Lymphadenectomy and Ovarian Preservation in Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

The value of surgery and the prognostic factors for patients with recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective study of 38 patients

OBJECTIVE

As an indolent malignant tumor, the long-term management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) patients required awareness, especially the management of recurrences. Unfortunately, few studies focused on the treatment of recurrent LGESS. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and the value of recurrent surgery on recurrent LGESS.

METHODS

This retrospective study consecutively recruited patients with pathologically diagnosed recurrent LGESS at our center from April 1, 2004 to April 1, 2020.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 137.0 months (95% confidence interval=85.4-188.6), the 5-year cumulative survival rate of the cohort of 38 patients with recurrent LGESS was 71.1%. The median overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) was 156 and 89.0 months. Survival analysis showed that patients with younger age, positive estrogen receptor (ER) and optimal abdominopelvic debulking in the first recurrent surgery had better prognosis (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that optimal abdominopelvic debulking in the first recurrent surgery was the only independent prognostic factor for OS and PRS (OS=216.0/35.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]=5.319, p=0.034; PRS=not reached/4.0 months, HR=10.900, p=0.006). There was no significant difference in OS and PRS between patients recurred only once and those recurred at least twice (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of recurrent LGESS was favorable. Optimal debulking of no residual tumor in abdominal and pelvic cavity should be the first choice of treatment for recurrent patients, while preservation of ovary or fertility should not be recommended.

Uterine sarcomas: A critical review of the literature

This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of surgical approaches for the management of uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas are rare uterine neoplasms. Frequently, diagnosis is made after hysterectomy or myomectomy scheduled for presumed benign leiomyomas. The gold standard for surgical treatment of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. It is possible to adopt a fertility-sparing approach for those patients who wish to maintain their fertility. The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy is controversial; in fact, removal of lymph nodes is only recommended in the case of radiological suspicion of nodal involvement. Use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of total recurrence, intra-abdominal recurrence and death. Advanced disease management should be customized based on the patient's performance status given the uncertain role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment of advanced or recurrent disease remains a subject of debate, but surgery is the best approach in terms of morbidity and mortality. There are few options for management of these uterine tumours, and further studies are needed to clarify the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of patients with a first diagnosis of uterine sarcoma and patients with relapse of uterine sarcoma. No specific evidence supports the adoption of adjuvant therapy in uterine-confined disease, and molecular/genomic profiling may be useful to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Prognostic factors in patients with uterine sarcoma: the SARCUT study

OBJECTIVE

Uterine sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies that include different histological sub-types. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate the impact of the different prognostic factors on overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with uterine sarcoma.

METHODS

This international multicenter retrospective study included 683 patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma at 46 different institutions between January 2001 and December 2007.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and adenosarcoma was 65.3%, 78.3%, 52.4%, and 89.5%, respectively, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 54.3%, 68.1%, 40.3%, and 85.3%, respectively. The 10-year overall survival for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma and adenosarcoma was 52.6%, 64.8%, 52.4%, and 79.5%, respectively, and the 10-year disease-free survival was 44.7%, 53.3%, 40.3%, and 77.5%, respectively. The most significant factor associated with overall survival in all types of sarcoma except for adenosarcoma was the presence of residual disease after primary treatment. In adenosarcoma, disease stage at diagnosis was the most important factor (hazard ratio 17.7; 95% CI 2.86 to 109.93).

CONCLUSION

Incomplete cytoreduction, tumor persistence, advanced stage, extra-uterine and tumor margin involvement, and the presence of necrosis were relevant prognostic factors significantly affecting overall survival in uterine sarcoma. The presence of lymph vascular space involvement and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse.

Utero-ovarian low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, a case report

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare malignancy of uterine in middle aged women. There are numerous subtypes for ESS which share the same clinical picture of uterine bleeding and pelvic pain. Consequently, diagnosis and treatment modalities of LG-ESS with metastasis are challenging. However, both molecular and immunological study of samples can be useful.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case study, we report a 52-year-old woman presenting with the chief complaint of unusual uterine bleeding. There was no specific finding in her past medical history. The CT study revealed enlarged bilateral ovary with a significantly large left ovarian mass and suspicious mass in uterus. By the diagnosis of ovarian mass, patient went under total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), greater omentectomy, and appendectomy followed by post-op hormone therapy. Her follow-up was uneventful. The IHC and pathological study of samples revealed incidental LG-ESS uterus mass with metastasis to ovaries despite her primary diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

LG-ESS has low metastasis rate. Surgical modalities and neoadjuvant therapies are recommended base on the stage of ESS. In the following study, we represent a case of incidental LG-ESS with bilateral ovarian invasion who was initially diagnosed as an ovarian mass.

CONCLUSION

Our patient was successfully managed by surgical intervention. Despite scarcity of LG-ESS, it is advised to consider LG-ESS as a differential diagnosis in management of patients with a uterus mass with bilateral ovarian involvement.

Sarcomes du stroma endométrial de bas grade : référentiels de prise en charge du GSF-GETO/NETSARC+ et du groupe TMRG

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) accounts for approximately 15% of all uterine sarcomas. Median age of patients is around 50 years and half of the patients are premenopausal. In all, 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. Preoperatively radiologic findings of ESS are not specific. Pathological diagnosis remains essential. This review aimed to present the French guidelines for low grade ESS treatment within the Groupe sarcome français - Groupe d'étude des tumeurs osseuse (GSF-GETO)/NETSARC+ and tumeur maligne rare gynécologique (TMRG) networks. Treatments should be validated in multidisciplinary team involved in sarcomas or rare gynecologic tumors. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, and morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome and is not recommended. Leaving the ovaries in situ in stage I tumors could be discussed for young women. Adjuvant hormonal treatment could be considered, for two years for stage I with morcellation or stage II and livelong for stages III or IV. Nevertheless, several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Tamoxifen is contraindicated. Secondary cytoreductive surgery if feasible for recurrent disease, appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease is mainly hormonal, with or without surgery.

Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/074, April 2021)

Purpose This is an official guideline, published and coordinated by the Germany Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG). Because of their rarity and heterogeneous histopathology, uterine sarcomas are challenging in terms of their clinical management and therefore require a multidisciplinary approach. To our knowledge, there are currently no binding evidence-based recommendations for the appropriate management of this heterogeneous group of tumors. Methods This S2k guideline was first published in 2015. The update published here is once again the result of the consensus of a representative interdisciplinary committee of experts who were commissioned by the Guidelines Committee of the DGGG to carry out a systematic search of the literature on uterine sarcomas. Members of the participating professional societies achieved a formal consensus after a structured consensus process. Recommendations 1.1 Epidemiology, classification, staging of uterine sarcomas. 1.2 Symptoms, general diagnostic workup, general pathology or genetic predisposition to uterine sarcomas. 2. Management of leiomyosarcomas. 3. Management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. 4. Management of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas. 5. Management of adenosarcomas. 6. Rhabdomyosarcomas of the uterus in children and adolescents. 7. Follow-up of uterine sarcomas. 8. Management of morcellated uterine sarcomas. 9. Information provided to patients.

Data Set for Reporting of Uterine Malignant and Potentially Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) seeks to produce standardized, evidence-based protocols for the reporting of tumors with the aim of ensuring that all cancer reports generated worldwide will be of similar high quality and record the same elements. Herein, we describe the development of the data set for the reporting of uterine malignant and potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors by a panel of expert pathologists and a single clinician and provide the commentary and rationale for the inclusion of core and noncore elements. This data set, which incorporates the recent updates from the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, addresses several subjects of debate including which mesenchymal tumors should be graded, how to document extent of invasion, mitotic counts, and the role of ancillary testing in tumor diagnosis and patient management. The inclusion of elements is evidence-based or based on consensus of the expert panel with clinical relevance being the guiding standard.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of uterine sarcoma: a single-institution retrospective study

Background

Uterine sarcomas are rare and aggressive gynaecologic malignancies, characterized by a relatively high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features and explore the prognostic factors of these malignancies.

Methods

This was a single-institution, retrospective study. We reviewed the medical records of 155 patients with pathologically confirmed uterine sarcomas including uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) and adenosarcoma (AS) between 2006 and 2022. A total of 112 patients who underwent surgery between January 2006 and April 2019 were included in the survival analysis. The current study recorded the clinicopathological, treatment and outcome data to determine clinical characteristics and survival.

Results

The most common histopathological type was ULMS (63/155, 40.64%), followed by LG-ESS (56/155, 36.13%) and HG-ESS (16/155, 10.32%). The mean age at diagnosis of all patients was 49.27±48.50 years and 32.90% (51/155) of patients were postmenopausal. Fifteen patients underwent fast-frozen sectioning, 63(54.78%) were diagnosed with malignancy, 29(25.22%) were highly suspected of malignancy that needed further clarification and 23(14.84%) were diagnosed with benign disease. A total of 124(80%) patients underwent total hysterectomy (TH) and salpingo-oophorectomy. Multivariate analyses showed that histological type and tumour size were independent prognostic factors both for overall survival (OS) (p<0.001 and P=0.017, respectively) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p<0.001 and P=0.018, respectively). Tumour stage was only significantly associated with PFS (P=0.002). Elevated preoperative NLR, PLR and postmenopausal status were significantly correlated with shorter PFS and OS in univariate analysis, but no statistically significant difference was found in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

In patients with uterine sarcoma, in comparison to LMS and LG-ESS, UUS and HG-ESS tend to present as more aggressive tumour with poorer outcomes. Furthermore, larger tumour (>7.5 cm) were an important predictor of shorter PFS and OS.

Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess potential predictive variables for nodal metastasis and survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma who presented between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2019 and underwent hysterectomy at our institution or presented within 3 months of primary surgery elsewhere before recurrence. Patients who presented to our institution only at recurrence were excluded. Patients with <3 months of follow-up were excluded from survival analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 127 consecutive patients for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 19-88 years); 91 (74.6%) of 127 were pre-menopausal; and 74 (58.3%) of 127 had uterine-confined, stage I tumors. Of 56 patients (44.1%) who underwent lymph node sampling, 10 (17.9%) had nodal metastasis. Of the 10 with nodal metastasis, 1 (10%) did not have lymphadenopathy or extra-uterine disease, 4 (40%) had lymphadenopathy only, 1 (10%) had extra-uterine disease only, and 4 (40%) had both. Among the 29 patients without apparent extra-uterine disease or gross lymphadenopathy, there was one occult lymph node metastasis (3.4%). Gross lymphadenopathy at time of surgery was predictive for lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 69 months (range 4-336) for the 95 patients included in the survival analyses. The 5-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival rates were 79.8% and 90.8%, respectively. Patients with stage I tumors had longer progression-free survival than those with stage II-IV disease (p<0.001); there was no difference in disease-specific survival (p=0.63). Post-operative observation versus adjuvant therapy with hormone blockade or radiation therapy did not result in progression-free survival differences for stage I or completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.50 and p=0.81, respectively). Similarly, there was no disease-specific survival difference for completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node dissection in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma should be reserved for those with clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy. Disease stage correlated with progression-free survival but not disease-specific survival. Post-operative therapy did not improve progression-free survival or disease-specific survival.

Low-Grade Uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognostic Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Treatments. Experience From Two Referral Centers

Objective

Low-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare tumor characterized by an overall good survival but showing a indolent behavior and a variable risk of recurrence. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of these tumors and no prognostic or predictive factors have been established. With this study, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of several clinical, surgical, and pathological features in patients affected by LG-ESS to identify risk factors associated with recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 52 LG-ESS cases, treated from January 1st, 1994, to May 31st, 2020, in two referral centers. The relationship between recurrence and clinicopathological characteristics as well as surgical treatment was investigated. Risk of recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier analysis, respectively.

