Adverse Events After Concurrent Procedures for Gynecologic Malignancies and Pelvic Floor Disorders

Short-Term Outcomes After Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer/EIN With Concomitant Pelvic Floor Disorder Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Endometrial cancer and precancer are common gynecologic problems for many women. A majority of these patients require surgery as the mainstay of treatment. Many of these patients often have concurrent pelvic floor disorders. Despite the prevalence and shared risk, fewer than 3% of women undergo concomitant surgery for PFDs at the time of surgery for endometrial cancer or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate postoperative morbidity of concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or urinary incontinence (UI) procedures at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (EC) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/endometrial hyperplasia (EIN/EH).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of women undergoing hysterectomy for EC or EIN/EH between 2017 and 2022 used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The primary outcome was any major complication within 30 days of surgery. Comparisons were made between 2 cohorts: hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence procedures (POPUI) versus hysterectomy without concomitant POP or UI procedures (HYSTAlone). A subgroup analysis was performed in patients with EC. A propensity score matching cohort was also created.

RESULTS

A total of 23,144 patients underwent hysterectomy for EC or EIN/EH: 1.9% (n = 432) had POP and/or UI procedures. Patients with POPUI were older, were predominantly White, had higher parity, and had lower body mass index with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Patients with POPUI were less likely to have EC (65.7% vs 78.3%, P < 0.0001) and more likely to have their hysterectomy performed by a general obstetrician- gynecologists or urogynecologists. Major complications were low and not significantly different between POPUI and HYSTAlone (3.7% vs 3.6%, P = 0.094). A subgroup analysis of EC alone found that the HYSTAlone subset did not have more advanced cancers, yet the surgeon was more likely a gynecologic oncologist (87.1% vs 68.0%, P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts for the primary and secondary outcomes using propensity score matching analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant prolapse and/or incontinence procedures were uncommon and did not increase the rate of 30-day major complications for women undergoing hysterectomy for EC/EH.

Pelvic floor dysfunction in gynecologic cancer survivors

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common complication in gynecologic cancer survivors (GCS) and is now a worldwide medical and public health problem because of its great impact on the quality of life of GCS. PFD after comprehensive gynecologic cancer treatment is mainly reflected in bladder function, rectal function, sexual dysfunction and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), of which different types of gynecologic cancer correspond to different disease incidence. The prevention strategies of PFD after comprehensive gynecologic cancer treatment mainly included surgical treatment, physical therapy and behavioral guidance, etc. At present, most of them still focus on physical therapy, mostly using Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) and multi-modal PFMT treatment of biofeedback combined with electrical stimulation, which can reduce the possibility of PFD after surgery in GCS to some extent. This article reviews the clinical manifestations, causes and current research progress of prevention and treatment methods of PFD after comprehensive treatment for GCS.

Concurrent Surgery for Locoregional Gynecologic Cancers and Pelvic Floor Disorders in a Population of Patients With Medicare Insurance

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the rate of concurrent surgery for locoregional gynecologic cancer and pelvic organ prolapse-urinary incontinence (POP-UI) and to assess the rate of surgery for POP-UI within 5 years for those who did not undergo concurrent surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify cases of local or regional endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2000 to 2017. Patients were followed up for 5 years from diagnosis. We used χ 2 tests to identify categorical variables associated with having a concurrent POP-UI procedure with hysterectomy or within 5 years of hysterectomy. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs adjusted for variables statistically significant (α=.05) in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 30,862 patients with locoregional gynecologic cancer, only 5.5% underwent concurrent POP-UI surgery. Of those with a preexisting diagnosis related to POP-UI, however, 21.1% had concurrent surgery. Of the patients who had a diagnosis of POP-UI at the time of initial surgery for cancer and who did not undergo concurrent surgery, an additional 5.5% had a second surgery for POP-UI within 5 years. The rate of concurrent surgery remained constant over the time period (5.7% in 2000 and 2017) despite an increase in the frequency of POP-UI diagnosis in the same time frame.

