Safety of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Grandmultiparous Women

Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review

The decision to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean delivery is complex and depends on patient preference, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, assessment of the risks vs benefits of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and available resources to support safe trial of labor after cesarean delivery at the planned birthing center. The most feared complication of trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture, which can have catastrophic consequences, including substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the absolute risk of uterine rupture is low, several clinical, historical, obstetrical, and intrapartum factors have been associated with increased risk. It is therefore critical for clinicians managing patients during trial of labor after cesarean delivery to be aware of these risk factors to appropriately select candidates for trial of labor after cesarean delivery and maximize the safety and benefits while minimizing the risks. Caution is advised when considering labor augmentation and induction in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. With established hospital safety protocols that dictate close maternal and fetal monitoring, avoidance of prostaglandins, and careful titration of oxytocin infusion when induction agents are needed, spontaneous and induced trial of labor after cesarean delivery are safe and should be offered to most patients with 1 previous low transverse, low vertical, or unknown uterine incision after appropriate evaluation, counseling, planning, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on clarifying true risk factors and identifying the optimal approach to intrapartum and induction management, tools for antenatal prediction, and strategies for prevention of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. A better understanding will facilitate patient counseling, support efforts to improve trial of labor after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates, and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Grand multiparity, is it a help or a hindrance in a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC)?

OBJECTIVE

Parity is a prognostic variable when considering trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). This study aimed to determine whether grandmultiparous patients are at increased risk of poor TOLAC outcomes such as uterine rupture.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort was conducted at a single university-affiliated medical center with approximately 10,000 deliveries per year. The study group included women post one cesarean section who attempted TOLAC carrying a singleton fetus in vertex presentation. We divided the cohort into three groups: group 1 - women who had a parity of 1; group 2 - parity of 2-4; group 3 - parity of 5 and above. The primary outcome was successful VBAC. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and combined maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, ANOVA, and paired t-test.

RESULTS

Five thousand four hundred and forty-seven women comprised the study group: group 1 - 879 patients, group 2 - 2374 patients, and group 3 - 2194 patients. No significant between-group differences were found in gestational age at delivery. Rates of a successful VBAC were 80.6%, 95.4%, and 95.5%, respectively. Group 1 were more likely to have a failed TOLAC compared to group 2 (OR 5.02, 95% CI 3.9-6.5, p<.001) and group 3 (OR 5.17, 95% CI 4.0-6.7, p<.001). There was no increased risk of failed TOLAC when comparing groups 2 and 3 (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.8-1.4, p=.89). Operative delivery rate differed significantly between all three groups; 25.1%, 6.2%, and 3.6%, for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<.001). The rate of uterine rupture was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (1.02% vs. 0.29% p=.02) and group 3 (1.02% vs. 0.2%, p=.01, respectively). There were no differences between group 2 and group 3 (0.29% vs. 0.2% p=.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Grandmultiparity is not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture during TOLAC.

Predictors of vaginal delivery following balloon catheter for labor induction in women with one previous cesarean

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate predictors for vaginal birth following balloon catheter induction of labor (IOL) in women with one previous cesarean section (CS) and an unfavorable cervix.

METHODS

This 4-year retrospective cohort study was conducted in Longhua District Central Hospital in Shenzhen China, between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients with one previous CS and a current singleton-term pregnancy who underwent balloon catheter cervical ripening and IOL were enrolled. Univariate analysis was used to identify predictive factors associated with vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Binary logistic regression was further used to identify which factors were independently associated with the outcome measure. The primary outcome was VBAC, which was a successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) following IOL.

RESULTS

A total of 69.57% (208/299) of the women who planned for IOL had VBAC. In the final binary logistic regression equation, lower fetal weight (< 4000 g) (odds ratio [OR]5.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09,13.27), lower body mass index (BMI,<30 kg/m²) (OR 2.27; CI 1.21, 4.26), Bishop score after cervical ripening > 6 (OR 1.94; CI 1.37, 2.76) remained independently associated with an increased chance of VBAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The influencing factors of VBAC following IOL were fetal weight, BMI, and Bishop score after cervical ripening. Adequate individualized management and assessment of the IOL may help improve the VBAC rate.

