Simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography for the evaluation of endometrial pathology in women aged 50 years and older

Combining Ultrasonography and Endometrial Aspiration as a One-Stop Screening for Endometrial Neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography to screen for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study from February 2014 to October 2020 at the ultrasound unit of a large urban academic medical center. The study included 1,635 women aged 50 years or older referred for endometrial evaluation, with follow-up through January 2021. Participants underwent saline infusion sonohysterography combined with ultrasound-guided endometrial aspiration. The primary outcome measured was a diagnosis of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia within 1 year from screening. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined evaluation method, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 1,170 women who completed the study protocol, 82 (7.0%) had endometrial cancer and 42 (3.6%) had endometrial hyperplasia. Of all patients who developed cancer during the follow-up period, 85.5% were diagnosed within 1 year after evaluation. The application of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography together demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.1%, specificity of 24.9%, PPV of 11.8%, and NPV of 99.6%. Using a theoretical sequential approach, assuming an endometrial aspiration is performed only in patients determined to be high risk by sonohysterography, demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.4%, specificity of 99.9%, PPV of 99.0%, and NPV of 99.3%.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography is an effective one-stop outpatient screening tool for detecting endometrial cancer and hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older. With the integration of two screening modalities into a single procedure, simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography may overcome the limitations inherent in each of the currently recommended methods individually, potentially improving patient prognosis and streamlining the diagnostic process.

Risk of endometrial polyp and surgical intervention in postmenopausal women with proliferative endometrium

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term risks of postmenopausal women with proliferative endometrium developing benign uterine pathologies (endometrial polyps and uterine fibroids) and requiring future gynecological interventions, and to compare them with women with atrophic endometrium.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of all women aged 55 or over who underwent endometrial biopsy between 1/1997 and 12/2008. Outcome data were available through to 2/2018. Women with proliferative endometrium were compared with those with atrophic endometrium for the presence of endometrial polyps, uterine fibroids, future endometrial biopsy for recurrent vaginal bleeding, and future hysteroscopy or hysterectomy. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of endometrial histology and other covariates with the risk of morbidities.

MAIN FINDINGS

Postmenopausal women with proliferative endometrium are at higher risk of developing endometrial polyps, uterine fibroids and need for surgical intervention. Of 1808 women who underwent endometrial biopsy during the study period, 962 met inclusion criteria: 278 had proliferative and 684 had atrophic endometrium. Length of surveillance was similar in the two groups (11.9 vs. 11.5 years, p = 0.2). Compared with women with atrophic endometrium, women with proliferative endometrium had significantly higher rates of endometrial polyps (17.3 % vs 9.7 % p = 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that women with proliferative endometrium had more fibroids on ultrasound (62.1 % vs 50.3 % 3 = 0.02), and had increased risks of developing endometrial polyps (aOR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.28-3.07, p = 0.002), repeat endometrial biopsy (34.9 % vs. 16.8%p < 0.001) and future hysterectomy or hysteroscopy (26.6 % vs 16.2 % p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the long-term increased risk of cancer, postmenopausal women with proliferative endometrium are more likely to have future bleeding, surgical interventions and diagnosis of endometrial polyps. Medical management to reduce estrogenic activity and associated risks may be considered in these cases.

The significance of "atrophic endometrium" in women with postmenopausal bleeding

We evaluated the interpretation of atrophic endometrium (AE) histology as the most common cause for postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). This theory has been accepted for several generations by gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists and has been published in past and current major gynecology textbooks. In our review of the literature, we did not find sufficient histological or clinical proof for this concept. In our view, AE is not a cause of PMB and we back this up with a review of old and current medical literature. The old studies are based on information which was obtained prior to the existence of transvaginal sonogram, sonohysterogram and hysteroscopy. Focal lesions are notorious for being missed by endometrial sampling and curettage. Recent studies show that focal endometrial lesions are a crucial cause for PMB and some of those lesions can harbor cancer. In our opinion, AE is the most common histology found because it is physiologic and a ubiquitous finding in postmenopausal women, but it is not a cause of PMB. Referring to AE as a cause of PMB may result in misdiagnosis of cancer, management delay and unnecessary intervention. To avoid misdiagnosis of cancer, transvaginal sonogram should be considered in all women with PMB and AE on pathology. If endometrial thickness is found, AE is unlikely to be the cause of the PMB and further workup is warranted to reveal the true etiology for the bleeding.

Differences between proximal and distal endometrial monolayer thickness in women aged over 50 years undergoing saline infusion sonohysterography

BACKGROUND

Saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) is a procedure performed to evaluate the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding.

PURPOSE

To investigate differences in endometrial monolayer measurements in women aged >50 years undergoing SIS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of women aged >50 undergoing SIS. Endometrial echo (EE) was measured according to the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) guidelines. Monolayer thickness was compared between anterior and posterior uterine walls and between the monolayer that was proximal or distal to the ultrasound probe. Presence and location of focal thickening and polyps on each of the monolayers were assessed.

