Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes After Failed Vacuum-Assisted Delivery

Failed vacuum and preterm delivery risk in the subsequent pregnancy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Second-stage cesarean delivery is associated with subsequent preterm delivery. Failed vacuum-assisted delivery is a subgroup of second-stage cesarean delivery in which the fetal head is engaged deeper in the pelvis and, thus, is associated with an increased risk of short-term maternal complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women at their subsequent delivery after a second-stage cesarean delivery with failed vacuum-assisted extraction vs after a second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted extraction.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included all women in their subsequent pregnancy after a second-stage cesarean delivery who delivered in all university-affiliated obstetrical centers (n=4) in a single geographic area between 2003 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who had second-stage cesarean delivery after a failed vacuum-assisted delivery were compared with women who had second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted delivery. The primary outcome of this study was preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were vaginal birth rate and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1313 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 215 (16.4%) had a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery at the previous delivery and 1098 (83.6%) did not. In univariate analysis, women with previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery had similar preterm delivery rates (<37, <34, <32, and <28 weeks of gestation), a successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery rates, uterine rupture, and hysterectomy. However, multivariable analyses controlling for confounders showed that a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery is associated with a higher risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.79; P=.02), but not with preterm delivery at <34 or <32 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION

Among women with a previous second-stage cesarean delivery, previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation in the subsequent birth.

Secundiparas following a failed vacuum delivery-factors associated with a successful vaginal delivery: a historical prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on the delivery subsequent to a failed vacuum delivery (failed-VD) in secundiparas. The objective of the current study was to examine the factors associated with a vaginal delivery following a failed-VD.

METHODS

An historical prospective cohort. Obstetric characteristics of secundiparas who underwent a planned caesarean delivery (CD) were compared to those who elected a trial of labour (TOLAC) at single medical-centre, throughout 2006-2019. The latter were further analysed to study for factures associated with successful vaginal birth (VBAC).

RESULTS

Among the 115 secundiparas included, 89 (77%) underwent TOLAC. Compared to women who underwent an elective CD, those who underwent TOLAC were younger by a mean of 4 years, were more likely to have conceived spontaneously, and had a more advanced gestation by a mean of 10 days. VBAC was achieved in 62 women (70%). New-borns of women with VBAC had in average a lower birth weight compared to those with failed TOLAC, (-)195 g ± 396 g versus ( +)197 g ± 454 g respectively, P < 0.01. Having a higher neonatal birthweight at P2 by increments of 500 g, 400 g or 300 g was associated with a failed TOLAC; OR of 9.7 (95%CI; 2.3, 40.0), 11.5 (95%CI; 2.8, 46.7) and 4.5 (95%CI; 1.4, 13.9), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among secundiparas with a previous CD due to a failed-VD, the absolute difference of neonatal BW was found to be significantly associated with achieving VBAC.

Predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean without an epidural among women with no prior vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce on predictors for success of labor after cesarean (LAC) among women delivering without epidural anesthesia (EA). We aimed to study the predictors for success of LAC among women with no prior vaginal delivery that did not use EA.

METHODS

A retrospective study including all women undergoing LAC between 3/2011 and 1/2021 with no prior vaginal delivery that did not use EA. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean were examined using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 466 no EA LAC, 339 (72.7%) delivered vaginally. Women in the successful LAC group had lower pregestational and predelivery BMI as compared to those who had a repeat cesarean [odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 (0.85-0.94), P < 0.001, and 0.89 (0.85-0.93), P < 0.001, respectively]. The rate of labor dystocia in previous cesarean was lower in the LAC success group [92 (27.1%) vs 50 (39.4%), OR 95% CI 0.57 (0.37-0.88)]. Mean gestational age at LAC was lower in the LAC success group (385/7  ± 25/7 vs 395/7  ± 15/7 , P = 0.014). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the following factors were negatively and independently associated with LAC success: higher predelivery BMI [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI 0.90 (0.86-0.95)], higher gestational age at previous cesarean and at LAC [aOR 95% CI 0.81 (0.70-0.93) and 0.97 (0.94-0.98), respectively], induction of labor [aOR 95% CI 0.08 (0.03-0.25)], and duration of ruptured membranes [aOR 95% CI 0.97 (0.96-0.99)].

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified that lower BMI, lower gestational age, shorter ruptured membranes duration, and spontaneous labor are associated with successful LAC among nonusers of EA with no prior vaginal delivery at one tertiary care facility in Israel.

Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean for labor dystocia by sonographic estimated fetal weight

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association of the weight difference between the index trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) sonographic estimated fetal weight (sEFW) and prior delivery birth weight with TOLAC success rate among women with previous labor dystocia and no prior vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all women with prior cesarean for labor dystocia and no prior vaginal delivery undergoing TOLAC during between March 2011 and June 2020 with a sEFW within 1 week from delivery.

RESULTS

Overall, 168 women were included, of those 107 (63.7%) successfully delivered vaginally. The mean sEFW and mean birth weight were lower in the TOLAC success group (P = 0.010 and P = 0.013, respectively). The rate of higher sEFW in the current delivery compared with the previous delivery did not differ between study groups. The rate of higher TOLAC birth weight was lower in the TOLAC success group (odds ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.58). In multivariable regression analysis, maternal age older than 30 years, induction of labor, and higher birth weight were independently negatively associated with TOLAC success (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.27 [0.10-0.70], 0.27 [0.08-0.90], and 0.43 [0.19-0.94]; P = 0.008, P = 0.034, and P = 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

sEFW characteristics did not predict the success or failure of TOLAC among women with prior labor dystocia and no previous vaginal delivery.

