Treatment of Urogenital Symptoms in Individuals With a History of Estrogen-dependent Breast Cancer: Clinical Consensus

A randomized, pilot trial comparing vaginal hyaluronic acid to vaginal estrogen for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a non-hormone alternative, vaginal hyaluronic acid (HLA), to a standard-of-care therapy, vaginal estrogen, for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

METHODS

This was a randomized, parallel arm pilot trial. Women with GSM were randomized to an HLA vaginal suppository or vaginal estrogen cream for 12 wk to compare the primary outcome, the vulvovaginal symptom questionnaire (VSQ) score. Secondary outcomes included the following: the female sexual function index (FSFI), the vaginal symptom index (VSI), visual analog scale (VAS) for dyspareunia, vaginal itching, and vaginal dryness, patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) at follow-up, vaginal maturation index, and vaginal pH. Differences between treatment groups were estimated using the two-sided, two-sample t-test and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Forty-nine women were randomized and 45 participants (vaginal estrogen = 23, vaginal HLA = 22) provided data at week 12. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. On the VSQ, there was no observed difference in overall scores between the HLA and vaginal estrogen groups at 12 wk (P = 0.81). Improvement was seen within both treatment groups on the VSQ after 12 wk. The VAS score, total VSI score, total FSFI score, and vaginal pH improved over time; however, improvement did not differ between study arms. Over 90% participants noted improvement on the PGI-I in both groups (P = 0.61). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no clinically meaningful differences between vaginal HLA and vaginal estrogen for the treatment of GSM after 12 wk. Vaginal HLA may be a promising non-hormone therapy for GSM.

A Contemporary View of Menopausal Hormone Therapy

Enthusiasm for the use of hormones to ameliorate symptoms of perimenopause and menopause has waxed and waned over the years. Both treatment for symptoms and training of women's health care practitioners in the management of menopause have sharply declined since publication of the Women's Health Initiative initial results in 2002. Findings from that trial, which treated a population of older, asymptomatic patients, have been extrapolated over the past 21 years to all estrogen products, all menopausal women, and all delivery mechanisms. Our patients deserve a more nuanced, individualized approach. Conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate are no longer the predominant medications or medications of choice available for management of menopausal symptoms. All hormones are not equivalent any more than all antiseizure medications or all antihypertensives are equivalent; they have different pharmacodynamics, duration of action, and affinity for receptors, among other things, all of which translate to different risks and benefits. Consideration of treatment with the right formulation, at the right dose and time, and for the right patient will allow us to recommend safe, effective, and appropriate treatment for people with menopausal symptoms.

Cancer and Female Sexual Function

Sexual health is a concern that often goes unaddressed among female cancer survivors. Management of these issues depends upon the type of malignancy, stage and other tumor characteristics, treatment, and the history, concerns, and goals of the individual patient.

Sexual Health in Women Affected by Gynecologic or Breast Cancer

Sexual health problems are prevalent among women affected by gynecologic or breast cancer. It is important to understand the effects cancer treatment can have on sexual health and to have the tools necessary to identify and treat sexual health problems. This Clinical Expert Series discusses practical methods for routinely screening for sexual dysfunction and reviews sexual health treatment options for women affected by cancer. We review the limitations of the current literature in addressing sexual health problems among sexually and gender minoritized communities. Finally, we discuss appropriate timing of referrals to sexual health experts, physical therapists, and sex therapists. Multiple resources available for both patients and clinicians are included.

Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Cancer Survivors

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) encompasses the symptoms of estrogen deprivation in the vaginal, vulva, and bladder areas. Because many cancer treatments induce a hypoestrogenic state, GSM is common in cancer survivors. The number of cancer survivors is increasing, and the unique aspects of GSM management for cancer survivors, such as the safety of hormonal therapies, is important to understand. In this review, we cover important considerations in the assessment of GSM; nonpharmacologic, behavioral, integrative, pharmacologic, and medical device treatments for GSM: the unique considerations in GSM by cancer treatment modality; bladder manifestations of GSM; and GSM in specific populations.