RESULTS

SIS was performed in 608 patients. Of them, 485 (79.8%) had anteverted, 85 (14%) retroverted, and 38 (6.2%) a midposition uterus. The mean posterior monolayer was thicker than the anterior monolayer (2.14 mm vs. 1.88 mm; P = 0.002). The distal monolayer was thicker than the proximal layer in both anteverted and retroverted uteri (2.18 mm vs. 1.84 mm; P < 0.0001). In 16% of women, the difference between distal and proximal monolayers was ≥1 mm. Focal thickening was seen 3.3 times more frequently in the distal endometrium. Among women with a double layer EE >4 mm, 18.8% had a proximal layer of <2 mm while only 4.6% had a distal EE <2 mm.

CONCLUSION

Distal endometrium measures thicker than the proximal endometrium in most SIS cases and in one out of six women, the difference is >1 mm. The distal layer is three times more likely to contain focal thickening. Sonologists should be conscious of possible enhancement artifact when measuring the EE during SIS.

Long-term outcome of postmenopausal women with proliferative endometrium on endometrial sampling

BACKGROUND

Proliferative endometrium has been reported in 15% of endometrial biopsies of women aged 50 years and older. Contrary to endometrial hyperplasia, proliferative endometrium has not been associated with the risk of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report on the long-term outcome of postmenopausal women who received a diagnosis of proliferative endometrium.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of 1808 women aged 55 years and older who underwent endometrial sampling between January 1997 and December 2008. Outcome data were available through February 2018. Women with a proliferative endometrium were compared with those with an atrophic endometrium for future development of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer. A subanalysis was performed for those who presented with postmenopausal bleeding. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess for confounders.

RESULTS

In this study, 297 women (16.4%) received a diagnosis of proliferative endometrium. Furthermore, 962 women met the inclusion criteria. Among those women, 278 had a proliferative endometrium, and 684 had an atrophic endometrium. Women with a proliferative endometrium were younger (61.2 vs 64.5 years; P<.0001) and had a higher body mass index (33.9 vs 30.6 kg/m²; P<.0001). More African American women had a proliferative endometrium. Both groups had a similar length of surveillance (11.9 vs 11.5 years; P=.27). Women with a proliferative endometrium had a higher risk of developing endometrial hyperplasia or cancer (11.9% vs 2.9%; P<.0001), any endometrial cancer (5.8% vs 1.8%; P=.002), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (2.2% vs 0.4%; P=.02), and nonatypical endometrial hyperplasia (2.0% vs 0.7%; P=.001). The risk of developing endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia remained similar after excluding cases on hormonal replacement therapy (12.2% vs 3%; P=.001). On logistic regression analysis, proliferative endometrium histology (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-7.49; P<.0001), age >60 years (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.82; P=.04), and body mass index >35 kg/m² (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-4.83; P<.0001) remained significant risk factors for progression to cancer.

CONCLUSION

One of the 6 postmenopausal women who underwent endometrial sampling had a proliferative endometrium. Furthermore, 11.9% of women developed endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, a 4-fold greater incidence than women with an atrophic endometrium. The findings of this study suggest that long-term monitoring is warranted for women with postmenopausal bleeding and a proliferative endometrium histology. Further studies are needed to examine if a treatment is required to negate the risk of unopposed estrogen.

Long-term outcome of postmenopausal women with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia on endometrial sampling

