Vaginal Mesh Contraction: Definition, Clinical Presentation, and Management

Multimodality Imaging of Anterior Compartment Pelvic Floor Repair

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are two common disorders that affect the anterior compartment of the pelvic floor in women. These can be treated conservatively or surgically. Among patients treated surgically, a substantial number present with pain, recurrent POP or SUI, or other conditions that warrant additional interventions. In many of these cases, imaging is key to identifying and characterizing the type of procedure performed, locating synthetic materials that may have been placed, and characterizing complications. Imaging may be particularly helpful when prior surgical records are not available or a comprehensive physical examination is not possible. US and MRI are the most commonly used modalities for such patients, although radiopaque surgical materials may be visible at voiding cystourethrography and CT. The authors summarize commonly used surgical treatment options for patients with SUI and POP, review imaging techniques for evaluation of such patients, and describe the normal imaging appearance and complications of pelvic floor surgical repair procedures in the anterior compartment of the pelvis. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without blind maneuver

AIM

To present the techniques of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without the blind maneuver and elucidate its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 45 women with a mean age of 77.9 years old. We investigated surgical outcomes including complications, anatomical recurrence rates, and changes in both subjective symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

The surgery required 111 ± 18 min and blood loss was 40 ± 24 g. Minor injuries of the bladder and rectum occurred in two and one patient, respectively. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1.1 and patients were discharged on postoperative day 4.4. No one experienced voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization. Wound infections occurred in two patients but they subsided with only antibiotics administered. Five patients had anatomical recurrence during a median follow-up of 17 months. Of these, two underwent reoperation and the remaining three were solely followed-up because there were no or few associated problems. Chronic pain, mesh erosion, and exposure were absent in all cases. Subjective symptoms and quality of life significantly improved after surgery at 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

It is considered that transvaginal mesh surgery without the blind maneuver is a safe and effective way to treat women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Surgical treatment of advanced anterior wall and apical vaginal prolapse using the anchorless self-retaining support implant: long-term follow-up

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Following health notification by the FDA in 2008 of serious complications with transvaginal mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse, there has been a return to native tissue repairs. Earlier work with a self-retaining support (SRS) implant showed a high anatomical success rate with minimal implant-related complications over a medium-term follow-up. It is proposed that post-implant complications are more a consequence of the method of mesh anchoring rather than the implant itself. Our system incorporates an ultralight mesh with a frame that provides level I, II, and III support without the need for fixation. The first long-term outcomes of SRS implantation are presented.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter trial was conducted using two consecutive identical protocols of the use of the SRS implant in women with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse extending their follow-up to 36 months. Anatomical success (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 0 or 1 or a Ba ≤ -2) was recorded along with subjective success as defined by regular quality-of-life (PFDI-20 and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire) assessments.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients completed 36 months of follow-up. Mean Ba measurements improved from 3.1 (-1 to 6) cm to -2.8 (-1 to -3) cm and C point from 0.4 (-8 to 6) cm to -6.9 (-10 cm to 1) cm. accumulating to a significant anatomical success rate of 94.3%. Subjective success based on question #3 of the PFDI-20, analyzed for the index surgical compartment, reached 95.7%. Post-operative complications included 2 cases of urinary retention, 1 minor frame exposure, 1 case of delayed voiding dysfunction, and 2 cases of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Untreated pre-operative second-degree Bp measurements had increased in 27% at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcome of the SRS implant shows an excellent subjective and objective success with minimal risk of complications or need for reintervention.

Mesh Deformation: a mechanism underlying polypropylene prolapse mesh complications in vivo

Polypropylene meshes used in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair are hampered by complications. Most POP meshes are highly unstable after tensioning ex vivo, as evidenced by marked deformations (pore collapse and wrinkling) that result in altered structural properties and material burden. By intentionally introducing collapsed pores and wrinkles into a mesh that normally has open pores and remains relatively flat after implantation, we reproduce mesh complications in vivo. To do this, meshes were implanted onto the vagina of rhesus macaques in nondeformed (flat) vs deformed (pore collapse +/- wrinkles) configurations and placed on tension. Twelve weeks later, animals with deformed meshes had two complications, 1) mesh exposure through the vaginal epithelium, and 2) myofibroblast proliferation with fibrosis - a mechanism of pain. The overarching response to deformed mesh was vaginal thinning associated with accelerated apoptosis, reduced collagen content, increased proteolysis, deterioration of mechanical integrity, and loss of contractile function consistent with stress shielding - a precursor to mesh exposure. Regional differences were observed, however, with some areas demonstrating myofibroblast proliferation and matrix deposition. Variable mechanical cues imposed by deformed meshes likely induce these two disparate responses. Utilizing meshes associated with uniform stresses on the vagina by remaining flat with open pores after tensioning is critical to improving outcomes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Pain and exposure are the two most reported complications associated with the use of polypropylene mesh in urogynecologic procedures. Most meshes have unstable geometries as evidenced by pore collapse and wrinkling after tensioning ex vivo, recapitulating what is observed in meshes excised from women with complications in vivo. We demonstrate that collapsed pores and wrinkling results in two distinct responses 1) mesh exposure associated with tissue degradation and atrophy and 2) myofibroblast proliferation and matrix deposition consistent with fibrosis, a tissue response associated with pain. In conclusion, mesh deformation leads to areas of tissue degradation and myofibroblast proliferation, the likely mechanisms of mesh exposure and pain, respectively. These data corroborate that mesh implantation in a flat configuration with open pores is a critical factor for reducing complications in mesh-augmented surgeries.