Results

Of 52 patients with LG-ESS, 8 experienced recurrence (15%). The median follow-up was 100 months (SD ± 96, range: 15–336). By univariate analysis, fragmentation/morcellation, tumor size, FIGO stage, higher mitotic count, presence of necrosis, and lymphovascular space invasion (LSVI) resulted associated with a poorer outcome. Conversely, the surgical modality (laparotomic vs laparoscopic and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy vs local excision) and pelvic lymphadenectomy were not. Even the different modalities of adjuvant therapy (hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) showed no prognostic significance. Tumor fragmentation/morcellation and higher mitotic count resulted independent prognostic variables at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This data supports the avoidance of any type of morcellation if LG-ESS is suspected preoperatively. Higher mitotic count and, possibly, tumor size, advanced FIGO stage, necrosis, and LVSI could be exploited to tailor the adjuvant therapy, but these results need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

A giant metastatic low-grade endometrial sarcoma requiring surgical management

Introduction and importance

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are relatively rare tumors. We here report a case of a woman presenting with a giant metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with thromboembolic complications requiring urgent surgical management.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old obese female was admitted, with a voluminous abdominopelvic mass, due to complications related to its size and extent. The tumor derived from the uterus and invaded the ureters, bladder and rectum. It compressed the right iliac vessels causing both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. She developed a painful irreducible umbilical. We proceeded with a debulking surgery (hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). Histological findings were consistent with a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Clinical discussion

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are generally low-grade malignant neoplasms with an indolent clinical course. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. In low-income countries, malignancies are more often diagnosed at a late stage, which limits therapeutic options. Cytoreduction is recommended in advanced tumors with extrauterine manifestation, depending on symptoms and with palliative intent.

Conclusion

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are indolent uterine malignancies with metastatic potential. Even in advanced cases, cytoreduction must be considered.

•

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are relatively rare tumors.

•

They are classified into three categories: low-grade, high-grade, and undifferentiated.

•

Staging is the most important prognostic factor.

•

Cytoreduction surgery is recommended even in advanced tumors.

•

Late presentation of cancers is commonplace in most low-income countries.

Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index in Patients With Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

Objective

The Ki-67 index is used to evaluate cell proliferation activity, which is related to tumor progression, metastasis, and prognosis. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of Ki-67 index in endometrial stromal sarcoma and to explore the optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 index for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Methods

A total of 82 patients with endometrial stromal sarcoma who were treated in our hospital were collected. Clinicopathological data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. Ki-67 index was detected by the immunohistochemical method. Receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden index were performed to determine the optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 index for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma. The Cox regression was performed to analyze risk factors affecting prognosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma. The Kaplan–Meier method and Log-rank test were performed to analyze the survival of patients.

Results

The optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 index for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma was 35%. The results of univariate analysis showed that high Ki-67 index (≥35%) was statistically significantly bound up with shorter progress free survival and overall survival. The results of multivariate analysis showed that Ki-67 index (P = 0.001) and ovarian preservation (P = 0.040) were independent prognostic factors of progress free survival.

Conclusions

A Ki-67 index cut-off of 35% was optimal for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma. Ki-67 index may be a useful prognostic marker in endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Primary low-grade extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: analysis of 10 cases with a review of the literature

Background

This study aimed to analyze the clinical and pathological features of extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (EESS) and explore an effective therapeutic regimen to reduce the recurrence rate in low-grade EESS patients.

Methods

Ten LG-EESS patients who were treated at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 1999 to June 2019 were collected and analyzed.

Results

(1) Patient demographics are summarized in manuscript. Preoperative CA125 examination showed that 8 patients had a median level of 49.5 U/L (15.4–168.0 U/L). (2) All ten patients underwent tumor cytoreductive surgery. Five patients underwent optimal tumor resection and achieved an R0 resection. After the initial surgery, 7 patients who had multiple metastasis were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 patients with vaginal ESS were treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and 6 patients with ER/PR positive received hormone therapy with or without chemotherapy. (2) Most EESS patients had multiple tumors. The omentum was the most commonly affected site, followed by the ovaries. (3) The median follow-up was 94 (range: 27–228) months, and recurrence was observed in 3 patients (n = 10, 30%) who underwent non-optimal surgery and no hormone therapy. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were both 70%, as shown in Fig. 2. OS was both 100% at 5 and 10 years.

Conclusion

As a conclusion, EESS is a rare disease and LG-EESS has a good prognosis. Surgery remains the available treatment for patients. LG-EESS has a risk of late recurrence which requires a long-term follow-up. With a limited sample size, our study shows optimal tumor reductive surgery and adjuvant hormone therapy may significantly reduce the risk of recurrence.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in a young woman diagnosed after resection of endometrial polyp-like lesions: A case report

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare tumor that mostly occurs in perimenopausal women. Treatment with total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended, although fertility preservation or ovarian preservation may be considered in younger patients. The present study reports a case of LG-ESS in a young woman diagnosed after resection of endometrial polyp-like lesions. A 26-year-old nulligravid woman was referred to our hospital after being diagnosed with endometrial polyps. Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy was performed twice, and LG-ESS was suspected on postoperative pathological examination. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor 5-cm in diameter on the right side of the uterus. In light of the young age of the patient, tumorectomy was first performed, and postoperative pathological diagnosis was LG-ESS with the positive resection margin. After thorough discussion with the patient about fertility preservation and recurrence risk, a total abdominal hysterectomy and ovarian preservation was performed. Medroxyprogesterone therapy was performed postoperatively and no recurrence was observed for 2 years.

The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS.

Methods

Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities.

Results

Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2–30.8) and 75.0% (68.0–82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5–13.1, 1.3–7.3, and 0.1–0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–1.0 and 0.1–1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse.

Conclusion

For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A Turkish uterine sarcoma group study analyzing prognostic factors and disease outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with refractory disease, recurrence, or death as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in low-grade endometrial sarcoma (LGESS).

METHODS

A multi-institutional, retrospective study was conducted in a total of 124 patients, who received a curative-intent surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) history of any other invasive disease; ii) neoadjuvant therapy; iii) fertility sparing surgery; iv) a different diagnosis after review of the slides.

