1
|
Horala A, Szubert S, Nowak-Markwitz E. Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1848. [PMID: 38791927 PMCID: PMC11120042 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Horala
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Gynaecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland; (S.S.); (E.N.-M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barquet-Muñoz S, Bandala-Jaques A, Perez-Montiel MD, Prada D, Martínez-Flores M, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Pérez-Plasencia C, Gonzalez-Enciso A, Leon DCD. Factors Associated with Parametrial Involvement in Endometrial Carcinoma in Patients Treated with Radical Hysterectomy. Int J Surg Pathol 2024:10668969231225773. [PMID: 38389391 DOI: 10.1177/10668969231225773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Describe factors associated with parametrial involvement, and how these factors modify the prognosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. METHODS Observational study in which categorized patients according to those with and without parametrial involvement. A descriptive analysis and comparative analysis were performed for associations between parametrial spread and clinical, surgical, and pathology variables. RESULTS We analyzed 85 patients, which 18 (21%) had parametrial involvement. Pathology factors associated with parametrial involvement were the endometrioid subtype, grade 3, and variants of poor prognosis (odds ratio (OR) 3.41, 95% CI 1.09-10.64; P = 0.035), myometrial invasion of over 50% (OR 7.76, 95% CI 1.65-36.44; P = 0.009), serosal involvement (OR 17.07, 95% CI 3.87-75.35; P < 0.001), ovarian metastasis (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.36-19.46; P = 0.016), positive peritoneal cytology (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.04-14.77; P = 0.044), and lymph node metastasis (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.16-9.97; P = 0.026). Five-year disease-free survival was 74% (95% CI 57.4-85.4) for the group without parametrial spread and 50.8% (95% CI 22.7-73.4) for the group with parametrial spread (P = 0.001). Similarly, 5-year overall survival was 85.2% (95% CI 67.9-93.6) for the group without parametrial spread and 47.5% (95% CI 8.1-80.2) for the group with parametrial spread (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Factors associated with parametrial involvement were histologies of poor prognosis, tumors affecting uterine serosa, cervix, or spread beyond the uterus. Additionally, parametrial involvement directly affects prognosis by reducing overall survival, disease-free survival and increasing odds for recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim Barquet-Muñoz
- Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas, Odontológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Antonio Bandala-Jaques
- Biomedical Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| | | | - Diddier Prada
- Basic Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| | | | | | - Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
- Biomedical Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Aaron Gonzalez-Enciso
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| | - David Cantu-de Leon
- Direction of Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matias-Guiu X, Selinger CI, Anderson L, Buza N, Ellenson LH, Fadare O, Ganesan R, Ip PPC, Palacios J, Parra-Herran C, Raspollini MR, Soslow RA, Werner HMJ, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S90-S118. [PMID: 36305536 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.
Collapse
|
4
|
Less is more in endometrial cancer (SLN, conservative treatment, radical hysterectomy, molecular classification). Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:511-517. [PMID: 35943439 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The management of endometrial cancer has known many evolutions within the last decades. In this review, we aim to summarize recent evolutions (mainly toward less aggressive management) that have occurred in the management of endometrial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Enhanced by molecular classification, the determination of lymph node status, in young women, in case of cervical invasion, the treatment is evolving toward a less aggressive strategy. SUMMARY The predictive value and the safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy explain why most societies propose to abandon systematic pelvic and para aortic lymphadenectomy. For young women, the safety of fertility preservation is now well established and efficient protocols have been validated. In stage II endometrial cancer (stromal cervical invasion), radical hysterectomy appears excessive. The Cancer Genome Atlas classification increases prognostic evaluation in association with the traditional pathological classification and permits to tailor adjuvant treatment more accurately.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lorenzini J, Deberti M, Body G, Carcopino X, Touboul C, Dabi Y, Collinet P, Coutant C, Akladios C, Lavoué V, Bolze PA, Huchon C, Bricou A, Canlorbe G, Mimoun C, Bendifallah S, Ouldamer L. Lymphovascular space invasion and Estrogen Receptor status in high-grade serous ovarian cancer-a multicenter study by the FRANCOGYN group. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 51:102242. [PMID: 34715402 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Lymphovascular Space Invasion (LVSI) on Overall Survival (OS) and Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) in patients managed for high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (HGSOC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective multicenter study by the FRANCOGYN research group between January 2001 and December 2018. All patients managed for HGSOC and for whom histological slides for the review of LVSI were available, were included. The characteristics of patients with LVSI (LVSI group) were compared to those without LVSI (No LVSI group). A Cox analysis for OS and RFS analysis was performed in all populations. RESULTS Over the study period, 410 patients were included in the thirteen institutions. Among them, 289 patients had LVSI (33.9%). LVSI was an independent predictive factor for poorer Overall and Recurrence-Free Survival. LVSI affected OS (p<0.001) and RFS (p<0.001), Association of LVSI status and estrogen receptor status (ER) also affected OS and RFS (p=0.04; p=0.04 respectively). CONCLUSION The presence of LVSI in HGSOC has an impact on OS and RFS and should be routinely included in the pathology examination along with ER status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Lorenzini