Design, mechanical and degradation requirements of biodegradable metal mesh for pelvic floor reconstruction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the herniation of surrounding tissue and organs into the vagina and or rectum, and is a result of weakening of pelvic floor muscles, connective tissue,...

Evaluation of the histological and biomechanical properties of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold for pelvic organ prolapse, compared with polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) is a biopolymer produced by Escherichia coli K12 bacteria. P4HB is fully resorbed in vivo by 18-24 months post-implantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate P4HB in the rabbit abdomen and vagina to determine that the biomechanical and histological properties are similar to the standard polypropylene mesh. Our hypothesis is that the histological and biomechanical properties of a fully absorbable graft will be similar to a lightweight polypropylene (PP) mesh when implanted in rabbit vagina and abdomen.

METHODS

Sixteen (n = 16) female New Zealand White (retired breeder) rabbits were equally divided between two time points (3 and 9 months). A total of 17 rabbits were used owing to one death secondary to suspected cardiomyopathy. P4HB scaffold and PP mesh were subcutaneously and peri-vaginally implanted into the rabbit abdomen and vagina respectively. All rabbits had both posterior and anterior vaginal implants, and half of the rabbits had four abdominal implants in addition to the vaginal implants. The abdominal implants were 4.5 cm long × 1.5 cm wide whereas the vaginal implants were 1.5 cm long × 0.5 cm wide. At 3 and 9 months, gross necropsy was performed and samples were obtained, sectioned, stained and evaluated via histological analysis. Specimens were assessed for host inflammatory response, neovascularization, elastin content, and collagen deposition/maturation. Specimens were also biomechanically evaluated via uniaxial tensile test to determine the stiffness, ultimate tensile strength and load at ultimate tensile strength of the device/tissue composite.

RESULTS

No abdominal mesh exposures were noted. A comparable number of asymptomatic partial vaginal exposures were observed at 3 months (P4HB: n = 3; PP: n = 2) and 9 months (P4HB: n = 3; PP: n = 2) respectively. Histological analysis of specimens showed comparable results in the P4HB and PP groups at 3 and 9 months post-implantation. Although no acute inflammation was seen, chronic inflammation was demonstrated in all specimens. Elastic fibers were present in the 3-month vaginal PP and P4HB specimens, but were not seen again. There was an increase in type I/III collagen noted over time. Biomechanical evaluation of the vaginal mesh tissue complex showed ultimate tensile strength was not significantly different between P4HB and PP groups at 3 (P = 0.625) and 9 months (P = 0.250) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

P4HB scaffold may represent a fully absorbable alternative to permanent mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair.

Immunochemical and urodynamic outcomes after polypropylene mesh explant from the pelvic wall of rats

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To analyze the immunochemical and urodynamic outcomes after partial versus complete excision of transvaginal polypropylene mesh (PPM) from pelvic walls of rats.

METHODS

Forty-eight female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly distributed into seven groups: control, mesh total removal 60 days (M-T 60D), mesh total removal 180 days (M-T 180D), mesh partial removal 60 days (M-H 60D), mesh partial removal 180 days (M-H 180D), sham 60 days (Sham 60D), and sham 180 days (Sham 180D). In the mesh groups, PPM was inserted and partially (0.3 × 0.3 cm) or completely removed 30 days later. In the Sham group, the space between the vagina and bladder was dissected without placing or removing the synthetic mesh at day 1 and day 30 later. Urodynamic studies, immunochemical analysis, and Western blot were done at days 60 and 180.

RESULTS

The M-T 60D voiding pressure was significantly decreased compared to the Sham 60D and M-H 60D. The voiding interval of M-T 60D was significantly shorter than that of M-H 60D. In the M-T 60D and M-T 180D groups, the leak point pressure was significantly less than in their corresponding sham groups. IL-1 and TNF-α were significantly more intense in M-T 60D compared to M-H 60D and Sham 60D. NGF was significantly greater in M-T 60D compared to Sham 60D. There were no significant differences in MMP-2 and CD-31s throughout the group.

CONCLUSION

Total mesh excision incites a host inflammatory response and transitory lower urinary tract dysfunction. Despite the good outcomes after total excision, the invasiveness and surgical risk associated with repeated procedures should not be underestimateded.

Meshy business: MRI and ultrasound evaluation of pelvic floor mesh and slings

Pelvic floor disorders are a complex set of conditions including but not limited to stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse that generally affect older and multiparous women. Of the several surgical options available for treatment of these conditions, synthetic mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence and vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse are amenable to imaging evaluation by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Ultrasound can evaluate the sub- and immediate peri-urethral portions of sling due to its ability to differentiate synthetic material from native tissues with real-time imaging, while MRI is able to better depict the global pelvic floor anatomy and assess the more distant components of mesh and slings material. Given the high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and complications after surgical repair, it is important that radiologists familiarize themselves with normal and abnormal imaging findings after these procedures. This article provides a review of the spectrum of imaging findings in patients after pelvic floor repair with synthetic mid-urethral slings and vaginal mesh.

