Practice Bulletin No. 176: Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Fortifying the foundation: assessing the role of uterine ligament integrity in uterine prolapse and beyond

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor stability is influenced by various biomechanical, anatomical, and physiological factors. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and related conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the key factors affecting pelvic floor integrity and explore both non-surgical and surgical interventions to enhance stability and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This review draws from biomechanical research to assess the role of the uterosacral ligament in pelvic support, while also examining the potential of both traditional and emerging therapeutic approaches, including non-surgical interventions like vitamin C supplementation.

RESULTS

- The uterosacral ligament demonstrates superior strength and stiffness, making it essential for structural support of pelvic organs. - Non-surgical interventions, such as vitamin C supplementation, show potential in improving ligament integrity and preventing pelvic floor disorders. - Emerging surgical techniques, including tendon-based procedures and injectable fibrous hydrogel composites, offer promising improvements in outcomes for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. - Additional factors such as muscle strength and neural deficiencies contribute to the complexity of pelvic floor biomechanics, indicating the need for multifaceted treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and managing pelvic floor stability by integrating biomechanical, physiological, and anatomical insights. The findings highlight the potential for personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes in pelvic floor disorders.

Risk of pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy for benign conditions: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after hysterectomy for benign conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

This nationwide retrospective cohort study, utilizing data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, compared women aged 40 to 59 who underwent benign hysterectomy between 2002 and 2011 (hysterectomy group) with those who had national medical examinations during the same period (nonhysterectomy group). The analysis used a 1:1 propensity score matching method adjusted for variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incident POP.

RESULTS

The final sample of 32,984 participants (16,492 in each group) had a median age of 47 years [45-50] (p-value 0.305) and a median follow-up of 11.4 years [10-13.3] (p-value 0.189). The incidence of POP was 0.5 % in the nonhysterectomy group and 0.6 % in the hysterectomy group. Hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk of POP that required surgery or pessary use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.403, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.026-1.919). Subtotal hysterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of POP (HR 1.868, 95 % CI, 0.624-5.593), while total hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk (HR 1.633, 95 % CI, 1.083-2.46). Laparoscopic surgery was not associated with an increased risk of POP (HR 0.611, 95 % CI 0.311-1.202).

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that, overall, hysterectomy is linked to a higher risk of POP, but subtotal hysterectomy and laparoscopy are not associated with increased risk, while total hysterectomy is associated with a higher risk.

Factors Associated With Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Postmenopausal South Korean Women

IMPORTANCE

This study identifies key risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Korean women, providing valuable insights for prevention and personalized care.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for POP in Korean women.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective case-control study analyzed 2003-2011 Korean health checkup data in postmenopausal women diagnosed with POP (cases) and age-matched controls without POP (1:4 ratio) to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 2,506,271 participants, 34,648 patients were selected for the POP group and 138,592 patients were selected for the control group. The risk of POP was found to be increased with overweight (body mass index, 23-24.9: odds ratio [OR], 1.146; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.196; body mass index, 25-29.9: OR, 1.142; 95% CI, 1.097-1.189) and multiple childbirths (2 times: OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.653; ≥3: OR, 1.639; 95% CI, 1.493-1.8). The risk of POP was found to be decreased with smoking (OR, 0.769; 95% CI, 0.688-0.861), alcohol drinking (3-6/week: OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.557-0.758), and exercise (1-2/week: OR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.862-0.947; 3-4/week: OR, 0.896; 95% CI, 0.844-0.951; 5-6/week: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.788-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that overweight and multiple childbirths were associated with an increased risk of POP. Smoking, alcohol drinking, and exercise reduced the risk of POP, but socioeconomic status, age at menarche, and age at menopause were not found to be associated with POP.

