1
|
Osei-Poku GK, Prentice JC, Easter SR, Diop H. Delivery at an inadequate level of maternal care is associated with severe maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231:546.e1-546.e20. [PMID: 38432412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementing levels of maternal care is one strategy proposed to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. The levels of maternal care framework outline individual medical and obstetrical comorbidities, along with hospital resources required for individuals with these different comorbidities to deliver safely. The overall goal is to match individuals to hospitals so that all birthing people get appropriate resources and personnel during delivery to reduce maternal morbidity. OBJECTIVE This study examined the association between delivery in a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care and the risk of experiencing severe maternal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN The 40 birthing hospitals in Massachusetts were surveyed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Levels of Care Assessment Tool. We linked individual delivery hospitalizations from the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System to hospital-level data from the Levels of Care Assessment Tool surveys. Level of maternal care guidelines were used to outline 16 high-risk conditions warranting delivery at hospitals with resources beyond those considered basic (level I) obstetrical care. We then used the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assigned levels to determine if delivery occurred at a hospital that had the resources to meet an individual's needs (ie, if a patient received risk-appropriate care). We conducted our analyses in 2 stages. First, multivariable logistic regression models predicted if an individual delivered in a hospital that did not have the resources for their risk condition. The main explanatory variable of interest was if the hospital self-assessed their level of maternal care to be higher than the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assigned level. We then used logistic regression to examine the association between delivery at an inappropriate level hospital and the presence of severe maternal morbidity at delivery. RESULTS Among 64,441 deliveries in Massachusetts from January 1 to December 31, 2019, 33.2% (21,415/64,441) had 1 or more of the 16 high-risk conditions that require delivery at a center designated as a level I or higher. Of the 21,415 individuals with a high-risk condition, 13% (2793/21,415), equating to 4% (2793/64,441) of the entire sample, delivered at an inappropriate level of maternal care. Birthing individuals with high-risk conditions who delivered at a hospital with an inappropriate level had elevated odds (adjusted odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-4.96) of experiencing severe maternal morbidity after adjusting for patient comorbidities, demographics, average hospital severe maternal morbidity rate, hospital level of maternal care, and geographic region. CONCLUSION Birthing people who delivered in a hospital with risk-inappropriate resources were substantially more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity. Delivery in a hospital with a discrepancy in their self-assessment and the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assigned level substantially predicted delivery in a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care, suggesting inadequate knowledge of hospitals' resources and capabilities. Our data demonstrate the potential for the levels of maternal care paradigm to decrease severe maternal morbidity while highlighting the need for robust implementation and education to ensure everyone receives risk-appropriate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Godwin K Osei-Poku
- Division of Research and Analysis, Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, MA.
| | - Julia C Prentice
- Division of Research and Analysis, Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah Rae Easter
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hafsatou Diop
- Commissioners Office, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Razaz N, Igland J, Bjørk MH, Joseph KS, Dreier JW, Gilhus NE, Gissler M, Leinonen MK, Zoega H, Alvestad S, Christensen J, Tomson T. Risk of Perinatal and Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Among Pregnant Women With Epilepsy. JAMA Neurol 2024; 81:985-995. [PMID: 39102246 PMCID: PMC11385047 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
Importance Maternal epilepsy is associated with adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. A better understanding of this condition and the associated risk of mortality and morbidity at the time of delivery could help reduce adverse outcomes. Objective To determine the risk of severe maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality among women with epilepsy. Design, Setting, Participants This prospective population-based register study in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden took place between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2017. Data analysis was performed from August 2022 to November 2023. Participants included all singleton births at 22 weeks' gestation or longer. Births with missing or invalid information on birth weight or gestational length were excluded. The study team identified 4 511 267 deliveries, of which 4 475 984 were to women without epilepsy and 35 283 to mothers with epilepsy. Exposure Maternal epilepsy diagnosis recorded before childbirth. Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medication (ASM), defined as any maternal prescription fills from conception to childbirth, was also examined. Main outcomes and measures Composite severe maternal morbidity and mortality occurring in pregnancy or within 42 days postpartum and composite severe neonatal morbidity (eg, neonatal convulsions) and perinatal mortality (ie, stillbirths and deaths) during the first 28 days of life. Multivariable generalized estimating equations with logit-link were used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs. Results The mean (SD) age at delivery for women in the epilepsy cohort was 29.9 (5.3) years. The rate of composite severe maternal morbidity and mortality was also higher in women with epilepsy compared with those without epilepsy (36.9 vs 25.4 per 1000 deliveries). Women with epilepsy also had a significantly higher risk of death (0.23 deaths per 1000 deliveries) compared with women without epilepsy (0.05 deaths per 1000 deliveries) with an aOR of 3.86 (95% CI, 1.48-8.10). In particular, maternal epilepsy was associated with increased odds of severe preeclampsia, embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulation or shock, cerebrovascular events, and severe mental health conditions. Fetuses and infants of women with epilepsy were at elevated odds of mortality (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38) and severe neonatal morbidity (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.40-1.56). In analyses restricted to women with epilepsy, women exposed to ASM compared with those unexposed had higher odds of severe maternal morbidity (aOR ,1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.48) and their neonates had an increased odd of mortality and severe morbidity (aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23-1.52). Conclusion and relevance This multinational study shows that women with epilepsy were at considerably higher risk of severe maternal and perinatal outcomes and increased risk of death during pregnancy and postpartum. Maternal epilepsy and maternal use of ASM were associated with increased maternal morbidity and perinatal mortality and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Razaz
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jannicke Igland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marte-Helene Bjørk
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - K S Joseph
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia and the Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Julie Werenberg Dreier
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- National Centre for Register-Based Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Centre for Integrated Register-based Research, CIRRAU, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nils Erik Gilhus
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mika Gissler
- Knowledge Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Region Stockholm, Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maarit K Leinonen
- Knowledge Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helga Zoega
- Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Silje Alvestad
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- National Center for Epilepsy, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jakob Christensen
- National Centre for Register-Based Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated member of EpiCARE, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torbjörn Tomson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeytin Demiral G, Betaş Akın S, Kayacık Günday Ö, Şahbaz FG, Türk Börü Ü. Maternal and fetal outcomes of antiepileptic treatments during pregnancy: A retrospective study. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 158:109937. [PMID: 39002279 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epilepsy is a disease that affects a significant proportion of the female population worldwide. The management of anti-seizure medications during pregnancy and the potential adverse outcomes to both the mother and fetus represent a significant challenge. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of anti-seizure medications during pregnancy by comparing maternal and fetal outcomes between pregnant women with and without epilepsy. METHODS A total of 242 participants were analysed, including 112 with epilepsy and 130 healthy pregnant controls. Maternal age, medical history, seizure characteristics, use of anti-seizure medications, and pregnancy history were recorded. Maternal and fetal complications, delivery modes, and perinatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 242 patients, including 112 (46.3 %) pregnant women with epilepsy and 130 (53.7 %) healthy pregnant women, were included in the study. Among pregnant patients with epilepsy, 4 (3.5 %) did not use anti-seizure medications, 79 (70.5 %) received monotherapy, and 29 (25.8 %) received polytherapy. The rates of pregnancy termination, spontaneous abortion, and maternal and fetal complications were significantly higher in pregnant women with epilepsy (p = 0.045, p = 0.045, p < 0.001, and p = 0.016, respectively). Folic acid use, planned pregnancy rate and postpartum breastfeeding rate were all statistically lower in pregnant women with epilepsy (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The rates of intensive care unit stay, infants with birth weight less than 2500 g, congenital malformations, and preterm births were significantly higher in babies born to pregnant women with epilepsy (p < 0.001, p = 0.047, p = 0.003, and p = 0.051, respectively). Gestational diabetes mellitus was observed in 4 (13.8 %) and congenital malformations in 4 (14.3 %) of the pregnant women with epilepsy who received polytherapy, and in both cases these rates were statistically higher than those of pregnant women with epilepsy who received monotherapy (p = 0.048 and p = 0.004, respectively). DISCUSSION This study demonstrated that pregnancies among women affected by epilepsy have significantly higher rates of maternal and fetal complications, spontaneous abortions, and premature births. Polytherapy with anti-seizure medications is associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes and congenital anomalies. Notably, folic acid use, planned pregnancy, and postpartum breastfeeding were less common in patients with epilepsy. The most commonly prescribed anti-seizure medications were levetiracetam and lamotrigine. Caesarean section is a common mode of delivery in pregnancies of mothers with epilepsy. CONCLUSION These results suggest that epilepsy increases both maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy. Furthermore, the use of anti-seizure medications appears to have a significant impact on pregnancy outcomes. Our findings highlight the need for comprehensive management strategies and informed decision making to reduce risks and optimise maternal and fetal outcomes among women with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gökçe Zeytin Demiral
- Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Zafer Health Complex Dortyol Mah. 2078 Street, No: 3, Block A, Pk. 03030, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
| | - Selin Betaş Akın
- Afyonkarahisar State Hospital, Department of Neurology, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Özlem Kayacık Günday
- Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Fatma Gülhan Şahbaz
- Afyonkarahisar State Hospital, Department of Neurology, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Ülkü Türk Börü
- Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Zafer Health Complex Dortyol Mah. 2078 Street, No: 3, Block A, Pk. 03030, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazzone PP, Hogg KM, Weir CJ, Stephen J, Bhattacharya S, Chin RFM. Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes for Women With and Without Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2023; 80:484-494. [PMID: 36912826 PMCID: PMC10012044 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Importance Pregnant women who have epilepsy need adequate engagement, information, and pregnancy planning and management to improve pregnancy outcomes. Objective To investigate perinatal outcomes in women with epilepsy compared with women without epilepsy. Data Sources Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched with no language or date restrictions (database inception through December 6, 2022). Searches also included OpenGrey and Google Scholar and manual searching in journals and reference lists of included studies. Study Selection All observational studies comparing women with and without epilepsy were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis The PRISMA checklist was used for abstracting data and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk-of-bias assessment. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were done independently by 2 authors with mediation conducted independently by a third author. Pooled unadjusted odds ratios (OR) or mean differences were reported with 95% CI from random-effects (I2 heterogeneity statistic >50%) or fixed-effects (I2 < 50%) meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures Maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications. Results Of 8313 articles identified, 76 were included in the meta-analyses. Women with epilepsy had increased odds of miscarriage (12 articles, 25 478 pregnancies; OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15-2.29), stillbirth (20 articles, 28 134 229 pregnancies; OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.29-1.47), preterm birth (37 articles, 29 268 866 pregnancies; OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.32-1.51) and maternal death (4 articles, 23 288 083 pregnancies; OR, 5.00; 95% CI, 1.38-18.04). Neonates born to women with epilepsy had increased odds of congenital conditions (29 articles, 24 238 334 pregnancies; OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.66-2.12), neonatal intensive care unit admission (8 articles, 1 204 428 pregnancies; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.58-2.51), and neonatal or infant death (13 articles, 1 426 692 pregnancies; OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.56-2.24). The increased odds of poor outcomes was increased with greater use of antiseizure medication. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found that women with epilepsy have worse perinatal outcomes compared with women without epilepsy. Women with epilepsy should receive pregnancy counseling from an epilepsy specialist who can also optimize their antiseizure medication regimen before and during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Pierino Mazzone
- Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Child Life and Health, Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Christopher J. Weir
- Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Stephen
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sohinee Bhattacharya
- The Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Richard F. M. Chin
- Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Child Life and Health, Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Darmawan KF, Panelli DM. Contemporary management of epilepsy in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 35:87-93. [PMID: 36912246 PMCID: PMC10023363 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The number of reproductive aged people with epilepsy in the United States is increasing, making epilepsy during pregnancy more prevalent. Simultaneously, more people are using newer generations of antiseizure medications before, during and after pregnancy. Here, we review current evidence on contemporary management and outcomes of pregnancies among people with epilepsy. RECENT FINDINGS This review evaluates recent literature to summarize current practices in preconception counselling, contraception, antiseizure medications before, during and after pregnancy, and peri-partum and postpartum risks in people with epilepsy. SUMMARY With the introduction of newer generation antiseizure medications being used during pregnancy, current literature shows that there may be decreased risk in adverse foetal and maternal outcomes. In the peri-partum and postpartum period, recent literature shows that people with epilepsy have an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity and hospital readmission. Given this, as well as considerations for dosing of antiseizure medications, close surveillance of people with epilepsy during pregnancy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danielle M Panelli
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Epilepsy Complicating Pregnancy. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s13669-022-00344-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
7
|
Hophing L, Kyriakopoulos P, Bui E. Sex and gender differences in epilepsy. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2022; 164:235-276. [PMID: 36038205 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2022.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Sex and gender differences in epilepsy are important influencing factors in epilepsy care. In epilepsy, the hormonal differences between the sexes are important as they impact specific treatment considerations for patients at various life stages particularly during early adulthood with establishment of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, perimenopause and menopause. Choice of antiseizure medication may have direct consequences on hormonal cycles, hormonal contraception, pregnancy and fetal risk of major congenital malformation. Conversely hormones whether intrinsic or extrinsically administered may have direct impact on antiseizure medications and seizure control. This chapter explores these important influences on the management of persons with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Hophing
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Esther Bui
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|