1
|
Angonese G, Buhl M, Kuhlmann I, Kollmeier B, Hildebrandt A. Prediction of Hearing Help Seeking to Design a Recommendation Module of an mHealth Hearing App: Intensive Longitudinal Study of Feature Importance Assessment. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11:e52310. [PMID: 39133539 DOI: 10.2196/52310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) solutions can improve the quality, accessibility, and equity of health services, fostering early rehabilitation. For individuals with hearing loss, mHealth apps might be designed to support the decision-making processes in auditory diagnostics and provide treatment recommendations to the user (eg, hearing aid need). For some individuals, such an mHealth app might be the first contact with a hearing diagnostic service and should motivate users with hearing loss to seek professional help in a targeted manner. However, personalizing treatment recommendations is only possible by knowing the individual's profile regarding the outcome of interest. OBJECTIVE This study aims to characterize individuals who are more or less prone to seeking professional help after the repeated use of an app-based hearing test. The goal was to derive relevant hearing-related traits and personality characteristics for personalized treatment recommendations for users of mHealth hearing solutions. METHODS In total, 185 (n=106, 57.3% female) nonaided older individuals (mean age 63.8, SD 6.6 y) with subjective hearing loss participated in a mobile study. We collected cross-sectional and longitudinal data on a comprehensive set of 83 hearing-related and psychological measures among those previously found to predict hearing help seeking. Readiness to seek help was assessed as the outcome variable at study end and after 2 months. Participants were classified into help seekers and nonseekers using several supervised machine learning algorithms (random forest, naïve Bayes, and support vector machine). The most relevant features for prediction were identified using feature importance analysis. RESULTS The algorithms correctly predicted action to seek help at study end in 65.9% (122/185) to 70.3% (130/185) of cases, reaching 74.8% (98/131) classification accuracy at follow-up. Among the most important features for classification beyond hearing performance were the perceived consequences of hearing loss in daily life, attitude toward hearing aids, motivation to seek help, physical health, sensory sensitivity personality trait, neuroticism, and income. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the identification of individual characteristics that predict help seeking in older individuals with self-reported hearing loss. Suggestions are made for their implementation in an individual-profiling algorithm and for deriving targeted recommendations in mHealth hearing apps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Angonese
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Oldenburg, Germany
- Psychological Methods and Statistics Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Mareike Buhl
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Oldenburg, Germany
- IHU reConnect, Institut de l'Audition, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Inserm, AP-HP, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Inka Kuhlmann
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Oldenburg, Germany
- Psychological Methods and Statistics Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Birger Kollmeier
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Oldenburg, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hildebrandt
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Oldenburg, Germany
- Psychological Methods and Statistics Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsimpida D, Rajasingam S, Panagioti M, Henshaw H. The leaky pipeline of hearing care: primary to secondary care evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Int J Audiol 2024; 63:349-357. [PMID: 36951175 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2186814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The proportions of older adults' transitions through acknowledging their hearing loss to getting access to treatment are unknown. This was examined using data from a nationally representative cohort in England. DESIGN Patient and healthcare factors associated with referrals were examined cross-sectionally, through primary to secondary care. Non-report predictors identified using multiple logistic regression models. STUDY SAMPLE 8529 adults with hearing data in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Wave 7. RESULTS Nearly 40% of those with acknowledged hearing loss did not tell a doctor or nurse (n = 857/2249). Women (OR 2.68, 95% CI 2.14-2.98), retirees (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.44), those with foreign education (OR 2.74, 95% CI 2.47-3.04), lower education (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.58-3.18), smokers (OR 4.39, 95% CI 3.95-4.87), and heavy drinkers (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.58-1.85) were more likely to not report hearing loss. Of those who acknowledged and reported hearing difficulties, willingness to try hearing aid(s) was high (78.9%). CONCLUSIONS Unacknowledged, or acknowledged but not reported hearing loss by individuals, and non-referrals by primary healthcare professionals, are barriers to accessing hearing healthcare. Future research should report hearing aid use as the proportion of individuals who acknowledge their hearing loss, to avoid an overestimation of the non-use of hearing aids within study samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dialechti Tsimpida
- Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Saima Rajasingam
- School of Psychology & Sport Sciences (Vision & Hearing) Cambridge Campus, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maria Panagioti
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Henshaw
