Predicting disease severity and remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: are we getting closer?

Patterns and determinants of response to novel therapies in juvenile and adult-onset polyarthritis

Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) have revolutionized the management of multiple rheumatic inflammatory conditions. Among these, polyarticular JIA (pJIA) and RA display similarities in terms of disease pathophysiology and response pattern to b/tsDMARDs. Indeed, the therapeutic efficacy of novel targeted drugs is variable among individual patients, in both RA and pJIA. The mechanisms and determinants of this heterogeneous response are diverse and complex, such that the development of true 'precision'-medicine strategies has proven highly challenging. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiological, patient-specific, drug-specific and environmental factors contributing to individual therapeutic response in pJIA in comparison with what is known in RA. Although some biomarkers have been identified that stratify with respect to the likelihood of either therapeutic response or non-response, few have proved useful in clinical practice so far, likely due to the complexity of treatment-response mechanisms. Consequently, we propose a pragmatic, patient-centred and clinically based approach, i.e. personalized instead of biomarker-based precision medicine in JIA.

Risk of flare in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Is it related to the methotrexate treatment strategy or patient characteristics?

Objectives

The study aimed to determine the factors that increase the risk of disease flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who stopped methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy following inactive disease (ID).

Patients and methods

In the retrospective study, files of all juvenile idiopathic arthritis cases between April 1992 and June 2022 were examined. Patients who stopped MTX monotherapy following ID were evaluated. Patients with disease flare and persistent ID were compared. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis subgroup, age of symptom onset, autoantibodies, acute phase reactants, MTX method of use, and withdrawal strategy were recorded. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients were excluded from the study due to different clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment methods.

Results

Files of 1,036 patients were evaluated, and 107 patients (88 females, 19 males; mean age: 5.9±4.2 years; range, 0.8-16.5 years) were included in the study. The median age at symptom onset was 4.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-7.6) years. In terms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis subgroups, 52 (48.6%) had oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 43 (40.2%) had polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and 12 (11.2%) had juvenile psoriatic arthritis. The patients reached ID in nine (IQR: 4.8-17.7) months after starting MTX, and MTX treatment was discontinued after one (IQR: 0.7-1.3) year following ID. The disease flare developed in 59 (55%) of the cases. The ID continued in 48 (45%) patients. In multivariate analysis, the risk of flare was associated with younger symptom onset (odds ratio [OR]=2.2, p=0.006), antinuclear antibody positivity (OR=1.6, p=0.03), higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR=1.01, p=0.04), and C-reactive protein (OR=1, p=0.02) at the MTX onset. No difference was observed between the two groups regarding MTX dose, route of administration, prior and concomitant treatments, time to reach ID, and time and method of MTX discontinuation.

Conclusion

In this study, the risk of flare was associated with patient's characteristics, rather than the administration and discontinuation method of MTX.

The role of ultrasonography in assessing remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is an important measurement tool in pediatric rheumatology as it detects subclinical disease activity and enables clinicians to treat patients during "the window of opportunity". However, the role of MSUS in assessing remission in JIA patients is not well-defined. This systematic review aimed to provide the most up-to-date published literature regarding the added value of MSUS in JIA patients in remission. This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines. Original articles from PubMed and Scopus, published until February 7th 2022, and tackling the role of MSUS in JIA patients in remission were included. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. They were published between 2011 and 2019 and included 356 children with JIA. Remission criteria were unanimous and relied on the Wallace criteria. Subclinical synovitis and Power Doppler signal (PD) were found in up to 84% and 33% of patients in remission, respectively. In most of the studies, predictors of future flares were abnormal MSUS findings at baseline particularly the presence of PD signal and patients without medication.  Conclusion: Published data indicate that JIA children in remission may have abnormal MSUS findings including PD signal. The application of a specific scoring system for the pediatric joint may be helpful in homogenizing outcomes in future trials. Further studies on this matter are needed to ascertain the specific implication for each subset for a better holistic approach. What is Known: • In these recent years, significant progress has been made on building the evidence base for MSUS in pediatric rheumatology, particularly in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). • In the frame of the OMERACT ultrasound pediatric subtask force, standardized musculoskeletal US examination for the pediatric population was established. What is New: • Published data indicate that JIA children in remission may have abnormal MSUS findings including PD signal. The role of MSUS in assessing remission in JIA is still not well-defined. • The application of a specific scoring system for the pediatric joint may be helpful in homogenizing outcomes and comparing results.

Tapering of biological treatment in autoinflammatory diseases: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Biological treatment and treat-to-target approaches guide the achievement of inactive disease and clinical remission in Autoinflammatory Diseases (AID). However, there is limited evidence addressing optimal tapering strategies and/or discontinuation of biological treatment in AID. This study evaluates available evidence of tapering biological treatment and explores key factors for successful tapering.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the OVID platform (1990-08/2020). Bibliographic search of relevant reviews was also performed. Studies/case series (n ≥ 5) in AID patients aged ≤ 18 years with biological treatment providing information on tapering/treatment discontinuation were included. After quality assessment aggregated data were extracted and synthesized. Tapering strategies were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 6035 records were identified. Four papers were deemed high quality, all focused on systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) (1 open-label randomized trial, 2 prospective, 1 retrospective observational study). Biological treatment included anakinra (n = 2), canakinumab (n = 1) and tocilizumab (n = 1). Strategies in anakinra tapering included alternate-day regimen. Canakinumab tapering was performed randomized for dose reduction or interval prolongation, whereas tocilizumab was tapered by interval prolongation. Key factors identified included early start of biological treatment and sustained inactive disease.