Fetal Head Station at Second-Stage Dystocia and Subsequent Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery Success Rate

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery is associated with a subsequent trial of labor success rate among primiparous women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study conducted at two tertiary medical centers included all primiparous women with subsequent delivery after cesarean delivery for second-stage dystocia during 2009-2019, identified from the electronic medical record databases. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) (primary outcome). Additionally, all women with failed TOLAC were matched one-to-one to women with successful TOLAC, according to factors identified in the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 481 primiparous women with prior cesarean delivery for second-stage dystocia, 64.4% (n=310) attempted TOLAC, and 222 (71.6%) successfully delivered vaginally. The rate of successful TOLAC was significantly higher in those with fetal head station below the ischial spines at the index cesarean delivery, as compared with those with higher head station (79.0% vs 60.5%, odds ratio [OR] 2.46, 95% CI 1.49-4.08). The proportion of neonates weighing more than 3,500 g in the subsequent delivery was lower in those with successful TOLAC compared with failed TOLAC (29.7% vs 43.2%, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93). In a multivariable analysis, lower fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery was the only independent factor associated with TOLAC success (adjusted OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.43-3.96). Matching all women with failed TOLAC one-to-one to women with successful TOLAC, according to birth weight and second-stage duration at the subsequent delivery, lower fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery remained the only factor associated with successful TOLAC.

CONCLUSION

Lower fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery for second-stage dystocia was independently associated with a higher vaginal birth after cesarean rate, with an overall acceptable success rate. These findings should improve patient counseling and reassure those who wish to deliver vaginally after prior second-stage arrest.

Successful vaginal birth after cesarean in the second delivery is not associated with the stage of labor of the primary unplanned cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Candidates for trial of labor after cesarean must be carefully screened to maximize success and minimize morbidity. Demographic and obstetric characteristics affecting success rates must be delineated.

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether the labor stage of the primary delivery in which a woman underwent an unplanned cesarean delivery would affect the likelihood that she could achieve a subsequent vaginal birth.

STUDY DESIGN

Electronic medical records-based study of 676 parturients. Trial of labor rates and outcomes were compared between women whose primary cesarean delivery was performed in the first vs. the second stage of labor.

SETTING

Hadassah Medical Center, Israel POPULATION: Women in their second pregnancies, with singleton fetuses, who underwent unplanned cesarean delivery in their first pregnancy and elected trial of labor in the second delivery. The main outcome measures were maternal and neonatal complications and vaginal birth rates in first vs. second stage of labor groups.

RESULTS

In our population, 76 % of women attempt trial of labor after cesarean. Rates of successful vaginal delivery did not differ significantly between those who underwent primary cesarean in the first vs. second stage of labor: 67.4 % vs. 70.2 %, p = 0.483, respectively. Among women whose primary UCD was in the second stage, only 18.2 % (35/192) required a UCD in the second stage in the subsequent delivery, while 58.9 % (113/192) underwent UCD in the first stage in both deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Labor stage of the primary unplanned cesarean delivery, should not dissuade women from a trial of labor after cesarean in their second delivery.

Trial of labor after cesarean in older women who never delivered vaginally

OBJECTIVE

Maternal age is an established determinant of successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). While an increasing proportion of parturients are aged 40 years and older, and previously underwent a cesarean section, little data regarding TOLAC success for this age group is available. This study assessed TOLAC success, and its associated characteristics, among women >40 years who never delivered vaginally.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study of all women who never delivered vaginally aged ≥40 years with a history of previous cesarean delivery, who delivered at our hospital during 2006-2017. Maternal, neonatal, and delivery characteristics were compared between women with successful and unsuccessful TOLAC.

RESULTS

Of 335 older women who never delivered vaginally with a history of one cesarean delivery, 61 (18.2 %) elected TOLAC (18.2 %); the median age was 41[40-42] years and the inter-delivery interval 34 [25-50] months. Overall, 38/61 (62.3 %) had a successful TOLAC. Women with successful TOLAC had a higher rate of a non-recurrent indication for cesarean delivery in their previous cesarean delivery (42.1 % vs. 13.0 %, P = 0.01), whereas dysfunctional labor at previous delivery was more common in the failed TOLAC group (47.8 % vs. 15.8 %, P = 0.007). Failed TOLAC was associated with the presence of gestational diabetes (13.0 % vs. 0 %, P = 0.02) and having a comorbidity (47.8 % vs. 21.0 %, P = 0.02). Induction of labor at TOLAC was more common in the failed TOLAC group (34.8 % vs. 2.6 %, P < 0.001). Birthweight was higher in the failed TOLAC group (3330 vs. 3107 g, P = 0.04), as well as the birthweight difference between deliveries (212 g vs. 82 g, P = 0.03). Neonatal and maternal outcomes were comparable between groups, except for longer length of stay (5 vs. 4 days, P = 0.04) in the failed TOLAC group. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only two factors were independently associated with TOLAC failure: previous cesarean delivery due to dysfunctional labor (OR [95 % CI]: 13.40 (1.29, 138.71), P = 0.03) and higher inter-delivery birthweight difference (OR [95 % CI]: 1.18 (1.11, 1.39), P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

TOLAC in older women who never delivered vaginally is associated with a moderate success rate. The indication for cesarean delivery at the first delivery and inter-delivery birthweight difference were identified as having strong predictive value for TOLAC outcome.