How Old Is Too Old? Outcomes of Prolapse Native-Tissue Repair through Uterosacral Suspension in Octogenarians

INTRODUCTION

Medical advancements are expected to lead to a substantial increase in the population of women aged 80 and older by 2050. Consequently, a significant number of individuals undergoing corrective prolapse surgery will fall into the elderly-patient category. The research indicates a notable rise in complications associated with prolapse surgery in patients older than 80, irrespective of frailty and other risk factors. Despite these challenges, the vaginal approach has been identified as the safest surgical method for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair in the elderly population. For this reason, we aimed to investigate the efficacy, complication rate, and functional outcomes associated with vaginal hysterectomy and an apical suspension/high uterosacral ligaments suspension as a primary technique for prolapse repair, both within a cohort of elderly patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent transvaginal hysterectomy plus an apical suspension procedure for stage ≥ II and symptomatic genital prolapse between January 2006 and December 2013. Anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score was used to evaluate subjective satisfaction after surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 81.3 years. All individuals exhibited an anterior compartment prolapse stage II or higher, and the majority also a central prolapse stage II or higher. Notably, all participants reported symptoms of vaginal bulging. Over half of the population (58.6%) complained of incomplete bladder emptying. The intervention for all participants involved a vaginal hysterectomy with an apical suspension. Sixty-three patients (96.9%) and forty-four patients (67.6%) underwent a simultaneous anterior or posterior repair, respectively. Long-term complications (>30 days from surgery) were observed during follow-up, with a median duration of 23 ± 20 months. Seven (10.7%) anatomical recurrences were recorded, five (7.69%) concerning the anterior compartment, one (1.5%) the central, and three (4.6%) the posterior. Nevertheless, none of them necessitated further surgical intervention due to symptoms. Significant anatomical improvements for the anterior, central, and posterior compartments were noticed, compared to preoperative assessment (p < 0.001 for Aa and Ba, p < 0.001 for Ap and Bp, and p < 0.001 for C). PGI-I values established that 100% of patients were satisfied (PGI-I ≥ 2), with a median score of 1.12. Consequently, objective and subjective cure rates were 89.5% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal hysterectomy combined with apical suspension, particularly high uterosacral ligaments suspension, is a safe and effective primary surgical approach, even in elderly patients.

scRNA-seq reveals aging-related immune cell types and regulators in vaginal wall from elderly women with pelvic organ prolapse

Introduction

In the pathology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), little is known about the contributing role of pelvic microenvironment. Also, the age-related differences in pelvic microenvironment of POP patients is always ignored. In the present study, we investigated the age-related differences in pelvic microenvironment between Young POP patients and Old POP patients, and the novel cell types and critical regulators which contributes to the age-related differences.

Methods

Single-cell transcriptomic analyses were used to detect the changes in cell composition and gene expression from the pelvic microenvironment of control group (<60 years), Young POP group (<60 years) and Old POP group (>60 years). Then, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were used to verify the novel cell types and critical regulators in the pelvic microenvironment. Furthermore, histopathological alteration and mechanical property alteration in POP with different ages were revealed by vaginal tissue histology and biomechanical testing.

Results

The up-regulated biological process in Old women with POP is mainly related to chronic inflammation, while the up-regulated biological process in Young women with POP is mainly related to extracellular matrix metabolism. Meantime, CSF3+ endothelial cells and FOLR2+ macrophages were found to play a central role in inducing pelvic chronic inflammation. Furthermore, the collagen fiber and mechanical property of POP patients decreased with aging.

Conclusions

Taken together, this work provides a valuable resource for deciphering the aging-related immune cell types and the critical regulators in pelvic microenvironment. With better understanding of normal and abnormal events in this pelvic microenvironment, we provided rationales of personalized medicine for POP patients with different ages.

The impact on complication rates of delayed routine pessary reviews during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction and hypothesis

During the COVID-19 pandemic, guidance was issued in the United Kingdom advising a delay in routine pessary reviews. The impact of this has not been fully explored. The null hypothesis for this study is that delayed routine pessary reviews during the COVID-19 pandemic did not result in a statistically significant increase in complication rate.

Methods

A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted in NHS Tayside, Scotland, involving 150 patients pre-pandemic and 150 patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (before exclusions). Their notes were reviewed identifying age, care provider, pessary type, length of pessary usage, review date, time elapsed since the previous review, bleeding/infection/ulceration, removal issues, pessary replacement and outcome. Patients excluded were those with no pessary in situ at review, reviews at ≤4 months and >8 months (pre-pandemic) and reviews at ≤8 months (COVID-19 pandemic).

