Nailing intertrochanteric hip fractures: short versus long; locked versus nonlocked

Short versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare short versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fractures in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We included cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4. Heterogeneity was checked with the I2 test. A fixed effects model was adopted if there was no heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. The reoperations rate was lower in the short nail group (OR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.38-0.88) and there were no differences regarding the peri-implant fracture rate (OR: 1.77, 95%CI: 0.68-4.60). Surgery time and blood loss was significantly higher in the long nail group (MD: -12.44, 95%CI: -14.60 -10.28) (MD: -19.36, 95%CI: -27.24 -11.48). There were no differences in functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The long nail showed a higher reoperation rate, blood loss and surgery time compared to the short nail.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Short versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare short versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fractures in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We included cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4. Heterogeneity was checked with the I2 test. A fixed effects model was adopted if there was no heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. The reoperations rate was lower in the short nail group (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88) and there were no differences regarding the peri-implant fracture rate (OR 1.77, 95% CI 0.68-4.60). Surgery time and blood loss was significantly higher in the long nail group (MD -12.44, 95% CI -14.60 to (-10.28)) (MD -19.36, 95% CI -27.24 to (-11.48)). There were no differences in functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The long nail showed a higher reoperation rate, blood loss and surgery time compared to the short nail.

Should the diameter of the proximal femoral nail be large enough to fill the canal in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture in patients over fifty?

PURPOSE

Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of nail shape, design, or length on the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. However, the clinical implications of the nail diameter remain unclear.

METHODS

This study was conducted with 191 patients aged ≥ 50 years with unilateral intertrochanteric fractures treated with the same type of short cephalomedullary nail and followed for at least one year. We recorded the reduction type, tip-apex distance, cortical contact of the nail, and nail/canal diameter ratio (NCR) just distal to the locking screw. The effects of nail diameter on the clinical results were evaluated.

RESULTS

The average NCR was 68.7. The average union time was 4.78 months. Delayed union or nonunion was seen in 17 patients. Eight patients underwent additional surgery. The mean change in the modified Koval activity score was -0.84. The NCR did not significantly affect the clinical results. Comparisons of cases with NCRs above and below the average and the average - 1 standard deviation revealed no significant difference. The clinical outcome was not related to any variable associated with the nail diameter.

CONCLUSION

With this specific proximal femoral nail, a small diameter relative to that of the femoral canal had no adverse effect on the union of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures, even in patients with unstable fractures and those who had unsatisfactory reductions.

Clinical observation and finite element analysis of femoral stable interlocking intramedullary nail in intertrochanteric fractures

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes of the femoral stable interlocking intramedullary nail (FSIIN) with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1 + A2).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed a registered sample of 74 intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1 + A2) surgically treated using FSIIN (n = 36) or PFNA (n = 38) from January 2015 to December 2021. The intra-operative variables (operation time, fluoroscopy time, intra-operative blood loss, length of incision) and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups in this study. Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the functional states. At the last follow-up, the incidence of related complications in patients was calculated. Eventually, the 3D finite element model was established to analyze the stress of FSIIN and PFNA.

RESULTS

The distribution of all basic characteristics was similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). The operation time, fluoroscopy time, intra-operative blood loss, and length of incision were significantly decreased in the FSIIN group (p < 0.001). The FSIIN group had a shorter fracture healing time than the PFNA group (p < 0.001). There is no significant difference between the two groups in the Harris and VAS (p > 0.05). The incidences of post-operative anaemia, electrolyte imbalance, varus malalignment, and thigh pain were significantly lower in FSIIN than in PFNA groups (all p < 0.05). The finite element results show that the stress shielding effect of FSIIN is smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that FSIIN seemed to be superior to PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1 + A2) due to less surgical damage and shorter fracture healing time.

Long Versus Short Twin-Screw Integrated Cephalomedullary Nail (InterTAN) for the Surgical Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip in Indians

INTRODUCTION

With an increasing life expectancy, there has been an increase in the incidence of intertrochanteric fractures. These fractures in the elderly are disabling and have a tremendous impact on the healthcare system. Despite substantial improvements in implant design and surgical techniques, high failure rates have been observed, varying with the severity of the fracture and the type of fixation. Intramedullary nails have become popular in recent times, especially in unstable fractures. The purpose of the present study is to compare the functional outcomes and complications of long versus short InterTAN cephalomedullary nails (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) used for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who had intertrochanteric fractures classifiable as AO OTA (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association) 31-A and were treated with either a short InterTAN nail (SIN) or long InterTAN nail (LIN) between March 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively assessed. AO subtype A1 fractures are considered to be stable whereas subtype A3 fractures are considered unstable. The stability of subtype A2 fractures is variable depending on the amount of posteromedial comminution. Both stable and unstable fractures were included. Patients aged above 18 years, who had a normal pre-injury gait and were operated on within seven days of trauma as per the records were included in the study. Postoperatively, functional outcome recorded using the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was compared. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. The mean age was 67.5 ± 8.92 years. Of the patients, 72% were above 60 years of age and 68% of those were females. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range: 24-54 months). Of the patients, 84.27% sustained fractures after a trivial trauma due to slip and fall at home. All fractures had united at nine to 12 months, except one had a screw cut-out, which required revision surgery. The mean mHHS at three months and nine to 12 months postoperatively was 42.46 ± 3.62 and 87.24 ± 6.44, respectively. The patients who were treated with LIN had a significantly better functional outcome at three-month follow-up (p-value < 0.05); however, post one year, this effect plateaued and no significant difference was seen when comparing SIN with LIN. The results also showed that there was no significant difference in complications among SIN and LIN.