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gotowiec S, Bennett RJ, Larsson J, Ferguson M. Development of a self-report measure of empowerment along the hearing health journey: a content evaluation study. Int J Audiol 2024; 63:275-285. [PMID: 36794384 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2174456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct the first phases in the development of a self-report measure of empowerment on the hearing health journey, specifically, item generation and content evaluation of the initial pool of items generated. DESIGN A content expert panel survey and cognitive interviews were conducted. Descriptive statistics were obtained for the quantitative data, and the cognitive interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. STUDY SAMPLE Eleven researchers and clinicians participated in the content expert surveys. Sixteen experienced hearing aid users participated in the cognitive interviews, recruited from the USA and Australia. RESULTS The items underwent five iterations based on feedback from the survey and interview data. This resulted in a set of 33 quality-tested potential survey items that were rated highly for relevance (mean = 3.96), clarity (mean = 3.70) and fit to dimensions of empowerment (mean = 3.92) (scale 0-4, where 4 was the maximum rating). CONCLUSIONS Involving stakeholders in item generation and content evaluation increased relevance, clarity, fit to dimension, comprehensiveness, and acceptability of the items. This preliminary version of the 33-item measure underwent further psychometric refinement (Rasch analysis and traditional classical test theory testing) to validate it for clinical and research use (reported separately).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca J Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Perth, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Melanie Ferguson
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Perth, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jorbonyan A, Abolfathi Momtaz Y, Foroughan M, Mehrkian S. Determinants of Continuance Intention to Use Hearing Aids among Older Adults in Tehran (Iran). Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:487. [PMID: 38391862 PMCID: PMC10888125 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The present study seeks to evaluate the factors determining the continuance intention to use hearing aids in older adults. This cross-sectional study was carried out in 2021. The technology post-acceptance model (PAM) framework was used to develop a model for the continuance intention to use hearing aids. In total, 300 hearing aid users aged ≥60 years, who were selected via a randomized stratified sampling method, completed the self-evaluation tools used in this study. With a mean age of 71.38 years (SD = 8), the participants comprised 50.7% and 49.3% females and males, respectively. The path analysis results showed that the continuance intention to use hearing aids was positively and significantly influenced by the actual use of hearing aids, the perceived benefits, satisfaction, confirmation, self-efficacy in using hearing aids, an extraverted personality trait, self-perceived hearing handicap, and perceived social support. The main results of the present study can help hearing care providers develop a better understanding of older users to design effective rehabilitation strategies and ensure their continuance intention to use hearing aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdolhakim Jorbonyan
- Department of Geriatric Health, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 48157-33971, Iran
| | - Yadollah Abolfathi Momtaz
- Iranian Research Center on Aging, The University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran 19857-13871, Iran
- Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mahshid Foroughan
- Iranian Research Center on Aging, The University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran 19857-13871, Iran
| | - Saeideh Mehrkian
- Department of Audiology, The University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran 19857-13871, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mishra S, Laplante-Lévesque A, Barbareschi G, Witte LD, Abdi S, Spann A, Khasnabis C, Allen M. Assistive technology needs, access and coverage, and related barriers and facilitators in the WHO European region: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 19:474-485. [PMID: 35906719 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2099021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Globally, assistive technology (AT) is used by over 1 billion people, but the prevalence of needs and access to AT in specific countries or regions is largely unknown. This scoping review summarises the evidence available on the prevalence of needs, access and coverage of AT in the World Health Organisation European Region and the barriers and facilitators to its use. METHODS Relevant publications were identified using a combination of two strategies: 1) a systematic search for AT publications in five scientific literature databases; and 2) consultations with 76 of the Region's AT experts. RESULT The search strategies yielded 103 publications, 62 of them identified by the systematic search. The included publications were predominantly from six countries, and 18 countries were unrepresented. Information on AT use for specific functional impairments was present in 57 publications: AT for hearing impairment in 14 publications; vision in 12; mobility, 12; communication, 11; self-care, 6; and cognition, 2. AT needs for vision and hearing impairment were more likely to be met (1-87% and 5-90%, respectively) compared with communication and cognition impairments (10-60% and 58%, respectively). The barriers and facilitators to AT access described were linked to accessibility, affordability and acceptability. CONCLUSION Data on AT prevalence and coverage are limited in both quantity and quality. Agreed-upon definitions of functional impairment and assistive product categories and standards for data collection are needed to facilitate data comparisons and to build a more representative picture of AT needs and coverage.Implications for