants, moderate-quality evidence). No benefit was observed at other times (0 to 6 hours, MD -0.64, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.00, 9 studies, 475 participants, moderate-quality evidence; 24 hours, MD -0.39, 95% CI -1.06 to 0.27,6 studies, 260 participants, low-quality evidence. Scalp infiltration may reduce additional analgesia requirements MD -9.56 mg, 95% CI -15.64 to -3.49, 6 studies, 345 participants, very low-quality evidence). When studies with high risk of bias were excluded, scalp infiltration lost the pain benefit at 12 hours and effects on additional analgesia requirements, but retained the pain-reducing benefit at 48 hours (MD -0.56, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.32, 2 studies, 100 participants, very low-quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (nausea and vomiting, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.41, 4 studies, 318 participants, low-quality evidence). Pregabalin or gabapentin may reduce pain up to 6 hours (2 studies, 202 participants), MD -1.15,95% CI -1.66 to -0.6, 2 studies, 202 participants, low-quality evidence). One study examined analgesic efficacy at 12 hours showing significant benefit. No analgesia efficacy was shown at later times (24 hours, MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.19; 48 hours, MD - 0.06, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.77, 2 studies, 202 participants, low-quality evidence). Additional analgesia requirements were not significantly less (MD -0.37 (95% CI -1.10 to 0.35, 3 studies, 234 participants, low-quality evidence). Risk of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.89, 3 studies, 273 participants, low-quality evidence). Results for other outcomes were imprecise (additional analgesia requirements: MD -0.37, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.35, 3 studies, 234 participants, low-quality evidence). Acetaminophen did not show analgesic benefit (0 to 6 hours, MD -0.35, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.30; 12 hours, MD -0.51, 95% CI -1.04 to 0.03, 3 studies, 332 participants, moderate-quality evidence; 24 hours, MD -0.34, 95% CI -1.20 to 0.52, 4 studies, 439 participants, high-quality evidence). Results for other outcomes remained imprecise (additional analgesia requirements, MD 0.07, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.99, 4 studies, 459 participants, high-quality evidence; length of hospitalizations, MD -3.71, 95% CI -14.12 to 6.7, 2 studies, 335 participants, moderate-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high-quality evidence that NSAIDs reduce pain up to 24 hours postoperatively. The evidence for reductions in pain with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin or gabapentin, scalp blocks, and scalp infiltration is less certain and of very low to moderate quality. There is low-quality evidence that scalp blocks and dexmedetomidine may reduce additional analgesics requirements. There is low-quality evidence that gabapentin or pregabalin may decrease nausea and vomiting, with the caveat that the total number of events for this comparison was low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ron Levy
- Kingston General HospitalDepartment of NeurosurgeryDept of Surgery, Room 304 , Victory 3 ,76 Stuart StreetKingstonONCanadaK7L 2V7
| | - Andrew G Day
- Kingston General HospitalClinical Research CentreAngada 4, Room 5‐42176 Stuart StreetKingstonONCanadaK7L 2V7
| | - Ian Gilron
- Queen's UniversityDepartments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine & Biomedical & Molecular Sciences76 Stuart StreetVictory 2 PavillionKingstonONCanadaK7L 2V7
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghaffarpasand F, Dadgostar E, Ilami G, Shoaee F, Niakan A, Aghabaklou S, Ghadimi M, Goudarzi S, Dehghankhalili M, Alavi MH. Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) for Postcraniotomy Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World Neurosurg 2019; 134:569-576. [PMID: 31756498 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pain control after supratentorial craniotomy is considered among the most important indicators of postoperative recovery. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of intravenous acetaminophen on postcraniotomy pain. METHODS We searched databases including Embase, Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until April 2019. Cochran Q test and I2 statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity across included clinical trials. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate pooled effect sizes. RESULTS Out of 479 reports, 5 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were appropriate for our meta-analysis, which included a total of 2635 patients. The pooled results of included clinical trials indicated that paracetamol intake significantly decreased rescue dose (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.19; P < 0.01; I2 = 90.0%), total dosage of rescue (SMD, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.37; P < 0.01; I2 = 86.0%), intensive care unit length of stay (SMD, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.04; P = 0.01; I2 = 0.0%), and visual analog scale score (SMD, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.00; P = 0.04; I2 = 71.7%) and increased patient satisfaction (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.43; P < 0.01; I2 = 10.2%) among patients with craniotomy. Time to rescue (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.51; I2 = 94.3%) and hospital length of stay (SMD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.16; P = 0.69; I2 = 0.0%) did not significantly change after paracetamol intake. CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that preoperative intravenous administration of acetaminophen is associated with decreased postoperative pain, need for rescue analgesics, and dosages of analgesics after craniotomy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fariborz Ghaffarpasand
- Research Center for Neuromodulation and Pain, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ehsan Dadgostar
- Halal Research Center of IRI, Food and Drug Administration, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazal Ilami
- Research Center for Neuromodulation and Pain, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Shoaee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiraz Kowsar Hospital, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Amin Niakan