Results

The pre-pandemic group (n=106) had average review times of 10.1,6.2 and 6.2 months for cubes, rings and all others. Overall rates of bleeding/infection/ulceration; reported removal issues; and pessary subsequently not replaced were 9.4%, 11.3% and 5.7% respectively. The COVID-19 pandemic group (n=125) had average review times of 14.7, 10.8 and 11.4 months for cubes, rings and all others. Overall rates of bleeding/infection/ulceration; reported removal issues; and pessary subsequently not replaced were 21.6%, 16.0%, and 12.0% respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, there was a significant increase in rates of bleeding/ulceration/infection (p=0.01). When individual pessaries were considered, this only remained true for rings (p=0.02). Our data would suggest that routine ring pessary reviews should not be extended beyond 6 months or risk bleeding/ulceration/infection.

Trends in Apical Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Impact of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare national surgical practice patterns of performing apical suspension procedures (ASPs) at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) before and after the publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2017 Practice Bulletin on POP.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for hysterectomy cases performed for POP indications for the years 2015-2016 and 2018-2019. The primary outcome was the use of ASP at the time of hysterectomy for POP. Secondary outcomes included the use of anterior, posterior, and paravaginal prolapse repair procedures. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with performing a hysterectomy without an ASP.

RESULTS

A total of 11,336 cases were included, and apical prolapse was the primary POP diagnosis in 86.3% of these cases. There was no statistically significant change in the utilization of ASPs in 2018-2019 compared with 2015-2016 (51.4% vs 49.8%, P = 0.081). Urogynecologists were significantly more likely than general gynecologists to perform ASPs (65.6% vs 37.5%, P < 0.001), which was confirmed on multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 3.257; P < 0.001). The use of concomitant anterior repairs (44.1% vs 39.5%, P < 0.001) and posterior repairs (47.5% vs 41.3%, P < 0.001) increased in the 2018-2019 cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no overall increase in the utilization of concomitant ASPs at the time of hysterectomy done for POP indications despite the 2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin. Urogynecologists were more likely to perform ASPs than general gynecologists.

Changes in Performance of Apical Suspension at the Time of Surgery for Prolapse: Assessment of the Influence of the American Urogynecologic Society and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association of publication of the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS)/American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin on pelvic organ prolapse and performance of an apical suspension at the time of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

Surgical procedures performed with a primary diagnosis of uterovaginal or female genital prolapse, cystocele, or enterocele were isolated from the 2011 to 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. An autoregressive interrupted time series regression estimated the overall temporal trend in performance of an apical suspension and assessed for a change in trend associated with publication of the AUGS/ACOG Practice Bulletin in April 2017. A stratified analysis was also performed depending on performance of a concomitant hysterectomy, and sensitivity analysis was performed using only diagnoses of uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.

RESULTS

There were 72,194 individuals identified; 83.4% had a diagnosis of uterovaginal or female genital prolapse, 15.2% cystocele and 1.4% enterocele. Only 36.6% of cases had an apical suspension. Prior to the practice bulletin publication, performance of an apical suspension grew at 0.19% per quarter (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.31), with a trend toward increased utilization (+0.12%; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.30) after publication. The increase was greater among cases with a concomitant hysterectomy (+0.35%; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62). Sensitivity analyses found similar changes in trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of apical suspensions during surgery for prolapse remains low and is increasing at less than 1% per year. The AUGS/ACOG practice guidelines were associated with minimal changes in this pattern. Incentives or other strategies may be needed to further encourage standard of care management of prolapse.

Pessaries and rectovaginal fistulae: consequences of delayed clinical follow-up in the Covid-19 pandemic

Introduction and hypothesis

While 2017 guidelines from The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists called for pessary replacement every 3 to 4 months, a recent study in Obstetrics and Gynecology suggested that uninterrupted pessary use up to 6 months is not an independent risk factor for development of pessary-related complications.

Methods

Our recent experience throughout the Covid-19 pandemic highlights the potential ramifications of delayed clinical follow-up.