RESULTS

All patients underwent hysterectomy, 96% had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 65% had lymphadenectomy. Twelve (14.8%) of 81 patients undergoing lymphadenectomy had lymph node (LN) metastasis. Of those, 8 (9.8%) had pelvic LN metastasis whereas 4 (5.6%) had isolated paraaortic LN metastasis. Six of 8 (75%) patients with positive pelvic LNs had concurrent paraaortic LN metastasis. Among 124 patients, 3 patients (2.4%) had refractory disease following primary therapy. During a median follow-up of 45.5 months, 27 (22.3%) of 121 patients who achieved complete remission after primary therapy developed recurrence, and 10 patients (8.1%) died of disease. The 3-year DFS and OS were 76.9% and 93.8%, respectively. Stage was the sole independent prognostic factor in the whole cohort. When analyzing factors within subgroups of stage I and stage ≥II, there was no significant prognostic factor for stage I; however, lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with disease outcomes for stage ≥II. While lymphadenectomy was related with improved DFS, chemotherapy was associated with poor DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

The risk of LN metastasis at pelvic as well as paraaortic lymphatic basins is not negligible to omit lymphadenectomy in stage ≥II LGESS. Moreover, lymphadenectomy provides significant DFS advantage in patients with extrauterine disease.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma

PURPOSE

To review the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients diagnosed with Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS) and Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma (USS) at our institution and investigate their clinical outcomes and factors affecting prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected demographic data, preoperative diagnostic methods and therapeutic management of patients treated for ESS and UUS between January 1995 and December 2019 at Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Spain. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included in the study, of which 51(81%) had a diagnosis of ESS and 12(19%) of UUS. Twenty patients (31.7%) were diagnosed after a previous non-oncologic surgery, and 12 of them (60%) suffered from tumor disruption. Cytoreductive procedures were needed in 29 patients (46%), and optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 80.9% of the patients. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (IQR = 0.99-14.31). Five-year overall survival was 57.6% (44.2-68.8) and was significantly better for low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) patients (p < 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival was 57.1% (42.8-69.1) and was also significantly higher in LG-ESS cohort (p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis histological type, age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and mitotic index were found significantly correlated with survival. For high-grade EES (HG-ESS) and USS patients adjuvant radiotherapy also correlated with improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival and disease-free survival are significantly better in patients with LG-ESS cohort. HG-ESS and UUS show similar survival outcomes. Age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and histological type were significantly correlated with survival in the global cohort, whilst adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with improved survival in HG-ESS and UUS patients.

Prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

OBJECTIVE

High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is a rare and highly malignant tumor that lacks a prognostic model. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic nomogram predicting the overall survival of patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

METHODS

Clinical data for patients were derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cox analysis and Akaike's information criterion were used to construct the nomogram. The concordance index, time dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration plot were used to evaluate the discriminative and calibrating capability. The net reclassification index, integrated discrimination improvement, and concordance index change were also compared between the nomogram and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. Clinical benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis. The patients were separated into groups with low and high nomogram risk scores. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox analysis were used to investigate the survival difference between the two groups.

RESULTS

The training and validation cohorts had 461 and 195 patients, respectively. A nomogram that incorporated disease stage, age, surgery, lymph node status, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for predicting overall survival was established and validated. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.734 (0.708-0.761) in the training cohort and 0.705 (0.659-0.751) in the validation cohort. The calibration plots showed a favorable calibrating ability of the nomogram. The 1 year and 3 year time dependent receiver operating characteristic curves showed the better discriminative ability of the nomogram than the staging system. The concordance index change, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement also indicated a significantly (p<0.05) better predictive power of the nomogram over disease stage. Furthermore, decision curve analysis suggested that the nomogram was clinically useful and had a larger clinical net benefit than disease stage alone. Patients with a high risk score had distinctly poorer survival than those with low risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

A prognostic nomogram in patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma exhibited favorable prognostic discrimination and survival prediction ability compared with FIGO stage.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to analyze the pathological aspects, diagnosis and treatment of rare mesenchymal uterine tumors.

METHODS

On August 2019, a systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes statement (PRISMA). The following words and key phrases have been searched: "endometrial stromal sarcoma", "low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "uterine sarcoma", "mesenchymal uterine tumors" and "uterine stromal sarcoma". Across these platforms and research studies, five main aspects were analyzed: the biological characteristics of the neoplasms, the number of cases, the different therapeutic approaches used, the follow-up and the oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 94 studies initially identified, 55 were chosen selecting articles focusing on endometrial stromal sarcoma. Of these fifty-five studies, 46 were retrospective in design, 7 were reviews and 2 randomized phases III trials.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasms and surgery represents the standard treatment. For uterus-limited disease, the remove en bloc with an intact resection of the tumor (without the use of morcellation) is strongly recommended. For advanced-stage disease, the standard surgical treatment is adequate cytoreduction with metastatectomy. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients with Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS), while is not clear whether cytoreduction of advanced tumors improves patient survival in High-grade ESS. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not routinely used and its role is still debated.

A nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A population-based analysis

Background

Low‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG‐ESS) is a rare tumor that lacks a prognostic prediction model. Our study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival of LG‐ESS patients.

Methods

A total of 1172 patients confirmed to have LG‐ESS between 1988 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. They were further divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The Akaike information criterion was used to select variables for the nomogram. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated using concordance index (C‐index), area under time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time‐dependent AUC), and calibration plots. The net benefits of the nomogram at different threshold probabilities were quantified and compared with those of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria‐based tumor staging using decision curve analysis (DCA). Net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were also used to compare the nomogram's clinical utility with that of the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging. The risk stratifications of the nomogram and the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging were compared.

Results

Seven variables were selected to establish the nomogram for LG‐ESS. The C‐index (0.814 for the training cohort and 0.837 for the validation cohort) and the time‐dependent AUC (> 0.7) indicated satisfactory discriminative ability of the nomogram. The calibration plots showed favorable consistency between the prediction of the nomogram and actual observations in both the training and validation cohorts. The NRI values (training cohort: 0.271 for 5‐year and 0.433 for 10‐year OS prediction; validation cohort: 0.310 for 5‐year and 0.383 for 10‐year OS prediction) and IDI (training cohort: 0.146 for 5‐year and 0.185 for 10‐year OS prediction; validation cohort: 0.177 for 5‐year and 0.191 for 10‐year OS prediction) indicated that the established nomogram performed significantly better than the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging alone (P < 0.05). Furthermore, DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically useful and had better discriminative ability to recognize patients at high risk than the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging.