CONCLUSION

Both LIN and SIN are equally effective for the surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures, and have similar functional outcomes. SIN, however, has shorter surgical procedure time and lesser estimated blood loss. LIN allowed in early recovery evidenced by better Harris hip scores at three months duration, thus improving the quality of life in the initial months post surgery. The choice of implant should be individualized according to fracture anatomy, patients' needs and expectations, and surgeons' expertise.

Comparison of Outcomes of Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14,547 Patients

Purpose

Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures (IFF) fixation could be done with short or long Cephalomedullary Nails (CMNs). Nevertheless, despite several studies in the literature, there has been a continued lack of consensus on which design of CMN is better than the other. Hence, the current review aimed to evaluate the evidence about short versus long CMNs for the fixation of IFF.

Methodology

PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol for the study was registered to PROSPERO. Four databases, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched. A total of 31 studies with 6 randomized trials (RCTs) and 25 non-randomized studies were included. Demographic data, follow-up period, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted and evaluated from each of the included studies; statistical analysis was done by Review Manager Software version 5.4.1.

Results

Fourteen thousand five hundred forty-seven patients were included in this review.

Primary Outcomes

Long CMNs showed statistically significant lower rates of ipsilateral shaft femur refracture (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14, 2.24, p = 0.007); however, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups for mortality at 30 days and within 1 year.

Secondary Outcomes

Statistically significant shorter duration of surgery (MD-17.83 (95% CI - 22.03, - 13.63, p < 0.05), less intra-operative blood loss (MD - 62.65, 95% CI - 97.13 to - 28.17, p =  < 0.05), and lower blood transfusion rates (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62, 0.83, p < 0.05) for short CMNs; no statistically significant difference for the length of hospital stay, implant-related complications, overall complications, re-operation rates, fluoroscopy time, and functional outcome between two groups of CMNs was seen.

Conclusion

With shorter operative time, lesser intra-operative blood loss, and lower postoperative transfusion rates for short CMNs, they have certain benefits over longer CMNs. However, more distal shaft femur fractures were seen in the shorter version of nail, which should be considered before offering these nails to a patient; careful and individualized postoperative weight-bearing protocol could minimize the same.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-00915-5.

Biomechanical stability of short versus long proximal femoral nails in osteoporotic subtrochanteric A3 reverse-oblique femoral fractures: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

Due to the demographic change towards an older society, osteoporosis-related proximal femur fractures are steadily increasing. Intramedullary nail osteosyntheses are available in different lengths, where the field of application overlaps. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subtrochanteric fractures can also be treated stably using a short femoral intramedullary nail in cadaveric bones.

METHODS

A short PFNA and a long PFNA were implanted in both seven artificial bones and osteoporotic human specimens. A standardized AO 31-A3 (reverse-oblique) fracture was placed in the specimens with a lateral fracture spur 2 cm proximal to the distal locking screw (short PFNA) and embedded. The simulated iliotibial tract was preloaded to 50 N. The force was applied at 10 mm/min up to a force of 200-800 N (artificial bones) and 200-400 N (human specimens). The dislocation of the fracture gap, the axial bone stiffness of bone construct and the force curve of the tractus iliotibialis were measured.

RESULTS

There is no difference in the use of a short versus long PFNA in terms of stiffness of the overall construct and only a slight increase in dislocation in the fracture gap results with short PFNA compared to a long intramedullary nail.

CONCLUSION

In summary of the available literature, the present study supports the thesis that there is no clinical difference between long versus short nails in A3 femur fractures. Furthermore, the present study defines a safe biomechanical range of fracture extension above the locking screw of the short intramedullary nail.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Fractures after cephalomedullary nailing of the femur : Systematization of surgical fixation based on the analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort

PURPOSES

Femoral implant related fractures (IRF) are a growing pathology in an increasingly elderly and frail population. A series of IRF after cephalomedullary nail (CMN) fixation of a femoral fracture is analyzed and an algorithm described to guide the management of such fractures.

METHODS

All eligible patients operated on for IRF fixation after CMN were reviewed regarding their demographics, comorbidities, injury pattern, and treatment. Primary outcomes were mortality and local complications. Secondary outcomes were time to consolidation, time to weight-bearing initiation, length of hospitalization, and discharge destination.

RESULTS

The incidence of IRF requiring fixation was 1.3% after 3401 CMN implantation procedures. Elderly women with comorbidities and plate fixation predominated. One-year mortality was 18.6%, being higher for patients presenting with infection and those unable to walk at the end of follow-up. Local complications occurred in 25.6%. Median time to weight-bearing was 9.1 weeks, but longer for patients with plate fixation or complications. Patients presenting with an infection and those discharged to nursing facilities had more comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Following an algorithm presented here, patients were treated either with nail exchange or lateral locking plate fixation, permitting straightforward evaluations and acceptable results in a very high-risk population.

Therapeutic Effects of the Proximal Femoral Nail for the Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical effect of the proximal femoral nail on elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture and the effect of the proximal femoral nail on serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and osteoprotegerin (OPG).

Methods

The elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were studied. 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (n = 50) and the observation group (n = 50). The patients in the control group were treated with a proximal femoral locking compression plate. The patients in the observation group were treated with the proximal femoral antirotation intramedullary nail. The clinical therapeutic effects of the two groups and the changes in serum MMPs and OPG levels before and after treatment were analyzed.

Results

Compared with the control group, the operation time, postoperative landing time, and fracture healing time of the observation group were significantly shortened, and intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the total effective rate of patients in the observation group was significantly higher (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of CRP, IL1β, IL2, MMP-2, MMP-6, TIMP-1, and RANKL decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.05), while the levels of OPG increased significantly (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the changes in the above indexes were more obvious in the observation group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The proximal femoral antirotation intramedullary nail has a better therapeutic effect on elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture, and the level of MMPs and OPG may be related to the treatment process.

Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of 3208 patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to compare treatment outcomes after short or long cephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of perioperative outcomes after short or long cephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures was performed. The following databases were used: using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2019), and MEDLINE (1980-2019). The queries were performed in June 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

The following search term query was used: "Intramedullary Nail AND Intertrochanteric Fracture OR "Long OR Short Nail AND intertrochanteric Fracture." Studies were excluded if they were "single-arm" studies (i.e., reporting on either long or short CMN but not both), or did not report at least one of the outcomes being meta-analyzed. Furthermore, cadaveric studies, animal studies, basic science articles, editorial articles, surveys and studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts from all identified articles. Full-text articles were obtained for review if necessary, to allow further assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additionally, all references from the included studies were reviewed and reconciled to verify that no relevant articles were missing from the systematic review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Short nails were associated with statistically significantly less estimated blood loss and operative time compared to long nails. There were no significant differences in transfusion rates, implant failures or overall re-operation rates between implant lengths. Similarly, there was no significant difference in peri-implant fracture between implant lengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the available clinical evidence supports the use of short cephalomedullary nails for the majority of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

STUDY DESIGN/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Meta-analysis; Level III, therapeutic.

Comparison of Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nail Length Outcomes in Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Cephalomedullary nail (CMN) length for intertrochanteric femur fractures without subtrochanteric extension has been an ongoing debate. The authors hypothesize that increasing nail length would result in increasing surgical time, greater incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), postoperative anemia, and blood loss requiring transfusion due to increased intramedullary reaming and pressurization of the canal with nail insertion.

Should Pertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures Be Treated with a Short or Long Intramedullary Nail?: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present multicenter cohort study was to compare the rates of reoperation in elderly patients with pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures that had been treated with a short or long intramedullary nail.

METHODS

Eleven orthopaedic departments across Denmark delivered data that had been obtained from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry (DMHFR) and a review of health-care records. With use of surgical procedure codes for pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures that had been treated with an intramedullary nail, the DMRHF was searched to identify patients who had been ≥65 years of age between 2008 and 2013. The health-care records for patients who had had major reoperations, defined as any reoperation with the exclusion of simple hardware removal, were retrieved from the DMHFR, were reviewed for the type of intramedullary nail and missed reoperations, including peri-implant fractures, within 2 years of follow-up. Crude logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidity was performed, yielding odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of 2,245 pertrochanteric fractures, 1,867 were treated with a short intramedullary nail and 378 were treated with a long intramedullary nail. The rate of major reoperations was 4.0% in the short intramedullary nail group and 6.3% in the long intramedullary nail group. This yielded a crude OR of 1.61 (1.01 to 2.60) and an adjusted OR of 1.67 (1.04 to 2.70). Of 909 subtrochanteric fractures, 308 were treated with a short intramedullary nail and 601 were treated with a long intramedullary nail. The rate of major reoperations was 8.4% in the short intramedullary nail group and 4.0% in the long intramedullary nail group, yielding a crude OR of 0.45 (0.25 to 0.80) and an adjusted OR of 0.45 (0.25 to 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study confirming the theory that, for subtrochanteric fractures, a long intramedullary nail has a lower rate of major reoperations compared with a short intramedullary nail. In contrast, a short intramedullary nail has a lower rate of major reoperations compared with a long intramedullary nail for pertrochanteric fractures but with a lower absolute risk reduction compared with the results for subtrochanteric intramedullary nailing. There is a need for validation of these results in other large studies, especially for pertrochanteric fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A comparison between Asians and Caucasians in the dimensions of the femoral isthmus based on a 3D-CT analysis of 1189 adult femurs

INTRODUCTION

For successful intramedullary implant placement at the femur, such as nailing in unstable proximal femur fractures, the use of an implant that at least reaches or exceeds the femoral isthmus and yields sufficient thickness is recommended. A number of complications after intramedullary femoral nailing have been reported, particularly in Asians. To understand the anatomical features of the proximal femur and their ethnic differences, we aimed to accurately calculate the femoral isthmus dimensions and proximal distance of Asians and Caucasians.

METHODS

In total, 1189 Asian and Caucasian segmented 3D CT data sets of femurs were analyzed. The individual femoral isthmus diameter was precisely computed to investigate whether gender, femur length, age, ethnicity or body mass index have an influence on isthmus diameters.

RESULTS

The mean isthmus diameter of all femurs was 10.71 ± 2.2 mm. A significantly larger diameter was found in Asians when compared to Caucasians (p < 0.001). Age was a strong predictor of the isthmus diameter variability in females (p < 0.001, adjusted r² = 0.299). With every year of life, the isthmus showed a widening of 0.08 mm in women. A Matched Pair Analysis of 150 female femurs showed a significant difference between isthmus diameter in Asian and Caucasian femurs (p = 0.05). In 50% of the cases the isthmus was found in a range of 2.4 cm between 16.9 and 19.3 cm distal to the tip of the greater trochanter. The female Asian femur differs from Caucasians as it is wider at the isthmus.

CONCLUSIONS

In absolute values, the proximal isthmus distance did not show much variation but is more proximal in Asians. The detailed data presented may be helpful in the development of future implant designs. The length and thickness of future standard implants may be considered based on the findings.

