Relevance of Artifact Removal and Number of Stimuli for Video Head Impulse Test Examination

Neck rigidity: a pitfall for video head-impulse tests in Parkinson's disease

Video head impulse tests (video-HITs) are commonly used for vestibular evaluation; however, the results can be contaminated by various artifacts, including technical errors, recording problems, and participant factors. Although video-HITs can be used in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the effect of neck rigidity has not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of neck rigidity on video-HIT results in patients with PD. We prospectively recruited 140 consecutive patients with PD (mean age ± standard deviation = 68 ± 10 years, 69 men) between September 2021 and April 2024 at Korea University Medical Center. The video-HIT results were compared with those of 19 age- and sex-matched healthy participants. Neck rigidity was stratified as a subdomain of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part (MDS-UPDRS-III). In 59 patients, the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain was overestimated in at least one canal plane (58/140, 41%), mostly in the anterior canal (AC, n = 44), followed by the horizontal (HC, n = 15) and posterior canals (PC, n = 7). VOR gain overestimation was also observed in patients with no (18/58, 35%), subtle (20/58, 34%), or mild (17/58, 29%) neck rigidity. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that VOR overestimation was positively associated with neck rigidity (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 1.51 [1.01-2.25], p = 0.043). The head velocities of patients decreased during head impulses for the AC (p = 0.033 for the right AC; p = 0.014 for the left AC), whereas eye velocities were similar to those of healthy participants. Our findings suggest that neck rigidity may be a confounder that can contaminate video-HIT results. Thus, the results of video-HITs, especially for the AC, should be interpreted with the context of head velocity during head impulses in patients with neck rigidity.

Insights Into Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Artifacts: A Narrative Review of the Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT)

Video head impulse test (vHIT) artifacts are defined as spurious elements or disturbances in the recorded data that deviate from the true vestibulo-ocular reflex response. These artifacts can arise from various sources, encompassing technological limitations, patient-specific factors, or environmental influences, introducing inaccuracies in vHIT outcomes. The absence of standardized criteria for artifact identification leads to methodological heterogeneity. This narrative review aims to comprehensively examine the challenges posed by artifacts in the vHIT. By surveying existing literature, the review seeks to elucidate the multifaceted nature of artifacts arising from technological, patient-related, evaluator-related, and environmental factors.

Effects of pupil size in video head-impulse tests

The results of video head impulse tests (video-HITs) may be confounded by data artifacts of various origins, including pupil size and eyelid obstruction of the pupil. This study aimed to determine the effect of these factors on the results of video-HITs. We simulated ptosis by adopting pharmacological dilatation of the pupil in 21 healthy participants (11 women; age 24-58 years). Each participant underwent video-HITs before and after pupillary dilatation using 0.5% tropicamide. We assessed the changes in the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, corrective saccade amplitude, and frequency of eyelid flicks. After pupillary dilatation, the VOR gain decreased for both right (RAC; 1.12 [Formula: see text] 0.12 vs. 1.01 [Formula: see text] 0.16, p = 0.011) and left anterior canals (LACs; 1.15 [Formula: see text] 0.13 vs. 0.96 [Formula: see text] 0.14, p < 0.001), and right posterior canal (RPC, 1.10 [Formula: see text] 0.13 vs. 0.98 [Formula: see text] 0.09, p = 0.001). The corrective saccade amplitudes also decreased significantly for all four vertical canals. The frequency of eyelid flicks, however, did not change. The changes of VOR gain were positively correlated with the lid excursion in RPC (r = 0.629, p = 0.002) and LPC (r = 0.549, p = 0.010). Our study indicates that eyelid position and pupil size should be considered when interpreting the results of video-HITs, especially for the vertical canals. Pupils should be shrunk in a very well-lit room, and artifacts should be prevented by taping or lifting the eyelids as required during video-HITs.

Use of Skull Vibration-Induced Nystagmus in the Follow-up of Patients With Ménière Disease Treated With Intratympanic Gentamicin

OBJECTIVES

Ménière disease (MD) is an idiopathic disorder that affects hearing and inner ear balance. Intratympanic gentamicin (ITG) is recognized as an effective treatment for uncontrolled MD characterized by persistent vertigo attacks despite therapy. The video head impulse test (vHIT) and skull vibration-induced nystagmus (SVIN) are validated.