Ultrasound imaging of slings and meshes in urogynecology

Imaging is used increasingly in urogynecology. One of the main applications is in the assessment of synthetic implants. Ultrasound is particularly useful for this purpose as most such implants appear highly echogenic on ultrasound but are not visible using other imaging techniques. The worldwide success of synthetic mid-urethral slings, introduced in the late 90s, led to the subsequent introduction of transvaginal mesh in 2003-2004. Widespread use of synthetic implants for both urinary incontinence and prolapse has caused a rise in implant-related complications and increasing negative publicity and litigation, with many products removed from the market. It is not surprising that there is increasing demand for the assessment and evaluation of sling and mesh implants using imaging. This review article discusses the role of translabial/transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of synthetic implants used in the treatment of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. The discussion focuses on those applications of the technique that are useful for surgeons dealing with patients after mesh and/or sling placement. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Laparoscopic latero-abdominal colposuspension: Description of the technique, advantages and preliminary results

INTRODUCTION

There are currently various fixation or suspension techniques for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. Laparoscopic colposacropexy is considered the gold standard. We present the surgical steps of the laparoscopic latero-abdominal colposuspension (LACS) technique and the preliminary results obtained.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with anterior and/or apical compartment symptomatic POP undergoing LACS are included. The Baden-Walker scale, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OAB-q SF), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale were used to assess the degree of prolapse, urinary filling and sexual symptoms and the level of satisfaction before and after surgery, respectively. Conventional laparoscopic material and a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh were used.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included with a minimum follow-up time of 6months. The mean surgical time was 70.3±23.8min. Anatomic correction of prolapse was seen in all cases. Only one recurrence was detected. High levels of patient satisfaction were achieved.

CONCLUSION

LACS allowed the anatomical reconstruction of the pelvic floor and proved to be a minimally invasive, fast, effective, safe and reproducible technique. More series are needed to evaluate its role against laparoscopic colposacropexy.

Clinical analysis of pain after transvaginal mesh surgery in patients with pelvic organ prolapse

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relevant factors of pain after transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and to analyse the management and relief of the pain.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective study of a clinical database of patients who underwent TVM surgery was conducted, and pain related aspects were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 1855 patients were included in the study. We divided the patients into two groups: pain-free (1805 patients) and pain (50 patients) group. The incidence of pain after TVM surgery was 2.70%, with a median occurrence time of 7.5 months. Pain mainly involved the vagina, perineum, buttocks, groin, inner thighs, and lower abdomen. Excessive intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.284, 95% CI 0.868-2.401) and postoperative anatomic failure (OR = 1.577, 95% CI 0.952-3.104) were analysed as risk factors with statistical significance. Mesh exposure rate in the pain group was 38%, showing a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.01). Forty patients underwent non-surgical treatment, with a relief rate of 40.0%, 33 patients received surgical treatment, 15 underwent partial mesh removal, and 18 underwent complete mesh removal, with a relief rate of 84.8%. The total relief rate was 88% within all 50 patients suffering from pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive intraoperative bleeding and unsatisfactory postoperative anatomic outcomes can increase the risk of postoperative pain; mesh exposure is also associated with the pain. Most patients can get pain relief with proper management, more than half of whom may need mesh removal with differing approach.

[Pelvic and perineal pain after genital prolapse: A literature review]

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic and perineal pain after genital prolapse surgery is a serious and frequent post-operative complication which diagnosis and therapeutic management can be complex.

MATERIALS ET METHODS

A literature review was carried out on the Pubmed database using the following words and MeSH : genital prolapse, pain, dyspareunia, genital prolapse and pain, genital prolapse and dyspareunia, genital prolapse and surgery, pain and surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 133 articles found, 74 were selected. Post-operative chronic pelvic pain persisting more than 3 months after surgery according to the International Association for the Study of Pain. It can be nociceptive, neuropathic or dysfunctional. Its diagnosis is mainly clinical. Its incidence is estimated between 1% and 50% and the risk factors are young age, the presence of comorbidities, history of prolapse surgery, severe prolapse, preoperative pain, invasive surgical approach, simultaneous placement of several meshes, less operator experience, increased operative time and early post-operative pain. The vaginal approach can cause a change in compliance and vaginal length as well as injury to the pudendal, sciatic and obturator nerves and in some cases lead to myofascial pelvic pain syndrome, whereas the laparoscopic approach can lead to parietal nerve damage. Therapeutic management is multidisciplinary and complex.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic pain after genital prolapse surgery is still obscure to this day.

Deformation of Transvaginal Mesh in Response to Multiaxial Loading

Synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair is associated with high complication rates. While current devices incorporate large pores (>1 mm), recent studies have shown that uniaxial loading of mesh reduces pore size, raising the risk for complications. However, it is difficult to translate uniaxial results to transvaginal meshes, as in vivo loading is multidirectional. Thus, the aim of this study was to (1) experimentally characterize deformation of pore diameters in a transvaginal mesh in response to clinically relevant multidirectional loading and (2) develop a computational model to simulate mesh behavior in response to in vivo loading conditions. Tension (2.5 N) was applied to each of mesh arm to simulate surgical implantation. Two loading conditions were assessed where the angle of the applied tension was altered and image analysis was used to quantify changes in pore dimensions. A computational model was developed and used to simulate pore behavior in response to these same loading conditions and the results were compared to experimental findings. For both conditions, between 26.4% and 56.6% of all pores were found to have diameters <1 mm. Significant reductions in pore diameter were noted in the inferior arms and between the two superior arms. The computational model identified the same regions, though the model generally underestimated pore deformation. This study demonstrates that multiaxial loading applied clinically has the potential to locally reduce porosity in transvaginal mesh, increasing the risk for complications. Computational simulations show potential of predicting this behavior for more complex loading conditions.

