A Case Study of Trisomy 13: Balancing Hope and Reality

Dissonance in views between parents and clinicians of children with serious illness: How can we bridge the gap?

Parents of children with serious illness must find a tolerable way of living each day, while caring for their child and making decisions about their treatments. Sometimes clinicians worry that parents do not understand the seriousness of their child's illness, including possible death. This can lead to tension, disagreement and even conflict. Such situations continue to occur despite expanding literature to help clinicians understand drivers of parental behaviour and decision-making. Some of this literature relates to the role of hope and how parents characterise being a 'good parent'. This article will summarise some of the applications and limitations of the hope and 'good parent' literature, as well as frameworks to understand grief and loss. We propose, however, that there is at least one missing link in understanding potential dissonance in views between parents and clinicians. We will make a case for the importance of a richer understanding about if, and how, parents 'visit' the 'reality' that clinicians wish to convey about their child's diagnosis and prognosis. We propose that clinician understanding about the benefits and burdens of 'visiting' this 'reality' for an individual family may help guide conversations and rapport, which in turn may influence decision-making with benefits for the child, family and clinicians.

An 8-week-old infant with trisomy 13: dilemmas for medical decision making

Patau syndrome, trisomy 13, is a rare genetic condition with notable physical and mental characteristics and an average reported lifespan of 9 months. For years, trisomy 13 was regarded as a lethal condition; however, a few infants survive for many years, creating a dilemma for both the medical practitioner and the family in terms of the appropriateness and timeliness of specific medical interventions. Even in the face of severe mental and physical limitations, most families of children with trisomy 13 report their experiences as enriching. Appropriate and timely surgical interventions and medical treatments have been shown to increase survival for some infants. Early palliative care helps to limit physical and emotional suffering, and allow the family to create a legacy that their baby's life had meaning, regardless of how long they survive. We present a case of an 8-week-old infant with trisomy 13 to illustrate some of the medical decision making dilemmas faced by both medical practitioner and the family.

"You Can Only Give Warmth to Your Baby When It's Too Late": Parents' Bonding With Their Extremely Preterm and Dying Child

This study on end-of-life decisions in extremely preterm babies shows that the parents under study experience a multitude of stressors due to the immediate separation after birth, the alienating setting of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the physical distance to the child, medical uncertainties, and upcoming decisions. Even though they are considered to be parents (assigned parenthood), they cannot act as primary caregivers. Instead, they depend on professional instructions for access and care. Embodied parenthood can be experienced only at the end-of-life, that is, during the dying trajectory and after the child's death. Professionally supporting parents during this compressed process (from assigned and distant to embodied parenthood) contributes fundamentally to their perception of being a family and supports their mourning. This calls for the further establishment of palliative and bereavement care concepts in neonatology.