|
1
|
Delma S, Langford K, Baylor JL, Ozdag Y, Hayes DS, Klena JC, Grandizio LC. Race and Ethnicity Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Upper-Extremity Journals. J Hand Surg Am 2023; 48:340-347. [PMID: 36658049 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hand surgery remains one of the least racially and ethnically diverse subspecialties in all of medicine, and minority patients demonstrate overall worse health care outcomes compared with White patients. Our purpose was to determine the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals with an upper-extremity (UE) focus. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs contained in peer-reviewed journals with an UE focus. All articles from 2000 to 2021 were included. Information such as article sample size, center type, funding, and location was recorded. We assessed each article to determine whether demographic information, including race and ethnicity, was reported for study participants. RESULTS A total of 481 RCTs in 9 UE journals were included. For UE RCTs, 96% of studies reported age, 90% reported sex, and 5% reported either race or ethnicity. Demographic information about economic status, insurance status, mental health, educational level, and marital status were each reported in <10% of RCTs. Racial representation was highest for White participants (80%) and lowest among American Indian participants. Of studies conducted within the United States, all racial groups except for White patients were underrepresented compared with census data. CONCLUSIONS Demographic data related to race and ethnicity for patients involved in UE RCTs are infrequently reported. When reported, the racial demographics of UE RCT patients do not match the demographics of the patients in United States. Black patients remain underrepresented in RCTs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Academic journals mandating the reporting of demographic data related to race may aid in improved reporting and allow for subsequent aggregation within systematic reviews to assess outcomes for racial minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Delma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Katelyn Langford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Jessica L Baylor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Yagiz Ozdag
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Daniel S Hayes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Joel C Klena
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Louis C Grandizio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Lehrich BM, Goshtasbi K, Brown NJ, Shahrestani S, Lien BV, Ransom SC, Tafreshi AR, Ransom RC, Chan AY, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Sahyouni R, Pham MH, Osorio JA, Oh MY. Predictors of Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2020; 146:e1160-e1170. [PMID: 33253954 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, there has been increased interest in patient satisfaction measures such as Press Ganey and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. In this systematic review, the spine surgery literature is analyzed to evaluate factors predictive of patient satisfaction as measured by these surveys. METHODS A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. All English-language articles from database inception to July 2020 were screened for study inclusion according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Twenty-four of the 1899 published studies were included for qualitative analysis. There has been a statistically significant increase in the number of publications across years (P = 0.04). Overall, the studies evaluated the relationship between patient satisfaction and patient demographics (71%), preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors (21%), and postoperative factors (33%). Top positive predictors of patient satisfaction were patient and nursing/medical staff relationship (n = 4; 17%), physician-patient relationship (n = 4; 17%), managerial oversight of received care (n = 3; 13%), same sex/ethnicity between patient and physician (n = 2; 8%), and older age (n = 2; 8%). Top negative predictors of patient satisfaction were high Charlson Comorbidity Index/high disability/worse overall health functioning (n = 7; 29%), increased length of hospital stay (n = 4; 17%), high rating for pain/complications/readmissions (n = 4; 17%), and psychosocial factors (n = 3; 13%). CONCLUSIONS There is heterogeneity in terms of different factors, both clinical and nonclinically related, that affect patient satisfaction ratings. More research is warranted to investigate the role of hospital consumer surveys in the spine surgical patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Lehrich
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Nolan J Brown
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Shane Shahrestani
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Brian V Lien
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Seth C Ransom
- School of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Ali R Tafreshi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ryan C Ransom
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alvin Y Chan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Luis D Diaz-Aguilar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ronald Sahyouni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Martin H Pham
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Joseph A Osorio
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Michael Y Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|