The Language of First-Trimester Nonviable Pregnancy: Patient-Reported Preferences and Clarity

A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multisociety panel to develop a first-trimester US lexicon based on scientific evidence, societal guidelines, and expert consensus that would be appropriate for imagers, clinicians, and patients. Through a modified Delphi process with consensus of at least 80%, agreement was reached for preferred terms, synonyms, and terms to avoid. An intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is defined as a pregnancy implanted in a normal location within the uterus. In contrast, an ectopic pregnancy (EP) is any pregnancy implanted in an abnormal location, whether extrauterine or intrauterine, thus categorizing cesarean scar implantations as EPs. The term pregnancy of unknown location is used in the setting of a pregnant patient without evidence of a definite or probable IUP or EP at transvaginal US. Since cardiac development is a gradual process and cardiac chambers are not fully formed in the first trimester, the term cardiac activity is recommended in lieu of 'heart motion' or 'heartbeat.' The terms 'living' and 'viable' should also be avoided in the first trimester. 'Pregnancy failure' is replaced by early pregnancy loss (EPL). When paired with various modifiers, EPL is used to describe a pregnancy in the first trimester that may or will not progress, is in the process of expulsion, or has either incompletely or completely passed.

A Review of Miscarriage and Healthcare Communication in the United States

Miscarriage is a pervasive and socioemotionally complex pregnancy complication. Evidence suggests that poor clinical management can worsen these experiences. Yet, assessments of healthcare communication during a miscarriage are limited and a systematic review of the literature is needed. This review identified and synthesized original research on miscarriage and healthcare communication in the United States from the past 20 years to identify existing knowledge gaps for future miscarriage research. The following databases were searched: PubMed, PsychINFO, and ERIC Database. Data were charted according to Arksey and O'Malley's Scoping Review Framework. Eleven articles were included in the review and three primary themes emerged: (a) patients overwhelmingly prefer patient-centered care; (b) miscarriage is often overmedicalized, which leads to poor communication; and (c) informed decision-making related to one's miscarriage can improve patient experiences. Several gaps were also identified, including studies seeking physician perspectives on miscarriage communication, evaluation of standard care guidelines, and studies evaluating diverse patients' perspectives. This review highlights the need for patient-centered care that utilizes compassionate and accessible language and promotes informed decision-making. Future research should use quantitative methodologies and longitudinal designs to build upon these findings and improve patient experiences of miscarriage.

A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multisociety panel to develop a first-trimester US lexicon based on scientific evidence, societal guidelines, and expert consensus that would be appropriate for imagers, clinicians, and patients. Through a modified Delphi process with consensus of at least 80%, agreement was reached for preferred terms, synonyms, and terms to avoid. An intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is defined as a pregnancy implanted in a normal location within the uterus. In contrast, an ectopic pregnancy (EP) is any pregnancy implanted in an abnormal location, whether extrauterine or intrauterine, thus categorizing cesarean scar implantations as EPs. The term pregnancy of unknown location is used in the setting of a pregnant patient without evidence of a definite or probable IUP or EP at transvaginal US. Since cardiac development is a gradual process and cardiac chambers are not fully formed in the first trimester, the term cardiac activity is recommended in lieu of 'heart motion' or 'heartbeat.' The terms 'living' and 'viable' should also be avoided in the first trimester. 'Pregnancy failure' is replaced by early pregnancy loss (EPL). When paired with various modifiers, EPL is used to describe a pregnancy in the first trimester that may or will not progress, is in the process of expulsion, or has either incompletely or completely passed. © RSNA and Elsevier, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. All rights reserved. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article. See also the editorial by Scoutt and Norton in this issue.

Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care

BACKGROUND

Abortion stigma likely affects the terminology abortion patients, providers and the public use or avoid using to refer to abortion care. Knowing the terminology people seeking abortion prefer could help inform the language used in clinical interactions and improve patients' experiences with abortion care. However, research in the U.S. has not examined patients' preferences in this area or whether terminology preferences vary by participant characteristics, in the way that experiences of stigma vary across different contexts and communities. This study aims to describe preferred terminology among people presenting for abortion care and to explore the pregnancy-related characteristics associated with these preferences.

METHODS

We surveyed abortion patients about their experiences accessing abortion care, including preferred terms for the procedure. Respondents could mark more than one term, suggest their own term, or indicate no preference. We recruited people ages 15-45 seeking abortion from four U.S. abortion facilities located in three states (California, Illinois, and New Mexico) from January to June 2019. We used descriptive statistics and multivariable multinomial logistic regression to explore associations between respondents' pregnancy-related characteristics and their preferred terminology.