CONCLUSION

The rate of concurrent surgery for patients with an early-stage gynecologic cancer and POP-UI-associated diagnosis in women older than age 65 years was 21.1%. Of women who did not undergo concurrent surgery but had a diagnosis of POP-UI, 1 in 18 underwent surgery for POP-UI within 5 years of their index cancer surgery. Dedicated efforts must be made to identify patients who would most benefit from concurrent cancer and POP-UI surgery in those with locoregional gynecologic cancers and pelvic floor disorders.

Endometrial Cancer Surgery With or Without Concomitant Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare quality of life (QOL) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or early-stage endometrial cancer and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who chose to have concomitant surgery with cancer surgery alone.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted across eight U.S. sites. Potentially eligible patients were screened for SUI symptoms. Those who screened positive were offered referral to urogynecology and incontinence treatment, including concomitant surgery. Participants were categorized into two groups: 1) concomitant cancer and SUI surgery or 2) cancer surgery alone. The primary outcome was cancer-related QOL as measured by the FACT-En (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial) (range 0-100; higher score indicates better QOL). The FACT-En and questionnaires assessing urinary symptom-specific severity and effects were assessed before surgery and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Adjusted median regression accounting for clustering was used to examine the relationship between SUI treatment group and FACT-En scores.

RESULTS

Of 1,322 (53.1%) patients, 702 screened positive for SUI with 532 analyzed; 110 (21%) chose concomitant cancer and SUI surgery, and 422 (79%) chose cancer surgery alone. FACT-En scores increased for both the concomitant SUI surgery and cancer surgery-only groups from the preoperative to the postoperative period. After adjustment for timepoint and preoperative covariates, the median change in FACT-En score (postoperative-preoperative) was 1.2 points higher (95% CI -1.3 to 3.6) for the concomitant SUI surgery group compared with the cancer surgery-only group across the postoperative period. Median time until surgery (22 days vs 16 days; P <.001), estimated blood loss (150 mL vs 72.5 mL; P <.001), and operative time (185.5 minutes vs 152 minutes; P <.001) were all greater for the concomitant cancer and SUI surgery group compared with the cancer-only group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant surgery did not result in improved QOL compared with cancer surgery alone for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and patients with early-stage endometrial cancer with SUI. However, FACT-En scores were improved in both groups.

Feasibility of combining pelvic reconstruction with gynecologic oncology-related surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

At our institution, every patient seen by the gynecologic oncology service is screened for pelvic floor dysfunction. This study was aimed at determining if a combined surgical approach by gynecologic oncology and urogynecology services at our institution was feasible and safe for this patient population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing combined surgery by gynecologic oncology and urogynecology services at our institution from 2013 to 2021. Perioperative variables, postoperative adverse events, and long-term outcomes were assessed, and descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

From 20 December 2013 to 29 January 2021, a total of 102 patients underwent concurrent surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence. Seventy-three patients (71.6%) had normal/benign pathologic conditions, and 29 (28.4%) had premalignant/malignant pathologic conditions. Ten patients (9.8%) had a postoperative complication, including reoperation for exposed midurethral sling (4.9%), urinary retention requiring midurethral sling release (2.9%), reoperation for hemoperitoneum (1.0%), and anemia requiring blood transfusion (1.0%). Nine complications occurred in patients with benign/normal pathologic conditions (12.3%), and one complication occurred in patients with pre-malignant/malignant pathologic conditions (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-institution experience, concurrent gynecologic oncology and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery were safe and feasible in combination with no reported major morbidity events.