METHODS

for evaluating vestibular function. A progressive linear relationship has been identified between the slow-phase velocity (SPV) of SVIN determined using a 100-Hz skull vibrator and the gain difference (healthy ear/affected ear) measured by vHIT. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the SPV of SVIN was associated with the recovery of vestibular function following ITG treatment. Consequently, we sought to determine whether SVIN could predict the onset of new vertigo attacks in patients with MD who were treated with ITG.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal case-control study was conducted. Several variables were recorded post-ITG and throughout the follow-up period, followed by statistical analyses. Two groups were compared: patients who experienced vertigo attacks 6 months after ITG and those who did not.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 88 patients diagnosed with MD who underwent ITG treatment. Of the 18 patients who experienced recurring vertigo attacks, 15 demonstrated gain recovery in the affected ear. However, all 18 patients exhibited a decrease in the SPV of SVIN.

CONCLUSION

The SPV of SVIN may be more sensitive than vHIT in identifying the recovery of vestibular function following ITG administration. To our knowledge, this is the first study to illustrate the link between a reduction in SPV and the likelihood of vertigo episodes in patients with MD who have been treated with ITG.

Discrimination of vestibular function based on inertial sensors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vestibular dysfunction, as a common disease or symptom, can cause abnormalities in gait and balance. Since the existing detection methods are static detection and cannot obtain the dynamic vestibular information of patients, this paper proposes a simple method for detecting vestibular dysfunction based on gait signals of subjects.

METHODS

In our study, the walking patterns of dynamic gait index (DGI) and inertial sensor were adopted for the data acquisition. Time-domain, frequency-domain and non-linear features were extracted from inertial sensor signals. Then the Relief algorithm was used for feature selection. Two classifiers, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF), were used to classify the patients with vestibular dysfunction and the healthy controls.

RESULTS

The highest accuracy of 84.79% was achieved based on magnetometer features and SVM classifier. To further improve classification results, features of three sensor signals were combined and applied to two classifiers. Combined features and RF classifier achieved a classification accuracy of 86.5%.

CONCLUSION

The detection of vestibular dysfunction based on inertial sensors might be simple, accurate and easy to implement in clinical examination, which provides a new method for the clinical diagnosis of vestibular function.

Video Head Impulse Test in Darkness, Without Visual Fixation: A Study on Healthy Subjects

OBJECTIVE

The head impulse test (HIT) is triggered by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), complemented by the optokinetic and pursuit systems. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of individualizing the VOR contribution to the HIT.

DESIGN

Thirty-six healthy individuals (19 males, 17 females; age 21-64 years, mean 39 years) underwent horizontal video HIT (vHIT). This was first conducted in darkness, without visual fixation, and then visually tracked.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of the impulses delivered ocular responses opposite to the direction of the head, matching its velocity to a point where quick anticompensatory eye movements (SQEM) stopped the response (SQEM mean latency 58.21 ms, interquartile range 50-67 ms). Of these, 75% recaptured the head velocity after culmination. Thirty percent of the responses completed a bell-shaped curve. The completed bell-shaped curve gains and instantaneous gains (at 40, 60, and 80 ms) before SQEM were equivalent for both paradigms. Females completed more bell-shaped traces (42%) than males (15%); p = 0.01. The SQEM latency was longer (62.81 versus 55.71 ms, p < 0.01), and the time to recapture the bell-shaped curve was shorter (77.51 versus 92.52 ms, p < 0.01) in females than in males. The gains were comparable between sexes in both paradigms.

CONCLUSIONS

The VOR effect can be localized in the first 70 ms of the vHIT response. In addition, other influences may take place in estimating the vHIT responses. The study of these influences might provide useful information that can be applied to patient management.

Quantifying a Learning Curve for Video Head Impulse Test: Pitfalls and Pearls

Objective: The video head impulse test (vHIT) is nowadays a fast and objective method to measure vestibular function. However, its usability is controversial and often considered as a test performed by experts only. We sought to study the learning curve of novices and to document all possible mistakes and pitfalls in the process of learning.