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France
| | - Marion Deberti
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France
| | - Gilles Body
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France; INSERM U1069 Université François-Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397, Marseille, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Creteil, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Creteil, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Department of Gynecologic surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene Avinée 59037 Lille Cedex, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Surgical Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, France. INSERM 1242, COSS, Rennes. Université de Rennes 1. France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynecologic and Oncologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of gynecology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, EA 7285 Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynecology, Bobigny University, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery and Oncology, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lariboisiere Hospital, 750019 Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Service de Gynécologie, Tours University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours 37044, France; INSERM U1069 Université François-Rabelais, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lymphovascular invasion as a criterion for adjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous, low grade serous and low grade endometrioid ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 50:102193. [PMID: 34224900 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients managed for stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous, low-grade serous and low-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicentre study of the research group FRANCOGYN between January 2001 and December 2018. All patients managed for stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous /low grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer and for whom the presence of histological slides for the review of LVSI was available, were included. Patient's characteristics with LVSI (LVSI group) were compared to those without LVSI (No LVSI group). A cox analysis for OS and RFS analysis were performed in all population. RESULTS Over the study period, 133 patients were included in the thirteen institutions. Among them, 12 patients had LVSI (9%). LVSI was an independent predictive factor for poorer Overall and recurrence free survivals. LVSI affected OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.0007), CONCLUSION: The presence of LVSI in stage I-IIa clear cell carcinoma, mucinous /low grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer has an impact on OS and RFS and should put them at high risk and consider the option of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Barquet-Muñoz SA, Cantú-de-León D, Bandala-Jacques A, González-Enciso A, Isla-Ortiz D, Prada D, Herrera LA, Salcedo-Hernández RA. What is the impact of radical hysterectomy on endometrial cancer with cervical involvement? World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:101. [PMID: 32438919 PMCID: PMC7243320 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01876-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When endometrial carcinoma invades the cervical stroma, overall survival and disease-free survival decrease. However, it is still controversial whether patients in suspected stage II should be treated with radical hysterectomy. The goal of this study is to describe the role of radical hysterectomy in patients with endometrial carcinoma and cervical involvement. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study were a total of 239 patients with endometrial carcinoma with cervical involvement from Mexico City's National Cancer Institute were divided according to the type of hysterectomy, and the outcomes were compared using statistical analysis. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival was 75.76% for the simple hysterectomy group and 89.19% for the radical hysterectomy group, without achieving statistical significance. The 5-year disease-free survival was 72.95% for the simple hysterectomy group and 64.31% for the radical hysterectomy group, without achieving statistical significance. Radicality was associated with longer surgical times, intraoperative complications, and bleeding over 500 ml. CONCLUSIONS In patients with endometrial carcinoma with cervical involvement, radical hysterectomy does not improve prognosis or alter adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim Abraham Barquet-Muñoz
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - David Cantú-de-León
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.,Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.,Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Antonio Bandala-Jacques
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.,Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - David Isla-Ortiz
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Diddier Prada
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.,Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.,Departamento de Informática Biomédica, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis A Herrera
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.,Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.,Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R A Salcedo-Hernández
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ørtoft G, Høgdall C, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancers in relation to uterine risk stratification after introduction of lymph node resection and omission of postoperative radiotherapy: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 31:e22. [PMID: 31912677 PMCID: PMC7044013 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancer in relation to uterine risk stratification. Outcome for stage II was compared before and after the introduction of lymph node (LN) resection and omission of all postoperative radiotherapy. Methods The cohort consisted of 4,380 endometrial carcinoma patients radically operated (no visual tumor, all distant metastasis removed) (2005–2012) including 461 stage II. Adjusted Cox regression was used to compare survival and actuarial recurrence rates. Results Uterine risk factors (low-, intermediate-, and high-) were the strongest predictors of survival and recurrence in stage II. Stage II low-risk having a prognosis comparable to