Early Clinical Outcomes of Short versus Long Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Both short and long PFNA are employed to treat intertrochanteric fractures. Controversy exists in the choice between the two nails as each implant has specific characteristics and theoretical advantages. This retrospective study seeks to examine the operative complication rates and clinical outcomes of short versus long (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation) PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between July 2011 and February 2015, 155 patients underwent PFNA insertion. The decision on whether to use a short or long PFNA nail, locked or unlocked, was determined by the attending operating surgeon. Visual Analogue Pain Score (VAS) Harris Hip Scores (HHS), Short-form 36 Health Questionnaire (SF-36) and Parker Mobility Scores (PMS) were collected at six weeks, six months and one year post-operatively.

RESULTS

A total of 137 (88.4%) patients were successfully followed-up. Forty-two (30.7%) patients received a short PFNA. The patients were similar in baseline characteristics of age, gender, and comorbidities. Operative time was significantly longer in the short PFNA group (62 ±17 mins) versus the long PFNA group (56±17). While the patients in both groups achieved improvement in all outcome measures, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of HHS (61.0 ±16.0 vs 63.0 ±16.8, p=0.443), PMS (2.3±1.5 vs 2.7±2.1, p=0.545) and VAS (1.7±2.9 vs 1.8 ±2.2 p=0.454). There were 3 (7.1%) and 7 (7.4%) complications in the short versus long PFNA group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both short and long PFNA had similar clinical outcomes and complication rates in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in an Asian population.

Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Long versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails

CONTEXT

Prior studies regarding indications for long vs short cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures had limited sample sizes and follow-up, suggesting a need for further investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between cephalomedullary nail length and outcomes for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

DESIGN

Cohort study using Kaiser Permanente's Hip Fracture Registry. A total of 5526 patients who underwent surgical treatment with cephalomedullary nails for an intertrochanteric femur fracture (2009-2014) were identified: 3108 (56.2%) with long nails and 2418 (43.8%) with short nails. Cox proportional hazards model regression was used to evaluate risks of all-cause revision and revision for periprosthetic fracture. Linear regression was used to evaluate operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Propensity score weights were used in all models to balance nail groups on patient and device characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause revision surgery.

RESULTS

No association was found in risk of all-cause revision (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-1.15) or revision for periprosthetic fracture (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.23-1.48) for long nails compared with short nails. Use of longer nails resulted in 18.80 more minutes of operative time (95% CI = 17.33-20.27 minutes), 41.10 mL more of estimated blood loss (95% CI = 31.71-50.48 mL), and a longer hospitalization (8.4 hours; β = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.12-0.58 hours).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that routine use of short cephalomedullary nails is safe and effective in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

BACKGROUND

Cephalomedullary nails are a commonly used implant for the treatment of many pertrochanteric femur fractures and are available in short and long configurations. There is no consensus on ideal nail length. Relative advantages can be ascribed to short and long intramedullary nails, yet both implant styles share the potentially devastating complication of peri-implant fracture. Determining the clinical sequelae after fractures below nails of different lengths would provide valuable information for surgeons choosing between short or long nails. Thus, the purpose of the study was to compare injury patterns and treatment outcomes following peri-implant fractures below short or long cephalomedullary nails.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study that identified 33 patients referred for treatment of peri-implant fractures below short and long cephalomedullary nails (n = 19 short, n = 14 long). We compared fracture pattern, treatment strategy, complications, and outcomes between these two groups.

RESULTS

Short nails were associated with more diaphyseal fractures (odds ratio [OR] 13.75, CI 2.2-57.9, p 0.002), which were treated more commonly with revision intramedullary nailing (OR, infinity; p 0.01), while long nails were associated with distal metaphyseal fractures (OR 13.75, CI 2.2-57.9, p 0.002), which were treated with plate and screw fixation (p 0.002). After peri-implant fracture, there were no differences in blood loss, operative time, weight bearing status, or complication rates based on the length of the initial nail. In patients treated with revision nailing, there was greater estimated blood loss (EBL, median 300 cc, interquartile range [IQR] 250-1200 vs median 200 cc, IQR 100-300, p 0.03), blood product utilization and complication rates (OR 11.1, CI 1.1-135.7, p 0.03), but a trend toward unrestricted post-operative weight-bearing compared to patients treated with plate and screw constructs.

CONCLUSION

Understanding fracture patterns and patient outcomes after fractures below nails of different lengths will help surgeons make more informed implant choices when treating intertrochanteric hip fractures. Revision to a long nail for the treatment of fractures at the tip of a short nail may be associated with increased patient morbidity.

Distal interlocking for short trochanteric nails: static, dynamic or no locking? Review of the literature and decision algorithm

Pertrochanteric hip fractures are among the most common and the use of short cephalomedullary nails as the treatment of choice is increasing.

A systematic review regarding distal locking options for short cephalomedullary nails was undertaken using Medline/PubMed®, Embase® and Cochrane Library® in order to evaluate current indications, associated complications and to provide treatment recommendations.

The results seem to support the use of distal static locking for unstable fractures, dynamic locking for length stable/rotational unstable fractures and no locking for stable fractures.

Complications associated with distal locking include iatrogenic fractures, thigh pain, delayed union and nonunion, implant failure, screw loosening and breaking, drill bit breaking, soft tissue irritation, femoral artery branch injury, intramuscular haematoma and compartment syndrome. It is also associated with longer operative time and radiation exposure.

In unlocked constructs, dorsomedial comminution and nail/medullary canal mismatch contribute to peri-implant fractures. Anterior cortical impingement is associated with cut-out and nonunion.

Most studies comparing distally locked and unlocked nails report a short follow-up.

