Coronary heart disease mortality and hormone therapy before and after the Women's Health Initiative

Prior pre-eclampsia does not diminish the vascular protective effect of menopausal hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE

Women with prior pre-eclampsia are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) may affect this risk. We evaluated the impact of MHT use on cardiovascular risk between women with and without prior pre-eclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed the occurrence of any CVD, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in MHT users (n = 9700) and non-users (n = 19,914) with prior pre-eclampsia, and likewise in MHT users (n = 27,764) and non-users (n = 58,248) without prior pre-eclampsia over the period 1994-2019. Follow-up started at MHT initiation (mean age 50.4 in pre-eclamptic women and 50.3 in non-pre-eclamptic women) and lasted for a mean of 13.3 years.

RESULTS

The use of MHT in prior pre-eclamptic women was associated with significant risk reductions for any CVD (HR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.78-0.91), MI (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.55-0.78) and stroke events (HR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.63-0.81) in comparison with non-users with prior pre-eclampsia. The risk reductions for cardiovascular deaths were even more pronounced (HR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.31-0.59 for any CVD death; HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.30-0.80 for MI death; HR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.10-0.64 for stroke death). However, none of these risk reductions differed from those seen in MHT users without prior pre-eclampsia. The risk of any CVD decreased already within five years of MHT use in women with prior pre-eclampsia but not in those without prior pre-eclampsia.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MHT is associated with reduced CVD risk in women with prior pre-eclampsia. This is important to clinicians considering the initiation of MHT for recently menopausal women with prior pre-eclampsia.

Research progress on the protective effect of hormones and hormone drugs in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a condition where the heart muscle does not receive enough blood flow, leading to cardiac dysfunction. Restoring blood flow to the coronary artery is an effective clinical therapy for myocardial ischemia. This strategy helps lower the size of the myocardial infarction and improves the prognosis of patients. Nevertheless, if the disrupted blood flow to the heart muscle is restored within a specific timeframe, it leads to more severe harm to the previously deprived heart tissue. This condition is referred to as myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI). Until now, there is a dearth of efficacious strategies to prevent and manage MIRI. Hormones are specialized substances that are produced directly into the circulation by endocrine organs or tissues in humans and animals, and they have particular effects on the body. Hormonal medications utilize human or animal hormones as their active components, encompassing sex hormones, adrenaline medications, thyroid hormone medications, and others. While several studies have examined the preventive properties of different endocrine hormones, such as estrogen and hormone analogs, on myocardial injury caused by ischemia-reperfusion, there are other hormone analogs whose mechanisms of action remain unexplained and whose safety cannot be assured. The current study is on hormones and hormone medications, elucidating the mechanism of hormone pharmaceuticals and emphasizing the cardioprotective effects of different endocrine hormones. It aims to provide guidance for the therapeutic use of drugs and offer direction for the examination of MIRI in clinical therapy.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy in prior pre-eclamptic women: a nationwide cohort study in Finland

OBJECTIVE

We compared the trends of hormone therapy (HT) use among women with and without a history of pre-eclampsia.

METHODS

This national cohort study consisted of women with a pre-eclamptic pregnancy (n = 31,688) or a normotensive pregnancy (n = 91,726) (controls) during 1969-1993. The data on their use of HT during 1994-2019 were traced from the National Medicine Reimbursement Register.

RESULTS

Both women with a history of pre-eclampsia and controls initiated HT at a mean age of 49.9 years. Cumulative HT™ use during the total follow-up did not differ between the groups (31.1% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.066). However, HT use in previously pre-eclamptic women was less common in 1994-2006 (20.2% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001) and more common in 2007-2019 (22.1% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001) than in controls. This trend was also seen in the annual changes of HT starters. Women with a history of pre-eclampsia used HT for a shorter time (6.3 vs. 7.1 years, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to controls, HT use in previously pre-eclamptic women increased during the last half of the follow-up. This may reflect the changes in the international recommendations, the increased awareness of pre-eclampsia-related cardiovascular risk later in life and the aim to diminish this risk with HT.

Anti-Müllerian hormone for the diagnosis and prediction of menopause: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The early onset of menopause is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. As a woman's circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration reflects the number of follicles remaining in the ovary and declines towards the menopause, serum AMH may be of value in the early diagnosis and prediction of age at menopause.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This systematic review was undertaken to determine whether there is evidence to support the use of AMH alone, or in conjunction with other markers, to diagnose menopause, to predict menopause, or to predict and/or diagnose premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature search for publications reporting on AMH in relation to menopause or POI was conducted in PubMed®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 31 May 2022. Data were extracted and synthesized using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis for diagnosis of menopause, prediction of menopause, prediction of menopause with a single/repeat measurement of AMH, validation of prediction models, short-term prediction in perimenopausal women, and diagnosis and prediction of POI. Risk-of-bias was evaluated using the Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies protocol and studies at high risk of bias were excluded.

