Hyperosmolar glucose injection for the treatment of heterotopic ovarian pregnancy

Navigating Diagnostic Challenges: Heterotopic Pregnancy Versus Hyperdecidual Reaction in Ectopic Gestation

In the intricate field of obstetrics and gynecology, few scenarios present as complex a diagnostic challenge as the differentiation between heterotopic pregnancy, hyperdecidual reaction, and ectopic pregnancy. These conditions, while distinct, often blur together in clinical presentation, necessitating a nuanced understanding to achieve accurate diagnosis and timely intervention. A heterotopic pregnancy is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition in which a woman simultaneously carries two pregnancies in different locations. One pregnancy is typically located within the uterus (an intrauterine pregnancy), while the other is located outside the uterus, most commonly in one of the fallopian tubes (an ectopic pregnancy). This condition is sometimes referred to as a combined intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy. The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy can be challenging because the symptoms can mimic those of a normal intrauterine pregnancy or an ectopic pregnancy. A combination of clinical symptoms, physical examination, and imaging studies, such as transvaginal ultrasound, can help in the diagnosis. After surgical or medical treatment, close monitoring and follow-up with a healthcare provider are essential. The remaining intrauterine pregnancy will need careful observation to ensure it continues to develop normally. However, in some cases of ectopic pregnancy, there will be hyperdecidual reaction within the uterus, which may sometimes create confusion with intrauterine pregnancy. Here, a case of ectopic pregnancy that was radiologically misdiagnosed as heterotopic pregnancy is presented to highlight the possibility of ectopic pregnancies being misdiagnosed as heterotopic pregnancy due to the hyperdecidual reaction. The index case underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy for tubal ectopic and dilatation and evacuation for suspected failed intrauterine pregnancy. The histopathological report of the intrauterine products of conception confirmed it to be decidua without any trophoblastic tissue.

Ovarian Pregnancy: 2 Case Reports and a Systematic Review

Ovarian pregnancy is a rare but well-known pathology. However, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment are not established. Therefore, all case reports on ovarian pregnancy published in PubMed from November 2011 till November 2022 were reviewed and two case reports were added. In these 84 case reports, 8% of ovarian pregnancies occurred in women without or with blocked oviducts and 23% were localised on the other side than the corpus luteum. Since symptoms are not specific, ovarian pregnancy has to be suspected in all women with abdominal bleeding. Surgical excision is the preferred treatment. However, since an associated intra-uterine pregnancy cannot be excluded, care should be taken not to interrupt this intra-uterine pregnancy with the uterine cannula or by damaging the corpus luteum. In conclusion, in women with abdominal bleeding, an ovarian pregnancy cannot be excluded, even in women with a negative pregnancy test or an empty uterus on transvaginal ultrasonography. Therefore, a laparoscopy is indicated but the surgeon should realise that an associated intra-uterine pregnancy also cannot be excluded and that therefore care should be taken not to interrupt this intra-uterine pregnancy by the uterine cannula or by damaging the corpus luteum.

Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management

Background

Heterotopic pregnancies albeit rare are conceivably life-threatening if missed. With the development of assisted reproductive techniques, the incidence has increased. Confirmation of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) should not preclude the existence of a heterotopic pregnancy.

Case

A healthy 27-year-old patient (gravida 4, term 1, preterm 0, abortion 2, living 1) at approximately 5 weeks gestation through natural conception presented to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. Pelvic ultrasound showed evidence of an IUP and a right adnexal mass, raising suspicion for a heterotopic pregnancy. The patient underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic right salpingectomy. An IUP was confirmed on ultrasound postoperatively. The patient had an early pregnancy loss at 8 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion

With a high index of suspicion from clinical presentation and pelvic imaging, heterotopic pregnancy, while rare, should not be ruled out.

The Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy with Transvaginal Ultrasound-Guided Local Injection of Absolute Ethanol

Aims:

The aim of the study is to present five cases of heterotopic pregnancy (HP) patients who received transvaginal ultrasound-guided local injection of absolute ethanol (AE).

Settings and Design:

This was a case series and literature review in Reproductive Medicine Center of the 105^th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army.

Materials and Methods:

Five primary infertile women who underwent assisted reproductive technology were diagnosed with HP and treated with local injection of AE (1.0–2.5 ml) under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The size of intrauterine (IU) and ectopic sacs and the level of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin as well as pregnancy outcomes were monitored after treatment.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Not applicable.

Results:

Four of five cases presented with lack of Doppler flow in the injected area after AE injection. Meanwhile, IU pregnancy proceeded well after treatment and delivered a normal newborn. One case received emergency surgery 3 h after local injection of 2.5 ml AE because of the rupture of ectopic gestational sac (GS). An early abortion was identified 7 days after the surgery.

Conclusions:

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided local injection of AE is an alternative nonsurgical treatment for HP, yet overdose injection of AE will increase the risk of ectopic GS rupture.