Assessment of Adverse Events in a Matched Cohort of Women Undergoing Concurrent Midurethral Sling at the Time of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Procedures for stress urinary incontinence and benign gynecologic surgery are often performed concurrently, and associated complication rates have previously been unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complication rates between women undergoing midurethral sling (MUS) placement at the time of benign gynecologic surgery and those undergoing MUS alone.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective matched cohort study of women undergoing MUS with or without concurrent minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery from January 2010 through December 2020. Eligible women undergoing concurrent surgery were matched to a cohort of women undergoing MUS placement alone. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic and perioperative/postoperative data up to 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight women met inclusion criteria for the concurrent group, and 152 women were matched accordingly. The overall adverse event rate was 39.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.55) for the concurrent group and 24.3% (95% CI, 0.18-0.32) for the MUS-only group ( P = 0.05). Adverse events with Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ 2 were higher in the concurrent group (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1: 5% vs 0%, P = 0.04; Clavien-Dindo Grade 2: 16% vs 6%, P = 0.04), as was composite postoperative resource utilization (76% vs 49%, P = 0.003). Mesh exposure ( P = 0.03) and sling lysis/excision rates ( P = 0.02) were higher in the concurrent group. On logistic regression, concurrent surgery cases remained significantly associated with sling mesh erosion (adjusted odds ratio, 12.6; 95% CI, 1.4-116.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Midurethral sling placement at the time of minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery is safe but is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative hospital resource utilization and sling mesh extrusion, and a need for revision.

Surgeon Attitudes Toward Concurrent Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Procedures: A Cross-sectional Survey

IMPORTANCE

There is increasing overlap in the urogynecologic and gynecologic oncologic patient populations. To improve patient advocacy and access to care, a collaborative surgical approach may benefit this cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate surgeon attitudes toward performing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures. We hypothesized that most surgeons are amenable to collaboration.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Urogynecologic Society from August to November 2020. A 23-item online survey was created to assess surgeon demographics, practice and screening patterns, and attitudes toward surgical collaboration. We also evaluated obstacles to performing joint procedures and assessed whether attitudes could be influenced by new information.

RESULTS

A total of 338 surveys were included in the analysis, including 158 urogynecologists and 226 gynecologic oncologists (GOs). Most surgeons (77.8%) will recommend concurrent procedures with another specialty, and 97.8% of urogynecologists and 95.7% of oncologists currently perform joint surgical procedures. Male surgeons, regardless of specialty, were more likely to recommend staged procedures (44% vs 31%, P < 0.001), as were GOs (28% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001). However, oncologists were more likely than urogynecologists to initiate referrals for surgical collaboration (33.3% vs 14.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 22.2% of urogynecologists and oncologists prefer staging surgical procedures. The most common barrier to a combined procedure was logistics. Urogynecologists were more concerned about the effects of cancer treatments on healing, the use of mesh implants, and financial reimbursements as compared with GOs. Treatment delay was a significantly greater concern for the oncologists.

Vaginal symptoms in women who are affected by gynecologic cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pelvic floor disorders are common among gynecologic cancer survivors. With improvements in survivorship, quality of life conditions in these women need greater attention and care. This review focuses specifically on vulvovaginal symptoms, which are common and have a negative impact on sexual health and quality of life in women affected by gynecologic cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review publications on treatment-specific sexual health outcomes, screening and treatment of vulvovaginal symptoms and sexual pain, and surgical management options. Recent evidence regarding the safety of concomitant prolapse repair at the time of surgery for gynecologic malignancies and CO2 laser therapy is discussed and areas needing further research and innovation are highlighted.

SUMMARY

Pelvic floor disorders, including vaginal and sexual health concerns, are common in women affected by gynecologic cancer due to both common risk factors and as a side effects of cancer treatment. Gynecologists play a critical role in screening, treatment, and collaboration with other specialists to provide comprehensive care for these women throughout their lifetime.

Functional Changes of the Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Systems before and after the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer-A Systematic Review

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC), which coexists with such civilization diseases as diabetes, obesity or hypertension, is constantly increasing. Treatment includes surgery as well as brachytherapy, teletherapy, rarely chemotherapy or hormone therapy. Due to the good results of the treatment, the occurrence of side effects of therapy becomes a problem for the patients. One of the large groups of side effects includes the pelvic organ prolapse, urinary and fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to present current knowledge on the occurrence of pelvic floor dysfunction in women treated for EC. A literature review was conducted in the PubMED and WoS databases, including articles on pelvic floor dysfunction in women with EC. PRISMA principles were followed in the research methodology. A total of 1361 publications were retrieved. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 papers were eligible for the review. Mostly retrospective studies based on different questionnaires were evaluated. No prospective studies were found in which, in addition to subjective assessment, clinical examination and objective assessment of urinary incontinence were used. Studies show a significant increase in the incidence of pelvic floor disorders, including urinary incontinence, after various forms of EC treatment. We believe that assessment of complications after endometrial cancer treatment is clinically relevant. The review emphasizes the importance of programming prospective studies to prevent and address these disorders at each stage of oncologic treatment.