Fractional CO2 laser for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: evaluating the evidence

The fractionated CO2 laser has been marketed to women for a variety of gynecologic symptoms and conditions, including the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). The evidence has been limited, precluding conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of the therapy. However, data from randomized, controlled trials evaluating this technology for GSM are now available. This Practice Pearl addresses the latest data concerning the use of the fractionated CO2 laser for the treatment of GSM.

Increased Rate of Mesh Erosion in Breast Cancer Survivors Taking Antiestrogen Therapy

IMPORTANCE

There are no current data investigating the relationship between mesh-exposure complications after midurethral sling surgery and antiestrogen therapy.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine if there are increased mesh-exposure complications between a breast cancer population versus a noncancer population particularly in conjunction with hormone suppression (HS) therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a history of breast cancer undergoing tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) surgery at our institution between 2013 and 2021. A group of patients who underwent TVT surgery without a history of cancer served as our control. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of mesh exposure complications.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one patients with breast cancer had TVT surgery. Two hundred ninety-seven patients without cancer had TVT surgery during the same period. Baseline characteristics across all groups were similar. Twenty-nine patients (6.9%) experienced mesh exposure. This occurred at a higher rate in our cancer (15.7%) versus the noncancer population (3.4%). Women with breast cancer taking HS therapy had a higher rate of mesh exposure complications compared with those not taking HS therapy (25.0% versus 6.6%; P = 0.005). The highest rate of mesh exposure complications occurred in the cohort taking estrogen receptor modulators, selective estrogen receptor modulator (10/36 [27.8%]) versus aromatase inhibitors (5/24 [20.8%]) versus no HS therapy (4/61 [6.6%]; P = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, HS therapy use (odds ratio, 1.57; P = 0.007) and diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 4.53; P = 0.018) were associated with increased TVT-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Women with breast cancer had a higher rate of mesh exposure complications from TVT surgery compared with women without cancer, particularly those taking antiestrogenic therapy.

Vaginal Estrogen Therapy Use and Survival in Females With Breast Cancer

Importance

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause can be treated with vaginal estrogen therapy. However, there are concerns about the safety of vaginal estrogen therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Objective

To determine whether the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality was higher in females with breast cancer who used vaginal estrogen therapy vs females with breast cancer who did not use hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study analyzed 2 large cohorts, one each in Scotland and Wales, of females aged 40 to 79 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer. These population-based cohorts were identified from national cancer registry records from 2010 to 2017 in Scotland and from 2000 to 2016 in Wales and were followed up for breast cancer-specific mortality until 2020. Females were excluded if they had a previous cancer diagnosis (except nonmelanoma skin cancer). Data analysis was performed between August 2022 and August 2023.

Exposure

Use of vaginal estrogen therapy, including vaginal tablets and creams, was ascertained from pharmacy dispensing records of the Prescribing Information System for the Scotland cohort and from general practice prescription records for the Wales cohort.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was time to breast cancer-specific mortality, which was obtained from national mortality records. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer-specific mortality, comparing vaginal estrogen therapy users with HRT nonusers and adjusting for confounders, including cancer stage and grade.

Results

The 2 cohorts comprised 49 237 females with breast cancer (between 40 and 79 years of age) and 5795 breast cancer-specific deaths. Five percent of patients with breast cancer used vaginal estrogen therapy after breast cancer diagnosis. In vaginal estrogen therapy users compared with HRT nonusers, there was no evidence of a higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality in the pooled fully adjusted model (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study showed no evidence of increased early breast cancer-specific mortality in patients who used vaginal estrogen therapy compared with patients who did not use HRT. This finding may provide some reassurance to prescribing clinicians and support the guidelines suggesting that vaginal estrogen therapy can be considered in patients with breast cancer and genitourinary symptoms.