OUTCOMES

A total of 3207 studies were identified, and 41, including 28 858 women, were deemed relevant and included. Of the three studies that assessed AMH for the diagnosis of menopause, one showed that undetectable AMH had equivalent diagnostic accuracy to elevated FSH (>22.3 mIU/ml). No study assessed whether AMH could be used to shorten the 12 months of amenorrhoea required for a formal diagnosis of menopause. Studies assessing AMH with the onset of menopause (27 publications [n = 23 835 women]) generally indicated that lower age-specific AMH concentrations are associated with an earlier age at menopause. However, AMH alone could not be used to predict age at menopause with precision (with estimates and CIs ranging from 2 to 12 years for women aged <40 years). The predictive value of AMH increased with age, as the interval of prediction (time to menopause) shortened. There was evidence that undetectable, or extremely low AMH, may aid early diagnosis of POI in young women with a family history of POI, and women presenting with primary or secondary amenorrhoea (11 studies [n = 4537]).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The findings of this systematic review support the use of serum AMH to study the age of menopause in population studies. The increased sensitivity of current AMH assays provides improved accuracy for the prediction of imminent menopause, but diagnostic use for individual patients has not been rigorously examined. Prediction of age at menopause remains imprecise when it is not imminent, although the finding of very low AMH values in young women is both of clinical value in indicating an increased risk of developing POI and may facilitate timely diagnosis.

Evaluation of atherosclerosis-related biomarkers during perimenopause: A prospective cohort study in women with endometriosis

AIM

Endometriosis is linked to asymptomatic atherosclerosis and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Vascular function tests are used to assess atherosclerosis, an important indicator of CVD development. In this study, we aimed to evaluate atherosclerosis-related biomarkers, such as vascular function tests and laboratory data, in perimenopausal women with endometriosis.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 207 women (≥40 years old) with endometriosis. Laboratory data, ankle brachial index (ABI), and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age, CAVI, and ABI of the participants at the initial examination were 45.02 years, 6.9 ± 0.6, and 1.07 ± 0.06, respectively. In multiple regression analysis, no factor was associated with CAVI, but ABI was significantly correlated with elevated total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and estradiol (partial regression coefficient [β] = -0.00074, p = 0.017; β = -0.00075, p = 0.033; and β = -0.00022, p = 0.015, respectively). The annual rate of change in CAVI showed a positive correlation with TC and pentosidine and a negative correlation with history of hormone therapy. Neither correlation was strong. In a comparison of three groups classified by the annual rate of change in CAVI, the group with the severe change had a higher level of pentosidine. In adjusted multinomial logistic regression analysis, high pentosidine levels were a risk factor for increased rate of change in CAVI.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between CAVI and serum markers related to lipid metabolism and ovarian function was mild. Longitudinal analysis of CAVI showed an association with pentosidine, which may be helpful in assessing atherosclerosis risk in women with endometriosis during perimenopause.

Multidisciplinary Management of Menopause: Symposium Proceedings

This proceeding summarizes a symposium on multidisciplinary management of menopause held on July 30, 2021 as part of the Health of Women 2021 conference. The workshop featured presentations by national experts who provided insights into multidisciplinary approaches to the management of menopause, vasomotor symptoms and genitourinary syndrome of menopause, bone health (including osteoporosis, muscular strength, and mobility), as well as sexual and psychological health during menopause. In this study, we highlight the major points of each presentation and the resultant discussion.

Management of menopause: a view towards prevention

Women spend approximately one-third of their lives with menopause, which occurs around 50 years of age. It is now appreciated that several important metabolic and cardiovascular disease risks emerge during the menopausal transition. Many important conditions occur 10-15 years after menopause, including weight gain and obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, osteoporosis, arthritis, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and cancer; therefore, the occurrence of menopause heralds an important opportunity to institute preventative strategies. These strategies will lead to improved quality of life and decreased mortality. Various strategies are presented for treating symptoms of menopause and diseases that are asymptomatic. Among several strategies is the use of hormone therapy, which has efficacy for symptoms and osteoporosis, and can improve metabolic and cardiovascular health. When instituted early, which is key, in younger postmenopausal women (under 60 years) oestrogen has been found to consistently decrease mortality with a favourable risk-benefit profile in low-risk women. Prospective data show that long-term therapy might not be required for this benefit.