rehabilitationComprehensive and disaggregated data concerning the prevalence of needs and coverage of AT is needed to enable the development of responsive policies and actions.The literature available on the prevalence of needs and coverage of AT in the WHO European Region is primarily focussed on a small subset of countries and comparisons between studies are limited due to the use of different data collection strategies.Evidence concerning barriers and facilitators to AT access across countries is more consistent and can be organised across the key themes of accessibility, affordability and acceptability of AT.There is a need for consensus among multiple AT actors on standardised definitions for functional impairment and assistive product categories and standards for data collection to enable a more representative picture to be built of AT needs and coverage across the WHO European Region and globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish Mishra
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Luc De Witte
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Abdi
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Spann
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Michael Allen
- United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cortina LE, Amini A, Benson J, Huang VW, Naples JG. Hearing Loss and Sociodemographic Barriers to Health Care Access Using the All of Us Research Program. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170:76-83. [PMID: 37473437 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how gender and low-income status independently influence general health care access in patients with hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING National database. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss from the National Institutes of Health All of Us database were included. Data entered from May 2018 to November 2022 was analyzed. Patient demographics such as age, gender, educational level, and insurance status were assessed. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for statistical evaluation. RESULTS A subset of 8875 patients (48.3% male, mean age 69) were evaluated. After multivariate analysis, female participants were more likely than male participants to report difficulty affording prescribed medications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, p < .0005) and specialists (OR: 1.4, p < 0.005). Female patients were also more likely to delay care due to elder care responsibilities (OR: 2.6, p < .0005), employment obligations (OR: 1.7, p < .0005), and feelings of apprehension in seeing a provider (OR: 1.7, p < .0005). Finally, female participants reported feeling less likely to be involved in their own medical care compared to males (OR: 1.2, p < .005). Low-income (<$25,000) participants reported less likely to feel respected (OR: 3.2, p < .0005) and delivered understandable health information (OR: 2.3, p < .0005) by providers compared to participants of higher income. CONCLUSION This work suggests that patients with hearing loss, female gender, and lower socioeconomic status independently introduce barriers to health care access and utilization. These factors should be considered in efforts to promote equity in the care of patients with hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis E Cortina
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew Amini
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jalen Benson
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Victoria W Huang
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James G Naples
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chibisova S, Tsigankova E, Tavartkiladze G. Self-Reported Hearing Aid Use in Russian Adults According to a National Survey. Audiol Res 2023; 13:710-720. [PMID: 37736943 PMCID: PMC10514822 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13050062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing loss is a significant public problem affecting 466 million people worldwide. Hearing-impaired persons benefit from the use of hearing aids, but the need is unmet in 85% of the global population. For the Russian population, no data have been found on this issue. The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of hearing aid use in the Russian adult population. METHODS data on hearing aid use and self-reported trouble with hearing were obtained from the open access database of the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey-Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE) for the years 1994-2021. RESULTS the prevalence of hearing aid use in Russian adults ranged from 4.3 per 1000 (95% CI 3.2-5.9) to 8.8 per 1000 (95% CI 7.5-10.2). The mean rate of self-reported trouble with hearing was 22.2% (SD 0.8); of them, 2.2% (SD 0.2) used hearing aids, and it strongly correlated with older age (r = 0.889) and more severe hearing issues (r = 0.938). CONCLUSIONS The overall prevalence of hearing aid use in Russian adults is very low with unmet needs in 98% of the cases of self-reported trouble with hearing, which is worse than in other populational studies and global estimates. The RLMS-HSE can be used for the monitoring of the national hearing health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Chibisova