low-risk stage I (grade 1–2, <50% myometrial invasion), whereas cervical invasion significantly increased the risk of recurrence and decreased cancer-specific survival in intermediate- and high-risk compared to the corresponding stage I risk groups. In 355 cases of 708 with cervical stromal invasion, LN-resection showed 27.9% with LN metastasis and upstaged 18.1% from stage II to IIIC resulting in longer survival and lower recurrence in LN-resected compared to non-LN resected stage II. Radical as compared to simple hysterectomy did not alter survival. Treatment with external beam radiotherapy decreased local recurrence without affecting survival. Conclusion Uterine risk groups are the strongest predictors for survival and recurrence in stage II patients and should be considered when advising adjuvant therapy. LN-resected stage II had increased survival and decreased recurrence. Omitting radiotherapy increase vaginal recurrence without affecting survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitte Ørtoft
- Department of Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Department of Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Estrid S Hansen
- Department of Histopathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Margit Dueholm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dieterich M, Schröter V, Stubert J, Reimer T, Gerber B, Stachs A. Oncologic Outcome of Patients with (Low-Risk) Endometrial Carcinoma Undergoing Laparotomy versus Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Analysis. Oncol Res Treat 2019; 42:636-649. [PMID: 31542781 DOI: 10.1159/000502757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) frequently are obese and have various secondary diseases. We investigated the oncologic safety and complication rates of early-stage EC treated with laparotomy (LAP) versus minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). A secondary study aim was the evaluation of risk factors for relapse and complications. METHODS Data from the Cancer Registry Rostock, Germany, and the medical records of women diagnosed with type 1 EC between January 2005 and December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. The baseline characteristics were analyzed with the χ2 test and Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional-hazards model and logistic regression were performed to identify prognostic factors for time to event and risk factors for complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS Of 350 evaluated patients, 242 underwent traditional LAP; on 108 patients, MIH was performed. The median follow-up period in the LAP group and the MIH group was 82 ± 31.1 and 71.1 ± 33.6 months, respectively (p = 0.10). The median time to event was 40.3 ± 28.1 months in the LAP group and 38.0 ± 27.5 months in the MIH group (p = 0.476). Significantly longer surgery times (p < 0.001) and more complications (p < 0.001) were observed in the LAP group. Disease-free survival after MIH was not significantly different from that after LAP (log-rank p = 0.052). Multimorbidity remained as the single risk factor for event/recurrence (p = 0.019) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS MIH for early-stage EC may be an oncologically safe approach when compared to LAP, and its complication rates are lower; therefore, MIH represents the preferred approach for this patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Dieterich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany,
| | - Victoria Schröter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Johannes Stubert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Angrit Stachs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barnes EA, Parra-Herran C, Martell K, Barbera L, Taggar A, Leung E. Vaginal brachytherapy alone for patients with Stage II endometrial cancer with inner half cervical stromal invasion. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:606-611. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
11
|
Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, Tatebe K, Veneris JL. Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:258-279. [PMID: 31074865 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and its incidence is rising. Although there have been significant recent advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, many aspects of treatment remain mired in controversy, including the role of surgical lymph node assessment and the selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. For the subset of women with microsatellite-instable, metastatic disease, anti- programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and numerous trials are attempting to build on this early success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Brooks
- Associate Professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Dr. Brooks is now the Associate Professor and Chief of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Gini F Fleming
- Professor of Medicine and Director, Medical Oncology Breast Program, Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ricardo R Lastra
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Nita K Lee
- Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - John W Moroney
- Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Christina H Son
- Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ken Tatebe
- Resident, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer L Veneris
- Instructor of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu T, Tu H, Li Y, Liu Z, Liu G, Gu H. Impact of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Simple Hysterectomy on Survival of Patients with Stage 2 Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2933-2942. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07472-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
13
|