Biomimetic surgical mesh to replace fascia with tunable force-displacement

Here we mimic the mechanical properties of native fascia to design surgical mesh for fascia replacement. Despite the widespread acceptance of synthetic materials as tissue scaffolds for pelvic floor disorders, mechanical property mismatch between mesh and adjacent native tissue drives fibrosis and erosion, leading the FDA to remove several surgical meshes from the market. However, autologous tissue does not induce either fibrosis or adjacent tissue erosion, suggesting the potential for biomimetic surgical mesh. In this study, we determined the design rules for mesh that mimics native fascia by mathematically modeling multi-component polymer networks, composed of elastin-like and collagen-like fibers, using a spring-network model. To validate the model, we measured the stress-strain curves of native bovine and nonhuman primate (Macaca mulatta) abdominal fascia in both toe and linear regions. We find that the stiffer collagen-like fibers must remain limp until the elastin-like fibers extend to the initial length of spanning collagen-like fibers under uniaxial tension. Comparing model results to experiment determines the product of fiber volume fraction and elastic modulus, a critical design parameter. Dual fiber mesh with mechanical properties that mimic fascia are feasible. These results have broad application to a wide range of soft tissue replacements including ~200,000 surgeries/year for pelvic floor disorders, because standard-of-care mesh contain only stiffer polymers that behave more like collagen than native tissue.

Preventing Mesh Pore Collapse by Designing Mesh Pores With Auxetic Geometries: A Comprehensive Evaluation Via Computational Modeling

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) meshes are exposed to predominately tensile loading conditions in vivo that can lead to pore collapse by 70-90%, decreasing overall porosity and providing a plausible mechanism for the contraction/shrinkage of mesh observed following implantation. To prevent pore collapse, we proposed to design synthetic meshes with a macrostructure that results in auxetic behavior, the pores expand laterally, instead of contracting when loaded. Such behavior can be achieved with a range of auxetic structures/geometries. This study utilized finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the behavior of mesh models with eight auxetic pore geometries subjected to uniaxial loading to evaluate their potential to allow for pore expansion while simultaneously providing resistance to tensile loading. Overall, substituting auxetic geometries for standard pore geometries yielded more pore expansion, but often at the expense of increased model elongation, with two of the eight auxetics not able to maintain pore expansion at higher levels of tension. Meshes with stable pore geometries that remain open with loading will afford the ingrowth of host tissue into the pores and improved integration of the mesh. Given the demonstrated ability of auxetic geometries to allow for pore size maintenance (and pore expansion), auxetically designed meshes have the potential to significantly impact surgical outcomes and decrease the likelihood of major mesh-related complications.

New Zealand white rabbit: a novel model for prolapse mesh implantation via a lumbar colpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

New Zealand white rabbits are an inexpensive large-animal model. This study explored the rabbit as a model for mesh-augmented colpopexy using the intra-abdominal vagina. We hypothesized that polypropylene mesh would negatively impact rabbit vaginal smooth muscle (VSM) morphology and contractile function, similar to the nonhuman primate (NHP)-the established model for prolapse mesh evaluation.

METHODS

Restorelle was implanted onto the vagina of ten rabbits via lumbar colpopexy after a hysterectomy. Ten rabbits served as sham. Twelve weeks post-implantation, the vagina was excised and VSM morphology and vaginal contractility were assessed. Outcome measures were compared using independent samples t and Mann-Whitney U tests with a Bonferroni correction, where appropriate. Results from the rabbits were compared with published NHP data.

RESULTS

Animals had similar age, parity and BMI. VSM was 18% thinner after Restorelle implantation, P = 0.027. Vaginal contractility was 43% decreased in response to 120 mM KCl (P = 0.003), similar to the 46% reduction observed in the NHP vagina implanted with Restorelle (P = 0.027). Three meshes wrinkled in vivo, resulting in dramatic thinning of the underlying vagina in the area of the mesh causing a mesh exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypropylene mesh negatively impacts VSM morphology and vaginal contractility in the rabbit, similar to the NHP, suggesting that the rabbit may serve as an alternative large-animal model. The vaginal thinning and appearance of a mesh exposure in the area of a mesh wrinkle suggest the rabbit may also serve as a model for understanding the pathophysiology of mesh exposure.

Management of vaginal mesh exposure: A systematic review

Objectives: To identify various predisposing factors, the clinical presentation, and the management of vaginal mesh-related complications, with special emphasis on mesh exposure and the indications for and results of vaginal mesh removal.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed using a search strategy based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria. PubMed was queried for studies regarding aetiology, risk factors, and management of vaginal mesh exposure from 1 January 2008 to June 2018. Full-text articles were obtained for eligible abstracts. Relevant articles were included, and the cited references were used to identify relevant articles not previously included.

Results: A total of 102 abstracts were identified from the PubMed search criteria. An additional 45 studies were identified based on review of the cited references. After applying eligibility criteria and excluding impertinent articles, 58 studies were included in the final analysis.

