Diagnosis and Management of Vulvar Skin Disorders: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 224

[Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

METHODS

The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.

Comorbid Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: A Management Conundrum

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if treating lichen sclerosus (LS) with high-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) increases the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) recurrence in patients with comorbid vulvar LS and HSIL.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with comorbid vulvar LS and HSIL treated with TCS between 2015 and 2020. Patients with clinically diagnosed or biopsy-proven LS and biopsy-proven HSIL of the vulva were included. Clinical data included demographics, tobacco use, immune-modifying conditions, specimen pathology, treatment types, and HSIL recurrence. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with and without HSIL recurrence.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with comorbid LS and HSIL were identified. The median age was 66.0 years and median time in treatment for LS was 5.5 years. Thirteen (50%) had recurrence of HSIL and 13 (50%) did not have recurrence. Exposure to high-potency TCS was present in 20 (77%) patients, with 17 (65%) having use of more than 1-year duration and 9 (35%) having use at the time of HSIL diagnosis. When comparing the groups with and without HSIL recurrence, there was no significant difference in high-potency TCS exposure, duration of use, or use at time of HSIL diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

High-potency TCS use for the treatment of LS did not seem to increase the risk of HSIL recurrence in patients with comorbid vulvar LS and HSIL. This suggests that high-potency TCS can be appropriately used for the treatment of LS even when HPV-associated disease is present.

High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for pediatric and adolescent vulvar lichen sclerosus

OBJECTIVE

The study's objective was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) in pediatric and adolescent patients.

METHODS

Pediatric and adolescent patients presenting to our hospital from June 2007 to July 2021, with VLS were retrospectively evaluated. The participants' information, including age, symptoms and vulvar examination, were documented, and they were treated with HIFU. The effectiveness of HIFU and its complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients with VLS undergoing HIFU for whom complete follow-up data were available participated in the study. The mean age of the patients at diagnosis was 13.3 ± 4.1 years. All patients successfully underwent HIFU therapy. The mean sonication time was 20.3 ± 8.6 min, and the median treatment energy was 3579.0 J. A few blisters developed in 8 (22.2%) patients and 2 (5.6%) had ulcers. The skin burns were treated medically without scar formation. On average, patients were followed up for 52.0 months after the procedure (a range of 6-175 months). At 6 months after therapy, the total response rate was 91.6%, and 86.6% at 12 months post HIFU. Overall, 16 patients were followed up for more than 5 years. The total response rate was 75%, and the recurrence rate was 12.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, HIFU was demonstrated to be effective and relatively safe for the treatment of VLS in pediatric and adolescent patients, but it is necessary to pay attention to the possible skin burns.

Vulvar High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Cancer as a Risk Factor for Anal Cancer: A Review

OBJECTIVES

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has a higher incidence described in certain groups, namely, in women with vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (vHSILs) and/or human papillomavirus squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). This review describes terminology, vHSIL, and VSCC in their association with ASCC and the published recommendations for early detection of this cancer in these women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review was conducted by the authors on vHSIL and VSCC as risk factors for ASCC.

RESULTS

The ASCC and VSCC incidence are increasing. Women with vHSIL and/or VSCC can present with ASCC at diagnosis, being one of the highest-risk groups. Suspicious symptoms include rectal bleeding, pain, and a sensation of an anal mass. Digital anorectal examination can help detect early ASCC. Sensitivity of anal cytology in women with vHSIL and VSCC seems low, with the exception of immunosuppressed women with genital neoplasia (cervix, vagina, and vulva). There are still insufficient data on high-resolution anoscopy in women with vHSIL and/or VSCC as a screening method.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians need be aware that women with vHSIL and VSCC comprise one of the highest-risk groups for ASCC. Inquiring suggestive symptoms of ASCC and a digital anorectal examination can help in the early detection of this type of cancer.