Pathologic Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Carcinoma (Other Than Tumor Type and Grade). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38 Suppl 1:S93-S113. [PMID: 30550486 PMCID: PMC6296841 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although endometrial carcinoma (EC) is generally considered to have a good prognosis, over 20% of women with EC die of their disease, with a projected increase in both incidence and mortality over the next few decades. The aim of accurate prognostication is to ensure that patients receive optimal treatment and are neither overtreated nor undertreated, thereby improving patient outcomes overall. Patients with EC can be categorized into prognostic risk groups based on clinicopathologic findings. Other than tumor type and grade, groupings and recommended management algorithms may take into account age, body mass index, stage, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion. The molecular classification of EC that has emerged from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study provides additional, potentially superior, prognostic information to traditional histologic typing and grading. This classifier does not, however, replace clinicopathologic risk assessment based on parameters other than histotype and grade. It is envisaged that molecular and clinicopathologic prognostic grouping systems will work better together than either alone. Thus, while tumor typing and grading may be superseded by a classification based on underlying genomic abnormalities, accurate assessment of other pathologic parameters will continue to be key to patient management. These include those factors related to staging, such as depth of myometrial invasion, cervical, vaginal, serosal surface, adnexal and parametrial invasion, and those independent of stage such as lymphovascular space invasion. Other prognostic parameters will also be discussed. These recommendations were developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma project.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen KS, Berhane H, Gill BS, Olawaiye A, Sukumvanich P, Kelley JL, Boisen MM, Courtney-Brooks M, Comerci JT, Edwards R, Berger J, Beriwal S. Outcomes of stage II endometrial cancer: The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:315-319. [PMID: 28866431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Revised: 08/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies of stage II endometrial cancer have included cancers with cervical glandular involvement, a factor no longer associated with risk of recurrence. In order to better assess relapse patterns and the impact of adjuvant therapy, a retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with modern stage II endometrial cancer, defined as cervical stromal invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with surgically staged FIGO stage II endometrial cancer at the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center from 1990-2013 were reviewed. Factors associated with rates of locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the log rank test. RESULTS 110 patients with FIGO stage II disease were identified. Most (84.5%) received EBRT±BT, with 13.6% receiving BT alone. With a median follow-up of 64.6months, the 5-year actuarial rates of LRC, DM, DFS, and OS were 94.9%, 85.1%, 67.9%, and 75.0%, respectively. With 5 locoregional failures, the only factor predictive of LRC was pelvic lymph node dissection. Characteristics associated with DM included age, LVSI, depth of myometrial invasion, and receipt of chemotherapy. Factors predictive of both DFS and OS were age, grade, adverse histology, LVSI, depth of myometrial invasion, and receipt of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This represents the largest single-institution study for modern stage II endometrial cancer, confirming high rates of pelvic disease control after surgery and adjuvant therapy. With most patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy, the predominant mode of failure, albeit low in absolute number, remains distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine S Chen
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hebist Berhane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Beant S Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Paniti Sukumvanich
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michelle M Boisen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - John T Comerci
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert Edwards
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Berger
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matsuo K, Wong KK, Fotopoulou C, Blake EA, Robertson SE, Pejovic T, Frimer M, Pardeshi V, Hu W, Choi JS, Sun CC, Richmond AM, Marcus JZ, Hilliard MAM, Mostofizadeh S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Abdulfatah E, Post MD, Saglam O, Shahzad MMK, Karabakhtsian RG, Ali-Fehmi R, Gabra H, Roman LD, Sood AK, Gershenson DM. Impact of lympho-vascular space invasion on tumor characteristics and survival outcome of women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:236-244. [PMID: 28787528 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To examine association of lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) with clinico-pathological factors and to evaluate survival of women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma containing areas of LVSI. METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective study examining consecutive cases of surgically treated stage I-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (n = 178). Archived histopathology slides for the ovarian tumors were reviewed, and LVSI was scored as present or absent. LVSI status was correlated to clinico-pathological findings and survival outcome. RESULTS LVSI was seen in 79 cases (44.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.1-51.7). LVSI was associated with increased risk of omental metastasis (87.0% vs 64.9%, odds ratio [OR] 3.62, P = 0.001), high pelvic lymph node ratio (median 12.9% vs 0%, P = 0.012), and malignant ascites (49.3% vs 32.6%, OR 2.01, P = 0.035). On multivariable analysis, controlling for age, stage, and cytoreductive status, presence of LVSI in the ovarian tumor remained an independent predictor for decreased progression-free survival (5-year rates 21.0% vs 35.7%, adjusted-hazard ratio 1.57, 95%CI 1.06-2.34, P = 0.026). LVSI was significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence in lymph nodes (OR 2.62, 95%CI 1.08-6.35, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION LVSI in the ovarian tumor is associated with adverse clinico-pathological characteristics and decreased progression-free survival in women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kwong-Kwok Wong
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Center, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colarodo
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sharon E Robertson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Department of Pathology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Marina Frimer
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Vishakha Pardeshi
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Wei Hu
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Center, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jong-Sun Choi
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Center, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte C Sun