Conclusions

A prognostic nomogram was developed and validated to assist clinicians in evaluating prognosis of LG‐ESS patients.

Utility of YWHAE fluorescent in-situ hybridisation in mesenchymal tumors of uterus- An initial experience from tertiary oncology centre in India

Background

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a common uterine mesenchymal malignancy. According to World Health Organisation (WHO) 2014 classification, ESSs are further subdivided into low-grade ESS (LGESS) and high-grade ESS (HGESS). HGESS is defined by the presence of YWHAE gene rearrangement and has a poorer prognosis compared to LGESS.

METHODS

Twenty-four cases comprising of 16 endometrial stromal sarcoma and 8 lesions mimicking ESS were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology and subjected to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for YWHAE gene rearrangement. Immunohistochemistry for CD10, ER, PR, Cyclin D1, SMA, H-Caldesmon, Desmin, Ki-67, and Pan Cytokeratin was performed.

RESULTS

Two cases with histological features similar to HGESS were positive for YWHAE gene rearrangement while 1 was indeterminate. No cases of LGESS and histological mimics of ESS were positive for this rearrangement.

CONCLUSIONS

HGESSs are defined by the presence of YWHAE rearrangement. These tumors present at higher stage and have poorer prognosis. They may not respond to hormonal therapy and may be treated with chemotherapy. Cyclin D1 though not specific remains a sensitive tool to triage endometrial stromal sarcomas for this FISH study.

Long-term impact of lymphadenectomies in patients with low-grade, early-stage uterine endometrial stroma sarcoma

AIM

The aim of our study was to investigate the lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate and effect of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with stage I, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS).

METHODS

Patients with stage I LGESS (n = 119) that underwent surgery from July 1969 to July 2017, following up over 48 years at the China National Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Surgical records and consulting data for patients with LGESS were analyzed to find that 47 patients received systematic pelvic LND. The number of patients with menopause in the LND(+) group were significantly lower than those in LND(-) group (2.1% vs 22.2%, P = 0.005), meanwhile, patients received bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy procedure in LND(+) group were significantly higher than LND(-) (97.9% vs 58.3%, P < 0.001). Neither progression-free survival nor overall survival was significantly improved in the LND(+) group even after propensity score matching although the progression-free survival has a stronger trend in LND(+) population.

CONCLUSION

A systematic LND was not significantly associated with prognosis for patients with early-stage LGESS. There is no sufficient indication for a systematic LND for patients with early-stage LGESS. A systematic LND might be necessary if enlarged lymph nodes were detected by image graphology or observation during surgery.

Ovarian preservation for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of ovarian preservation on oncologic outcomes for women with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Cohrane, and Web of Science databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Studies including patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma who had hysterectomy were identified. Data on tumor recurrence and death rate were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and reported on 786 patients. Based on available information, ovarian preservation was noted in 190 patients while 501 had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A significantly increased tumor recurrence rate was observed in the ovarian preservation group (89/190, 46.8%) compared with the bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy group (121/501, 24.2%) (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.39 to 5.28). Based on data from 162 patients, no difference in death rate was noted between the ovarian preservation (2/34, 5.9%) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (9/128, 7%) groups (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-quarter of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma were managed with ovarian preservation. These women experienced a higher recurrence rate. Hormone exposure may be responsible for this elevated risk. Given the apparent high salvage rate, however, ovarian preservation may be an option only in a well-informed patient population.

Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG and OEGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Register Number 015/074, February 2019)

Aims This is an official guideline published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG). Because of their rarity and heterogeneous histopathology, uterine sarcomas are challenging in terms of how they should be managed clinically, and treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. To our knowledge, there are currently no binding evidence-based recommendations for the appropriate management of this heterogeneous group of tumors. Methods This S2k guideline was first published in 2015. The update published here is the result of the consensus of a representative interdisciplinary group of experts who carried out a systematic search of the literature on uterine sarcomas in the context of the guidelines program of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG. Members of the participating professional societies achieved a formal consensus after a moderated structured consensus process. Recommendations The consensus-based recommendations and statements include the epidemiology, classification, staging, symptoms, general diagnostic work-up and general pathology of uterine sarcomas as well as the genetic predisposition to develop uterine sarcomas. Also included are statements on the management of leiomyosarcomas, (low and high-grade) endometrial stromal sarcomas and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas and adenosarcomas. Finally, the guideline considers the follow-up and morcellation of uterine sarcomas and the information provided to patients.

Hormone therapy following surgery in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: Is it related to a decrease in recurrence rate?

BACKGROUND

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is, in most cases, a slow-growing malignancy; however, it is related with high recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to determine which factors may be associated with the recurrence rate of LGESS.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features and treatment options in 37 patients with LGESS were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Additionally, lymphadenectomy was performed in 56.8% (n = 21) of the patients. Among the patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, 14.3% (n = 3) had lymph node metastasis. The disease was limited to the uterus in 75.7% of patients. Treatment following surgery was radiotherapy in three patients, chemotherapy in seven patients, hormone therapy in 12 patients, and chemotherapy plus hormone therapy in one patient. Megestrol acetate was used in all patients who received hormone therapy. Median follow-up time was 96 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 72% and 97%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 27%. Only hormone therapy following surgery was significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate, even in patients with stage 1 disease. None of the patients treated with hormone therapy following surgery had recurrence, whereas recurrence occurred in 38.5% of the patients who underwent surgery only (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Hormone therapy after surgery should be considered a viable option for decreasing the LGESS recurrence rate, regardless of the disease stage.

