Family Caregiver-Receiver Mutuality: A Concept Analysis

Association Between Benefit Finding and Self-care Management in Heart Failure Patient-Caregiver Dyads: The Mediating Role of Mutuality

BACKGROUND

Inadequate self-care management has been reported in patients with heart failure (HF) and their family caregivers. However, evidence on the influencing factors and corresponding action paths for self-care management within a dyadic context is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine dyadic associations between benefit finding and self-care management in HF patient-caregiver dyads and the mediating role of mutuality in these associations.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in China, and a convenience sample of 253 HF patient-caregiver dyads was included in the analysis. Dyadic benefit finding and mutuality, patients' self-care management, and caregivers' contributions to self-care management were measured using self-reported questionnaires. The actor-partner interdependence model and actor-partner interdependence mediation model were adopted to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Patients' benefit finding had an actor effect on their own self-care management (β = 0.134, P < .05) and a partner effect on caregivers' contributions to self-care management (β = 0.130, P < .05). Similarly, caregivers' benefit finding had an actor effect on their contributions to self-care management (β = 0.316, P < .01) and a partner effect on patients' self-care management (β = 0.187, P < .01). Moreover, patients' mutuality completely mediated the actor effect of their benefit finding on self-care management (β = 0.127; 95% confidence interval, 0.032-0.233), and caregivers' mutuality partially mediated the actor effect of their benefit finding on contributions to self-care management (β = 0.060; 95% confidence interval, 0.012-0.124). In addition, caregivers' mutuality completely mediated the partner effect of patients' benefit finding on caregivers' contributions to self-care management (β = 0.036; 95% confidence interval, 0.009-0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed the importance of benefit finding and mutuality, 2 modifiable factors positively associated with dyadic HF self-care management. Dyadic interventions targeting on enhancing benefit finding and mutuality should be designed and implemented to improve HF self-care management.

Expressive Arts Interventions to Improve Psychosocial Well-Being in Caregivers: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Over 43 million caregivers provide care and support in the United States. Increased stress and burden may contribute to poor psychosocial well-being. Recently, there has been an emergence of art-based interventions to improve well-being among care receivers and caregivers. A synthesis of this literature evaluating expressive arts interventions (EAIs) with caregivers is needed.

OBJECTIVES

Identify the nature and impact of EAIs for caregivers and outline directions for future research.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Web of Science for relevant studies between 2001 and 2022. Inclusion criteria included EAI addressing psychosocial well-being of caregivers, quantitative and mixed methods studies, and written in English.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included (1359 participants). There was a diverse global representation of countries (n = 14). Twelve studies were randomized controlled trials. The majority (n = 11) were conducted with dementia/alzheimers caregivers and 41% (n = 11) were delivered to the caregiver/receiver dyad. Fifty-nine percent of the EAIs were music-based, 22% were visual arts, and 10% were writing. Intervention length varied from a single one-hour session to biweekly for 10-months; eight lasted two-weeks. Overall, stress improved in 80% of the studies, anxiety in 69%, caregiver burden in 57%, and depressive symptoms in 31%.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers are essential to the care of people with medically complex and life-limiting conditions. EAIs hold the potential to improve psychosocial outcomes for caregivers, are used globally, and can be culturally tailored. Future research should examine intervention duration and intensity, measures to address additional dimensions of psychsocial well-being, and implementation in additional caregiver populations.

"Informal Caregiver" in Nursing: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis

The informal caregiver experience has surged as a research topic in health care, including in nursing. However, the "informal" language is controversial, lacking conceptual clarity. Without a common understanding of who an "informal caregiver" may be, nurses may fail to consistently identify informal caregivers requiring support. Therefore, a concept analysis of "informal caregiver" was conducted on the basis of a sample of 20% of relevant nursing literature. The analysis of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and contexts associated with "informal caregiver" offers a foundational guide for the ongoing development of nurses' understanding of the informal caregiver role.

Negative Impact and Positive Value of Caregiving in Spouse Carers of Persons with Dementia in Sweden

(1) Background: Spouse carers of persons with dementia (PwD) are particularly vulnerable to negative outcomes of care, yet research rarely focuses on their caregiving situation. This study explores factors associated with the positive value and negative impact of caregiving in spouse carers of PwD in Sweden. (2) Methods: The study was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey, with a convenience sample of spouse carers of PwD (n = 163). The questionnaire addressed: care situation, carer stress, health and social well-being, relationship quality and quality of support, and contained measures of positive value and negative impact of caregiving. (3) Results: Hierarchical regression models explained 63.4% variance in positive value and 63.2% variance in negative impact of caregiving. Three variables were significant in the model of positive value: mutuality, change in emotional closeness following dementia and quality of support. Six variables were significant in the model of negative impact: years in relationship, years as carer, behavioural stress, self-rated health, emotional loneliness and change in physical intimacy following dementia. (4) Conclusions: Support to spouse carers of PwD should address the carer-care-recipient relationship quality, although different aspects of the relationship should be addressed if both the positive value of caregiving is to be enhanced and the negative impact reduced.

Influence of mutuality on quality of life in heart failure patient with inadequate self-care and caregiver dyads: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis

AIMS

Mutuality, a positive quality of the relationship between patients and their informal caregivers characterized by love and affection, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity, influences several patient-caregiver outcomes in chronic-condition cases, but it remains unknown whether it influences the heart failure (HF) patient-caregiver dyad quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of mutuality and its four dimensions (love and affection, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity) on QOL in HF patient-caregiver dyads.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cross-sectional study: Using the actor-partner interdependence model, we examined how an individual's mutuality influenced his/her own QOL (actor effect) and his/her partner's QOL (partner effect). Mutuality and physical and mental QOL were measured with the Mutuality Scale and Short Form 12, respectively. A total of 494 HF patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled in the study. Mutuality showed strong evidence of caregiver partner effects on the HF patients' physical QOL (total score B = 2.503, P = 0.001; shared pleasurable activities B = 2.265, P < 0.001; shared values B = 1.174, P = 0.420 and reciprocity B = 1.888, P = 0.001). For the mental QOL, mutuality and its four subscales had actor effects only on the patients' mental health (total mutuality B = 2.646, P = 0.003; love and affection B = 1.599, P = 0.360; shared pleasurable activities B = 2.599, P = 0.001; shared values B = 1.564, P = 0.001 and reciprocity B = 1.739, P = 0.020). In caregivers, mutuality had an actor effects on mental QOL (total score B = 1.548, P = 0.041 and reciprocity B = 1.526, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the important role of mutuality in determining the physical and mental QOL in HF patient-caregiver dyads. Interventions aimed at improving the relationships within HF patient-caregiver dyads may have an impact on HF patients' and caregivers' QOL.