- Trauma Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Sara Aghabaklou
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maryam Ghadimi
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sogand Goudarzi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Johnson A, Rice AN, Titch JF, Gupta DK. Identifying Components Necessary for an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Elective Intracranial Surgery: An Improvement Project Using the Quality of Recovery-15 Score. World Neurosurg 2019; 130:e423-e430. [PMID: 31279110 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the domains of recovery, as determined by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, that needed improvement to develop initial interventions for an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for patients undergoing elective intracranial surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS A paired-availability design was used to assess 2 groups of 41 patients undergoing elective intracranial surgery. The baseline QoR-15 score and scores 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit characterized the postoperative recovery trajectory. The lowest scoring domains of the QoR-15 score were identified in the preimplementation group, and pharmacologic interventions were initiated in the postimplementation group. RESULTS Postoperative analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting were identified as the lowest scoring domains. The pharmacologic interventions implemented were chosen because they produced minimal sedation and were easy to administer-1 40-mg oral preoperative dose of aprepitant to target postoperative nausea and vomiting and 2 perioperative 1-g doses of intravenous acetaminophen to improve analgesia. We observed a clinically significant as well as statistically significant improvement in analgesia on arrival in the intensive care unit and at the 6-hour postoperative time point. The total QoR-15 score was improved through the 12-hour time point. CONCLUSIONS In this quality improvement project, the QoR-15 score allowed us to identify domains that slowed the recovery course in this patient population. Two 1-g doses of intravenous acetaminophen improved patients' well-being and analgesia after elective intracranial surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Johnson
- Division of Certified Nurse Anesthesia, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andi N Rice
- Division of Certified Nurse Anesthesia, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - J Frank Titch
- Division of Certified Nurse Anesthesia, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dhanesh K Gupta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Critically ill patients commonly experience pain, and the provision of analgesia is an essential component of intensive care unit (ICU) care. Opioids are the mainstay of pain management in the ICU but are limited by their adverse effects, risk of addiction and abuse, and recent drug shortages of injectable formulations. A multimodal analgesia approach, utilizing nonopioid analgesics as adjuncts to opioid therapy, is recommended since they may modulate the pain response and reduce opioid requirements by acting on multiple pain mediators. Nonopioid analgesics discussed in detail in this article are acetaminophen, α-2 receptor agonists, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This literature review describes the clinical pharmacology, supportive ICU and relevant non-ICU data, and practical considerations associated with the administration of nonopioid analgesics in critically ill adult patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn E Smith
- 1 Department of Pharmacy, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
This review provides a summary of the literature pertaining to the perioperative care of neurosurgical patients and patients with neurological diseases. General topics addressed in this review include general neurosurgical considerations, stroke, traumatic brain injury, neuromonitoring, neurotoxicity, and perioperative disorders of cognitive function.
Collapse
|
22
|
Burbridge MA, Stone SA, Jaffe RA. Acetaminophen Does Not Reduce Postoperative Opiate Consumption in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Cerebral Revascularization: A Randomized Control Trial. Cureus 2019; 11:e3863. [PMID: 30899614 PMCID: PMC6414184 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative management in patients undergoing craniotomy is unique and challenging. We utilized a population of patients who underwent bilateral extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC bypass) revascularization procedures for moyamoya disease and hypothesized that 1 gram (gm) of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen given immediately after intubation and again 45 minutes prior to the end of craniotomy may be more effective than saline in minimizing opiate consumption and decreasing pain scores. Methods In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study, 40 craniotomies in 20 patients were studied. A random number generator assigned patients to receive either 1 gram of IV acetaminophen or an equal volume of normal saline immediately after intubation and again 45 minutes prior to the end of their first operation. For the second surgery, patients received the study drug (IV acetaminophen or normal saline) that they did not receive during their first surgery. Results In the IV acetaminophen group, the average 24-hour postoperative fentanyl equivalent consumption was decreased but the difference was not statistically significant: 228 micrograms compared to 312 micrograms in the placebo group (Figure 1; p = 0.09). Pain scores did not significantly differ between the IV acetaminophen group and the placebo group in postoperative hours 0-12 (Figure 2; p = 0.44) or 24 (Figure 3; p = 0.77). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that in patients receiving bilateral craniotomies for moyamoya disease, IV acetaminophen when given immediately after intubation and again 45 minutes prior to closure does not significantly decrease 12- or 24-hour postoperative opiate consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Burbridge
- Anesthesiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| | - Sarah A Stone
- Anesthesiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| | - Richard A Jaffe
- Anesthesiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|