Role of surgery in gynaecological sarcomas

Gynaecological sarcomas account for 3-4% of all gynaecological malignancies and have a poorer prognosis compared to gynaecological carcinomas. Pivotal treatment for early-stage uterine sarcoma is represented by total hysterectomy. Whereas oophorectomy provides survival advantage in endometrial stromal sarcoma is still controversial. When the disease is confined to the uterus, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended. Removal of enlarged lymph-nodes is indicated in case of disseminated or recurrent disease, where debulking surgery is considered the standard of care. Fertility sparing surgery for uterine leiomyosarcoma is not supported by strong evidence, whilst available data on fertility sparing treatment for endometrial stromal sarcoma are more promising. For ovarian sarcomas, in the absence of specific data, it is reasonable to adapt recommendations existing for uterine sarcomas, also regarding the role of lymphadenectomy in both early and advanced stage disease. Specific recommendations on cervical sarcomas' surgery are lacking. Existing data on surgical approach vary from radical hysterectomy to fertility-preserving surgery in the form of trachelectomy or wide local excision, however no definite conclusions can be drafted on the recommended surgical approach. For vulval sarcomas, complete surgical excision with at least 2 cm of free margin is considered to be the primary treatment which is associated with good prognosis. The aim of this review is to provide highest quality evidence to guide gynaecologic oncologists throughout surgical management of gynaecological sarcomas.

Uterine Sarcomas: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Care Center from India

Uterine sarcomas are uncommon and aggressive tumors comprising 3-7% of all uterine malignancies. The aim is to evaluate clinical presentation, histopathologic pattern, recurrence pattern, and outcome of patients with uterine sarcomas presenting to a tertiary care cancer center over an 8-year period. A total of 11 cases of uterine sarcoma were diagnosed. The median age of patients at presentation was 51 years (range 30-67 years). Six patients had leiomyosarcoma (54.5%), 4 had endometrial stromal sarcoma (36%), and 1 had adenosarcoma (9%). The main presenting symptoms were abnormal vaginal bleeding, low abdominal pain, and white discharge. Median follow-up was 11 months ranging from 3 to 200 months. Median survivals for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, and adenosarcoma were 6.5, 18, and 56 months. The 3- and 5-year survival by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the entire cohort was 30 and 20%. The mitotic index, age, adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), and performance of pelvic nodal dissection did not impact survival significantly in the patient with leiomyosarcoma. Stage and histology had the strongest bearing on survival and leiomyosarcoma has the worst survival, whereas adenosarcoma had the best prognosis. Adequately powered prospective studies are required to define the role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in this rare disease.

Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma - a Review

Like other uterine sarcomas, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LG-ESS) are a very rare tumor entity. In the past, research studies therefore discussed the various different types of the disease in combination. In addition, the classification of endometrial stromal tumors presented difficulties for quite some time so that in earlier studies it was not always possible to precisely distinguish between LG-ESS, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. For LG-ESS, surgery with hysterectomy and adnexectomy is the first-line treatment. The benefits of lymphadenectomy and tumor debulking are unclear. Endocrine therapy with gestagens and aromatase inhibitors is under discussion to provide adjuvant treatment for patients with advanced stages of the disease. As radiotherapy only provides locoregional control, and in view of the usually good prognosis of patients with LG-ESS, its benefits need to be weighed against its side effects. In the case of recurrence, repeat surgery is the first choice. Further research studies viewing LG-ESS as a distinct entity are needed in order to improve treatment options for patients with LG-ESS.

Treatment of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in a nulligravid woman

A 32 year-old nulligravid woman with a uterine mass underwent exploratory laparotomy with myomectomy. Final pathology revealed a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) with positive margins. She subsequently underwent definitive robotic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian preservation. She was diagnosed with a stage IB low-grade ESS. She is currently undergoing observation. Discussion of classification, surgical options, and adjuvant therapy is presented.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma in combination with mixed type endometrial carcinomas: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is rare, representing only approximately 0.2% of all uterine malignancies. Mixed type endometrial carcinomas (MT-ECs) are rare tumors with both type I and II features, and are difficult to diagnose. Cases of ESS and MT-ECs coexisting in the same patient are extremely rare. This study aimed to describe a case of ESS in combination with MT-ECs in a 47-year-old premenopausal woman.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A woman presented to the hospital complaining of occasional abdominal pain and had high tumor markers: cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 (263.6 U/mL) and CA 125 (428.0 U/mL). Transvaginal ultrasound examination revealed a complex mass (12.3 × 9.1 × 6.3 cm) with solid and cystic components on the right rear wall of the uterus. Abdominopelvic computed tomography images showed a pelvic cystic-solid mixed mass. The patient underwent an exploratory midline laparotomy. The mass was hypothesized to be malignant on the uterine posterior wall. Tumor deposits were found on bilateral parametrium. On peritoneal implantation, multiple metastases were seen on the serosal surface of the bowel and greater omentum. A frozen section revealed a spindle cell sarcoma.

DIAGNOSES

Pathological reports following surgery revealed concurrent ESS and MT-ECs.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total omentectomy, and macroscopic clearance of the tumor. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given.

OUTCOMES

The patient was still alive when this report was written.

LESSONS

Considering the rarity of ESS in combination with MT-ECs, this study presented an overview of the literature and discussed a number of histological and clinical issues. Nevertheless, etiology and pathogenesis of these tumors need further investigation.

Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A National Cancer Database study

OBJECTIVE

To provide refined prognostic information from large cohorts of women with low-grade or high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS).

METHODS

We performed an observational retrospective cohort analysis of women diagnosed with low-grade or high-grade ESS from the 1998-2013 National Cancer Database. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable accelerated failure time survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors after multiple imputation of missing data. Recursive partitioning methods were used to rank prognostic factors in high-grade ESS. Matched cohort analyses were performed to hypothesis-test effects of adjuvant treatments.

RESULTS

We identified 2414 and 1383 women with low-grade or high-grade ESS, respectively. Women with high-grade ESS had markedly decreased survival compared to women with low-grade ESS (five-year survival (95% CI): 32.6 (30.1-35.3%) versus 90.5% (89.3-91.8%), P<0.001). Among women with high-grade ESS, median survival (95% CI) was only 19.9 (17.1-22.1) months. Increased age and tumor size were associated with decreased survival in low-grade ESS. In high-grade ESS, additional negative prognostic factors were distant or nodal metastasis, omission of lymphadenectomy, and pathologically-positive surgical margins (all P<0.001). Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (time ratio (TR) (95% CI): 1.36 (1.17-1.58), P<0.001) and radiotherapy (TR (95% CI): 1.57 (1.32-1.87), P<0.001) were associated with increased survival for high-grade ESS.