Distal locking mode should be based on the fracture’s stability.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:421-429. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190045

Distal locked versus unlocked intramedullary nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nails have become the main treatment for intertrochanteric fractures. However, a distal locking procedure during nailing gradually raised controversy. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed to summarize existing evidence, aiming to determine the safety and efficacy of distal locking or unlocking in the nailing of stable intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

Appropriate articles were identified using the most common public databases, such as PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from the inception of each database to April 2019, without restriction of language, publication date, and considering ongoing trials. Eligible studies were represented by randomized controlled trials or retrospective cohort studies, comparing distal locking and unlocking for the treatment of acute stable intertrochanteric fractures in adult patients. Information regarding methodological quality, patient demographics, and clinical outcomes were extracted independently by two reviewers. Subsequently, patients were divided into a locking and unlocking group.

RESULTS

This study included 9 articles, comprising a total of 1978 patients with a similar baseline. The results showed that the unlocking group had a shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, lower transfusion rate, and less thigh pain after the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture when compared with the distal locking group. No significant differences were observed in safety-related outcomes, including mortality, infection rate, cutting out, loss of reduction, backing out of lag screws, cephalic screw breakage, nail breakage, and peri-implant fractures between the two groups. In addition, efficacy-related outcomes including nonunion, delayed healing rates, and the Harris functional score were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis demonstrated that distal unlocking of stable intertrochanteric fractures can shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, and reduce the blood transfusion rate. The use of locked or unlocked intramedullary nailing does not affect long-term outcomes regarding complications and function.

Impact of Resident Training Level on Radiation Exposure During Fixation of Proximal Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether residents are at greater risk of radiation exposure from intraoperative fluoroscopy while earlier in their training and during more complex procedures.

METHODS

We analyzed 852 extracapsular proximal femur fracture fixation cases. We compared fluoroscopy times by various levels of resident training, fracture type, and implant used. Attending-only cases were used as a control group.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopy times during subtrochanteric fracture fixation (176.1 ± 11.27 seconds) were longer than intertrochanteric (111.4 ± 2.44 seconds) and basicervical fractures (91.49 ± 5.77 seconds). Long nail (150.2 ± 3.75 seconds) times were longer than short (92.3 ± 3.15 seconds) and intermediate (76.45 ± 3.01 seconds) nails. Significantly, more fluoroscopy was used in junior (115.9 ± 4.24 seconds), senior (123.0 ± 6.08 seconds), junior combo (130.6 ± 7.74 seconds), and senior combo cases (131.8 ± 6.11 seconds) compared with the control (94.91 ± 3.91).

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic surgery residents and attendings must remain aware of radiation exposure secondary to intraoperative fluoroscopy. Appropriate personal protective equipment should be worn, and more experienced surgeons should take a more active role in the complex cases to decrease exposure risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Effectiveness analysis of closed or limited open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of Seinsheimer type Ⅴ subtrochanteric fracture]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of closed or limited open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of Seinsheimer type Ⅴ subtrochanteric fracture.

METHODS

Between May 2014 and July 2018, 36 patients with Scinsheimer type Ⅴ subtrochanteric fractures were treated with closed or limited open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation. There were 25 males and 11 females with an age of 23-86 years (mean, 55.8 years). The cause of injury included falling in 19 cases, traffic accident in 9 cases, falling from height in 7 cases, and heavy object injury in 1 case; all were fresh closed injuries. The interval between injury and operation was 1-14 days (mean, 6.8 days). There were 18 cases of closed reduction and 18 cases of limited open reduction during the operation. Seventeen cases were fixed with femoral reconstruction intramedullary nail, 5 with InterTan long nail, 14 with lengthened proximal femoral nail anti-rotation, and 7 cases were assisted with auxiliary steel wire binding. After operation, through X-ray film and clinical follow-up, the fracture reduction and maintenance status, internal fixation position, and fracture healing were judged; the range of motion, walking ability, and complications of hip joint were observed, and the function of hip joint was evaluated according to Merle d'Aubigne Postel hip joint scoring standard.

RESULTS

All the incisions of medullary operation healed by first intention, and no vascular, nerve injury, or infection occurred. All patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 14.2 months. Among the 36 patients, 1 patient received revision surgery due to varus displacement of femoral head and screw penetration at 2 months after closed reduction, with poor recovery of hip function. X-ray film re-examination showed that the fractures of the other 35 patients healed after 9-15 months, with an average of 11.5 months. During follow-up, there was no complication such as internal fixation failure, fracture redisplacement, bone nonunion or malunion, and deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. The function of hip joint recovered well, and the patients could walk and squat normally without affecting daily life or work. At last follow-up, according to Merle d'Aubigne Postel hip joint scoring standard, 28 cases were rated as excellent, 4 cases as good, 3 cases as fair, and 1 case as poor, the excellent and good rate was 88.9%.

CONCLUSION

C-arm X-ray fluoroscopic closed or limited open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of Seinheimer Ⅴ type subtrochanteric fracture, if necessary, with the aid of auxiliary steel wire binding, it has the advantages of less blood supply destruction at the fracture end, satisfactory reduction, firm fixation, and early rehabilitation training, with definite effectiveness.

Distal locked or unlocked nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, there are just several studies comparing distal locked nails with distal unlocked nails in treating intertrochanteric fractures. We report the first meta-analysis about this issue.

METHODS

Systematic search was conducted for studies in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Meta-analyses were performed regarding intra operative outcomes, complications and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Pooled results showed insignificant difference between distal locking group and distal unlocking group in hip pain (relative risk (RR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-2.19), distal tip fracture (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.37-3.11), lag screw cut-out (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.54-4.78), delayed or nonunion (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.25-7.06), deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.23-4.84), wound infection (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28-1.22), Harris hip score (standard mean deviation (SMD) 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.21) and walking ability. However, significant difference was detected in operation time (SMD 0.77, 95% CI 0.36-1.17), fluoroscopy exposure time (SMD 1.02, 95% CI 0.52-1.52), blood loss (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-0.99) and total incision length (SMD 1.16, 95% CI 0.86-1.47). Result of trial sequential analysis indicated conclusive evidence.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that the distal locked intramedullary nails should not be recommended as routine choice for stable intertrochanteric fractures.