The Risk of Primary Uterine and Cervical Cancer After Hysteropexy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the rate of subsequent uterine/cervical cancer after hysteropexy compared with hysterectomy with apical prolapse repair.

METHODS

The study used a retrospective cohort of women with uterovaginal prolapse using the Cerner Health Facts database between 2010 and 2018. We identified sacrospinous or uterosacral ligament suspensions or sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy and excluded those with previous hysterectomy. We used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for endometrial cancer/hyperplasia and cervical cancer and then reviewed each case, excluding those whose cancer existed at time of prolapse repair. Given that 0 cancer cases were identified, we used Wilson, Jeffreys, Agresti-Coull, Clopper-Pearson, and Rule of 3 to define 95% confidence intervals to estimate the highest possible rate of cancer in each cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 8,927 patients underwent apical prolapse surgery. Of 4,510 with uterovaginal prolapse, 755 (16.7%) underwent hysteropexy. Seventy one with hysterectomy and 5 with hysteropexy had codes for subsequent gynecologic cancer but were excluded on further review. This left 0 gynecologic cancer cases with the largest 95% confidence interval of 0%-0.61% for hysteropexy versus 0%-0.13% for hysterectomy (P > 0.05). The hysteropexy cohort was older (62.6 years vs 57.3 years, P < 0.0001), more likely to have public insurance (51.0% vs 37.9%, P < 0.0001), and less likely to smoke (4.5% vs 7.6%, P = 0.0026). Median follow-up was longer after hysteropexy (1,480 days vs 1,164 days, P < 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

We can say with 95% certainty that uterine or cervical cancer will develop after hysteropexy in fewer than 0.61% of women, which was not different if hysterectomy was performed. This should be included in preoperative counseling for hysteropexy. Studying longer follow-up after hysteropexy may capture more cases of subsequent cancer development.

Mesh Complication Rates Following Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Women With History of Synthetic Midurethral Sling Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of mesh complications in women with and without subsequent pelvic and abdominal radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

We identified women within a large health care organization who underwent mesh-augmented surgery for pelvic floor disorders between 2008 and 2014 and subsequently received RT prior to 2018. We compared them to a randomly selected group of women who underwent similar mesh-augmented pelvic reconstructive surgery without RT in a 1:4 ratio. Mesh complications were identified through chart review corroborated with the ninth and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes for mesh complications. Mesh complications between groups were compared using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 36 women with RT and compared them with 144 women without RT. Indications for mesh implantation and concomitant vaginal procedures were similar between the groups. The majority of mesh implants (94.4%) were midurethral slings. Twelve mesh complications (6.7%) were identified, with similar rates in the RT (8.3%) and no-RT (6.2%) groups (P = 0.65). The risk of mesh complications did not differ between groups when compared using the Cox proportional hazards model, controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, menopausal status, and smoking (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.802-1.787).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the occurrence of mesh-related complications between women with and without RT. Abdominopelvic RT may not substantially increase the risk of mesh complications following placement of a synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence. The need for future RT may only be a minor factor in counseling patients on the risks of mesh implants for pelvic floor disorders.

Pelvic floor muscle assessment by digital palpation and translabial ultrasound of women with cervical or endometrial cancer after pelvic radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that anatomical changes in the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) could be detected using four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (4D TLUS) in patients with cervical (CC) or endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent pelvic radiotherapy (RT) as digital palpation may present sensitivity limitations.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study that included 64 women (26 with CC and 38 with EC). PFM function was assessed by digital palpation, grading muscle strength according to the Modified Oxford Scale and by 4D TLUS. Ultrasonographic variables were: levator plate angle, hiatal area, puborectalis muscle thickness, puborectalis strain and levator ani muscle integrity. These variables were also correlated with clinical and sociodemographic data from all these patients. A 5% significance level was adopted.