CONCLUSION

The contrasting excellent versus poor prognosis of low-grade versus high-grade ESS, respectively, was confirmed. The best treatment of high-grade ESS is early and complete surgical resection including lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may increase survival of women with high-grade ESS.

Uterine sarcoma Part II-Uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: The TAG systematic review

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine tumors (<1%). Four main categories include endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and uterine undifferentiated sarcoma (UUS). This review is a series of articles discussing the uterine sarcomas. LG-ESS, a hormone-dependent tumor harboring chromosomal rearrangement, is an indolent tumor with a favorable prognosis, but characterized by late recurrences even in patients with Stage I disease, suggesting the requirement of a long-term follow-up. Patients with HG-ESS, based on the identification of YWHAE-NUTM2A/B (YWHAE-FAM22A/B) gene fusion, typically present with advanced stage diseases and frequently have recurrences, usually within a few years after initial surgery. UUS is, a high-grade sarcoma, extremely rare, lacking a specific line of differentiation, which is a diagnosis of exclusion (the wastebasket category, which fails to fulfill the morphological and immunohistochemical criteria of translocation-positive ESS). Surgery is the main strategy in the management of uterine sarcoma. Due to rarity, complex biological characteristics, and unknown etiology and risk factors of uterine sarcomas, the role of adjuvant therapy is not clear. Only LG-ESS might respond to progestins or aromatase inhibitors.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment strategies for patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

To investigate and evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment strategies for patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS).The medical records of LG-ESS patients who were treated at 2 cancer referral centers from January 2005 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.Twenty patients with LG-ESS met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was the mainstay of surgery. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 12 (60%) cases, and no positive nodes were identified. CD10 was the most commonly used immunohistochemistry marker, followed by smooth muscle actin (SMA), estrogen receptor (ER), desmin, progesterone receptor (PR), and S-100; the positivity rates of these markers were 88.2%, 66.7%, 75.0%, 16.7%, 88.9%, and 0, respectively. Postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal treatment were provided alone or in combination in 10 (50%) patients, 4 (20%) patients, and 1 (5%) patient, respectively. One patient developed lung metastasis at initial diagnosis, and 2 (10%) patients had recurrence with distant metastasis. They all underwent complete or incomplete resection followed by hormonal treatment. The overall survival time of these patients was 66, 89, and 109 months at last contact, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 90% and 72%, respectively. No patients died of the disease.CD10/SMA/ER/PR in combination with desmin/S-100 might improve the diagnostic accuracy. Surgical resection is the foremost treatment for LG-ESS patients with recurrence or distant metastasis. Hormonal treatment may be beneficial for unresectable or residual tumors.

Practice guidelines for management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement

Clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers have been developed by many organizations. Although these guidelines have much in common in terms of the practice of standard of care for uterine corpus cancer, practice guidelines that reflect the characteristics of patients and healthcare and insurance systems are needed for each country. The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) published the first edition of practice guidelines for gynecologic cancer treatment in late 2006; the second edition was released in July 2010 as an evidence-based recommendation. The Guidelines Revision Committee was established in 2015 and decided to produce the third edition of the guidelines as an advanced form based on evidence-based medicine, considering up-to-date clinical trials and abundant qualified Korean data. These guidelines cover screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment, and advanced and recurrent disease with respect to endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcoma. The committee members and many gynecologic oncologists derived key questions from the discussion, and a number of relevant scientific literatures were reviewed in advance. Recommendations for each specific question were developed by the consensus conference, and they are summarized here, together with other details. The objective of these practice guidelines is to establish standard policies on issues in clinical areas related to the management of uterine corpus cancer based on the findings in published papers to date and the consensus of experts as a KSGO Consensus Statement.

Letrozole as second-line hormonal treatment for recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A case report and review of the literature

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is a rare malignancy. The tumor is reportedly responsive to hormonal therapy, most commonly with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), but the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors for recurrent LGESS remains unclear. The present study reports a case of stage IC LGESS presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding, and also provides a review of the literature. Following a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, MPA therapy was initiated; treatment was successful, but discontinued 19 months later due to disruptive side effects. A further 2 months later, the patient presented with recurrent disease and received chemotherapy. MPA treatment was restarted with a partial response. A second recurrence, 4 years later, presented with lung and para-aortic lymph node metastases. The patient responded to treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole. The patient has since exhibited stable disease and remained free of symptoms for 7 years. This case suggests that aromatase-inhibitor treatment may be effective for recurrent LGESS as a second-line treatment.

Laparoscopic surgery on broken points for uterine sarcoma in the early stage decrease prognosis

Uterine sarcoma, a rare solid tumor in uterus, is difficult to identify in the early stage from some benign uterine tumors, such as uterine fibroids. Hence, uterine sarcoma may be treated in the same way as uterine fibroids; and this may not be found until pathological diagnosis. Consequently, this can lead to tumor's abdominal spread, planting and local invasive growth, resulting in an early uterine sarcoma, an increased relapse rate after surgery and a decreased survival. Therefore, it's important to avoid these unintended and iatrogenic complications through an accurate diagnosis and an appropriate surgical approach. The surgical staging and a complete resection of the tumor are both important for patients' prognosis. In this review, we will discuss the laparoscopic surgery for uterine sarcoma in the early stage and patients' prognosis.

Role of Lymphadenectomy for Uterine Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

Uterine sarcomas are rare, highly aggressive tumors with an unfavorable prognosis. The role of lymphadenectomy (LAD) remains controversial for this particular tumor type. To examine whether LAD can assist in prognosis or clinical benefits for uterine sarcoma patients, we performed a meta-analysis based on published studies.

Methods

We initially identified published studies by searching the PubMed database up to 30 November 2015. Study quality was evaluated systematically using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the quality of studies for inclusion in meta-analyses. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Stata software version 12.0.