Cardiovascular health after menopause transition, pregnancy disorders, and other gynaecologic conditions: a consensus document from European cardiologists, gynaecologists, and endocrinologists

Women undergo important changes in sex hormones throughout their lifetime that can impact cardiovascular disease risk. Whereas the traditional cardiovascular risk factors dominate in older age, there are several female-specific risk factors and inflammatory risk variables that influence a woman's risk at younger and middle age. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and gestational diabetes are associated with a higher risk in younger women. Menopause transition has an additional adverse effect to ageing that may demand specific attention to ensure optimal cardiovascular risk profile and quality of life. In this position paper, we provide an update of gynaecological and obstetric conditions that interact with cardiovascular risk in women. Practice points for clinical use are given according to the latest standards from various related disciplines (Figure 1).

Clinical trials in menopause

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials in menopause have undergone much scrutiny over the years. This has led to significant shifts in the treatment of symptomatic menopause and a substantial impact on women. We aim to delineate the key studies contributing to this controversy and highlight new directions specifically related to menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and vascular disease risk.

METHODS

We performed a search of sentinel studies delineating the risks and benefits of HT in otherwise healthy postmenopausal women. Using PubMed we input the following search terms: hormone replacement therapy, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, angina, coronary heart calcification, carotid intimal thickness, lipids, and/or lipoproteins. We included studies of menopausal women (surgical or natural) using combined estrogen/progestogen therapy or estrogen-only therapy that looked at cardiovascular disease risk factors or outcomes. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by the authors; however, this is not intended to be a systematic or an exhaustive analysis.

RESULTS

In women close to the time of menopause, there is a decreased risk of subclinical and clinical coronary heart disease with menopausal HT. Additionally, HT confers a significant benefit to vasomotor symptoms of menopause, bone health, and colorectal cancer. There is an increased risk of venous thromboembolism with oral formulations that appears mitigated with transdermal estradiol. Mixed data regarding breast cancer risk are available, with some studies suggesting an increased risk of invasive breast cancer with estrogen/progestogen therapy and a null effect with estrogen-only therapy. Other more long-term epidemiologic studies identify a decreased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The available literature suggests that HT is a viable option for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. Newer trials will likely verify this assessment. If this is enough to change clinical practice, however, remains to be seen given the general fear of HT by many with prescriptive authority, and also the women in our care.

Menopausal hormone therapy and heart disease prevention: desired or valid?

Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of death for women in older age groups. For many decades, specialists have tried to prevent their development by the use of estrogen. The review of the literature presents current data on the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on the risk of cardiovascular complications. The results of the main randomized clinical and observational studies in this area, conducted over several decades, are discussed. We described the concept of “window of opportunities”, in accordance with which an improvement in cardiovascular prognosis can be expected only at the onset of MHT in women under the age of 60 years in early postmenopause (menopause duration <10 years). There are experimental and clinical data explaining the different effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular prognosis in women of various age groups and different duration of postmenopause. The recommendations given in the review on the use of MHT are based on modern international guidelines.

BMS consensus statement for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women

The British Menopause Society Council is committed to provide up to date authoritative reviews to aid health professionals to inform and advise women about key issues in postreproductive health. Coronary heart disease is a leading cause of death in women. Observational studies have consistently shown estrogen to help prevent coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. The large randomized controlled Women’s Health Initiative trial initially did not confirm these observational findings. However, further analyses of the Women’s Health Initiative study as well as meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of hormone replacement therapy and of the observational Nurses’ Health Study have now found that the timing of onset of hormone replacement therapy use is important and that estrogen may have an important protective role in coronary heart disease, particularly in women initiating treatment below age 60 years. This consensus statement will examine the evidence regarding hormone replacement therapy and non-estrogen therapies (lipid-lowering agents, aspirin, antihypertensives, anti-diabetic medications, selective estrogen receptor modulators) as well as diet, lifestyle and smoking cessation in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women.

