Posterior cruciate ligament: a literature review

Functional outcomes of peroneus longus tendon autograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is vital for regulating posterior tibial translation in relation to the femur, which is critical for knee stability. PCL tears are infrequently isolated in knee injuries; however, the absence of the PCL results in abnormal knee kinematics, which may cause injuries to other ligaments. The ideal tendon source for PCL reconstruction is still a subject of debate.

AIM

To evaluate the results of employing the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) in PCL reconstruction.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and retrospective observational studies discussing the outcomes of using the PLT for PCL reconstruction. Studies published up to August 2024 were searched across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Full texts of the selected articles were retrieved, reviewed, and independently assessed by the investigators. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus, with any remaining disagreements being arbitrated by a third author.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included five studies on PLT use for PCL reconstruction: (1) Four prospective studies with 104 patients; and (2) One retrospective study with 18 patients. Most studies followed up participants for 24 months, while one had a shorter follow-up of 18 months. Lysholm and modified cincinnati scores improved by pooled means of 32.2 (95%CI: 29.3-35.1, I² = 0%) and 31.1 (95%CI: 27.98-34.22, I² = 0%), respectively. Postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and Foot and Ankle Disability Index scores were 94.5 (I² = 61.5%) and 94.5 (I² = 80.09%), respectively. Single-hop and triple-hop test scores averaged 95.5 (95%CI: 94.5-96.5) and 92.4 (95%CI: 91.9-92.9) respectively. No significant differences were observed in thigh circumference at 10 cm and 20 cm between the injured and healthy sides.

CONCLUSION

Evidence supports PLT autografts for PCL reconstruction, improving knee function and patient outcomes. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy and compare graft options.

Outcome Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Narrative Review

The primary posterior stabilizer of the knee is the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the largest intra-articular ligament in the human knee. One of the four primary ligaments of the knee joint, the PCL, serves to support the tibia on the femur. An extreme force applied anteriorly to the proximal tibia of the flexed knee results in trauma to the PCL. Dashboard injuries, which occur when the knee is driven into the dashboard after a collision with a motor vehicle, are frequent causes. Grade 1 and 2 acute injuries are often addressed conservatively due to the PCL's natural capacity for mending. If a grade 3 injury occurs, a cautious trial can be conducted on elderly or low-demand patients. When standard treatment for isolated grade 3 injuries has failed, surgery is advised. Single-bundle or double-bundle techniques using either transtibial tunnel or tibial inlay techniques are among the reconstruction approaches. Restoring the natural kinematics of the knee and forestalling persistent posterior and mixed rotatory knee laxity are the ultimate goals of treating PCL injuries through a personalized strategy. These injuries may become more common in the future as more people participate in sports. As a result of ongoing instability, discomfort, diminished function, and the emergence of inflammatory and degenerative disorders of joints, PCL rips are becoming more well-acknowledged as a cause of morbidity and decreased function.

Return to Play after Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Posterior cruciate ligament injuries can be treated conservatively with a structured rehabilitation program or with surgical reconstruction. Treatment algorithms are based on a variety of factors including the patient's presentation, physical exam, and desired level of activity. The goal is to return the patient to their athletic pursuits with a stable and pain-free knee. Return to play and activities should be individualized based on the patient's injury and progression through rehabilitation. This article provides a review of the current treatments for posterior cruciate ligament injuries and the respective rehabilitation protocols, outcomes after each treatment option, and specific return to play criteria.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows excellent outcomes and return to play with conservative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Return to play algorithms stress the importance of quadriceps strengthening throughout the recovery process and emphasize inclusion of plyometrics and sport-specific training. Rehabilitation plays a critical role in the outcome after posterior cruciate ligament injury and the ability to return to athletics. The primary focus of post-injury or post-operative rehabilitation is to restore function, as it relates to range of motion, strength, and proprioception, while mitigating swelling and pain. The patients' desired sport and level of play dictate return to play timelines. The literature supports the use of non-operative management of isolated PCL injuries in athletes and non-athletes with excellent functional and patient-reported outcomes.

Outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament treatment: a review of the evidence

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the current recommendations in an evidence-based manner with regard to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of multiple databases, evaluating studies on the outcomes of PCL treatment in isolation and in the multiligamentous injured knee.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies of isolated PCL reconstructions and 10 studies of combined PCL reconstruction were identified for inclusion. Eight studies reported graft failure as an outcome, with an overall rate of 11.6%. Three studies reported outcomes of single bundle PCL reconstruction using hamstring autograft; there were 12 graft failures in 96 reconstructions (12.5%). There were 2 graft failures in a total of 17 combined PCL/anterior cruciate ligament/posterolateral corner reconstructions (11.8%). In the combined PCL studies, return to preinjury activity level ranged from 19 to 68%. In the isolated PCL studies, 50 to 82% of patients were able to return to preinjury activity level. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes (Lysholm and IKDC). From 37% to 70% of patients in the combined PCL studies had a normal posterior drawer test at final follow-up. One study showed a significant difference in the mean posterior drawer test side-to-side difference between the 7-strand and 4-strand hamstring autograft groups (1.7 vs. 3.7 mm, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, firm recommendations on what treatment or technique to choose cannot be given based upon the available literature. There is a need for higher-quality clinical studies to guide treatment decisions. Generally good results are reported after PCL reconstruction, but the long-term studies available suggest that normal stability in the majority of patients is not restored.