Results

Our search retrieved 14 eligible studies, involving a total of 4867 patients, including 1356 (27.9%) patients who had LAD. The pooled RR for uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) in patients with LAD in 5 trials was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.62–1.31) and for endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) in 11 trials was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.69–1.34), suggesting that there was no significant benefit of LAD in improving overall survival (P < 0.05). A random-effects model was chosen to estimate the RRs in view of the significant heterogeneity in the included studies (uLMS: Cochran Q test: P = 0.022, I2 = 64.9%; ESS: Cochran Q test: P = 0.005, I2 = 60.1%). No publication bias was detected by the Egger and Begg tests (uLMS: Begg: P = 0.221, Egger: P = 0.148; ESS: Begg: P = 1.000, Egger: P = 0.928).

Conclusions

Based on currently available evidence, the findings of this meta-analysis suggest that LAD bears little prognostic or therapeutic benefit in patients with uterine sarcoma. Systematic LAD may not be recommended in patients with uLMS or ESS unless the patient has obvious extrauterine involvement, clinically suspicious enlarged nodes, or advanced sarcomas.

Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/074, August 2015)

Purpose: Official guideline published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). Due to their rarity and their heterogeneous histopathology uterine sarcomas remain challenging tumors to manage and need a multidisciplinary approach. To our knowledge so far there is no evidence-based guideline on the appropiate management of these heterogeneous tumors. Methods: This S2k-guideline is the work of an representative committee of experts from a variety of different professions who were commissioned by the DGGG to carry out a systematic literature review of uterine sarcoma. Members of the participating scientific societies developed a structured consensus in a formal procedure. Recommendations: 1. The incidence and histopathologic classification of uterine sarcoma. 2. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis and staging of uterine sarcoma. 3. The management of leiomyosarcoma. 4. The management of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. 5. The management of adenosarcoma as well as carcinosarcomas. 6. The management of morcellated uterine sarcoma.

Influence of different treatment modalities on survival of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy of different treatment modalities on the outcome of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS).

METHODS

Patients with LG-ESS who received hysterectomy from March 1991 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The associations between clinicopathologic variables and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients met the eligibility requirements. All patients received hysterectomy as the main treatment, 17.5% (20/114) of patients received ovarian preservation, and 62.3% (71/114) of patients received lymphadenectomy. Fifty-six patients received chemotherapy, 36 patients received radiotherapy, and 11 patients received endocrine therapy. The median follow-up duration was 40 months. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were 91.8% and 77.4%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 96.7% and 96.7%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that there were no risk factors associated with DFS. Lymphadenectomy, lymph node status, ovarian preservation, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy had no significant effect on DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysterectomy has been the mainstay of treatment for LG-ESS. The optimal treatment strategy in LG-ESS remains to be determined.

Vascular invasion in uterine sarcomas and its significance. A multi-institutional study

Although metastases and high-mortality are frequent in high-grade endometrial sarcomas (HGSs), these findings are less commonly seen in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESSs), even in cases with lymphovascular invasion (LVI). We hypothesized that the "bulging plugs" of tumor characteristic of LVI in LGESS are fundamentally different from LVI seen in HGS. We reviewed 70 uterine sarcomas: 42 HGSs (high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma) and 28 LGESSs. All cases had LVI documented on the histologic slides. Immunostains for CD31, ERG, and D2-40 were performed. LGESS harbored cohesive intravascular tumor foci with direct communication from the main tumor and attached to the vessel wall. The intravascular foci included tumor cells and small arteriole-type vessels and were surrounded by a thin fibrous band. Vascular markers confirmed the LVI and highlighted positively stained endothelial cells separating intravascular tumor foci from the blood itself. In contrast, intravascular tumor foci in HGS were composed of discohesive cells clusters, lacking the features described in LGESS. Only 8 (30.8%) patients with LGESS had recurrence/metastases (6 with lung metastasis); only 1 patient died of disease. Thirty (77%) patients with HGS had recurrence/metastases, 27 (69%) patients had lung metastases, and 22 (56.4%) patients died of disease. We propose that in most LGESSs, LVI represents vascular intrusion; manipulation or trauma is potentially responsible for tumor cell detachment into the circulation increasing the chances of recurrence/metastases. Classic LVI features were identified in HGS. This important distinction may allow for better management of patients and avoid unnecessary treatment in LGESS, reducing morbidity.

Uterine Sarcoma: The Indian Scenario

Uterine sarcomas are rare, highly malignant tumours comprising < 1 % of all gynaecologic malignancies. To evaluate clinical presentation, histolopathologic pattern and outcome of uterine sarcomas presenting to a tertiary referral centre over an 8 year period (2004-2012). All histologically proven uterine sarcomas were retrospectively analysed. Clinical presentation, histology, treatment and outcome were analysed. Mean age was 42 years. Predominant histopathology was endometrial stromal sarcoma (n = 13); 9 were low grade, carcinosarcoma (n = 8) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 2). Fourteen patients had Stage I disease, 3 Stage II, 4 Stage III and 2 were Stage IV at presentation. Patients with disease confined to uterus received no adjuvant treatment (61 %). Of these, 11 were endometrial stromal sarcoma (7 were low grade) and 3 were carcinosarcomas. Four patients received adjuvant EBRT following hysterectomy (17 %). Two patients who presented with metastases received palliative chemotherapy. Mean follow-up period was 46 months (0-86 months). Eleven patients (47 %) developed disease recurrence. Seven (30 %) had local recurrence, while 4 (17 %) developed pulmonary metastases. A total of eight patients died and all deaths were within 1 year of recurrence. The only prognostic factor that correlated with survival was the stage of disease at diagnosis.

Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for endometrial stromal sarcoma

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) accounts for approximately 20% of all uterine sarcomas and presents, at a mean age, around 50 years of age. Half of the patients are premenopausal. ESS often manifests as an endometrial polyp and 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. The natural history is one of slow growing indolent disease. Typical microscopic findings include a uniform population of endometrial stromal-type cells invading the myometrium and myometrial vessels. Imaging studies cannot reliably diagnose ESS preoperatively, so surgical resection for a presumed fibroid is a common scenario. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, but morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome. Leaving the ovaries in situ does not worsen survival and this is of importance especially for young women. The data support the current practice to administer adjuvant hormonal treatment, although several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Repeat surgery for recurrent disease that is indolent and hormone sensitive appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent disease is mainly hormonal.