Comprehensive review of cardiovascular toxicity of drugs and related agents

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in most developed countries of the world. Pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, and toxins can significantly contribute to the overall cardiovascular burden and thus deserve attention. The present article is a systematic overview of drugs that may induce distinct cardiovascular toxicity. The compounds are classified into agents that have significant effects on the heart, blood vessels, or both. The mechanism(s) of toxic action are discussed and treatment modalities are briefly mentioned in relevant cases. Due to the large number of clinically relevant compounds discussed, this article could be of interest to a broad audience including pharmacologists and toxicologists, pharmacists, physicians, and medicinal chemists. Particular emphasis is given to clinically relevant topics including the cardiovascular toxicity of illicit sympathomimetic drugs (e.g., cocaine, amphetamines, cathinones), drugs that prolong the QT interval, antidysrhythmic drugs, digoxin and other cardioactive steroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, female hormones, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and anticancer compounds encompassing anthracyclines and novel targeted therapy interfering with the HER2 or the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway.

Hormone-replacement therapy: current thinking

For several decades, the role of hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) has been debated. Early observational data on HRT showed many benefits, including a reduction in coronary heart disease (CHD) and mortality. More recently, randomized trials, including the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), studying mostly women many years after the the onset of menopause, showed no such benefit and, indeed, an increased risk of CHD and breast cancer, which led to an abrupt decrease in the use of HRT. Subsequent reanalyzes of data from the WHI with age stratification, newer randomized and observational data and several meta-analyses now consistently show reductions in CHD and mortality when HRT is initiated soon after menopause. HRT also significantly decreases the incidence of various symptoms of menopause and the risk of osteoporotic fractures, and improves quality of life. In younger healthy women (aged 50-60 years), the risk-benefit balance is positive for using HRT, with risks considered rare. As no validated primary prevention strategies are available for younger women (<60 years of age), other than lifestyle management, some consideration might be given to HRT as a prevention strategy as treatment can reduce CHD and all-cause mortality. Although HRT should be primarily oestrogen-based, no particular HRT regimen can be advocated.

Back to the future: Hormone replacement therapy as part of a prevention strategy for women at the onset of menopause

In the late 1980s, several observational studies and meta-analyses suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was beneficial for prevention of osteoporosis, coronary heart disease, dementia and decreased all-cause mortality. In 1992, the American College of Physicians recommended HRT for prevention of coronary disease. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, several randomized trials in older women suggested coronary harm and that the risks, including breast cancer, outweighed any benefit. HRT stopped being prescribed at that time, even for women who had severe symptoms of menopause. Subsequently, reanalyzes of the randomized trial data, using age stratification, as well as newer studies, and meta-analyses have been consistent in showing that younger women, 50-59 years or within 10 years of menopause, have decreased coronary disease and all-cause mortality; and did not have the perceived risks including breast cancer. These newer findings are consistent with the older observational data. It has also been reported that many women who abruptly stopped HRT had more risks, including more osteoporotic fractures. The current data confirm a "timing" hypothesis for benefits and risks of HRT, showing that younger have many benefits and few risks, particularly if therapy is predominantly focused on the estrogen component. We discuss these findings and put into perspective the potential risks of treatment, and suggest that we may have come full circle regarding the use of HRT. In so doing we propose that HRT should be considered as part of a general prevention strategy for women at the onset of menopause.

Cardiovascular risk assessment in women - an update

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women. Although it is a disease of aging, vascular disease initiates much earlier in life. Thus, there is a need to be aware of the potential to prevent the development of the disease from an early age and continue this surveillance throughout life. The menopausal period and early menopause present an ideal opportunity to assess cardiovascular risk and plan accordingly. Generally in this period, women will be seen by primary health-care professionals and non-cardiovascular specialists. This review addresses female-specific risk factors that may contribute to the potential development of cardiovascular disease. It is important for all health-care professionals dealing with women in midlife and beyond to be cognisant of these risk factors and to initiate female-specific preventative measures or to refer to a cardiovascular specialist.

Estradiol-based postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality

OBJECTIVE

Data on the health benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) are derived mainly from the use of conjugated equine estrogens. Estradiol-based regimens may have a different risk-benefit profile. We evaluated the risk of death caused by coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, or any disease among users of estradiol-based HT regimens in a nationwide study in Finland.

METHODS

A total of 489,105 women who used HT from 1994 to 2009 (3.3 million HT exposure years), as indicated in the nationwide reimbursement register and the national Cause of Death Register, were followed. A total of 28,734 HT users died during follow-up; among the deaths, 3,843 were caused by CHD and 2,464 were caused by stroke. Mortality risk in HT users with varying duration of exposure (≤1 y, >1 to 3 y, >3 to 5 y, >5 to 10 y, or >10 y) was compared with that in an age-matched background population.