- Audiology Department, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow 125040, Russia; (E.T.); (G.T.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Allum J, Meredith R, Uus K, Kirkham JJ, Dawes P. Association between hearing loss and deprivation among Welsh adults: a cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066419. [PMID: 37147086 PMCID: PMC10163448 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To index levels of hearing loss with respect to area-level indices of deprivation in a Welsh population. DESIGN A cross-sectional observational study of all adults (aged >18) that attended Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University (ABMU) Health Board audiology services between 2016 and 2018. Service access, first hearing aid fitting appointment rates and hearing loss at time of first hearing aid provision were used to index population hearing loss versus area-level indices of deprivation based on patient postcode. SETTING Primary and secondary care. PARTICIPANTS 59 493 patient entries met the inclusion criteria. Patient entries were grouped by age (18-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, >80 years) and deprivation decile. RESULTS The interaction between age group and deprivation decile predicted access rate to ABMU audiology services (b=-0.24, t(6858) = -2.86, p<0.01) with audiology services accessed more frequently by the most deprived versus the least deprived decile in every age group (p<0.05), except the >80 years. First hearing aid fitting rates were highest among the most deprived in the four youngest age groups (p<0.05). Severity of hearing loss at the time of first hearing aid fitting was worse among the most deprived in the five oldest age groups (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Hearing health inequalities are prevalent among adults accessing ABMU audiology services. Our findings suggest that deprivation increases the likelihood of developing hearing loss, brings earlier onset of hearing loss and is linked to delays in getting help for hearing problems. However, it is not possible to know the true scale of these disparities without knowing the hearing health of the Welsh adult population including those who do not seek help for hearing problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Allum
- Audiology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Rhys Meredith
- Audiology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Kai Uus
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jamie J Kirkham
- Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Piers Dawes
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knoetze M, Manchaiah V, Mothemela B, Swanepoel DW. Factors Influencing Hearing Help-Seeking and Hearing Aid Uptake in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. Trends Hear 2023; 27:23312165231157255. [PMID: 36798964 PMCID: PMC9940236 DOI: 10.1177/23312165231157255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This systematic review examined the audiological and nonaudiological factors that influence hearing help-seeking and hearing aid uptake in adults with hearing loss based on the literature published during the last decade. Peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and February 2022 were identified through systematic searches in electronic databases CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE. The review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA protocol. Forty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Seventy (42 audiological and 28 nonaudiological) hearing help-seeking factors and 159 (93 audiological and 66 nonaudiological) hearing aid uptake factors were investigated with many factors reported only once (10/70 and 62/159, respectively). Hearing aid uptake had some strong predictors (e.g., hearing sensitivity) with others showing conflicting results (e.g., self-reported health). Hearing help-seeking had clear nonpredictive factors (e.g., education) and conflicting factors (e.g., self-reported health). New factors included cognitive anxiety associated with increased help-seeking and hearing aid uptake and urban residency and access to financial support with hearing aid uptake. Most studies were rated as having a low level of evidence (67%) and fair quality (86%). Effective promotion of hearing help-seeking requires more research evidence. Investigating factors with conflicting results and limited evidence is important to clarify what factors support help-seeking and hearing aid uptake in adults with hearing loss. These findings can inform future research and hearing health promotion and rehabilitation practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Knoetze
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA,Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA,UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA,Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Bopane Mothemela
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA,Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA,Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia,De Wet Swanepoel, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road & Roper Street, Pretoria, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neal K, McMahon CM, Hughes SE, Boisvert I. Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures. Front Psychol 2022; 13:786347. [PMID: 35360643 PMCID: PMC8960922 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hearing loss in adults has a pervasive impact on health and well-being. Its effects on everyday listening and communication can directly influence participation across multiple spheres of life. These impacts, however, remain poorly assessed within clinical settings. Whilst various tests and questionnaires that measure listening and communication abilities are available, there is a lack of consensus about which measures assess the factors that are most relevant to optimising auditory rehabilitation. This study aimed to map current measures used in published studies to evaluate listening skills needed for oral communication in adults with hearing loss. Methods A scoping review was conducted using systematic searches in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar to retrieve peer-reviewed articles that used one or more linguistic-based measure necessary to oral communication in adults with hearing loss. The range of measures identified and their frequency where charted in relation to auditory hierarchies, linguistic domains, health status domains, and associated neuropsychological and cognitive domains. Results 9121 articles were identified and 2579 articles that reported on 6714 discrete measures were included for further analysis. The predominant linguistic-based measure reported was word or sentence identification in quiet (65.9%). In contrast, discourse-based measures were used in 2.7% of the articles