RESULTS

Among the 1092 people approached, 784 (77%) initiated the survey and 697 responded to the terminology preference question. Most participants (57%, n = 400) preferred only one term. Among those participants, "abortion" (43%) was most preferred, followed by "ending a pregnancy" (29%), and "pregnancy termination" (24%). In adjusted multivariable models, participants who worried "very much" that other people might find out about the abortion (29%) were significantly more likely than those who were "not at all" worried (13%) to prefer "ending a pregnancy" over having no preference for a term (adjusted relative risk ratio: 2.68, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.46-4.92).

CONCLUSIONS

People seeking abortion have varied preferences for how they want to refer to their abortions, in particular if they anticipate abortion stigma. Findings can be useful for clinicians and researchers so that they can be responsive to people's preferences during clinical interactions and in the design and conduct of abortion research.

First Trimester Miscarriage

First trimester miscarriage, or early pregnancy loss, is a common occurrence in the United States. Miscarriage management includes expectant, medical, or surgical approaches. Decisions about management options should be approached through shared decision making between the patient and provider and with consideration of patient's preferences, hemodynamic stability, cost, gestational age, and effectiveness. Emergencies requiring immediate interventions are rare. Newer developments in management, including a more effective medical regimen with the addition of mifepristone and cost-effective and convenient in-office surgical interventions, have expanded treatment options.

Retrospective analysis of stillbirth and induced termination of pregnancies: Factors affecting determination

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the factors and frequencies of induced termination of pregnancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 488 terminations of pregnancies (TOPs) between January 2011 and December 2021 to demonstrate the factors affecting the decision to terminate the pregnancy. All cases had been hospitalized to manage the induction of labor. Methods included serial multiple laminaria dilation of the cervix and administration of a cervical misoprostol suppository. After induction of labor, the subject may experience amniotomy, instrumental evacuation of the uterus, and even hysterotomy. Pre-procedure counseling included an agreement to share medical records (paper-based and electronic). We verified the indications for all patients seeking TOPs. All cases were performed according to known diagnostic classifications and divided into seven groups for analysis.

RESULTS

The patient ages ranged from 12 to 46 years. The median maternal age was 34 years [interquartile range (IQR) 30, 37]; 52.2% had at least one prior delivery. The pre-procedure diagnosis was divided into seven groups including the following: chromosomal and genetic abnormalities (146/488, 29.9%), no intrauterine heartbeats (126/488, 25.8%), structural anomalies (84/488, 17.2%), elective termination (56/488, 11.5%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (42/488, 8.6%), cervical incompetence (32/488, 6.6%), and other conditions (2/488, 0.4%). After excluding elective terminations, the eleven-year rate of fetal death and stillbirth to births did not show significant changes from 2011 to 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowing the factors underlying the decision to induce intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) including reasons for objecting to pregnancy are important for obstetricians-they can offer better planning and medical counseling. It is important to educate all women about family planning to prevent large numbers of unwanted and unsafe pregnancy terminations.

Predicting miscarriage using systemic immune-inflammation index

AIM

To evaluate the clinical significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for patients who had miscarriages.

MATERIALS

The retrospective study included 709 pregnant women who had a miscarriage (nonviable intrauterine pregnancy up to 20 weeks of gestation) and 676 women who carried a viable intrauterine pregnancy up to 20 weeks of gestation-serving as the control group. The study and the control group were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, laboratory test results, and SII values. Furthermore, laboratory test results and SII values were compared between patients in the study group and the control group with a history of genital bleeding (threatened abortion).

RESULTS

The mean gestational week of pregnancy was 9.5 ± 3 for the control group and 8.3 ± 2.5 for the study group (p = 0.150). The SII values were higher in the study group than in the control group (p = 0.030). In all participants with a clinical history of genital bleeding, the leukocyte count, neutrophil count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and SII values were higher in the miscarriage group than the group with viable fetus (p = 0.031, p = 0.003, p = 0.002, p < 0.001). Based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the SII cutoff value for miscarriage was 883.95 (10⁹ /L) (62.6% sensitivity, 62% specificity) in patients with a clinical history of threatened abortion.

CONCLUSION

High SII values in early pregnancy may be used as an additional marker for the prediction of miscarriage, in pregnant women with threatened abortion. Further prediction models including maternal risk factors and multiple markers may be more valuable for clinical practice.