RESULTS

Risk of CHD death was significantly reduced by 18% to 54% in HT users and was positively related to HT exposure time. Risk of stroke death was also reduced by 18% to 39%, but this reduction was not clearly related to HT exposure time. Risk of all-cause mortality was reduced in HT users by 12% to 38%, almost in linear relationship with duration of exposure. All these risk reductions were comparable in women initiating HT before age 60 years and women initiating HT at age 60 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

In absolute terms, the risk reductions mean 19 fewer CHD deaths and 7 fewer stroke deaths per 1,000 women using any HT for at least 10 years.

Vaginal estradiol use and the risk for cardiovascular mortality

STUDY QUESTION

Does the use of post-menopausal vaginal estradiol (VE) affect the mortality risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.

SUMMARY ANSWER

The use of VE reduces the risk for cardiovascular mortality.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A growing number of women use VE for post-menopausal genitourinary symptoms. Although this therapy is intended to have only local effects, estrogen is absorbed into the blood circulation and thus VE use may also have systemic effects.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We studied a nationwide cohort in Finland 1994-2009 during which post-menopausal women (n = 195 756) initiated the use of VE (age [mean ± SD] 65.7 ± 10.9 years). Follow-up data gathered 1.4 million women-years and we assessed the mortality risk due to CHD (n= 9656) or stroke (n = 4294).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The mortality risk in VE users was compared with that in the age-matched background population (standardized mortality ratio; [SMR]; 95% confidence interval) and related to various durations of exposure to VE (1 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, >5 to ≤10 and >10 years).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The use of VE was accompanied by decreases in the risk for CHD and stroke death. The risk reduction for CHD death was highest for >3 to ≤5 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.70) and for stroke for >5 to ≤10 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.72). The risk reductions for both CHD and stroke mortality were detected in all age groups with the highest risk reduction being in women aged 50-59 years (SMR 0.43; 0.19-0.88 and SMR 0.21; 0.06-0.58, respectively).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Our series lack a placebo arm and thus, may harbor a healthy woman bias. Moreover, data on clinical variables such as weight, smoking, blood pressure and family background were unobtainable for this study. Women using both VE and systemic hormone therapy (HT) were included in the comparator background population. This should not cause any significant error because the proportion of women using VE or other HT was modest (<10% in age-matched population) and because the use of systemic HT also reduces death risks in the same population. Our data cannot be directly applied for local regimens containing conjugated equine estrogens, because they are absorbed differently and may show effects that differ from those of estradiol.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In 1000 women using VE for up to 10 years, a maximum of 24 fewer CHD deaths and 18 fewer stroke deaths is likely to occur.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This work was supported by unrestricted grants from the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Orion Farmos Research Foundation, the Paavo Nurmi Foundation and a special governmental grant for health sciences research. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data handling or manuscript preparation. EPID Research is a company that performs financially supported studies for several pharmaceutical companies. Dr Korhonen, Dr Hoti and MSc Vattulainen, employed by Epid Research, report financial activities from several other pharmaceutical companies outside the submitted work. Dr Mikkola has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Mylan and Novo Nordisk. Dr Tuomikoski has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Orion and Mylan. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.

Increased Cardiovascular Mortality Risk in Women Discontinuing Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy

CONTEXT

Current guidelines recommend annual discontinuation of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) to evaluate whether a woman could manage without the treatment. The impact of HT on cardiovascular health has been widely studied, but it is not known how the withdrawal of HT affects cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the risk of cardiac or stroke death after the discontinuation of HT. Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures: Altogether 332 202 Finnish women discontinuing HT between 1994 and 2009 (data from National Reimbursement register) were followed up from the discontinuation date to death due to cardiac cause (n = 3177) or stroke (n = 1952), or to the end of 2009. The deaths, retrieved from the national Cause of Death Register, were compared with the expected number of deaths in the age-standardized background population. In a subanalysis we also compared HT stoppers with HT users.

RESULTS

Within the first posttreatment year, the risk of cardiac death was significantly elevated (standardized mortality ratio; 95% confidence interval 1.26; 1.16-1.37), whereas follow-up for longer than 1 year was accompanied with a reduction (0.75; 0.72-0.78). The risk of stroke death in the first posttreatment year was increased (1.63; 1.47-1.79), but follow-up for longer than 1 year was accompanied with a reduced risk (0.89; 0.85-0.94). The cardiac (2.30; 2.12-2.50) and stroke (2.52; 2.28-2.77) death risk elevations were even higher when compared with HT users. In women who discontinued HT at age younger than 60 years, but not in women aged 60 years or older, the cardiac mortality risk was elevated (1.94; 1.51-2.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased cardiovascular death risks question the safety of annual HT discontinuation practice to evaluate whether a woman could manage without HT.