Methods: In a prospective cohort observational study, we included 10 novices. We tested their ability to perform correctly horizontal head impulses recorded with vHIT. We assessed vHITs in 10 sessions with 20 impulses per session giving a video instruction after the first session (S1) and individual feedback from an expert for session 2 (S2) up to session 10 (S10). We compared VOR gain, the HIT acceptance rate by the device algorithm, mean head velocity, acceleration, excursion, and overshoot between sessions.

Results: A satisfying number of accepted HITs (80%) was reached after an experience of 160 vHITs. Mean head velocity between sessions was always in accepted limits. Head acceleration was too low at the beginning (S1) but improved significantly after the video instruction (p = 0.001). Mean head excursion and overshoot showed a significant improvement after 200 head impulses (p < 0.001 each).

Conclusions: We showed that novices can learn to perform head impulses invHIT very fast provided that they receive instructions and feedback from an experienced examiner. Video instructions alone were not sufficient. The most common pitfall was a low head acceleration.

Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update

Unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction presents most commonly with symptoms of dizziness or postural imbalance and affects a large population. However, it is often missed because no quantitative testing of vestibular function is performed, or misdiagnosed due to a lack of standardization of vestibular testing. Therefore, this article reviews the current status of the most frequently used vestibular tests for canal and otolith function. This information can also be used to reach a consensus about the systematic diagnosis of vestibular hypofunction.

Are gain values significantly altered by manual data selection when performing the video Head Impulse Test (v-HIT) on all six semicircular canals with two different v-HIT systems

BACKGROUND

It has not yet been tested whether averaged gain values and the presence of pathological saccades are significantly altered by manual data selection or if data selection only done by the incorporated software detection algorithms provides a reliable data set following v-HIT testing.

OBJECTIVE

The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the averaged gain values of all six SCCs are significantly altered by manual data selection with two different v-HIT systems.

METHOD

120 subjects with previously neither vestibular nor neurological disorders underwent four separate tests of all six SCCs with either EyeSeeCam® or ICS Impulse®. All v-HIT test reports underwent manual data selection by an experienced ENT Specialist with deletion of any noise and/or artifacts. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare averaged gain values based on unsorted data with averaged gain values based on the sorted data.

RESULTS

EyeSeeCam®: Horizontal SCCs: The estimate and the p-value (shown in parenthesis) for the right lateral SCC and the left lateral SCC were 0.00004 (0.95) and 0.00087 (0.70) respectively. Vertical SCCs: The estimate varied from -0.00858 to 0.00634 with p-values ranging from 0.31 to 0.78. ICS Impulse®: Horizontal SCCs: The estimate and the p-value for the right lateral SCC and the left lateral SCC were 0.00159 (0.18) and 0.00071 (0.38) respectively. Vertical SCCs: The estimate varied from 0.00217 to 0.01357 with p-values ranging from 0.00 to 0.17. Based upon the averaged gain value from the individual SCC being tested, 148 tests before and 127 after manual data selection were considered pathological.

CONCLUSION

None of the two v-HIT systems revealed any clinically important effects of manual data selection. However, 21 fewer tests were considered pathological after manual data selection.

Quantitative Analysis of Saccade Gain in Video Head Impulse Testing

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively analyze corrective saccade (CS) gain and further characterize the specific relationship between vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and CS gain in patients with vestibular loss and healthy controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective combined with retrospective study.

SETTING

Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with unilateral vestibular loss and 40 participants with normal vestibular function were subjected to video head impulse testing (vHIT). The analysis of the horizontal semicircular canal VOR and CS gains was based on individual head impulses.

RESULTS

The patient group had significantly higher CS gain and lower VOR gain than the control group (P < .001). While there was no significant correlation between VOR and CS gains in the control group after adjusting for age and sex (P = .689), VOR gain negatively correlated with CS gain in the patient group (r = -0.853, P < .001). The specific relationship between VOR and CS gains was characterized as y = -1.17x + 1.12 (x: VOR gain, y: CS gain; r ² = 0.732, P < .001) in the patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy participants, CS was not correlated with VOR gain, suggesting that CS is not due to VOR hypofunction. In patients with unilateral vestibular loss, CS was closely associated with VOR gain and can almost correct gaze position errors required for visual stabilization. CS gain could be an important indicator to diagnose vestibular loss and help physicians identify abnormal vHIT curves caused by artifacts and irregular practices.