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term outcome of postmenopausal women diagnosed with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NEH).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of women aged 55 or older who underwent endometrial sampling in our academic medical center between 1997 and 2008. Women who had a current or recent (< 2 years) histological diagnosis of NEH were included in the study group and were compared with those diagnosed with atrophic endometrium (AE). Outcome data were obtained until February 2018. The main outcomes were risk of progression to endometrial carcinoma and risk of persistence, recurrence or new development of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) ('persistent EH'). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify covariates that were independent risk factors for progression to endometrial cancer or persistent EH.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1808 women aged 55 or older underwent endometrial sampling. The median surveillance time was 10.0 years. Seventy-two women were found to have a current or recent diagnosis of NEH and were compared with 722 women with AE. When compared to women with AE, women with NEH had significantly higher body mass index (33.9 kg/m² vs 30.6 kg/m² ; P = 0.01), greater endometrial thickness (10.00 mm vs 6.00 mm; P = 0.01) and higher rates of progression to type-1 endometrial cancer (8.3% vs 0.8%; P = 0.0003) and persistent NEH (22.2% vs 0.7%; P < 0.0001). They also had a higher rate of progression to any type of uterine cancer or persistent EH (33.3% vs 3.5%; P < 0.0001). Women with NEH had a significantly higher rate of future surgical intervention (51.4% vs 15.8%; P < 0.0001), including future hysterectomy (34.7% vs 9.8%; P < 0.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only NEH remained a significant risk factor for progression to endometrial cancer or persistence of EH.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal women with NEH are at significant risk for persistent EH and progression to endometrial cancer, at rates higher than those reported previously. Guidelines for the appropriate management of postmenopausal women with NEH are needed in order to decrease the rate of persistent disease or progression to cancer. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Genomic Analysis of Uterine Lavage Fluid Detects Early Endometrial Cancers and Reveals a Prevalent Landscape of Driver Mutations in Women without Histopathologic Evidence of Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy, and its incidence and associated mortality are increasing. Despite the immediate need to detect these cancers at an earlier stage, there is no effective screening methodology or protocol for endometrial cancer. The comprehensive, genomics-based analysis of endometrial cancer by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed many of the molecular defects that define this cancer. Based on these cancer genome results, and in a prospective study, we hypothesized that the use of ultra-deep, targeted gene sequencing could detect somatic mutations in uterine lavage fluid obtained from women undergoing hysteroscopy as a means of molecular screening and diagnosis.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Uterine lavage and paired blood samples were collected and analyzed from 107 consecutive patients who were undergoing hysteroscopy and curettage for diagnostic evaluation from this single-institution study. The lavage fluid was separated into cellular and acellular fractions by centrifugation. Cellular and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were isolated from each lavage. Two targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels, one composed of 56 genes and the other of 12 genes, were used for ultra-deep sequencing. To rule out potential NGS-based errors, orthogonal mutation validation was performed using digital PCR and Sanger sequencing. Seven patients were diagnosed with endometrial cancer based on classic histopathologic analysis. Six of these patients had stage IA cancer, and one of these cancers was only detectable as a microscopic focus within a polyp. All seven patients were found to have significant cancer-associated gene mutations in both cell pellet and cfDNA fractions. In the four patients in whom adequate tumor sample was available, all tumor mutations above a specific allele fraction were present in the uterine lavage DNA samples. Mutations originally only detected in lavage fluid fractions were later confirmed to be present in tumor but at allele fractions significantly less than 1%. Of the remaining 95 patients diagnosed with benign or non-cancer pathology, 44 had no significant cancer mutations detected. Intriguingly, 51 patients without histopathologic evidence of cancer had relatively high allele fraction (1.0%-30.4%), cancer-associated mutations. Participants with detected driver and potential driver mutations were significantly older (mean age mutated = 57.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.30-∞, mean age no mutations = 50.35; p-value = 0.002; Benjamini-Hochberg [BH] adjusted p-value = 0.015) and more likely to be post-menopausal (p-value = 0.004; BH-adjusted p-value = 0.015) than those without these mutations. No associations were detected between mutation status and race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, parity, and smoking status. Long-term follow-up was not presently available in this prospective study for those women without histopathologic evidence of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Using ultra-deep NGS, we identified somatic mutations in DNA extracted both from cell pellets and a never previously reported cfDNA fraction from the uterine lavage. Using our targeted sequencing approach, endometrial driver mutations were identified in all seven women who received a cancer diagnosis based on classic histopathology of tissue curettage obtained at the time of hysteroscopy. In addition, relatively high allele fraction driver mutations were identified in the lavage fluid of approximately half of the women without a cancer diagnosis. Increasing age and post-menopausal status were associated with the presence of these cancer-associated mutations, suggesting the prevalent existence of a premalignant landscape in women without clinical evidence of cancer. Given that a uterine lavage can be easily and quickly performed even outside of the operating room and in a physician's office-based setting, our findings suggest the future possibility of this approach for screening women for the earliest stages of endometrial cancer. However, our findings suggest that further insight into development of cancer or its interruption are needed before translation to the clinic.

Comparison of saline infusion sonography (SIS) versus SIS-guided endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial pathology

PURPOSE

To compare saline infusion sonography (SIS) to tissue obtained from SIS-guided endometrial sampling (SISES) to determine sensitivity and specificity for benign and malignant conditions of the endometrium.

METHODS

Added value of SISES after SIS was evaluated over 5 years. SIS and SISES techniques have been previously described. Women with abnormal uterine bleeding and endometrial findings underwent SIS. Criteria for SISES included atypical polypoid mass, focal irregularity or global endometrial thickening, nondiagnostic SIS, discordance between SIS and endometrial biopsy, or request from the primary team. Final surgical pathology was compared with SIS and SISES.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-three SIS patients had SISES. SIS alone had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 42%, positive predictive value of 16%, and negative predictive value of 100%. A total of 120 patients had final clinical or surgical outcomes. Specificity was greatly improved with addition of SISES (95.5%, p < 0.001). Combination of SIS with SISES detected all 12 premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions. Three cases had small foci of hyperplasia (n = 2) or atypia (n = 1) in polyps on final surgical pathology, which were not prospectively identified on SISES.

CONCLUSIONS

SISES significantly improves the specificity in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. False-negative findings of SISES in polyps in postmenopausal women with bleeding suggest the need for surgical removal in this setting. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:416-422, 2016.