Vaginal Laser Treatment for the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic condition resulting from reduced estrogen levels during menopause. The North American Menopause Society and the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health suggested the term "genitourinary syndrome of menopause" (GSM) to indicate the broader aspects of VVA. Breast cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, can induce early and abrupt menopausal symptoms, including GSM, which negatively affects sexual function and the quality of life of the survivors. Vaginal laser therapy has emerged as a safe and effective option for the management of GSM in breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Two main types of lasers, the non-ablative erbium:YAG laser and fractional microablative CO2 vaginal laser, have been evaluated for GSM treatment. While there are few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the subject of BCSs, a wealth of prospective and retrospective studies have highlighted the beneficial effects of vaginal laser therapy on the symptoms of VVA, vaginal health, sexual function, and overall quality of life. More comprehensive research is essential to confirm its enduring effectiveness and safety, with a focus on conducting standardized and meticulously controlled investigations. This study is a narrative review that summarizes clinical trials ranging from the earliest to the most recent ones on laser treatment for GSM in BCSs.

Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer Survivors: Current Perspectives on the Role of Laser Therapy

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a frequent consequence of iatrogenic menopause or anti-estrogenic adjuvant therapies in breast cancer survivors (BCSs). GSM may profoundly affect sexual health and quality of life, and a multidimensional unique model of care is needed to address the burden of this chronic heterogeneous condition. Severe symptoms may be insufficiently managed with non-hormonal traditional treatments, such as moisturizers and lubricants, recommended as the first-line approach by current guidelines, because concerns exist around the use of vaginal estrogens, particularly in women on aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Vaginal laser therapy has emerged as a promising alternative in women with GSM who are not suitable or do not respond to hormonal management, or are not willing to use pharmacological strategies. We aim to systematically review current evidence about vaginal laser efficacy and safety in BCSs and to highlight gaps in the literature. We analyzed results from 20 studies, including over 700 BCSs treated with either CO2 or erbium laser, with quite heterogeneous primary outcomes and duration of follow up (4 weeks-24 months). Although evidence for laser efficacy in BCSs comes mostly from single-arm prospective studies, with only one randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial for CO2 laser and one randomized comparative trial of erbium laser and hyaluronic acid, available data are reassuring in the short term and indicate effectiveness of both CO2 and erbium lasers on the most common GSM symptoms. However, further studies are mandatory to establish long-term efficacy and safety in menopausal women, including BCSs.

Priorities for alleviating menopausal symptoms after cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine treatment priorities in women cancer patients attending a dedicated Menopausal Symptoms After Cancer service.

METHODS

Cancer type and stage were abstracted from medical records. Women ranked up to three symptoms as treatment priorities from the list "hot flushes/night sweats," "mood changes," "vaginal dryness or soreness," "sleep disturbances," "feeling tired or worn out (fatigue)," "sexual problems and/or pain with intercourse," "joint pain," and "something else" with free-text response. For each prioritized symptom, patients completed standardized patient-reported outcome measures to determine symptom severity and impact.

RESULTS

Of 189 patients, most had breast cancer (48.7%, n = 92), followed by hematological (25.8%, n = 49), gynecological (18.0%, n = 34), or colorectal (2.6%, n = 5). The highest (first-ranked) treatment priority was vasomotor symptoms (33.9%, n = 64), followed by fatigue (18.0%, n = 34), vaginal dryness/soreness (9.5%, n = 18), and sexual problems/pain with intercourse (9.5%, n = 18). Symptoms most often selected in the top three ("prioritized") were fatigue (57.7%, n = 109), vasomotor symptoms (57.1%, n = 108), and sleep disturbance (49.2%, n = 93). In patients who prioritized vasomotor symptoms, medians on the "problem," "distress," and "interference" dimensions of the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale were, respectively, 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-8.0), 5.5 (IQR, 3.0-8.0), and 5.0 (IQR, 3.-7.0), indicating moderate severity. In patients who prioritized fatigue, the median Fatigue Scale score was 28 (IQR, 19-36), 37% worse than general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasomotor symptoms, fatigue, sexual problems, and vaginal dryness/soreness were the leading priorities for treatment. Understanding symptom severity and patient priorities will inform better care for this growing population.