Results

During the Covid-19 pandemic, 3 of our patients developed rectovaginal fistulae secondary to Gellhorn pessary erosion in the context of delayed clinical follow-up. Our patients had previously attended routine appointments every 3 months without complications until missed appointments secondary to the pandemic led to fistulae formation.

Conclusion

We believe that delayed clinical follow-up of pessary management beyond 3 months due to the Covid-19 pandemic may lead to fistula complications in elderly women with Gellhorn pessaries.

International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This segment of Chapter 1 of the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reviews the literature on the clinical definition of POP with the intent of creating standard terminology.

METHODS

An international group containing nine urogynecologists and one university-based medical librarian performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search terms in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Publications were eliminated if not relevant to the clinical definition of POP, and those articles remaining were evaluated for quality using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE). The resulting list of articles was used to inform a comprehensive review and creation of the clinical definition of POP.

RESULTS

The original search yielded 31,931 references, of which 167 were used by the writing group. Ultimately, 78 are referenced in the manuscript.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical definition of POP for this review of the literature is: "anatomical prolapse with descent of at least one of the vaginal walls to or beyond the vaginal hymen with maximal Valsalva effort WITH the presence either of bothersome characteristic symptoms, most commonly the sensation of vaginal bulge, or of functional or medical compromise due to prolapse without symptom bother."

Effect of vaginal estrogen in postmenopausal women using vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse treatment: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Evidence and recommendations for the use of intravaginal estrogen for prevention of bacterial vaginosis and pessary-related complications are limited and controversial. We hypothesized that adding intravaginal estrogen to pessary use would decrease the incidence of bacterial vaginosis and other pessary-related complications.

METHODS

A single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel study was conducted between April 2018 and August 2020. Participants were randomized to either receive intravaginal estriol 0.03 mg plus Lactobacillus acidophilus 100 million viable cell vaginal tablets or have no treatment. The Amsel criteria, normal flora index, visual analog scale, Thai version of the ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal symptoms) questionnaire, vaginal abrasions and vaginal bleeding were evaluated at entry and at 2- and 14-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight women were included and randomized to two groups (39 women per group). At 2-week follow-up, one participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group were diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis (2.7% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.609). At 14-week follow-up, two participants in the intervention group and two participants in the control group were diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis (5.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.926). Normal flora index was significantly different at 2-week follow-up [8 (6.3) vs. 5 (6.0), p = 0.032]. There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale, Thai version of the ICIQ-VS, vaginal abrasions and vaginal bleeding between the 2- and 14-week follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no benefit of intravaginal estrogen in reducing bacterial vaginosis, vaginal abrasions, vaginal bleeding and pain in postmenopausal women using a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.

Risk Factors for Dislodgment of Vaginal Pessaries in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the associated factors associated with pessary dislodgment in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

A cohort study with women (N = 98) with advanced POP who chose conservative treatment with ring pessary between December 2016 and 2018 identified by screening. Demographic data, history of POP, urinary, and/or bowel symptoms were collected. A medical visit was scheduled 3 and 6 months after pessary insertion to evaluate symptoms (vaginal discharge, bleeding, pain, discomfort, new-onset urinary, or fecal problems) and any pessary dislodgment. Two groups were created (women who were able to retain the pessary versus who were not able), and univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to look for risk factors for pessary dislodgment. Women who requested to have their pessaries removed during the 6-month follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

Ninety-three women included in the study, 78 successfully continued to use the pessary at 6 months, and 15 had pessary dislodgment (16.1%). Demographic characteristics were similar between the treatment group and the control group. After multivariate analysis, women who had their pessaries dislodged presented higher rates of previous surgery (odds ratio = 8.11; 95% confidence interval = 2.09-31.58; P = 0.003) with advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system staging (odds ratio, 13.41; confidence interval, 1.97-91.36; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of advanced apical POP and previous POP surgery are risk factors for ring pessary dislodgment. This information should guide physicians for counseling patients before pessary insertion.