Emergency Medicine Clinician Experiences Addressing Uncertainty in First-Trimester Bleeding

The purpose of this work is to understand Emergency Department (ED) clinicians’ experiences in communicating uncertainty about first-trimester bleeding (FTB) and their need for training on this topic. This cross-sectional study surveyed a national sample of attending physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs). The survey included quantitative and qualitative questions about communicating with patients presenting with FTB. These questions assessed clinicians’ frequency encountering challenges, comfort, training, prior experience, and interest in training on the topic. Of 402 respondents, 54% reported that they encountered challenges at least sometimes when discussing FTB with patients where the pregnancy outcome is uncertain. While the majority (84%) were at least somewhat prepared for these conversations from their training, which commonly addressed the diagnostic approach to this scenario, 39% strongly or moderately agreed that they could benefit from training on the topic. Because the majority of ED clinicians identified at least sometimes encountering challenges communicating with pregnant patients about FTB, our study indicates a need exists for more training in this skill.

Pregnant and bleeding: A model to assess factors associated with the need for emergency care in early pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of Critical or Emergent patient classification among pregnant patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) and to identify characteristics that discriminate between patients requiring Emergency care from those who can be safely triaged to the ambulatory setting.

STUDY DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study conducted in 3 urban EDs, patients under 16 weeks gestation who presented with bleeding and/or cramping completed a 7-item questionnaire. We compared baseline clinical variables and survey responses among patients classified as Critical or Emergent per the American Board of Emergency Medicine's patient acuity definitions with those classified as Lower Acuity to identify independent risk factors for outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 484 participants, 21 (4.3%) were classified as Critical or Emergent and required interventions. While no demographic characteristics differentiated Critical patients from Lower Acuity patients, survey questions associated with a higher likelihood of emergency intervention included history of prior ectopic pregnancy (OR 8.7, 95% CI 3.2-23.5) heavy bleeding in the past two hours (OR 11.8, 95% CI 3.8-36.1), as well as having made a prior ED visit in the current pregnancy (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.7-5.1). Joint consideration of these risk factors in a multivariable model performed well at discriminating between Critical and Lower Acuity patients with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of ectopic pregnancy, heavy bleeding in the past two hours, and/or prior presentation to the ED in the current pregnancy had the highest risk of needing emergency-level care. The vast majority of patients presenting to the ED with early pregnancy complaints were discharged without intervention.

Early pregnancy loss: Invisible but real

ABSTRACT

One of every five pregnancies ends in miscarriage, disputing the common misconception that miscarriage is rare. Early pregnancy loss has a complex impact on women's mental health, requiring compassionate, trauma-informed care. This article explores the emotional and psychological impacts of miscarriage, and strategies for nurses to support the needs of patients after a miscarriage.

Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the patient experience for clinically stable patients presenting with miscarriage to the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory clinics.

METHODS

We present a subanalysis of a mixed-methods study from 2016 on factors that influence miscarriage treatment decision-making among clinically stable patients. Fifty-four patients were evaluated based on location of miscarriage care (ED or ambulatory-only), and novel parameters were assessed including timeline (days) from presentation to miscarriage resolution, number of health system interactions, and number of specialty-based provider care teams seen. We explored themes around patient satisfaction through in-depth narrative interviews.

RESULTS

Median time to miscarriage resolution was 11 days (range 5-57) (ED) and 8 days (range 0-47) (ambulatory-only). We recorded a mean of 4.4±1.4 (ED) and 3.0±1.2 (ambulatory-only) separate care teams and a median of 13 (range 8-20) (ED) and 19 (range 8-22) (ambulatory-only) health system interactions. Patients seeking care in the ED were younger (28.3 vs 34.0, odds ratio [OR] 5.8, 95% CI 1.8-18.7), more likely to be of black race (28.3 vs 34.0, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1-10.0), uninsured or insured through Medicaid (16 vs 6, OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.1-22.5), and more likely to meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder when compared with ambulatory-only patients (10 vs 3, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.5-23.4). Patients valued diagnostic clarity, timeliness, and individualized care. We found that ED patients reported a lack of clarity surrounding their diagnosis, inefficient care, and a mixed experience with health care provider sensitivity. In contrast, ambulatory-only patients described a streamlined and sensitive care experience.

CONCLUSION

Patients seeking miscarriage care in the ED were more likely to be socioeconomically and psychosocially vulnerable and were less satisfied with their care compared with those seen in the ambulatory setting alone. Expedited evaluation of early pregnancy problems, with attention to clear communication and emotional sensitivity, may optimize the patient experience.