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Center, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jenna Z Marcus
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Maren A M Hilliard
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sayedamin Mostofizadeh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eman Abdulfatah
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Miriam D Post
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Ozlen Saglam
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Rouba Ali-Fehmi
- Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hani Gabra
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colarodo
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anil K Sood
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Center, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David M Gershenson
- Ovarian Cancer Action Research Center, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Body N, de Kerdaniel O, Lavoué V, Leblanc M, Henno S, Levêque J. [Early-stage endometrial cancer: Sentinel node or lymphadenectomy?]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 44:239-43. [PMID: 27053036 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The endometrial cancers are mainly discovered at an early stage justifying a less aggressive treatment. The therapeutic choices are today based on preoperative classifications themselves based on histo-prognostic factors of the tumor and its extension measured in MRI: consequently, lymph node dissection in case of low and intermediate risk cancer is not systematically achieved. But a number of patients have lymph node involvement finally, probably justifying an adapted surgical and adjuvant treatment. The technique of sentinel node would compensate the weaknesses of preoperative prognostic evaluation. This new operative technique needs to be precised and evaluated: the topics subject to discussion are the technical implementation, the definition of its quality standards and the management of its histological results especially in cases of low volume lymph node metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Body
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et reproduction humaine, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 203, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, Breizh, France
| | - O de Kerdaniel
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et reproduction humaine, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 203, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, Breizh, France; Service de gynécologie obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Vannes, 56000 Vannes, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et reproduction humaine, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 203, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, Breizh, France
| | - M Leblanc
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Vannes, 56000 Vannes, France
| | - S Henno
- Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, CHU Pontchaillou, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - J Levêque
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et reproduction humaine, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 203, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, Breizh, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miyamoto M, Takano M, Aoyama T, Soyama H, Kato M, Yoshikawa T, Shibutani T, Matsuura H, Goto T, Sasa H, Nagaoka I, Furuya K. Is Modified Radical Hysterectomy Needed for Patients with Clinical Stage I/II Endometrial Cancers? A Historical Control Study. Oncology 2016; 90:179-85. [PMID: 26986224 DOI: 10.1159/000444258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to assess whether hysterectomy with wider resection could improve survival by preventing local recurrence. METHODS Medical charts of the patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial cancers treated at our hospital between 1990 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effects according to the type of hysterectomy. RESULTS A total of 247 patients were identified: 46 patients treated with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH group) and 201 patients with modified radical hysterectomy (mRH group). No significant differences were observed in OS (p = 0.52) and PFS (p = 0.67) between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in the distribution of recurrent sites between the two groups. The patients treated with mRH had a longer operation time and more frequently developed severe adverse events, such as blood loss and lymphedema. CONCLUSION In our cohorts, there were no significant differences in both PFS and OS according to surgical procedures, and the mRH group more frequently developed severe adverse events. Overall, clinical benefit was not obtained by mRH in patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morikazu Miyamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stubert J, Gerber B. Current Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometrial Carcinoma. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76:170-175. [PMID: 26941450 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common carcinoma of the female genital tract. Its most important clinical sign is postmenopausal bleeding. An endometrial biopsy is essential for diagnosis. Treatment decisions are governed by tumour risk assessment and patient comorbidity, which is often present. Pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection is unnecessary in low risk cases (definition: pT1 a, G1/2) and adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic treatments are usually avoidable. Treatment of high-risk patients (G3 and/or pT1b) and palliative cases is difficult and not well standardised. New molecular-based subtype classification may help treatment decision making in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Stubert
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik Rostock, Rostock
| | - B Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik Rostock, Rostock
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:2-30. [PMID: 26645990 PMCID: PMC4679344 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 426] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Colombo
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Amant
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Antonio González-Martín
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Ledermann
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Christian Marth
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Remi Nout