Outpatient vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective feasibility study

BACKGROUND

In the light of recent progress in pelvic organ prolapse surgery, the modalities of hospital admission need reconsidering. This work aims to assess success rate of outpatient (ambulatory) vaginal mesh surgery for genital prolapse.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted between January 2015 and July 2017, including all patients presenting with POP-Q stage ≥3 anterior and/or apical prolapse.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine of the 89 eligible patients were treated on an ambulatory basis (group A); 20 required overnight admission (group B): i.e., ambulatory success rate, 77.5%. Mean operative time was 44.9±2.5 min in group A and 62±6.5 min in group B. Reasons for ineligibility for ambulatory management comprised organizational issues at home (10.5%) and excessive home-to-hospital distance (5.7%). The postoperative urinary retention rate was 4.5%. Rates for successful cystocele correction (POP-Q <2) at 2 months were similar in the two groups: 94.2% in group A and 94.4% in group B (P=ns). Mean satisfaction score was 8.6±0.3/10.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient anterior vaginal mesh surgery for prolapse is safe and effective. The current medical-economic context favors ambulatory management. Patient selection, prior information and continuity of care seem primordial.

Fractional Pixel CO2 laser treatment for decubitus ulcer in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a case report

OBJECTIVE

Cervicovaginal decubitus ulceration is a complication of advanced pelvic organ prolapse that is very difficult to manage. Here, we report on the effectiveness of fractional CO2 laser treatment for a wide decubitus ulcer over an apical vaginal vault prolapse.

METHODS

We report a case of a postmenopausal woman with a wide decubitus ulcer over a vaginal vault prolapse. A fractional microablative CO2 Pixel laser system (Alma Lasers, Cesarea, Israel), equipped with an appropriate probe for the vulva, was used to treat the ulceration of a 78-year-old patient across three laser sessions with 30-day intervals.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in the decubitus ulcer was noted in a check-up held 2 months after the final laser session, with approximately 95% wound healing observed. No side effects were reported during or after the laser therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates that fractional Pixel CO2 laser treatment is a viable option for managing decubitus ulcers before definitive surgery in postmenopausal women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Apical suspension is underutilized for repair of stage IV pelvic organ prolapse: an analysis of national practice patterns in the United States

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Support of the vaginal apex is paramount for a durable repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Our aim is to assess national utilization of apical suspension procedures for the surgical treatment of complete POP. We hypothesize that there might be a high rate of apical suspension with advanced prolapse.

METHODS

The 2006-2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for a primary postoperative diagnosis of complete POP. The primary outcome was type of repair. Secondary outcomes included patient characteristics associated with apical suspension or colpocleisis. Procedures were delineated using CPT codes. Chi-squared and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with repair type.

RESULTS

A total of 2,784 women underwent surgery for complete POP with a mean age of 64.6 ± 11.0 years. Overall, 1,300 (46.7%) patients underwent apical suspension: 487 sacrocolpopexies (17.5%), 428 extraperitoneal suspensions (15.4%), and 391 uterosacral suspensions (14.0%). 5.2% (144) underwent colpocleisis, and 47.5% (1,332) of women had a concurrent hysterectomy (CH). With CH, 38.6% (502) had apical suspension or colpocleisis versus 69.5% (940) of post-hysterectomy cases. On logistic regression, CH was inversely associated with apical suspension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.37, CI 0.32-0.44, p < 0.001). Colpocleisis was associated with older age (aOR 4.9 per 10 years, CI 3.8-6.3, p < 0.001), post-hysterectomy surgery (aOR 0.23, CI 0.1-0.4, p < 0.001 for CH), and higher comorbidity index (OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.6, p = 0.009). Complication rates are similar with and without apical suspension (8.2% versus 7.0%, p = 0.269).

CONCLUSIONS

During surgery for complete POP, an apical suspension procedure is performed in 46.7% of patients and is more common post-hysterectomy.

Restoring Genital Hiatus to Normative Values After Apical Suspension Alone Versus With Level 3 Support Procedures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate postoperative genital hiatus after apical suspension procedures without a level 3 support procedure (L3SP), posterior repair, and perineorrhaphy, compared with normative-value genital hiatus of 3.4 cm.