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of Stable Versus Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center

The purpose of this study was to compare failure and complication rates associated with short cephalomedullary nail vs long cephalomedullary nail fixation for stable vs unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. This study included 201 adult patients with nonpathologic intertrochanteric femur fractures without subtrochanteric extension (OTA 31-A1.1-3, 31-A2.1-3, 31-A3.1-3) who were treated with a short cephalomedullary nail (n=70) or a long cephalomedullary nail (n=131) and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Treatment groups were similar in terms of age, sex, and comorbidities. In the stable fracture group (N=81), there was no difference in total complications (adjusted P=.73), failure (adjusted P=.78), or mortality (adjusted P=.62) between short cephalomedullary nails and long cephalomedullary nails. Unstable fracture patterns were more likely to be treated with a long cephalomedullary nail than a short cephalomedullary nail (P=.01). In the unstable fracture group (N=120), there was no difference in total complications (adjusted P=.32) or failure (adjusted P=.31) between short cephalomedullary nails and long cephalomedullary nails. A cumulative mortality curve showed a trend toward increasing mortality in unstable fractures treated with short cephalomedullary nails. Traumatologists did not display a statistically significant preference between short cephalomedullary nails and long cephalomedullary nails when compared with nontraumatologists. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e202-e209.].

Outcomes after unstable pertrochanteric femur fracture: intermediate versus long cephalomedullary nails

PURPOSE

Optimal cephalomedullary nail (CMN) length for unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures is controversial. Long CMNs (L-CMNs) are currently recommended; however, intermediate-length CMNs (I-CMNs) may provide stable fixation without the additional surgical steps required by L-CMNs. We analyzed outcomes after unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with L-CMNs or I-CMNs to determine whether functional outcomes, perioperative measures, complications, and mortality and reoperation rates differ by CMN length.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records at our institution for 100 patients who received surgical treatment for pertrochanteric femur fractures from June 2014 to June 2016. Data from 43 unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with L-CMNs (n = 25) or I-CMNs (n = 18) were analyzed. We evaluated operative time, fluoroscopy time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusions, and perioperative complications; peri-implant fracture, malunion, reoperation, and death; and neck-shaft angle, tip-apex distance, and 6-month postoperative functional scores. We analyzed categorical data with Fisher exact tests and continuous data with Student t tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The I-CMN group had shorter operative time (68 versus 92 min; P = 0.048), shorter fluoroscopy time (72 versus 110 s; P = 0.019), and less intraoperative blood loss (80 versus 168 mL; P < 0.001) than the L-CMN group. The groups were similar in rates of blood transfusion, perioperative complications, peri-implant fracture, malunion, reoperation, and death. Six-month postoperative functional scores were similar between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found operative advantages of I-CMNs over L-CMNs with no difference in treatment outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective case series study.

Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the difference between and compare intramedullary fixation (IF) and extramedullary fixation (EF) for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed database and Cochrane library following by including and excluding articles based from inception to December, 2016. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IF and EF for unstable intertrochanteric fractures were assessed and selected by two researchers independently. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.1 version.

RESULTS

17 RCTs were enrolled in our meta-analysis comparing IF and EF and showed evidence that IF had lower rate of implant failure RR = 0.2695%CI 0.13-0.51, P < 0.0001 and re-operation (RR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.37-0.98, P = 0.04), while there was no statistical differences of cut-out, postoperative infections and other complications. Moreover, PPM scores verified that IF had better postoperative hip mobility recovery (MD = 0.87, 95%CI 0.08-1.66, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

IF has lower incidence of failure of implant and reoperation and shows better postoperative functional recovery when treating adult unstable intertrochanteric fracture while the most postoperative complications were not statistically different from EF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Dual head screw hip nailing for trochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

There are limited information and inconclusive results for dual head screw intramedullary hip nails for trochanteric fractures. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to evaluate the healing of fractures, and survival, function, and complications of patients operated with this implant.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 79 patients (61 women and 18 men; mean age: 84.7 years; range: 65-96 years) with a low-energy trochanteric fracture, treated with a dual head screw intramedullary hip nail from 2013 to 2016. The mean follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 1-3 years); seven patients were lost to follow up. This left 72 patients for further analysis. We evaluated the healing of fractures, and survival, function, and complications of patients.

RESULTS

Fracture healing was evident in 70 patients (97.2%) at 2-3 months postoperatively. One patient experienced cut-out and z-effect phenomenon of the head screws. Another patient experienced a periprosthetic femoral diaphysis fracture at the distal tip of the nail. A third patient experienced an acute postoperative superficial skin infection that was treated successfully with wound dressing changes and a course of antibiotics. Sixteen patients (22.2%) deceased within 12 months postoperatively. In the remaining patients, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively was excellent in 16 (28.6%), good in 23 (41.1%), fair in 10 (17.8%), and poor in 7 patients (12.5%). The function declined after the patients' fracture. Fair and poor results were related to age > 85 years, poor pre-fracture level of function, and AO/OTA-31-A3 fracture types.

CONCLUSION

The dual head screw intramedullary hip nail is associated with high healing and low complication rates for intertrochanteric fractures. The function of the patients is good or excellent in most cases; however, it declines, especially for those patients with age > 85 years, poor pre-fracture level of function, and AO/OTA-31-A3 fracture types.

