Long-term Data on Graft-Related Complications After Sacrocolpopexy With Lightweight Compared With Heavier-Weight Mesh

Dysregulated wound healing in the pathogenesis of urogynecologic mesh complications

To test the hypothesis that dysregulated wound healing is associated with Urogynecologic mesh complications, we collected vaginal cell secretions using vaginal swabs after polypropylene mesh implantation in patients with (N = 39) and without (N = 40) complication. A customized multiplex immunoassay measured markers of inflammation (MCP-1, IGFBP-1, IL-2, IL-10, IL-17, PDGF-BB, bFGF, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-12p70, TNF-α), neuroinflammation (IL-1RA, TGF-β, IL-15, IL-18, IL-3, M-CSF), angiogenesis (VEGF), and matrix proteins (fibronectin, tenasin c, thrombospondin-2, lumican) between groups. Patients with complications were younger, heavier, implanted with mesh longer, and more likely to be ever smokers. A 5 kg/m2 BMI increase and ever-smoking were associated with a 2.4-fold and sixfold increased risk of complication, respectively. Patients with the highest tertile of bFGF, fibronectin, thrombospondin-2, TNF-β, or VEGF had an odds ratio (OR) of 11.8 for having a mesh complication while ≥ 3 elevated had an OR of 237 while controlling for age, BMI, and smoking. The highest tertile of bFGF, thrombospondin-2, and fibronectin together perfectly indicated a complication (P < 0.0001). A receiver-operator curve for high bFGF, thrombospondin-2, and fibronectin showed excellent discrimination between complications and controls (AUC 0.87). These data provide evidence of dysregulated wound healing in mesh complications. Modifiable factors provide potential targets for patient counseling and interventions.

Safety and medium-term outcome of redo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a matched case-control study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

In the case of recurrent apical prolapse following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP), one may consider a "redo" procedure. We hypothesized that redo LSCP may carry an increased complication risk and less favorable outcomes when compared with primary procedures.

METHODS

This is a single-center, matched case-control (1:4) study, comparing all 39 women who had a redo LSCP and 156 women who had a primary LSCP for symptomatic apical prolapse between 2002 and 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Matching was based on proximity to the operation date. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative and early postoperative complications within 3 months. Secondary outcomes included subjective (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] ≥4) and objective (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] stage <2) success rates, surgical variables, graft-related complications and reinterventions.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the rate of intraoperative and early postoperative complications (redo: 21.1% vs control: 29.8%, OR: 0.63, 95% CI 0.27-1.48). The conversion rate was higher in redo patients (redo: 10.3% vs control: 0.6, OR: 17.71, 95% CI 1.92-163.39). Early postoperative complications were comparable: they were mainly infectious and managed by antibiotics. At a comparable follow-up (redo: 81 months (IQR: 54) vs control: 71.5 months (IQR: 42); p=0.37), there were no differences in graft-related complications (redo: 17.9% vs control: 9.6%, p=0.14) and reinterventions for complications (redo: 12.8% vs control: 5.1%, p=0.14) or prolapse (redo: 15.4% vs control: 8.3%, p=0.18). Subjective (redo: 88.5% vs control: 80.2%, p=0.41) and objective (redo: 31.8% vs control: 24.7%, p=0.50) success rates were also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, redo LSCP is as safe and effective as a primary LSCP, but there is a higher risk of conversion.

Modified Oxford technique of colpopexy for the treatment of uterine and vaginal vault prolapse: a retrospective pilot cohort study

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health issue that affects 30.8% of women. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and colpopectopexy are two of the most common procedures to restore the pelvic anatomy. Mesh application on the other hand carries an increased complications risk over the short and long terms. The aim of this study is to provide a basis for meshless sacrocolpopexy and colpopectopexy.

Methods

This study is a retrospective cohort pilot study that analyzed the data of patients with a pelvic organ prolapse according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and underwent the modified technique for sacrocolpopexy and colpopectopexy. Descriptive statistics were used to express the different variables.

Results

A total of 36 patients met the inclusion criteria and provided consent for the participation in this study. The majority of patients were postmenopausal. 22 out of 36 patients received a previous prolapse surgery. All patients presented with reducible vaginal lump. Dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction were the most commonly reported symptoms. The intraoperative complications rate was 0%. Only one patient had a postoperative persistent urinary retention that was managed medically.

Discussion

Sacrocolpopexy and colpopectopexy seems to be a safe alternative to the mesh-based pelvic surgeries with a very low rate of intraoperative complications and favorable follow up outcomes.