METHODS

This an analysis of a pre-existing retrospectively collected database that included all minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies and uterosacral ligament suspensions performed at a tertiary medical center from January 2009 to August 2015.

RESULTS

We identified 1006 surgical cases: 160 (15.9%) apical suspensions with L3SPs and 846 (84.1%) without. Mean (SD) age was 59 (9) years and body mass index was 27.6 (4.7) kg/m. Women were mainly white (97.4%) with stage III prolapse (67.8%). Those who underwent L3SPs were more likely to be premenopausal and undergo hysterectomy and USLS.Baseline genital hiatus was similar with and without L3SPs (4.8 [1.2] cm vs 4.6 [1.1] cm, P = 0.096). Postoperative genital hiatus was reduced beyond normative (3.4 cm) after apical suspension without (3.0 [0.7] cm, P < 0.001) and with (2.8 [0.9] cm, P < 0.001) L3SPs. Postoperative genital hiatus after L3SPs was similar to those without (2.8 [0.9] cm vs 3.0 [0.7] cm, P = 0.06). We found that change in genital hiatus was greater, by 0.7 cm, when L3SP was performed versus not performed (2.3 [1.2] cm vs 1.6 [1.1] cm, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Level 3 support procedures may be unnecessary to restore genital hiatus to normal at time of apical suspension procedures and should be reserved for select patients.

The underutilization of obliterative and constrictive surgery in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Vaginal length and caliber are necessary for satisfactory vaginal coitus. Surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can include preservation of vaginal length and caliber, or shortening and narrowing of the vagina (constrictive and obliterative surgery). The latter option is proven to have fewer complications and a lower risk of recurrence of POP. Women undergoing surgical intervention for POP who are not coitally active and choose not to be coitally active for the rest of their lives should be offered constrictive and obliterative surgery.

Apical Suspension Utilization at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Varies With Surgeon Specialty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether utilization of apical suspension procedures at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse varies with surgeon specialty.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2016. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification with a diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with any combination of pelvic reconstructive procedures. Propensity score matching using available preoperative clinical data was used to ameliorate selection bias by specialty at a ratio of 1 female pelvic reconstructive surgeon (FPMRS) surgeon to 2 obstetrician-gynecologists (OBG). Descriptive statistics were reported as means with standard deviations. Pairwise analysis using Student t test and Fisher exact test was performed where appropriate.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were 901 cases performed by FPMRS and 1802 performed by OBG. The overall utilization rate of apical suspension in the matched cohort was 81.7% for FPMRS and 19.8% for OBG (P < 0.001). Obstetrician-gynecologists were more likely to perform vaginal hysterectomy without apical suspension compared with FPMRS (44.3% vs 5.8%; P < 0.001) and were also more likely to perform nonapical vaginal repair without also performing an apical suspension, (17.7% vs 9.3%, P < 0.001), compared to urogynecologists. On multivariable logistic regression, having surgery performed by FPMRS was the only significant variable associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing apical suspension (adjusted odds ratio, 5.34; 95% confidence interval, 4.48-6.36).

CONCLUSIONS

The FPMRS physicians are more likely to perform apical suspension with vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse repair compared with OBG.

Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is an increasing medical problem with complex diagnostics and controversial surgical management. It causes a series of dysfunctions in the gynecological, urinary, and anorectal organs. Numerous procedures have been proposed to treat these conditions, but in recent years, ventral mesh rectocolposacropexy (VMRCS) has emerged as the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of POP, especially by a laparoscopic approach. This surgical technique limits the risk of autonomic nerve damage, and the colpopexy allows the correction of concomitant prolapse of the middle compartment. However, symptoms derived from anterior compartment prolapse remain a major morbidity and sometimes require an additional procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of laparoscopic prosthetic rectocolposacropexy (LRCS) and colposacropexy (LCS) procedures performed to manage combined multicompartmental POP.