included. Of the included studies, 36.6% used a self-reported instrument purporting to measures of listening for communication. Consistent with previous studies, a large number of self-reported measures were identified (n = 139), but 60.4% of these measures were used in only one study and 80.7% were cited five times or fewer. Discussion Current measures used in published studies to assess listening abilities relevant to oral communication target a narrow set of domains. Concepts of communicative interaction have limited representation in current measurement. The lack of measurement consensus and heterogeneity amongst the assessments limit comparisons across studies. Furthermore, extracted measures rarely consider the broader linguistic, cognitive and interactive elements of communication. Consequently, existing measures may have limited clinical application if assessing the listening-related skills required for communication in daily life, as experienced by adults with hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Neal
- Department of Lingustics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine M McMahon
- Department of Lingustics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Hearing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah E Hughes
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration (ARC), West Midlands, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Isabelle Boisvert
- Hearing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maidment DW, Wege TE. The association between non-communicable disease and hearing aid adoption in older adults with hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:220-227. [PMID: 33870834 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1910740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether specific non-communicable diseases are associated with hearing aid adoption in older adults with hearing loss.Design: A cross-sectional, observational study.Study sample: Data was obtained from one of the largest pharmacy-led health and beauty retailers in the United Kingdom. In total, 17,172 older adults were included.Results: Greater odds of adopting hearing aids were associated with being older (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02, 1.03), having fewer self-reported hearing difficulties (OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.58, 0.64), and greater audiometric hearing loss (OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.54, 1.83). The odds of adopting hearing aids were lower if individuals self-reported hypertension (OR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.79, 0.97) and diabetes (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72, 0.95). Using a decision tree model, self-reported hearing difficulties, audiometric hearing loss, and age were the best combination of variables to differentiate between individuals that did and did not adopt hearing aids.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that hearing aid adoption is lower in older adults with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Thus, there is a need for healthcare professionals to identify older adults living with hearing loss and cardiovascular ill-health, ensuring that they receive appropriate patient-centred support to manage their health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W Maidment
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - T E Wege
- Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsimpida D, Kontopantelis E, Ashcroft DM, Panagioti M. Conceptual Model of Hearing Health Inequalities (HHI Model): A Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Trends Hear 2021; 25:23312165211002963. [PMID: 34049470 PMCID: PMC8165532 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211002963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hearing loss is a major health challenge that can have severe physical, social, cognitive, economic, and emotional consequences on people's quality of life. Currently, the modifiable factors linked to socioeconomic inequalities in hearing health are poorly understood. Therefore, an online database search (PubMed, Scopus, and Psych) was conducted to identify literature that relates hearing loss to health inequalities as a determinant or health outcome. A total of 53 studies were selected to thematically summarize the existing literature, using a critical interpretive synthesis method, where the subjectivity of the researcher is intimately involved in providing new insights with explanatory power. The evidence provided by the literature can be summarized under four key themes: (a) There might be a vicious cycle between hearing loss and socioeconomic inequalities and lifestyle factors, (b) socioeconomic position may interact with less healthy lifestyles, which are harmful to hearing ability, (c) increasing health literacy could improve the diagnosis and prognosis of hearing loss and prevent the adverse consequences of hearing loss on people's health, and (d) people with hearing loss might be vulnerable to receiving low-quality and less safe health care. This study uses elements from theoretical models of health inequalities to formulate a highly interpretive conceptual model for examining hearing health inequalities. This model depicts the specific mechanisms of hearing health and their evolution over time. There are many modifiable determinants of hearing loss, in several stages across an individual's life span; tackling socioeconomic inequalities throughout the life-course could improve the population's health, maximizing the opportunity for healthy aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dialechti Tsimpida
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Institute for Health Policy and Organisation (IHPO), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Evangelos Kontopantelis
- Institute for Health Policy and Organisation (IHPO), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Darren M. Ashcroft
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Panagioti
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|