The Unexpected Ovarian Pregnancy at Laparoscopy: A Review of Management

Ovarian ectopic pregnancies are a rare occurrence; however the incidence is on the rise. Preoperative diagnosis remains difficult due to nonspecific clinical symptoms and USS findings. Most patients undergo diagnostic laparoscopy with subsequent surgical management. We present the case of a 32-year-old female who presented with vaginal bleeding and an unsited pregnancy, with a BhCG of 24693. Formal USS described unruptured right tubal ectopic with ovarian pregnancy being diagnosed at laparoscopy. A wedge resection was conducted to preserve ovarian function. Postoperative recovery was uneventful and BhCG levels returned to zero (nonpregnant) in an outpatient setting. Although laparoscopy remains the gold standard of diagnosis and treatment, in this case report we discuss benefits of early diagnosis for fertility conserving management, including nonsurgical options.

Individualisation of intervention for tubal ectopic pregnancy: historical perspectives and the modern evidence based management of ectopic pregnancy

Historically, ectopic pregnancy was a life-threatening condition where diagnosis was possible only at post mortem or laparotomy and maternal mortality was up to 90%. The evolution in the management of ectopic pregnancy has meant that diagnosis can be made using non-invasive techniques with an aim to identify the ectopic gestation before tubal rupture. This enables health care professionals to offer management options that consider not only maternal mortality, but morbidity and fertility outcomes as well. In spite of this, diagnostic techniques and management options are not without limitations. Research is currently focused on new tests with a single diagnostic capability, diagnostic and treatment algorithms and safe methods of triaging patients. This article aims to review the current literature on the diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy and to formulate a pathway to help individualise care and achieve the best possible outcome.

Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review

BACKGROUND

Ectopic pregnancy is a potentially life-threatening condition occurring in 1-2 % of all pregnancies. The most common ectopic implantation site is the fallopian tube, though 10 % of ectopic pregnancies implant in the cervix, ovary, myometrium, interstitial portion of the fallopian tube, abdominal cavity or within a cesarean section scar.

FINDINGS

Diagnosis involves a combination of clinical symptoms, serology, and ultrasound. Medical management is a safe and effective option in most clinically stable patients. Patients who have failed medical management, are ineligible, or present with ruptured ectopic pregnancy or heterotopic pregnancy are most often managed with excision by laparoscopy or, less commonly, laparotomy. Management of nontubal ectopic pregnancies may involve medical or surgical treatment, or a combination, as dictated by ectopic pregnancy location and the patient's clinical stability. Following tubal ectopic pregnancy, the rate of subsequent intrauterine pregnancy is high and independent of treatment modality.

CONCLUSION

This review describes the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of tubal and non-tubal ectopic and heterotopic pregnancies, and reviews the existing data regarding recurrence and future fertility.

Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies

BACKGROUND

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during the first trimester and the incidence increases dramatically with in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The co-existence of an EP with a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is known as heterotopic pregnancy (HP) affecting about 1% of patients during assisted conception. EP/HP can cause significant morbidity and occasional mortality and represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly during fertility treatment. Many risk factors related to IVF-ET techniques and the cause of infertility have been documented. The combination of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is the most reliable diagnostic tool, with early diagnosis of EP/HP permitting conservative management. This review describes the risk factors, diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches of EP/HP during IVF-ET and also their impact on subsequent fertility treatment.

METHODS

The scientific literature was searched for studies investigating EP/HP during IVF-ET. Publications in English and within the past 6 years were mostly selected.

RESULTS

A history of tubal infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease and specific aspects of embryo transfer technique are the most significant risk factors for later EP. Early measurement of serum hCG and performance of TVS by an expert operator as early as gestational week 5 can identify cases of possible EP. These women should be closely monitored with repeated ultrasound and hCG measurement until a diagnosis is reached. Treatment must be customised to the clinical condition and future fertility requirements of the patient. In cases of HP, the viable IUP can be preserved in the majority of cases but requires early detection of HP. No apparent negative impact of the different treatment approaches for EP/HP on subsequent IVF-ET, except for risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

EP/HP are tragic events in a couple's reproductive life, and the earlier the diagnosis the better the prognosis. Due to the increase incidence following IVF-ET, there is a compelling need to develop a diagnostic biomarker/algorithm that can predict pregnancy outcome with high sensitivity and specificity before IVF-ET to prevent and/or properly manage those who are at higher risk of EP/HP.

Ruptured heterotopic pregnancy in a natural conception cycle: a case report at the Yaounde central Hospital (Cameroon)

Heterotopic pregnancy is very rare under natural circumstances. We report the case of a 28 year old Gravida2 Para1001 woman at 9 weeks of pregnancy who consulted in emergency for acute pelvic pain following metrorrhagia. Physical exam revealed hemoperitoneum without shock. An emergency ultrasonography revealed two gestational sacs, one intra-uterine and the other extra-uterine. Laparotomy was done and the findings were: a ruptured right tubal pregnancy with 1,300 milliliters of hemoperitoneum, type B left utero-adnexal adhesions and an increased uterus consistent with a 9 weeks pregnancy. Right total salpingectomy was done and the patient did well postoperatively. That intrauterine pregnancy evolved normally under progesterone supply and the woman delivered a termed live female baby weighing 3.1 kilogrammes. In our context where ultrasound is not always available, practitioners carrying out salpingectomy for ruptured ectopic pregnancies should bear in mind the plausibleness of heterotopic pregnancy in order to properly handle the uterus.