A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: a minimum follow-up of 3 years

BACKGROUND

The study aims to compare the long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of two devices for the treatment of primary intertrochanteric fractures (IFs, OTA 3.1A2.1-A2.3) in elderly patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Between December 2010 and August 2014, 332 elderly osteoporosis patients with IFs (OTA 3.1A2.1-A2.3) fixed by an InterTAN nail (IT) or a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) device were retrospectively evaluated. Follow-up occurred 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and every year thereafter. Mortality was recorded. Patient-related functional and radiographic outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was the long-term radiographic outcomes. The secondary endpoint was the long-term functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients (283 hips) with osteoporosis (IT, n = 144; PFNA, n = 139) were evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 38.8 months (range, 36-43 months). No between-group significant differences were noted in the patient demographics, operation variables, and postoperative Harris Hip Score. More radiographic complications were noted in terms of screw cut-out, femoral shaft fracture distal or around the tip of the main nail, and varus collapse of the femoral head in the PFNA group compared with that in the IT group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For osteoporotic IFs (OTA 3.1A2.1-A2.3) in elderly patients, the use of IT aids in decreasing radiographic complications, but the between-group functional outcomes showed no significant difference.

Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies have reported conflicting findings concerning the efficacy and safety of the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1,A2 and A3) using short intramedullary nails (SIN) and long intramedullary nails (LIN). The present meta-analysis and literature review investigated the outcomes of SIN and LIN, thereby providing guidance for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. When used to treat intertrochanteric femur fractures, LIN did not decrease the secondary femoral shaft refracture or reoperation rates. Eight electronic databases were searched for studies related to the use of SIN compared to LIN in treating intertrochanteric fractures. The modified Jadad Scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the methodological quality and the risk of bias of these studies. The two groups were compared based on nine indicators, including the surgical times, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, length of hospital stay, secondary femoral shaft refracture, reoperation, 1-year mortality, Harris hip scores (1 year) and complications. A total of 2431 patients were included in the analysis, with 1498 LIN cases and 940 SIN cases (bilateral nails were used in 7 cases), and the average patient age was 74.83 years. The pooled results indicated that patients in the LIN group had longer surgical times (MD [mean difference]: 12.56; 95% CI: 8.28-16.84; P<0.00001), more intraoperative blood loss (MD: 37.44; 95% CI: 8.06-66.82, P=0.01) and a higher transfusion rate (OR [odds ratio]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.12-2.10, P=0.008) than patients in the SIN group. However, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (MD: 0.24; 95% CI: -0.58-1.06, P=0.56), occurrence of secondary femoral shaft refractures (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.34-1.53, P=0.39), reoperation rate (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.60-1.50, P=0.82), 1-year mortality (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.67-1.8, P=0.71), Harris hip score (MD: 1.87; 95% CI: -2.8-6.54, P=0.43) or complication rate (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.84-1.99, P=0.25). LIN may not be a better method or provide more effective treatment for intertrochanteric femur fractures; the LIN patients demonstrated the same prognosis as the SIN patients, particularly in terms of secondary femoral shaft refracture and reoperation rate, but they experienced greater trauma. Due to the limitations of the included studies, however, more highly powered randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients

Objective To evaluate long-term radiographic and functional outcomes between dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs) among elderly patients Methods A retrospective comparative study was carried out. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. The primary outcome was the radiographic outcome, and the secondary outcome was the functional outcome. Results A significant difference in radiographic complications was observed between the DHS group (n = 45, 40.2%) and PFNA group (n = 15, 13.6%). The risk of femoral shaft fracture after implant removal at the 1-year follow-up was increased by 0.9% (n = 1) and 6.3% (n = 7) in the PFNA and DHS groups, respectively. This difference persisted with rates of 3.6% (n = 4) and 12.5% (n = 14) at the final follow-up. Additionally, significant differences were present in the Harris hip score at each visit. Conclusion Our results indicate that PFNA yields better outcomes than DHS fixation among elderly patients with osteoporotic type 31-A1 IFFs.

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture

This study compared patients who underwent treatment with short or long cephalomedullary nails with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. Patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 or A3 pertrochanteric fractures treated with either short (n=72) or long (n=97) InterTAN (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) cephalomedullary nails were reviewed. Information on perioperative measures (estimated blood loss, surgical time, and fluoroscopy time) and postoperative orthopedic complications (infection, implant failure, screw cutout, and periprosthetic femur fracture) was included. Estimated blood loss (short nail, 161 mL; long nail, 208 mL; P=.002) and surgical time (short nail, 64 minutes; long nail, 83 minutes; P=.001) were lower in the short nail group. There were no differences in fluoroscopy time (short nail, 90 seconds; long nail, 142 seconds; P=.071) or rates of infection (short nail, 1.4%; long nail, 3.1%; P=.637) or overall orthopedic complications (short nail, 11.1%; long nail, 9.3%; P=.798) between the 2 groups. The long nail group had a trend toward more screw cutouts (long nail, 5.2%; short nail, 0.0%; P=.134) but fewer periprosthetic femur fractures (short nail, 8.3%; long nail, 0.0%; P=.013). This study found a similar overall rate of orthopedic complications between short and long nails with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. These results confirm the suspected advantages of short nails, including faster surgery and less blood loss; however, the rate of periprosthetic femur fracture remains high, despite changes to implant design. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):83-88.].

The treatment strategies of intertrochanteric fractures nonunion: An experience of 23 nonunion patients

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common, but the nonunion of intertrochanteric fractures is not. The purpose of this study was to divide intertrochanteric fracture nonunion into different types and give corresponding treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 23 patients with intertrochanteric fracture nonunion. The patients were divided into five groups and each group was treated with a different strategy. All patients had staged clinical and radiographic follow-ups and the mean follow-up was 16.0±4.6months.