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Denis Querleu
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Cristiana Sessa
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C, Altundag O, Amant F, van Leeuwenhoek A, Banerjee S, Bosse T, Casado A, de Agustín L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Creutzberg C, del Campo JM, Emons G, Goffin F, González-Martín A, Greggi S, Haie-Meder C, Katsaros D, Kesic V, Kurzeder C, Lax S, Lécuru F, Ledermann J, Levy T, Lorusso D, Mäenpää J, Marth C, Matias-Guiu X, Morice P, Nijman H, Nout R, Powell M, Querleu D, Mirza M, Reed N, Rodolakis A, Salvesen H, Sehouli J, Sessa C, Taylor A, Westermann A, Zeimet A. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015; 27:16-41. [PMID: 26634381 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 694] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Colombo
- Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - C Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A González-Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology, GEICO Cancer Center, Madrid Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Ledermann
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - R Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - M R Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C Sessa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
ESMO–ESGO–ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:559-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
22
|
MATSUO KOJI, GARCIA-SAYRE JOCELYN, MEDEIROS FABIOLA, CASABAR JENNIFERK, MACHIDA HIROKO, MOEINI AIDA, ROMAN LYNDAD. Impact of depth and extent of lymphovascular space invasion on lymph node metastasis and recurrence patterns in endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015; 112:669-76. [PMID: 26391212 PMCID: PMC7526048 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To determine the significance of depth and extent of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) on lymph node metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer. METHODS A case-control study was conducted to examine LVSI-positive (n = 70) and LVSI-negative (n = 641) stage I-III endometrial cancer cases that underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging. The risk of lymph node metastasis and distant recurrence was estimated based on LVSI patterns. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, deep (>50% invasion), and extensive (≥7 foci/slide) LVSI patterns had a significantly increased risk of lymph node metastasis (incidence 57.6% and 72.7%, odds ratio 33.8 and 49.9, respectively, P < 0.001) as compared to other traditional uterine factors (>50% myometrial tumor invasion, cervical stromal invasion, and adnexal involvement: incidence range 30.4-37.9%, odds ratio range 3.80-7.03). Deep and extensive of LVSI patterns were both significantly correlated to distant recurrence (P < 0.001). Among women who received postoperative chemotherapy, deep and extensive LVSI patterns did not have increased risks for distant recurrence compared to no LVSI (P = 0.47 and 0.32, respectively). Among women who received postoperative radiotherapy, the depth of LVSI was significantly associated with recurrence outside the radiated field (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Depth and extent of LVSI are important predictors for lymph node metastasis and distant recurrence in endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KOJI MATSUO
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, California
| | - JOCELYN GARCIA-SAYRE
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - FABIOLA MEDEIROS
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - JENNIFER K. CASABAR
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - HIROKO MACHIDA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - AIDA MOEINI
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - LYNDA D. ROMAN
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Matsuo K, Sheridan TB, Yoshino K, Miyake T, Hew KE, Im DD, Rosenshein NB, Mabuchi S, Enomoto T, Kimura T, Sood AK, Roman LD. Significance of lymphovascular space invasion in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Med 2012; 1:156-64. [PMID: 23342265 PMCID: PMC3544453 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2012] [Revised: 08/21/2012] [Accepted: 08/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
While the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is well established in endometrial and cervical cancer, its role in ovarian cancer is not fully understood. First, a training cohort was conducted to explore whether the presence and quantity of LVSI within the ovarian tumor correlated with nodal metastasis and survival (n = 127). Next, the results of the training cohort were applied to a different study population (validation cohort, n = 93). In both cohorts, histopathology slides of epithelial ovarian cancer cases that underwent primary cytoreductive surgery including pelvic and/or aortic lymphadenectomy were examined. In a post hoc analysis, the significance of LVSI was evaluated in apparent stage I cases (n = 53). In the training cohort, the majority of patients had advanced-stage disease (82.7%). LVSI was observed in 79.5% of cases, and nodal metastasis was the strongest variable associated with the presence of LVSI (odds ratio [OR]: 7.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98–32.1, P = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. The presence of LVSI correlated with a worsened progression-free survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.01–4.24, P = 0.048). The significance of the presence of LVSI was reproduced in the validation cohort (majority, early stage 61.3%). In apparent stage I cases, the presence of LVSI was associated with a high negative predictive value for nodal metastasis (100%, likelihood ratio, P = 0.034) and with worsened progression-free survival (HR: 5.16, 95% CI: 1.00–26.6, P = 0.028). The presence of LVSI is an independent predictive indicator of nodal metastasis and is associated with worse clinical outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles County Medical Center, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Approach to Endometrial Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012; 22:425-33. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e318244248c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting.MethodsConsecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed.ResultsA total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed.ConclusionsIn the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.