Emerging Use of Vaginal Laser to Treat Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Review

Breast cancer treatment, such as chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, can cause earlier and more sudden menopausal symptoms. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is one of the most bothersome side effects of breast cancer treatment, resulting in sexual dysfunction and impaired quality of life. GSM includes genital, urinary, and sexual symptoms. However, alleviating symptoms of GSM for breast cancer survivors may be challenging due to ineffectiveness, contraindications, and low adherence to treatment. The most recent data show the feasibility and safety of vaginal laser to treat GSM for breast cancer survivors. This narrative review provides the aspects of GSM in breast cancer patients, putting the focus on the efficacy and safety of vaginal laser therapy.

Pharmacologic therapeutic options for sexual dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sexual problems are reported by up to 45% of individuals assigned female at birth. Although sexual function is a complex biopsychosocial construct, there are a number of pharmacologic treatment options aimed at addressing the changing vaginal hormonal milieu in postmenopausal individuals and moderating the excitatory and inhibitory aspects of the central nervous system in those with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

RECENT FINDINGS

The last decade has seen an increase in the number and type of pharmacologic treatment options for dysfunction primarily associated with menopause and hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Recent publications and systematic reviews have strengthened the safety data of existing FDA-approved medications as well as off-label therapies.

SUMMARY

Pharmacologic treatment with local estrogen and testosterone replacement in postmenopausal individuals and with centrally-acting therapies such as flibanserin, bremelanotide, and testosterone in premenopausal individuals assigned female at birth are safe and can be used to improve sexual desire and sexual satisfaction.

Association of Vaginal Estradiol Tablet With Serum Estrogen Levels in Women Who Are Postmenopausal: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Half of women who are postmenopausal have genitourinary discomfort after menopause. Recommended therapies include low-dose vaginal estrogen. Individuals with a history of breast cancer or venous thromboembolism may have concerns about the safety of this intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To compare serum estrogen concentrations with the use of vaginal estrogen, 10 μg, tablet vs placebo in women who are postmenopausal.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a secondary, post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial of treatment for moderate to severe genitourinary syndrome in women who are postmenopausal. The study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute and the University of Minnesota from April 11, 2016, to April 23, 2017. Measurements and data analysis were performed from November 3, 2020, to September 23, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to vaginal estradiol tablet (10 μg/d for 2 weeks and then twice weekly) plus placebo gel (3 times weekly) or dual placebo for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

In this post hoc analysis, baseline and week 12 serum estradiol, estrone, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured by a chemiluminescent assay. Week 12 values of the 3 analytes were compared by baseline participant characteristics. Linear models compared week 12 estradiol concentrations between treatment groups, adjusted for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 174 women, mean (SD) age 61 (4) years, were included. Those in the estrogen group (n = 88) were more likely to have higher geometric mean (SD) week 12 serum estradiol concentrations (4.3 [2.2 pg/mL]) than those in the placebo group (n = 86) (3.5 [2.1] pg/mL) (P = .01). Adjusted for pretreatment hormone concentrations, age, clinical site, and body mass index, assignment to the estrogen vs placebo treatment group was significantly associated with higher week 12 estradiol concentrations (23.8% difference; 95% CI, 6.9%-43.3%). Most (121 of 174 [69.5%]) participants had enrollment serum estradiol concentrations higher than 2.7 pg/mL. Of women starting treatment at estradiol levels lower than or equal to 2.7 pg/mL, 38.1% (8 of 21) in the estrogen group and 34.4% (11 of 32) in the placebo group had estradiol concentrations higher than 2.7 pg/mL after 12 weeks of study participation (P = .78). Treatment assignment was not associated with week 12 estrone or SHBG concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, a significant, although small, increase in serum estradiol levels was noted after 12 weeks of vaginal estrogen administration. The clinical relevance of this small increase is uncertain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02516202.

Exogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Risk: Contraception, Menopausal Hormone Therapy, and Breast Cancer Survivors

The use of exogenous estrogen and progesterone/progestin medications spans the reproductive and postreproductive lives of millions of women providing control over pregnancy timing, management of premenopausal and postmenopausal symptoms, and prevention of disease, including endometrial and ovarian cancer. These same hormones can also increase the risk of breast cancer in some settings and their use in breast cancer survivors may increase the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Given both the benefits and risks of these exogenous hormones, a detailed understanding of the available scientific evidence is imperative to help counsel individuals in their use across various settings.