Partogram of Grandmultiparous Parturients: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Sparse and conflicting data exist regarding the normal partogram of grand-multiparous (GMP, defined as parity of 6+) parturients. Customized partograms may potentially lower cesarean delivery rates for protraction disorders in this population. In this study, we aim to construct a normal labor curve of GMP women and compare it to the multiparous (MP, defined as parity of 2-5) partogram. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of deliveries between the years 2003 and 2019. Eligible parturients were the trials of labor of singletons ≥37 + 0 weeks in cephalic presentation with ≥2 documented cervical examinations during labor. Exclusion criteria were elective cesarean delivery without a trial of labor, preterm labor, major fetal anomalies, and fetal demise. GMP comprised the study group while the MP counterparts were the control group. A total of 78,292 deliveries met the inclusion criteria, comprising 10,532 GMP and 67,760 MP parturients. Our data revealed that during the first stage of labor, cervical dilation progressed at similar rates in MPs and GMPs, while head descent was a few minutes faster in GMPs compared to MPs, regardless of epidural anesthesia. The second stage of labor was faster in GMPs compared to MPs; the 95th percentile of the second stage duration of GMPs (48 min duration) was 43 min less than that of MPs (91 min duration). These findings remained similar among deliveries with and without epidural analgesia or labor induction. We conclude that GMPs' and MPs' cervical dilation progression in the active phase of labor was similar, and the second stage of labor was shorter in GMPs, regardless of epidural use. Thus, GMPs' uterus function during labor corresponds, and possibly surpasses, that of MPs. These findings indicate that health providers can use the standard partogram of the active phase of labor when caring for GMP parturients.

Correlation Between Previous Caesarean Section and Adverse Maternal Outcomes Accordingly With Robson Classification: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The increasing rates of Caesarean section (CS) beyond the WHO standards (10–15%) pose a significant global health concern.

Objective: Systematic review and meta-analysis to identify an association between CS history and maternal adverse outcomes for the subsequent pregnancy and delivery among women classified in Robson classification (RC).

Search Strategy: PubMed/Medline, EbscoHost, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS, MEDLINE, and Russian Science Citation Index databases were searched from 2008 to 2018.

Selection Criteria: Based on Robson classification, studies reporting one or more of the 14 adverse maternal outcomes were considered eligible for this review.

Data Collection: Study design data, interventions used, CS history, and adverse maternal outcomes were extracted.

Main Results: From 4,084 studies, 28 (n = 1,524,695 women) met the inclusion criteria. RC group 5 showed the highest proportion among deliveries followed by RC10, RC7, and RC8 (67.71, 32.27, 0.02, and 0.001%). Among adverse maternal outcomes, hysterectomy had the highest association after preterm delivery OR = 3.39 (95% CI 1.56–7.36), followed by Severe Maternal Outcomes OR = 2.95 (95% CI 1.00–8.67). We identified over one and a half million pregnant women, of whom the majority were found to belong to RC group 5.

Conclusions: Previous CS was observed to be associated with adverse maternal outcomes for the subsequent pregnancies. CS rates need to be monitored given the prospective risks which may occur for maternal and child health in subsequent births.

Trial of labor after previous single cesarean delivery in grand-multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare pregnancy outcomes in grand-multiparous (GMP) women with and without one previous cesarean delivery (CD), and to evaluate the number of previous successful vaginal deliveries after a CD needed to reduce the complication rate of trials of labor after a previous CD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancy at term who had a trial of vaginal delivery between 2007 and 2014 at a tertiary medical center. We compared pregnancy outcomes in GMP women with and without one previous cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was mode of delivery and secondary outcomes were uterine rupture and composite maternal and neonatal morbidity. For the secondary objective, we compared pregnancy outcomes in women in TOLAC, stratified by the number of previous vaginal deliveries.

RESULTS

Overall, 2815 GMP women met the study criteria, of which 310 (11%) had a previous cesarean delivery. The rate of a successful vaginal deliveries (VBAC) was similar, regardless of the presence of a previous cesarean delivery. No other differences in outcomes were found between the groups. In a secondary analysis, it was found that the presence of a single previous VBAC (compared to no previous VBACs) increased the odds of achieving a vaginal delivery in the next trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) (aOR 5.66; 95% CI 3.73-8.60), and decreased the risk of maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes (aOR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.97, and aOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.25-0.97, respectively). Multiple prior VBACs (as compared to a single prior VBAC) did not increase the odds of achieving another VBAC.

CONCLUSION

Grand-multiparous women with and without previous uterine scar have comparable pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, after the first VBAC, additional successful VBACs do not improve the success rate in the next TOLAC.