CONCLUSION

Tapering of biological treatment after sustained inactive disease should be considered. Guidance for optimal strategies is limited. Future studies may leverage therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with pharmacometric modelling to further enhance personalized "taper-to-target" strategies respecting individual patients and diseases aspects.

Demographic and clinical features of pediatric uveitis and scleritis at a tertiary referral center in China

Background

To analyse demographic, clinical features, treatment and therapeutic outcomes of pediatric uveitis and scleritis patients.

Subjects

The clinical records of pediatric uveitis and scleritis cases between January 2012 and December 2020 at a tertiary uveitis service center in Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital (TMUEH) were reviewed.

Results

In total, 209 patients (337 eyes) were included, 49.3% were male. The median onset age was 9.0 (IQR, 7.0–12.0) years. Chronic uveitis and scleritis accounted for 86.1%. Panuveitis (29.2%), anterior uveitis(29.2%), and intermediate uveitis (22.0%) were the most common presentations. The most common diagnoses were idiopathic (71.3%), JIA (8.1%), and infectious uveitis (4.8%). At baseline, 40.7% patients received oral corticosteroid therapy; during follow-up, corticosteroids (66.0%), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (61.2%), and biologic agents (35.4%) were the mainstay. Posterior synechia (26.1%) and cataracts (25.5%) were the most common complications. In acute cases, the median best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.99 (IQR, 0.5–1.0) at baseline and 0 (IQR, 0–0) at last follow-up; in chronic cases, the median BCVA improved from 1.09 (IQR, 0.5–2.0) to 0.27 (IQR, 0–0.5), with anterior chamber cell grade significantly declining. Ten eyes underwent cataract surgery during regular follow-up and achieved satisfactory long-term visual outcomes and decreased burden of immunosuppressants. The incidence of steroid-induced ocular hypertension was 41.0%, and children with frequent instillation of eyedrops were at high risk.

Conclusions

Most cases were of chronic uveitis and scleritis requiring long-term systemic immunosuppressive therapies in pediatric uveitis and scleritis in China. Good management of complications is important for long-term prognosis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term for arthritis of unknown origin, lasting for >6 weeks with onset before 16 years of age. JIA is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic condition of childhood. According to the International League Against Rheumatism (ILAR) classification, seven mutually exclusive categories of JIA exist based on disease manifestations during the first 6 months of disease. Although the ILAR classification has been useful to foster research, it has been criticized mainly as it does not distinguish those forms of chronic arthritis observed in adults and in children from those that may be unique to childhood. Hence, efforts to provide a new evidence-based classification are ongoing. Similar to arthritis observed in adults, pathogenesis involves autoimmune and autoinflammatory mechanisms. The field has witnessed a remarkable improvement in therapeutic possibilities of JIA owing to the availability of new potent drugs and the possibility to perform controlled trials with support from legislative interventions and large networks availability. The goal of drug therapy in JIA is to rapidly reduce disease activity to inactive disease or clinical remission, minimize drug side effects and achieve a quality of life comparable to that of healthy peers. As JIA can influence all aspects of a child's and their family's life, researchers increasingly recognize improvement of health-related quality of life as a key treatment goal.

Consensus clinical approach for a newly diagnosed systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis among members of the pediatric rheumatology Arab group

BACKGROUND

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a diagnosis of exclusion. The complex nature and clinical variety of the disease, as well as the vast clinical variation of disease presentation, may lead to difficulties in disease detection and subsequent delays in treatment.

AIM

To provide a consensus guidance on the management of newly diagnosed sJIA patients among pediatric rheumatologists in Arab countries.

METHODS

This work was conducted in two phases. The first phase utilized an electronic survey sent through an email invitation to all pediatric rheumatologists in Arab countries. In the second phase, a Task Force of ten expert pediatric rheumatologists from Arab countries met through a series of virtual meetings. Results obtained in phase one were prioritized using a nominal group and Delphi-like techniques in phase two.

RESULTS

Seven overarching principles and a set of recommendations were approved by the Task Force to form the final consensus.

CONCLUSION

This is the first consensus on a clinical approach for pediatric rheumatic diseases among Arab pediatric rheumatologists. It is presented as a guidance on the clinical approach to sJIA that requires further evidence, and future updates are anticipated.

Recent progress in the treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the joints and other organs that occurs in 1 in 1,000 children in the United States. Given the various categories of JIA, interpretation of the literature can be difficult. In this review, new developments in understanding non-systemic JIA and its treatment will be covered. Recent advances in the journey toward personalized treatment in JIA will be highlighted, including a review of currently available biologic modifiers. Uveitis and the temporomandibular joint will be discussed as particularly challenging treatment issues. Recent guideline updates and literature-guided treatment decisions will be reviewed.

Musculoskeletal ultrasound in children: Current state and future directions

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of chronic inflammatory arthritides that if inadequately treated, may be associated with chronic disability and deformity. Early diagnosis and treatment initiation is essential in the management of patients with JIA. Conventional means of evaluation of disease presence, disease activity and response to therapy including physical exam, labs and x-rays are at times limited and may be insufficient in making an accurate assessment. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is a well-established modality that is patient and family-friendly, non-invasive, does not require sedation and can be performed at the bedside in real-time. MSUS offers information that cannot be attained by standard outcome measures, and may help to advance both diagnosis and treatment of patients with JIA ultimately improving patient outcomes. This review explores the background of MSUS and the current evidence to support its potential role as a diagnostic, disease activity monitoring and interventional tool.