RESULTS

Except for the patients treated with total hip arthroplasty, all patients achieved fracture union. The mean union time was 4.7±1.2months. The Harris hip function score differed significantly from preoperative (28.9±6.8) to postoperative (83.8±6.3; p<0.05). For the three patients who were classified as type III, the femoral neck shaft angle was corrected to a significant degree, from 97.3±6.4 to 127.3±2.5 (p<0.05). For the four patients who were classified as type V, the mean time from debridement to re-internal fixation was 3.7±1.5months.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several factors associated with the failure of intertrochanteric fracture treatments. We need to analyze the causes of fracture treatment failure carefully. Based on our five classifications and corresponding treatment strategies, the radiographic and functional treatment outcomes were satisfactory. Future larger comparative studies are needed to confirm our results.

Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip

Aims

The aim of this paper is to review the evidence relating to the anatomy of the proximal femur, the geometry of the fracture and the characteristics of implants and methods of fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Materials and Methods

Relevant papers were identified from appropriate clinical databases and a narrative review was undertaken.

Results

Stable, unstable, and subtrochanteric intertrochanteric fractures vary widely in their anatomical and biomechanical characteristics, as do the implants used for their fixation. The optimal choice of implant addresses the stability of the fracture and affects the outcome.

Conclusion

The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip has evolved along with changes in the design of the implants used to fix them, but there remains conflicting evidence to guide the choice of implant. We advocate fixation of 31A1 fractures with a sliding hip screw and all others with an intramedullary device. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:128–33.

Is distal locking with short intramedullary nails necessary in stable pertrochanteric fractures? A prospective, multicentre, randomised study

We investigated whether a proximal femoral nail can be implanted without a distal locking screw in AO/OTA 31-A1 and 31-A2 pertrochanteric stable femur fractures. A multicentre, randomised study was conducted in six level-two trauma centres in our area (Puglia, Italy). A total of 333 patients received their allocated intervention (162 in the locking group [LG] and 171 in the unlocking group [UG]) and 266 patients were included in the final analysis at 1year. Our data showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 1-year follow-up for ability to walk, SF-36 questionnaire results, residual pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] score) and level of overall satisfaction. There were also no statistically significant differences between groups for mortality and length of hospital stay. Conversely, the UG was associated with shorter operation and fluoroscopy times, shorter surgical incision length, and less blood loss and residual thigh pain. Pertrochanteric stable fractures (31-A1, 31-A2) can be treated successfully with intramedullary nails without distal locking, reducing patient and clinical personnel radiation exposure and sanitary costs (surgery time and screws costs).

Costs and Complications of Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of OTA 31-A2 Proximal Femur Fractures in U.S. Veterans

OBJECTIVES

In fractures without subtrochanteric extension, the indications for the use of short versus long cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for intertrochanteric femur fractures are unclear. We hypothesized that long nails would be associated with higher costs and similar complication rates.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients receiving CMNs for OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures from 2001 to 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Costs, perioperative complications, readmissions, surgical failures, and mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 262 patients with OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures (125 treated with short CMNs and 137 treated with long CMNs). The 2 cohorts had similar demographic and medical characteristics. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, readmissions within 30 days, surgical failures within one year, or death within 30 days or one year. The average cost of hospitalization was significantly higher for the cohort treated with long nails (greater than $7000 in actual costs, and greater than $3000 when statistically adjusted for differences in postoperative lengths of stay). Multivariable analyses showed no significant differences in the rates of development of at least one complication, readmission, or death.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of patients with similar characteristics and fracture patterns, the use of long CMNs was associated with similar rates of complications, readmission, and reoperations, but significantly higher costs than with the use of short nails.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Preliminary results of the treatment of proximal femoral fractures with the AFFIXUS nail

Contemporary fixation of the proximal femur is performed utilising a number of implants adopting different concepts and techniques. Cephalomedullary nails in particular represent one of two main options, the other being dynamic hip screw (DHS). The aim of this cohort study is to present the early experience of two large units from different countries of the use of the AFFIXUS nail for stabilisation of proximal femoral fractures. Over a period of almost three years, data from 476 proximal femoral fractures were collected and analysed using a specific research protocol, assessing data relevant to basic demographic details, in-hospital stay, surgical technique and post discharge outcomes with a minimum follow up of 6 months. Both the short and long versions of the nail were used in both centres, however, with some statistically significant differences as far as the type of fractures stabilised with the nail, which also translated to differences in the combination or not of 2 lag screws, and the static or dynamic mode of the proximal fixation construct. Other areas of difference amongst the 2 units, were the length of hospital stay and return of patients to their pre-injury residence, most likely reflecting the different social circumstances between the 2 countries. Overall mortality at a median follow up period of 17 months (range 6 to 35) was limited to 6.3%, nonunion and cut out rates 2.7%, whilst revision surgery occurred in just 2.5%. Over the first 6 months of follow up 63.6% returned to their pre-injury ambulatory status and 90.5% to their pre-injury residence. Further studies and higher level of scientific evidence is needed to verify the findings of this retrospective cohort study as to the effectiveness and safety of this new cephalomedullary nail.

Common complications in hip fracture surgery: Tips/tricks and solutions to avoid them

Surgical management of hip fractures in elderly people is challenging and complications relating to surgery could be devastating. They often lead to reoperation and revision surgery and can be associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. The most common surgical complications after internal fixation of hip fractures include cut-out, nonunion, Z-effect/medial migration, periimplant failure and avascular necrosis. High quality surgical fixation is of outmost importance to avoid surgical complications. This article presents the aetiology, risk factors and incidence of perioperative and post-fracture fixation complications. Technical tips and tricks for a successful fixation as well as the contemporary evidence surrounding the augmentation of osteoporotic bone fixation in internal fixation of hip fractures are discussed.