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate success rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective computerized data base study was conducted at a single tertiary center, between 2005 and 2019. The study compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous women (parity ≥ 6) as compared to multiparous women (parity: 3-5). Comparison analysis was performed by univariate analysis and followed by adjusted multiple logistic regression models.

RESULTS

During the study period we identified 2749 and 4294 cases of trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous and multiparas, respectively. VBAC was observed in 94.6% of the grand multiparous as compared to 96.5% in the multiparous group, p < .01. The grand multiparous group had a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (3 vs. 2.2%, p = .03) and prolonged postpartum hospitalization (1.4 vs. 0.7%, p < .01). The rates of uterine rupture (0.3 vs. 0.2%, p=.50), peripartum hysterectomy (0.1 vs. 0%, p = .33) and adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous women is associated with favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Consideration and awareness should be given for the increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage, not associated with uterine rupture.

Induction of labor in women with a scarred uterus: does grand multiparity affect the risk of uterine rupture?

BACKGROUND

Previous cesarean delivery is the most important risk factor for subsequent uterine rupture. Data are inconsistent regarding grand multiparity (≥6th delivery) and a risk for uterine rupture. Specifically, no data exist regarding the risk that is associated with labor induction or augmentation in grand multiparous women after cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine whether grand multiparity elevates the risk for uterine rupture in trials of labor after 1 previous cesarean that involved induction or augmentation of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted that included all trials of labor after cesarean delivery at 24-42 gestational weeks with vertex presentation between the years 2003-2015. The study groups were defined in the following manner: (1) grand multiparous parturients (current delivery ≥6) who underwent labor induction or augmentation; (2) multiparous parturients (delivery 2-5) who underwent induction or augmentation; (3) grand multiparous parturients with no induction or augmentation of labor. The primary outcome was uterine rupture rate, which was defined as complete separation of all uterine layers. Secondary outcomes were obstetric and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

A total of 12,679 labors were included in the study. The study group included 1304 labors of grand multiparous parturients after 1 previous cesarean delivery, of which 800 parturients underwent induction of labor and 504 parturients received labor augmentation. The multiparous group included 3681 parturients with either labor induction or augmentation. The third group included 7694 grand multiparous parturients without induction or augmentation. Incidence of uterine rupture was similar among the 3 study groups (0.3%, 0.3%, and 0.2%, respectively; P=.847). In the multivariable model that was adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, diabetes mellitus, birthweight, and prolonged second stage of labor, no association was found between grand multiparity and uterine rupture in women with a scarred uterus who underwent labor induction or augmentation.

CONCLUSION

Labor induction/augmentation during trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous parturients appears to be a reasonable option that has a similar uterine rupture risk as in multiparous parturients. Avoiding a mandatory cesarean delivery enables reduction of the risk for future multiple cesarean deliveries.

Grandmultiparity, maternal age, and the risk for uterine rupture-A multicenter cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Uterine rupture is a critical complication causing fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Data are conflicting regarding whether grandmultiparity (parity ≥ 6) is a risk factor. This multicenter cohort study aimed to determine whether grandmultiparity (parity ≥ 6) poses a risk for uterine rupture in women with no previous cesarean delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study of deliveries that occurred between the years 2003 and 2015 in three tertiary medical centers. Deliveries of grandmultiparous women were compared with those of multiparous women (parity 2-5). Women with previous cesarean deliveries were excluded. Multivariable regression modeling was applied to control for possible confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 388 784 deliveries of multiparous women with unscarred uteri were recorded during the study period, including 53 965 deliveries of grandmultiparous women and 334 819 deliveries of multiparous women. Grandmultiparous women were significantly older (33.9 ± 5 vs 27.3 ± 5 years; P < 0.0001). Fourteen cases of uterine rupture were recorded in the grandmultiparae group (1 per 3855 labors) vs 41 in the multiparae group (1 per 8166 labors) (odds ratio [OR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.13-3.81; P = 0.030). However, in a multivariable model controlling for maternal age, the association between grandmultiparity and uterine rupture lost its significance (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.66-2.41; P = 0.491), and maternal age emerged as an independent predictor of uterine rupture (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.13; P < 0.0001). Additionally, the risk for uterine rupture was elevated in a linear fashion, concomitant with age.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal age is a risk factor for uterine rupture. Grandmultiparity does not increase the risk beyond that associated with maternal age.

Outcome of the vaginal birth after cesarean section during the second birth order in West Kazakhstan

Background

Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) increases the chance of subsequent vaginal deliveries and reduces the repeat cesarean section (CS) rate with subsequent postoperative morbidity.