Collapse
|
25
|
What is the impact of cervical invasion on lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 285:1119-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-2030-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2011] [Accepted: 07/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
26
|
Andrusiewicz M, Szczerba A, Wołuń-Cholewa M, Warchoł W, Nowak-Markwitz E, Gąsiorowska E, Adamska K, Jankowska A. CGB and GNRH1 expression analysis as a method of tumor cells metastatic spread detection in patients with gynecological malignances. J Transl Med 2011; 9:130. [PMID: 21827674 PMCID: PMC3173340 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2010] [Accepted: 08/09/2011] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasis is a common feature of many advanced stage cancers and metastatic spread is thought to be responsible for cancer progression. Most cancer cells are localized in the primary tumor and only a small population of circulating tumor cells (CTC) has metastatic potential. CTC amount reflects the aggressiveness of tumors, therefore their detection can be used to determine the prognosis and treatment of cancer patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit (CGB) and gonadoliberin type 1 (GNRH1) expression as markers of tumor cells circulating in peripheral blood of gynecological cancer patients, indicating the metastatic spread of tumor. METHODS CGB and GNRH1 expression level in tumor tissue and blood of cancer patients was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. The data was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and Spearman tests. In order to distinguish populations with homogeneous genes' expression the maximal likelihood method for one- and multiplied normal distribution was used. RESULT Real time RT-PCR results revealed CGB and GNRH1 genes activity in both tumor tissue and blood of gynecological cancers patients. While the expression of both genes characterized all examined tumor tissues, in case of blood analysis, the transcripts of GNRH1 were found in all cancer patients while CGB were present in 93% of patients. CGB and GNRH1 activity was detected also in control group, which consisted of tissue lacking cancerous changes and blood of healthy volunteers. The log-transformation of raw data fitted to multiplied normal distribution model showed that CGB and GNRH1 expression is heterogeneous and more than one population can be distinguished within defined groups.Based on CGB gene activity a critical value indicating the presence of cancer cells in studied blood was distinguished. In case of GNRH1 this value was not established since the results of the gene expression in blood of cancer patients and healthy volunteers were overlapping. However one subpopulation consists of cancer patient with much higher GNRH1 expression than in control group was found. CONCLUSIONS Assessment of CGB and GNRH1 expression level in cancer patients' blood may be useful for indicating metastatic spread of tumor cells.
Collapse
|
27
|
Todo Y, Kato H, Minobe S, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Sudo S, Takeda M, Watari H, Kaneuchi M, Sakuragi N. Initial failure site according to primary treatment with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 121:314-8. [PMID: 21315429 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2010] [Revised: 01/13/2011] [Accepted: 01/15/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare the initial failure sites in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical treatment including pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy. METHODS A retrospective chart review was carried out for 657 endometrial cancer patients with no residual disease after initial treatments including lymphadenectomy at two tertiary centers between 1987 and 2004. Surgical treatment at one institute included pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLX) without para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALX), while surgical treatment including PLX+PALX was routinely performed at the other institute. We identified patients with recurrence and evaluated initial failure sites. Rates of recurrence in the respective sites were compared according to the type of lymphadenectomy. RESULTS Of the 657 patients, 103 (15.7%) suffered recurrence. There was no significant difference between the rate of intrapelvic recurrence in the PLX alone group and that in the PLX+PALX group (4.7% vs. 2.9%, p=0.22). The rate of extrapelvic recurrence in the PLX alone group was significantly higher than that in the PLX+PALX group (16.1% vs. 6.2%, p<0.0001), and the rate of para-aortic node (PAN) recurrence in the PLX alone group was also significantly higher than that in the PLX+PALX group (5.1% vs. 0.6%, p=0.0004). In the analysis of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, the rate of PAN recurrence in the PLX alone group was significantly higher than that in the PLX+PALX group (9.5% vs. 1.3%, p=0.0036). CONCLUSION PAN recurrence was a failure pattern peculiar to the PLX alone group. Adjuvant chemotherapy might not be able to replace surgical removal as a treatment for metastatic lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukiharu Todo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
|