A Pilot Study of Mothers' Breastfeeding Experiences in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

Do Orofacial Clefts Impair Breastfeeding and Increase the Prevalence of Anemia?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to correlate the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia and breastfeeding with orofacial clefts in children.

DESIGN

Data on the participant profile, presence and type of the cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), and records on anemia and breastfeeding were collected from patients' charts, and submitted to statistical analysis by χ² test (p < .05; software SPSS 23.0).

RESULTS

Two-hundred and ten files were divided according to: CL/P presence (cleft group;   n = 132) or absence (control group;   n = 78). Group CL/P was subdivided according to the type of cleft: CL/P-I (cleft lip;   n = 35); CL/P-II (cleft lip and palate;   n = 45); CL/P-III (cleft palate;   n = 43); and CL/P-IV (rare orofacial clefts;   n = 9). Group CL/P had significantly more records on anemia (p = .016) and fewer records on breastfeeding (P<.01) than controls. More records on anemia occurred in CL/P-II (p = .004) and CL/P-IV (p = .006) than the control group. The comparison among the orofacial cleft types regarding the anemia records showed no statistically significant differences (p = .123). Group CL/P-I had more records on breastfeeding than the other cleft types (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, it is suggested that the breastfeeding process is more complex, and the history of anemia is more frequent, in children with cleft lip and palate or rare orofacial clefts than in children without clefts.

Evaluation of prenatal breastfeeding workshop to inform and support mother with antenatal diagnosis of cleft lip/palate

INTRODUCTION

To support mother with antenatal diagnosis of cleft lip/palate (CL/P), we implement an antenatal breastfeeding workshop to promote breastfeeding and its continuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction after this workshop and efficiency of this workshop on breastfeeding rates and duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study from February 2018 to April 2022. Patients received two surveys after the workshop and after birth, to evaluate their satisfaction. A prospective breastfeeding follow-up were pursued by email, at 1-3-6 and 12 months to determine if the breastfeeding had been continued or stopped.

RESULTS

We included 124 pregnant women who participated to the workshop. After the workshop, most participants (114/124) answered to the first survey. Amongst the 114 participants who answered to the first survey, 45 participated to a face-to-face workshop; and 69 to a teleworkshop. Participants were globally satisfied or very satisfied from the workshop; and felt more capable to breastfeed their child. 95/124 participants answered to the second survey. Most of the participants considered that the workshop had help them carry on a maternal milk feeding to their child Breastfeeding was pursued 1 month at 90%, 3 months at 62.5%, 6 months at 41.9%, after 6 months at 18.4%. Duration of breastfeeding were not statistically different, depending on the cleft type(p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The prenatal information helped the future mothers and met their requests and needs. The satisfaction rate reflected the importance of informing and supporting mothers in their feeding choices for their infants. The rate of breastfeeding at birth of a cleft-infant, whatever its type, for mothers who participated in the breastfeeding workshop, was over 90%.

Impact of Insurance Status on Initiation of Breast Milk Feeding Among Infants With CL ± P

To evaluate rates of breast milk feeding among infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ± P) enrolled in Medicaid compared to Private Insurance/Self-Pay.

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study.

The 2018 US National Vital Statistics System-Natality component (NVSS-N) was used to examine nationwide birth certificate data.

Infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate and either Medicaid or Private Insurance/Self-Pay were included.

Breast milk feeding rates among infants with CL ± P, as a function of insurance status.

Chi-square tests of independence revealed that of 896 infants with CL ± P and insured by Medicaid, 527 (58.8%) were breast milk fed at discharge. Of 865 infants with CL ± P and insured by Private Insurance/Self-Pay, 621 (71.8%) were breast milk fed at discharge. Using logistic regression models and controlling for baseline demographic differences, results indicated that infants with CL ± P in the Medicaid group had reduced odds of breast milk feeding compared to the Private Insurance/Self-Pay group (OR = 0.08; 95% CI 0.56, 0.96).

Breast milk support services are often necessary for the initiation of breast milk feeding among infants with CL ± P. However, these resources are likely not as readily available for those enrolled in Medicaid. These results suggest that infants with CL ± P, enrolled in Medicaid, may experience reduced breast milk feeding rates due to limited resources to initiate breast milk feeding. Factors that may promote breast milk feeding among this population are discussed.