RESULTS

When assessed by digital palpation, no significant difference was found in PFM strength between women with CC and those with EC (p = 0.747). However, when assessed by 4D TLUS, women with CC presented greater thickening of the left (p = 0.039) and right (p = 0.014) lower portion of the puborectalis muscle during PFM contraction compared to those with EC. After pooling the groups, higher cancer staging (p = 0.028) was associated with smaller narrowing in the symphysis-levator distance, and shorter RT finishing duration (< 60 months) was associated with higher thickening in the left (p = 0.029) and right (p = 0.013) upper portion of the puborectalis muscle during PFM contraction as well as a shorter menopause duration (p = 0.007 and p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical changes in the puborectalis muscle during PFM contraction were detected by 4D TLUS within gynecological cancer patients after pelvic RT.

Transvaginal single-port laparoscopic pelvic reconstruction with Y-shaped mesh: experiences of 93 cases

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To demonstrate the outcomes of pelvic reconstruction using Y-shaped mesh in patients with multiple-compartment pelvic organ prolapse via transvaginal single-port laparoscopy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series study. Patients diagnosed with severe multiple-compartment prolapse were enrolled between July 1, 2017, and March 31, 2020. Patients underwent transvaginal single-port laparoscopic pelvic reconstruction with Y-shaped mesh. Baseline data and perioperative results were collected. Patients were followed up with the POP-Q score, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12). T-test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Operations were successful in all 93 patients without conversion or serious complications. Mean operative time was 132.70 ± 28.02 min and estimated blood loss was 110.65 ± 56.31 ml. VAS pain score was 2.91 ± 1.16 and cosmetic score was 9.20 ± 0.60. During 1-33 months of follow-up, no recurrence or mesh exposure was observed. Five patients suffered from de novo SUI, six had constipation, two had dyspareunia, and one had persistent pelvic pain. The pre- and postoperative Aa point was +2.13 ± 1.23 vs. -2.91 ± 0.28 (P < 0.05), C point was 2.63 ± 2.41 vs. -6.86 ± 0.69 (P < 0.05), and Ap point was -0.26 ± 1.79 vs. -2.97 ± 0.16 (P < 0.05). The PFDI-20 score was 76.81 ± 32.06 vs. 18.18 ± 20.25 (P < 0.05), while the PISQ-12 score was 34.30 ± 4.17 vs. 37.20 ± 2.60 (P < 0.05), which suggested significant improvements in both physical prolapse and quality of life after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal single-port laparoscopic pelvic reconstruction with Y-shaped mesh is a feasible, effective and safe treatment option for severe multiple-compartment prolapse. Patients may benefit from its mild pain level and good cosmetic effect as well as only minor mesh-related complications.

Perioperative adverse events in women undergoing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgeries for suspected malignancy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study's objectives were to compare the incidence of adverse events after concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery to gynecologic oncology surgery alone and to describe the frequency of modification in planned urogynecologic procedures. The authors hypothesized there would be no difference in major complications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched cohort study of women who underwent concurrent surgery at a large tertiary care center between January 2004 and June 2017. Cohorts were matched by surgeon, surgery route, date, and final pathologic diagnosis. Perioperative data and postoperative adverse events classified by Clavien-Dindo grade were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients underwent concurrent surgeries, with 216 matched cohorts. Concurrent-case patients were more likely to be older, postmenopausal, have greater vaginal parity, have had preoperative chemotherapy, and have preoperative cardiac or pulmonary disease. There were no differences in intraoperative complications or Dindo grade ≥ 3 adverse events between groups, but there were more grade 2 adverse events in the concurrent cohort (44 vs 19%, p < 0.0001) including postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) (26 vs 7%, p < 0.0001). Concurrent surgery remained associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 2 events on multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.2, p = 0.0004). Discharge with a urinary catheter was more frequent after concurrent cases (35 vs 2%, p < 0.0001). Planned urogynecologic procedures were modified in 10% (n = 11) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent surgeries have an increased incidence of minor but not serious perioperative adverse events. One in ten planned urogynecologic procedures is either modified or abandoned during combined surgeries.