Conclusion: Numerous studies have found at least some degree of symptomatic improvement regardless of the amount of mesh removed. Focal areas of exposure or pain can be successfully managed with partial mesh removal with low rates of complications. With partial mesh removal, many patients will ultimately require subsequent mesh removal procedures. For this reason, complete mesh excision is an alternative for patients with diffuse vaginal pain, large mesh exposure, and extrusion of mesh into adjacent viscera. However, when considering complete mesh removal, it is important to counsel patients regarding possible complications of removal and the increased risk of recurrent stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse postoperatively.

Abbreviations: MUS: midurethral sling; OR: odds ratio; POP: pelvic organ prolapse; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses; SUI: stress urinary incontinence; TOT: transobturator; TVT: tension-free vaginal tape

Safety and efficacy of non-absorbable mesh in contemporary gynaecological surgery

Mesh-augmented pelvic floor surgery evolved to address the limitations of native tissue repair in reconstructive surgery. The development of the synthetic mid-urethral tape signalled a revolution in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, whilst the use of mesh in abdominal apical prolapse repair may confer benefits over native tissue alternatives. However, these procedures can be associated with mesh-specific complications, underlining the need for shared decision-making between physicians and patients prior to mesh surgery.

Transvaginal non-absorbable mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse are associated with a high risk of serious adverse events, leading to withdrawal or restricted use in many countries. Increased scrutiny has led to growing concerns about complications associated with all types of mesh-augmented reconstructive surgery, attracting widespread media attention.

National and international reports have been commissioned examining the safety and efficacy of mesh surgery in gynaecology. They have all highlighted systemic failures in the development, regulation and clinical adoption of medical devices. The widespread application of novel devices prior to the availability of reliable safety and efficacy data, and delayed recognition of adverse events, is of serious concern. Notwithstanding, the available data continue to support a role for mesh augmentation. This review outlines the evolution of gynaecological mesh, the safety and efficacy of pelvic floor surgery using non-absorbable mesh materials, and an overview of specific complications.

3D reconstruction of MR-visible Fe3 O4 -mesh implants: Pelvic mesh measurement techniques and preliminary findings

AIMS

To develop MR-based measurement technique to evaluate the postoperative dimension and location of implanted magnetic resonance (MR)-visible meshes.

METHODS

This technique development study reports findings of six patients (A-F) with cystoceles treated with anterior vaginal MR-visible Fe₃ O₄ -polypropylene implants. Implanted meshes were reconstructed from 3 months and/or 1 year postsurgical MR-images using 3D Slicer®. Measurements including mesh length, distance to the ischial spines, pudendal, and obturator neurovascular bundles and urethra were obtained using software Rhino® and a custom Matlab® program. The range of implanted mesh length and their placements were reported and compared with mesh design and implantation recommendations. With the anterior/posterior-mesh-segment-ratio mesh shrinkage localization was evaluated.

RESULTS

Examinations were possible for patients A-D 3 months and for A, C, E, and F 1 year postsurgical. The mesh was at least 40% shorter in all patients 3 months and/or 1 year postoperatively. A, B showed shrinkage in the anterior segment, D, E in the posterior segment (Patients C, F not applicable due to intraoperative mesh trimming). Patient E presented pain in the area of mesh shrinkage. In Patient C posterior mesh fixations were placed in the iliococcygeal muscle rather than sacrospinous ligaments. Arm placement less than 20 mm from the pudendal neurovascular bundles was seen in all cases. The portion of the urethra having mesh underneath it ranged from 19% to 55%.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-based measurement techniques have been developed to quantify implanted mesh location and dimension. Mesh placement variations possibly correlating with postoperative complications can be illustrated.

Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a surgical polypropylene mesh for correction of anterior vaginal prolapse, with or without apical defects, by providing simultaneous reinforcement at the anterior and apical aspects of the vagina with a single-incision approach.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study involving women with baseline stage ≥2 anterior and/or apical vaginal wall prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The primary endpoint was defined as achievement of POP-Q stage ≤1 status. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS). The device under evaluation was Calistar A, which is fixed posteriorly to the sacrospinous ligaments with a novel tissue-anchoring system (TAS) and anteriorly to the obturator internus muscles. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 7 days and at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

Ninety-seven women were treated and assessed for the primary outcome. They were followed for up to 2 years (n=43), with a median of 12 months. Objective cure was achieved in 86 of the 97 patients (88.7%) (P<0.0005). The mean reduction in the ICIQ-VS scores was in the range of 70%–90% for every time point (P<0.05). No bleeding or surgical revision was reported. Mesh exposure occurred in 7 patients (7.2%), urinary retention in 5 (5.2%), de novo dyspareunia in 3 (3.1%), and urinary tract infections in 7 (7.2%).

Conclusions

This midterm follow-up showed that apical and anterior vaginal reinforcement with a polypropylene implant fixed with a TAS provided good anatomical correction, with no major complications.

BIOMECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF NORMAL AND PROLAPSED VAGINAL TISSUE SURROGATES

In the recent years, poorly evaluated gynecological surgeries and urogynecological mesh implantations have been affecting millions of women in the US and across the globe. These failed surgeries could be mainly attributed to the nonavailability of vaginal tissues (due to ethical and biosafety issues), which does not allow any experimental testing of operation and mesh implantation techniques before an actual surgery. A surrogate which behaves biomechanically like the human vaginal tissue would be indispensable for simulating surgical suture of vaginal tissues in prolapse surgery, hysterectomy or surgery during traumatic child births (such as Cesarean). Also, vaginal tissue surrogates simulating the various prolapse conditions (such as vaginal tissue stiffening) would be very useful to evaluate tissue modifications due to prolapse, and also mesh and vaginal tissue interactions. In the current work, a low cost four-part silicone-based material was developed, which precisely simulates the linear and nonlinear mechanical behavior of the normal human vaginal tissue. Additionally, a range of four-part silicone-based novel materials were developed which precisely mimics the mechanical behavior of stiffened vaginal tissues at different degrees of prolapse. The linear and nonlinear mechanical behavior of all such novel materials were characterized using elastic and hyperelastic formulations. Such precisely characterized normal and prolapsed vaginal tissue surrogates have not been developed anywhere to date as per the best of our knowledge and would be clinically helpful for gynecological surgical planning in the future.

No. 351-Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the evidence related to the risks and benefits of using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repairs in order to update recommendations initially made in 2011.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, residents, urologists, urogynaecologists, and other health care providers who assess, counsel, and care for women with pelvic organ prolapse.

TARGET POPULATION

Adult women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse considering surgery and those who have previously undergone transvaginal mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

OPTIONS

The discussion relates to transvaginal mesh procedures compared with other surgical options for pelvic organ prolapse (mainly about vaginal native tissue repairs and minimally about other alternatives such as biological and absorbable vaginal mesh and abdominally placed surgical mesh).

OUTCOMES

The outcomes of interest are objective and subjective success rates and intraoperative and postoperative complications, such as adjacent organ injury (urinary, gastrointestinal), infection, hematoma/bleeding, vaginal mesh exposure, persistent pain, dyspareunia, de novo stress urinary incontinence, and reoperation.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Database, and EMBASE were searched using the key words pelvic organ prolapse/surgery*, prolapse/surgery*, surgical mesh, surgical mesh*/adverse effects, transvaginal mesh, and pelvic organ prolapse.

RESULTS

were restricted to English or French language and human research. Articles obtained through this search strategy were included until the end of June 2016. Pertinent new studies were added up to September 2016. Grey literature was not searched. Clinical practice guidelines and guidelines of specialty societies were reviewed. Systematic reviews were included when available. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included when evidence for the outcome of interest or in the target population was not available from systematic reviews. New studies not yet included in systematic reviews were also included. Only publications with study groups larger than 20 individuals were selected because this criterion was used in the largest meta-analysis referenced in this guideline. A total of 1470 studies were obtained; after selecting only applicable studies and excluding duplicates, 68 manuscripts were reviewed and included.

VALUES

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors and members of the Urogynaecology Committee. The Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology framework. The Summary of Findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

It is expected that this guideline will benefit women with pelvic organ prolapse by ensuring that health care providers are aware of outcomes related to transvaginal mesh procedures and steps in the management of related complications. This should guide patient-informed consent before such procedures are undertaken. The benefits clearly outweigh the potential harms or costs of implementation of this guideline, although no direct harms or costs are identified.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Short term post-operative morphing of sacrocolpopexy mesh measured by magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Sacrocolpopexy (SC) involves suspension of the vaginal vault or cervix to the sacrum using a mesh. Following insertion, the meshes have been observed to have undergone dimensional changes.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify dimensional changes of meshes following implantation and characterize their morphology in-vivo.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

24 patients underwent SC using PolyVinyliDeneFluoride mesh loaded with Fe₃O₄ particles. Tailored anterior and posterior mesh flaps were sutured to the respective vaginal walls, uniting at the apex. The posterior flap continued to the sacrum and was attached there. Meshes were visualized on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 12 [3-12] (median [range]) months postoperatively and 3D models of the mesh were generated. Dynamic MR sequences were acquired during valsalva to record mesh mobility.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The area of the vagina effectively supported by the mesh (Effective Support Area (ESA)) was calculated. The 3D models' wall thickness map was analyzed to identify the locations of mesh folding. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated to test the reliability of the methods. To measure the laxity and flatness of the mesh, the curvature and the ellipticity of the sacral flap were calculated.

RESULTS

The ESA calculation methodology had ICC = 0.97. A reduction of 75.49 [61.55-78.67] % (median [IQR]) in area, 47.64 [38.07-59.81] % in anterior flap, and of 23.95 [10.96-27.21] % in the posterior flap was measured. The mesh appeared thicker near its attachment at the sacral promontory (n = 19) and near the vaginal apex (n = 22). The laxity of the mesh was 1.13 [1.10-1.16] and 60.55 [49.76-76.25] % of the sacral flap was flat. We could not reliably measure mesh mobility (ICC = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

A methodology for complete 3D characterization of SC meshes using MR images was presented. After implantation, the supported area is much lower than what is prepared prior to implantation. We propose this happened during the surgery itself.

Surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse using different prosthetic mesh implants: a finite element analysis

Particularly multiparous elderly women may suffer from vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy due to weak support from lax apical ligaments. A decreased amount of estrogen and progesterone in older age is assumed to remodel the collagen thereby reducing tissue stiffness. Sacrocolpopexy is either performed as open or laparoscopic surgery using prosthetic mesh implants to substitute lax ligaments. Y-shaped mesh models (DynaMesh, Gynemesh, and Ultrapro) are implanted in a 3D female pelvic floor finite element model in the extraperitoneal space from the vaginal cuff to the first sacral (S1) bone below promontory. Numerical simulations are conducted during Valsalva maneuver with weakened tissues modeled by reduced tissue stiffness. Tissues are modeled as incompressible, isotropic hyperelastic materials whereas the meshes are modeled either as orthotropic linear elastic or as isotropic hyperlastic materials. The positions of the vaginal cuff and the bladder base are calculated from the pubococcygeal line for female pelvic floor at rest, for prolapse and after repair using the three meshes. Due to mesh mechanics and mesh pore deformation along the loaded direction, the DynaMesh with regular rectangular mesh pores is found to provide better mechanical support to the organs than the Gynemesh and the Ultrapro with irregular hexagonal mesh pores.

Self-retaining support implant: an anchorless system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-2-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The search for an improved vaginal mesh prompted the development of a new anchorless implant. The objective was to report on outcome after 2 years of a technique using a self-retaining support (SRS) implant.

METHODS

Patients with anterior vaginal wall prolapse, with/without apical prolapse, were recruited. Participants underwent surgical repair using the SRS device. Demographic data, pre-surgical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) scoring, quality of life (QoL) questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20 [PFDI-20], Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire 12 [PISQ-12]), and surgical data were collected. Patients were followed at 2 weeks, 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Objective anatomical success was defined using the NIH criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty women were recruited for the study with an average age of 62.1 years and an average parity of 4.0 deliveries. Average BMI was 28. Pre-operative mean POP-Q measurements were Aa =1.40 (-1 to 3) cm, Ba = 2.3 (-1 to 6) cm and C = 0.4 (-7 to 6) cm. Surgical time averaged 31.2 min. Estimated blood loss averaged 165 ml. No intra-operative complications were observed. One case (5%) of frame erosion was documented 8 months after surgery. At 2 years' follow-up, mean POP-Q measurements were: Aa = -2.95 (-3 to -2) cm, Ba = -2.85 (-3 to -2) cm, and C point -6.90 (-10 to -3) cm. Seventeen (85%) patients had stage 0 and 3 patients (15%) had stage 1. No mesh erosions or chronic pelvic pain were documented at follow-up. The total PFDI score at follow-up was decreased by 92.8 points (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

At 2 years' follow-up, the SRS implant was found to be safe, showing no intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications. All women presented with POP-Q measurements of the anterior and apical compartment at normal value (Ba ≤ -2 cm) and statistically significant subjective improvement.

Suprameatal urethrolysis with Martius flap for refractory bladder outflow obstruction following stress incontinence surgery in females

AIMS

To present our technique of suprameatal urethrolysis with Martius flap (SMUM) and outcomes of this procedure for refractory female bladder outflow obstruction (BOO).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify female patients who underwent SMUM between January 2010 and August 2016 after failed transvaginal urethrolysis (TVU) for BOO due to prior stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined as patient ability to void volitionally without need for catheterization or additional surgery for BOO. Secondary outcomes assessed included perioperative outcomes, intraoperative and 30-day complications, change in post-void residual volume (PVR), resolution of urge urinary incontinence (UUI), incidence of recurrent SUI, and treatment for any urinary incontinence.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were identified. After a median follow-up of 10.8 months (range 3.1-20.1), the procedure was successful in nine patients (82%). Postoperative median PVR was 29 cc (range 0-425) and median change in PVR was a 280 cc (range 29-1050) decrease (P < 0.01). Among the seven patients who required catheterization preoperatively, five patients (71%) recovered volitional voiding. Two patients (18%) continued to require indwelling or intermittent catheterization and underwent additional surgery for BOO. SUI recurred in one patient (9%). UUI persisted in all four patients who reported this preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

SMUM is successful in improving or relieving refractory BOO in this challenging patient population. After TVU, we believe that Martius flap interposition is critical to preventing recurrent fixation of the urethra to the pubic bones and thus achieving improved voiding.

Iatrogenic Pelvic Pain: Surgical and Mesh Complications

Female stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are prevalent conditions in adult women. Among treatment alternatives, more traditional methods of surgical intervention have been supplanted by synthetic polypropylene mesh kits. However, novel complications with mesh-related exposure, pelvic pain alone or with dyspareunia, and increased incidence of revision surgeries, resulted in 2 FDA warnings on transvaginal mesh use for prolapse repair. This review examines the anatomy of the vagina and urethra, the etiology of pain related to mesh use, and the relevant surgical techniques for management of this complication along with their outcomes.

Long-term follow-up of sacrocolpopexy mesh implants at two time intervals at least 1 year apart using 4D transperineal ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To determine, using four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound, whether the appearance, position or dimensions of sacrocolpopexy mesh implants or the degree of tissue support change in the long term.

METHODS

Women who had undergone minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse were invited for follow-up assessment at two consecutive visits at least 1 year apart. All participants completed a Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaire (PFDI-20) and underwent a pelvic examination by one examiner and had 4D ultrasound volumes obtained by a different examiner. Volumes were analyzed offline for mesh position with the woman at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver, and for mesh dimensions and characteristics on three-dimensional orthogonal planes and rendered views, with the operator blinded to the clinical data. Findings were compared between the two examinations.

