Pedicle screw placement assisted by 3D imaging (O-arm system with StealthStation® software) versus free-hand technique for multilevel posterior thoracolumbar fusion

Comparison of major spine navigation platforms based on key performance metrics: a meta-analysis of 16,040 screws

PURPOSE

The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare available computer-assisted navigation platforms by key performance metrics including pedicle screw placement accuracy, operative time, neurological complications, and blood loss.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using major databases for articles comparing pedicle screw accuracy of computer-assisted navigation to conventional (freehand or fluoroscopy) controls via post-operative computed tomography. Outcome data were extracted and pooled by random-effects model for analysis.

RESULTS

All navigation platforms demonstrated significant reduction in risk of breach, with Stryker demonstrating the highest accuracy compared to controls (OR 0.16 95% CI 0.06 to 0.41, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) followed by Medtronic. There were no significant differences in accuracy or most surgical outcome measures between platforms; however, BrainLab demonstrated significantly faster operative time compared to Medtronic by 30 min (95% CI - 63.27 to - 2.47, P = 0.03, I2 = 74%). Together, there was significantly lower risk of major breach in the navigation group compared to controls (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.63, P < 0.0001, I2 = 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing between platforms, Stryker demonstrated the highest accuracy, and Brainlab the shortest operative time, both followed by Medtronic. No significant difference was found between platforms regarding neurologic complications or blood loss. Overall, our results demonstrated a 60% reduction in risk of major breach utilizing computer-assisted navigation, coinciding with previous studies, and supporting its validity. This study is the first to directly compare available navigation platforms offering insight for further investigation and aiding in the institutional procurement of platforms. LEVEL 3 EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy

This study aimed to compare screw placement accuracy and clinical aspects between Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation (ARSN) and free-hand (FH) technique. Twenty patients underwent spine surgery with screw placement using ARSN and were matched retrospectively to a cohort of 20 FH technique cases for comparison. All ARSN and FH cases were performed by the same surgeon. Matching was based on clinical diagnosis and similar proportions of screws placed in the thoracic and lumbosacral vertebrae in both groups. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed on postoperative scans according to the Gertzbein scale and grades 0 and 1 were considered accurate. Procedure time, blood loss and length of hospital stay, were collected as secondary endpoints. A total of 262 and 288 screws were assessed in the ARSN and FH groups, respectively. The share of clinically accurate screws was significantly higher in the ARSN vs FH group (93.9% vs 89.6%, p < 0.05). The proportion of screws placed without a cortical breach was twice as high in the ARSN group compared to the FH group (63.4% vs 30.6%, p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was observed for the secondary endpoints between both groups. This matched-control study demonstrated that ARSN provided higher screw placement accuracy compared to free-hand.

Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging: A First In-Human Prospective Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) in a clinical trial.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent cadaveric studies have shown improved accuracy for pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using ARSN with intraoperative 3D imaging, without the need for periprocedural x-ray. In this clinical study, we used the same system to place pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine of 20 patients.

METHODS

The study was performed in a hybrid operating room with an integrated ARSN system encompassing a surgical table, a motorized flat detector C-arm with intraoperative 2D/3D capabilities, integrated optical cameras for augmented reality navigation, and noninvasive patient motion tracking. Three independent reviewers assessed screw placement accuracy using the Gertzbein grading on 3D scans obtained before wound closure. In addition, the navigation time per screw placement was measured.

RESULTS

One orthopedic spinal surgeon placed 253 lumbosacral and thoracic pedicle screws on 20 consenting patients scheduled for spinal fixation surgery. An overall accuracy of 94.1% of primarily thoracic pedicle screws was achieved. No screws were deemed severely misplaced (Gertzbein grade 3). Fifteen (5.9%) screws had 2 to 4 mm breach (Gertzbein grade 2), occurring in scoliosis patients only. Thirteen of those 15 screws were larger than the pedicle in which they were placed. Two medial breaches were observed and 13 were lateral. Thirteen of the grade 2 breaches were in the thoracic spine. The average screw placement time was 5.2 ± 4.1 minutes. During the study, no device-related adverse event occurred.

CONCLUSION

ARSN can be clinically used to place thoracic and lumbosacral pedicle screws with high accuracy and with acceptable navigation time. Consequently, the risk for revision surgery and complications could be minimized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.