Optimized Diagnostic Approach to Patients Suspected of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Diagnostic Yield of Patients Undergoing Evaluation of Possible Superior Canal Dehiscence

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the diagnostic yield of patients undergoing evaluation for superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS), and identify alternative conditions diagnosed in patients suspected of, but not ultimately diagnosed with, SCDS.

METHODS

Diagnostically undifferentiated adult patients suspected of having SCDS were identified between 2016 and 2021 at a tertiary academic medical system. Patients were categorized by diagnostic testing, radiographic superior semicircular canal (SSC) abnormality, symptoms, evaluating clinician specialty, operative intervention, and diagnosis. Differences among groups were assessed for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Of 1242 candidate patients, 477 met inclusion criteria-evaluation by a clinician with SCDS on their differential diagnosis prior to diagnostic imaging. The mean (SD) age was 53.0 (15.0) years and 70.6% were female. A total of 364 patients underwent subsequent diagnostic imaging, and among these, 164 (45.1%) had a radiographic SSC abnormality with 99 (27.2%) receiving a diagnosis of SCDS (two cases of "near dehiscence syndrome"). One third (33.3%) of patients with SCDS underwent operative repair. Most clinicians with the initial suspicion for SCDS were otolaryngologists (90.6%), who had greater diagnostic yield than clinicians from other specialties (22.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.012). Patients not diagnosed with SCDS alternatively received 21 unique diagnoses and 52.1% (138/265) were not definitively diagnosed with any condition.

CONCLUSIONS

This study characterizes the diagnostic incidence, or yield, of newly identified radiographic SSC abnormalities (45.1%) and SCDS (27.2%) among people suspected of having SCDS. Considerable overlap in presentation between SCDS and other conditions exists, and there is need for improvement in efficiently diagnosing patients with SCDS and audio-vestibular complaints in general.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 134:4095-4100, 2024.

A Single Fast Test for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence—oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz—Depends on Stimulus Rise Time

As previously reported, a single test measuring oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz stimuli (bone-conducted vibration (BCV) or air-conducted sound (ACS)) provides a definitive diagnosis of semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) in 22 CT-verified patients, with a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 1.0. This single short screening test has great advantages of speed, minimizing testing time, and the exposure of patients to stimulation. However, a few studies of the 4000 Hz test for SCD have reported sensitivity and specificity values which are slightly less than reported previously. We hypothesized that the rise time of the stimulus is important for detecting the oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz, similarly to what we had shown for 500 and 750 Hz BCV. We measured oVEMP n10 in 15 patients with CT-verified SCD in response to 4000 Hz ACS or BCV stimuli with rise times of 0, 1, and 2 ms. As a result, increasing the rise time of the stimulus reduced the oVEMP n10 amplitude. This outcome is expected from the physiological evidence of guinea pig primary vestibular afferents, which are activated by sound or vibration. Therefore, for clinical VEMP testing, short rise times are optimal (preferably 0 ms).