METHODS

Between November 2008 and December 2017, 38 patients with symptomatic POP underwent rectocolposacropexy (RCS) or colposacropexy (CS) by a laparoscopic approach. Demographics, mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, and functional outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The median operating time was 200 min (IQR 160-220). Additional simultaneous surgery for POP was performed in nine cases: five suburethral slings and four hysterectomies were performed. No mortality was recorded. The conversion rate was 7.89%. There were two intraoperative complications (5.26%): one enterotomy and one urinary bladder tear. Late complications occurred in 5.26% of cases. After a mean follow-up of 20 months, constipation was completely resolved or improved in 83.33% of patients, urinary stress incontinence was resolved or improved in 52.94%, and gynecological symptomatology was resolved or improved in 93.75%. The recurrence rate was 5.26%.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic mesh rectocolposacropexy and colposacropexy are safe and effective techniques associated with very low morbidity. In the medium term, they provide good results for POP and associated symptoms, but urinary symptomology has a worse outcome.

Universal cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy: a debate

Injury to the bladder and/or ureters is the cause of significant morbidity, and efforts to reduce these injuries are important. This debate presents arguments that both support, and refute, the value of routine cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy. Proponents of routine cystoscopy state that injuries are more likely to be detected and repaired when cystoscopy is routinely performed. Dissenters counter that the available evidence does not support routine cystoscopy at the current rates of lower urinary tract injury, and the cystoscopy should be performed only when injury is suspected or when performing hysterectomy with concurrent procedures that increase the risk of lower urinary tract injury.

Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate

BACKGROUND

Apical vaginal support is considered the keystone of pelvic organ support. Level I evidence supports reestablishment of apical support at time of hysterectomy, regardless of whether the hysterectomy is performed for prolapse. National rates of apical support procedure performance at time of inpatient hysterectomy have not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to estimate trends and factors associated with use of apical support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in a large national database.

STUDY DESIGN

The National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample was used to identify hysterectomies performed from 2004 through 2013 for benign indications. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to select both procedures and diagnoses. The primary outcome was performance of an apical support procedure at time of hysterectomy. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

There were 3,509,230 inpatient hysterectomies performed for benign disease from 2004 through 2013. In both nonprolapse and prolapse groups, there was a significant decrease in total number of annual hysterectomies performed over the study period (P < .0001). There were 2,790,652 (79.5%) hysterectomies performed without a diagnosis of prolapse, and an apical support procedure was performed in only 85,879 (3.1%). There was a significant decrease in the proportion of hysterectomies with concurrent apical support procedure (high of 4.0% in 2004 to 2.5% in 2013, P < .0001). In the multivariable logistic regression model, increasing age, hospital type (urban teaching), hospital bed size (large and medium), and hysterectomy type (vaginal and laparoscopically assisted vaginal) were associated with performance of an apical support procedure. During the study period, 718,578 (20.5%) inpatient hysterectomies were performed for prolapse diagnoses and 266,743 (37.1%) included an apical support procedure. There was a significant increase in the proportion of hysterectomies with concurrent apical support procedure (low of 31.3% in 2005 to 49.3% in 2013, P < .0001). In the multivariable logistic regression model, increasing age, hospital type (urban teaching), hospital bed size (medium and large), and hysterectomy type (total laparoscopic and laparoscopic supracervical) were associated with performance of an apical support procedure.

CONCLUSION

This national database study demonstrates that apical support procedures are not routinely performed at time of inpatient hysterectomy regardless of presence of prolapse diagnosis. Educational efforts are needed to increase awareness of the importance of reestablishing apical vaginal support at time of hysterectomy regardless of indication.

Updates on the diagnostic tools for evaluation of pelvic floor disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pelvic floor disorders are common and cause significant morbidity for women. Recent advances in the evaluation of women with pelvic floor dysfunction have improved diagnostic accuracy and, with the development and use of validated patient-reported outcomes, has improved measurement of outcomes important to patients. We describe recent advances in the evaluation and measurement of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs).

RECENT FINDINGS

We describe recent developments in pelvic floor assessment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

SUMMARY

Complex integration of multiple anatomic structures and their function are necessary for pelvic floor function. Although the pillars of a complete assessment are a thorough history and physical exam, diagnostic tools can aid in fleshing out the correct and complete analysis of the patient suffering from PFDs.