Root avulsion and para-root tear of the posterolateral meniscus: repair versus untreated

Root Repair Has Superior Radiological and Clinical Outcomes Than Partial Meniscectomy and Nonoperative Treatment in the Management of Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compile and analyze structural and clinical outcomes after meniscus root tear treatment as currently described in the literature.

METHODS

A review was conducted to identify studies published since 2011 on efficacy of repair, meniscectomy, and nonoperative management in the treatment of meniscus root tears. Patient cohorts were grouped into treatment categories, with medial and lateral root tears analyzed separately; data were collected on patient demographics, structural outcomes including joint space width, degree of medial meniscal extrusion, progression to total knee arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria. Heterogeneity was measured using the I-statistic, and outcomes were summarized using forest plots without pooled means.

RESULTS

The 56 included studies comprised a total of 3,191 patients. Mean age among the included studies ranged from 24.6 to 65.6 years, whereas mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 125.9 months. Heterogeneity analysis identified significant differences between studies. Change in joint space width ranged from -2.4 to -0.6 mm (i.e., decreased space) after meniscectomy (n = 186) and -0.9 to -0.1 mm after root repair (n = 209); change in medial meniscal extrusion ranged from -0.6 to 6.5 mm after root repair (n = 521) and 0.2 to 4.2 mm after meniscectomy (n = 66); and event rate for total knee arthroplasty ranged from 0.00 to 0.22 after root repair (n = 205), 0.35 to 0.60 after meniscectomy (n = 53), and 0.27 to 0.35 after nonoperative treatment (n = 93). Root repair produced the greatest numerical increase in International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores of the 3 treatment arms. In addition, root repair improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (range: 22-32), Sports and Recreational Activities (range: 23-36), Quality of Life (range: 22-42), and Symptoms subscales (range: 10-19), in studies with low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature reporting on the treatment of meniscus root tears is heterogenous and largely limited to Level III and IV studies. Current evidence suggests root repair may be the most effective treatment strategy in lessening joint space narrowing of the knee and producing improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Case Study: Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Considering the frequency of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, optimal management of these injuries was the subject of a 2022 clinical practice guideline update from The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) with input from representatives from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and the American College of Emergency Physicians. The eight recommendations and seven options to guide orthopaedic surgeons and other physicians managing patients with these anterior cruciate ligament injuries are based on the best current available evidence. The cases presented in this article are examples designed to demonstrate the clinical application of these guidelines.

Low reoperation rate following lateral meniscus root repair: clinical outcomes at 2 years follow-up

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of lateral meniscus posterior root tears repair at the time of ACL reconstruction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Between March 2015 and August 2018, 2017 patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction and were considered for study eligibility. Lateral meniscus posterior root tears were identified arthroscopically, and repair was performed with a transtibial pull-out suture technique or a side-to-side suture technique. Clinical outcomes were recorded at the time of physical examination. At the end of the study period, patients were contacted to determine whether they had required reoperation.

RESULTS

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears were identified in 153 out of the 2,017 primary ACL reconstructions (7.6%). Ninety-nine patients were included for analysis: 23 transtibial pull-out sutures and 76 side-to-side repairs. At a mean follow-up of 42 ± 10 months, one patient (1%) had undergone reoperation for failure of the side-to-side repair. There were 11 reoperations in 10 patients (10.1%), including 6 cyclops syndrome, 1 graft rupture, 1 tibial bone cyst, 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscus repair failure, and 1 arthrolysis. Postoperatively, ninety (90.9%) patients were graded A for the IKDC objective score and 9 (9.1%) patients were graded B, with an IKDC subjective score of 86.9 ± 7.6, a Lysholm score of 90.7 ± 6.7 and a median Tegner Activity Scale of 6 (3-9). All of their objective and subjective evaluations improved after surgery (p < 0.001) except for the Tegner Activity Scale. Ten patients underwent second look arthroscopy (10.1%), lateral meniscus healing was observed in 9 out of 10 patients (90%).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that lateral meniscus posterior root tear repair is a safe procedure with a very low reoperation rate at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

All-Cause Failure Rates Increase With Time Following Meniscal Repair Despite Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting meniscus repair outcomes. Pooled analyses of such studies will provide an accurate estimate of the outcomes that can be expected following meniscal repair at various postoperative time points.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of meniscal repair failure (defined as persistent symptoms, lack of healing on magnetic resonance imaging or revision surgery) and other clinical outcomes was performed following meniscal repair. Patients included had traumatic, nondegenerative meniscal tears, were skeletally mature, and had specific time-points after surgery. Repairs included were performed either in isolation, or with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Because of the inherent heterogeneity of single-arm meta-analyses, pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Rates of all-cause meniscal repair failure was pooled to be 12% at 0-1 years (95% CI: .09-.16), 15% at 2-3 years (95% CI: .11-.20), and 19% at 4-6 years (95% CI: .13-.24). Sensitivity analysis for studies performing meniscal repair entirely on patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) showed comparable rates of failure at similar time intervals. Development of osteoarthritis, in patients with knees previously free from articular pathologies, was 4% at 2-3 years (95% CI: .02-.07), and 10% at 4-6 years (95% CI: .03-.25).

CONCLUSION

Meniscus repair for traumatic injuries have an all-cause failure rate that increases from 12% to 19% through a time period ranging from 1-6 years following surgery. The failure rates were comparable for patients with meniscal repairs performed with concomitant ACLRs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV Studies.

Meniscal Root Repair Along with Auxiliary Procedures for Joint Preservation: Current Concepts

Meniscal root repair and joint preservation surgeries have gained increased interest in the last decade, from a better interpretation of the role of meniscal functions, from the biomechanical studies. Several published results from both biomechanical and clinical studies has proven the effectiveness of meniscal root repairs and has led to a unanimous international consensus for the need for root repair surgery. Meniscal repair by suture pull-out technique is widely followed around the world and leads to adequate healing and good clinical outcome. There are auxiliary procedures like centralization sutures (to reduce the meniscal extrusion), high tibial osteotomy, cartilage repair procedures, meniscal root reconstruction and ligament reconstructions are performed along with meniscal root repair, especially in the younger patients and recently sub-chondroplasty for the bone marrow lesions (BMLs) are also executed. This review article discusses the anatomy, types of root tears, evaluation, treatment, outcomes of root repair, and the need for additional procedures, which are imperative for joint preservation and restoration of the biomechanics of the knee.