RESULTS

Thirty women attended follow-up assessment at two time points, a median of 22 (range, 12-37) months apart. The median age at the latter visit was 60 (range, 46-72) years, median body mass index was 25.9 (range, 20.8-31.9) kg/m² , median parity was 3 (range, 1-7) and median time from surgery to first and second visit, respectively, was 11.2 (range, 6-26) months and 33.5 (range, 14-56) months. There were no significant differences between the two time points in symptom scores, reported satisfaction from surgery, pelvic examination findings or pelvic organ descent in any compartment according to ultrasound. While mesh dimensions of anterior and posterior arms did not change significantly over time, both arms descended less on Valsalva at the second follow-up compared with at the first (13.2 ± 6.7 mm vs 21.9 ± 10.0 mm and 9.1 ± 5.3 mm vs 16.1 ± 8.1 mm, respectively, both P < 0.001). There were no mesh erosions, but folding remained a consistent finding, occurring in 80% of women in each assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of tissue support and dimensions of sacrocolpopexy mesh implants remained constant over long-term follow-up, with no mesh shrinkage or erosion. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

In Vivo Ultrasound Characteristics of Vaginal Mesh Kit Complications

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the ultrasound characteristics of vaginal mesh in women with vaginal mesh complications.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of women presenting with extrusion complications from vaginal mesh kit for prolapse at our tertiary care center between years 2009 and 2014. We included women who concurrently underwent a 3-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) as part of the clinical evaluation. We excluded women with incomplete charts and poor imaging quality. Subjects were categorized by the presence or absence of associated pelvic pain. Based on ultrasound findings, we compared the location of mesh, the appearance of mesh pattern (flat, folding, prominence, convoluted), and other EVUS characteristics of mesh.

RESULTS

Forty-six women with vaginal mesh complications and good image quality were included. When comparing mesh length between posterior and anterior compartments, the posterior meshes were significantly longer than the anterior meshes (42.1 [SD, 11.9] mm vs 25.8 [SD, 9] mm; P < 0.0001) and more often associated with pain. In the posterior compartment, the mean mesh length seen on EVUS was significantly longer in women with pain than in women without pain (46.5 [SD, 9] mm vs 31.8 [SD, 12.1] mm; P = 0.0001). There was also a higher proportion of a "flat" mesh pattern, 14 (58.3%) of 25, in the posterior compartment associated with the presence of pain (P = 0.013). In the posterior compartment, a smaller distance between the distal edge of the mesh and the anal sphincter was significantly associated with the presence of pain (8 mm [0-37] vs 21 mm [8-35], P = 0.024). In both compartments, the EVUS had 100% sensitivity for detection of mesh extrusions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of patients presenting with mesh complications, the posterior meshes were more often visualized as a "flat" pattern with a higher frequency of pain. Mesh complications of the anterior compartment had a higher frequency of folding and shrinkage.

Latency to vaginal mesh exposure with mesh placed abdominally versus vaginally in pelvic floor surgery: A retrospective comparative study. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2016;37:238-242. [PMID: 27966387 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1245716]

The primary aim was to compare the difference in time to mesh exposure between mesh placed abdominally versus vaginally. This is a retrospective comparative study of patients presented with vaginal mesh exposure between January 2001 and July 2012. This study compares patients who had undergone vaginally placed mesh procedures to those who had had abdominally placed mesh. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to measure the time to mesh exposure. There were 68 patients with mesh exposure in our cohort. Thirty eight patients had undergone vaginal placement of mesh and 30 patients had abdominal mesh. There was a statistically significant difference in time to mesh exposure between abdominal and vaginal meshes (p≤.0001). Mean time to vaginal mesh exposure with abdominal mesh was 59.8 months (95%CI 46.2-73.3) compared to 23 months (95%CI 15.9-30.2) for vaginal mesh. When controlling for age, BMI and surgeon at index surgery, the Hazard Ratio for mesh exposure in our Cox Regression model was 0.53 (95%CI 0.39-0.71) (p ≤.0001). The mean time to vaginal mesh exposure after abdominal mesh was longer compared to the time to exposure with vaginally placed mesh (60 versus 23 months, p ≤.0001). These results support the evolving evidence that mesh exposures can occur many years distant from the procedure and warrant some level of surveillance or provision of warning signs by the providers who perform procedures with mesh.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2e-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/006, April 2016)

Aims: The aim was to establish an official interdisciplinary guideline, published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). The guideline was developed for use in German-speaking countries. In addition to the Germany Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the guideline has also been approved by the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG) and the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG). This is a guideline published and coordinated by the DGGG. The aim is to provide evidence-based recommendations obtained by evaluating the relevant literature for the diagnostic, conservative and surgical treatment of women with female pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress incontinence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review together with a synthesis of data and meta-analyses, where feasible. MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, Pedro and the Cochrane Register were searched for relevant articles. Reference lists were hand-searched, as were the abstracts of the Annual Meetings of the International Continence Society and the International Urogynecological Association. We included only abstracts of randomized controlled trials that were presented and discussed in podium sessions. We assessed original data on surgical procedures published since 2008 with a minimum follow-up time of at least 12 months. If the studies included descriptions of perioperative complications, this minimum follow-up period did not apply. Recommendations: The guideline encompasses recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse. Recommendations for anterior, posterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse with or without concomitant stress urinary incontinence, uterine preservation options, and the pros and cons of mesh placements during surgery for pelvic organ prolapse are presented. The recommendations are based on an extensive and systematic review and evaluation of the current literature and include the experiences and specific conditions in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.