Objectives

To detect the outcome of VBAC during the second birth order in Aktobe region of West Kazakhstan.

Patients and Methods

A total of 832 women eligible for trial of VBAC were included in this study. Women who signed the consent of VBAC were evaluated thoroughly and data such as maternal age, body mass index, height, gestational age at admission, indication of the previous CS, estimated fetal weight, engagement of the fetal head, condition of the membranes, and cervical dilatation were collected. Data collected after delivery include duration from active phase of labor, mode of delivery, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. The collected data analyzed to detect the outcome of trial of VBAC during the second birth order in Aktobe region of West Kazakhstan.

Results

Logistic analysis and odds ratio (OR) showed that body mass index (BMI) ≤25 kg/m² (OR 1.7; P = 0.0004), height ≥150 cm (OR 1.7; P = 0.002), gestational age ≤40 weeks (OR 2.3; P = 0.0001), and inter-delivery interval ≥2 years (OR 1.6; P = 0.008) were significantly associated with successful VBAC. In addition, <2/5 of the fetal head palpable abdominally, station <-2 (OR 1.7; P = 0.0009), cervical dilatation ≥4 cm (OR 1.7; P = 0.003), and duration of active phase of labor ≤7 h (OR 1.6; P = 0.01) were significantly associated with successful VBAC.

Conclusion

VBAC is safe in properly selected cases. BMI ≤25 kg/m², gestational age ≤40 weeks, inter-delivery interval ≥2 years, and fetal head <-2 station increase the success of VBAC. Prolonged active phase of labor >7 h and the need for labor augmentation decrease the chance of VBAC success.

Contemporary epidemiology and novel predictors of uterine rupture: a nationwide population-based study

PURPOSE

In spite of several policies aiming to decrease cesarean rates and related complications such as uterine rupture, data show that uterine rupture and associated morbidity are increasing along the years. Whether previously unidentified risk factors are currently playing an important role on these trends is unknown. We analyze current risks of uterine rupture and main preceding factors from more recent years compared to former data.

METHODS

All uterine rupture cases in the US from 2011-2012 were selected, with matched non-uterine rupture cases selected as controls. Variables considered for analysis included demographics, maternal morbidity, and obstetric complications. Likelihood forward selection was used to identify main risk factors of uterine rupture. Medians of main factors identified were used to simulate groups at risk and calculate odds ratios of uterine rupture.

RESULTS

From ~8 million births, 1925 presented uterine rupture. In patients with no prior cesarean delivery, multiple gestation, chronic hypertension and chorioamnionitis presented the highest odds of uterine rupture, with the combination of these factors increasing the odds of rupture 59 times (~1%). In women with prior cesarean delivery, induction/augmentation and chorioamnionitis were the most significant predictors, with the combination increasing the odds 33 times (~3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite policies implemented and changes in clinical practice, uterine rupture remains an important issue. Previously unidentified risk factors are playing now an important role, information that should be considered during patient counseling and clinical practice. Combinations of some of these factors may increase the risk of uterine rupture significantly enough to modify clinical care.

Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To detect the maternal and obstetrical factors associated with successful trial of vaginal birth among women with a previous cesarean delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 122 women who were eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) according to departmental protocol were included in this comparative prospective study. After informed consent, the women included in this study were subjected to a thorough history to detect maternal and obstetric characteristics and a standard examination to estimate fetal weight, engagement of the fetal head, intra-partum features of fetal membranes, and cervical dilatation. After delivery, data on duration of labor, labor augmentation, mode of delivery, birth outcome, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Trial of labor after cesarean section was successful in 72.13% and was unsuccessful in 27.87%. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the successful TOLAC group compared to the unsuccessful group (23.8±0.03 versus 26.2±0.02 kg/m(2)), and the number of women with BMI >25 kg/m(2) was significantly high in the unsuccessful group; also, mean gestational age was significantly lower in the successful TOLAC group compared to the unsuccessful group (37.5±0.04 versus 38.5±0.03 weeks), and the number of women admitted in labor with gestation ≥40 weeks was significantly high in the unsuccessful group. The number of women admitted with >2/5 of fetal head palpable abdominally and fetal head station ≥-2 was significantly high in the unsuccessful TOLAC group.

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected cases, TOLAC is safe and often successful. Presence of BMI >25 kg/m(2), gestation ≥40 weeks, and vertex station ≥-2 were risk factors for unsuccessful TOLAC.