Versatility of an Extended Posterior Approach for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures With Reference to the Superior Gluteal Neurovascular Bundle

Posterior Exposure in Kocher-Langenbeck With Gluteus Minimus Debridement vs. the Gibson Approach: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the posterior acetabular exposure achieved with the Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) with gluteus minimus debridement and Gibson approaches.

METHODS

A Kocher-Langenbeck approach and a subsequent Gibson approach on the contralateral hip were performed in the prone position on 9 fresh frozen cadavers. Calibrated digital images were obtained of the Kocher-Langenbeck exposure, Kocher-Langenbeck exposure after gluteus minimus debridement, and Gibson exposure. The surface area of the posterior hip and pelvis visualized with each approach was calculated and compared with the contralateral side to assess for the difference between exposures.

RESULTS

In 5 of the 9 cadavers, the Kocher-Langenbeck exposure before gluteus minimus debridement yielded an increased exposure in comparison with the Gibson approach, and the exposure was equivocal in 3 specimens. An increase of greater than 10% was considered significant. The exposure increased anteriorly and cranially by an average of 13.1 cm 2 after debridement of the gluteus minimus caudal to the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle in the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Debridement of the gluteus minimus caudal to the level of the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle can significantly increase anterior and cranial exposure in the Kocher-Langenbeck approach and provide similar areas of access when compared with that in the Gibson approach.

Rehabilitative management of pelvic fractures: a literature-based update

A comprehensive rehabilitation program is required after Pelvic Fracture (PF). In a PF rehabilitation setting an effective treatment and a proper management of complications is supplied by an appropriate and reliable clinical assessment. In this literature-based update, we search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews to find articles, scientific society guidelines and practioners experiences defining the rehabilitative management of clinically PF outcomes. Based on literature evidences and expert opinions, a set of key topics was collated to generate advices and recommendations to put into daily practice. Even if there are no high-quality evidence for rehabilitative interventions after PF in terms of duration and modality of therapy, rehabilitation setting, care pathways, and long-term functional outcomes, it is strongly recommended an early multidisciplinary intervention to improve recovery from PF.

Exposure Provided by the Gibson Versus the Kocher-Langenbeck Approaches With and Without Trochanteric Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Mapping Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if prevalent approaches in acetabular fracture surgery provide enhanced anterior and cranial exposure in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

A Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach (followed by a Gibson approach on the contralateral hip) was performed in the lateral position on 8 cadavers. A Steinmann pin was used to create holes outlining the bony surfaces available for instrumentation before and after a trochanteric osteotomy. All soft tissue was then removed from the pelvis, and a calibrated digital picture was taken. The surface area of the pelvis visualized through each approach was calculated and compared with the contralateral side to assess for a difference in exposure between the Gibson approach and the K-L approach. An increase in exposure of greater than 10% was considered significant. The extent of anterior exposure (with and without a trochanteric osteotomy) was then measured from the greater sciatic notch.

RESULTS

In 2 of 8 cadavers (25%), the Gibson approach yielded an increase in exposure when compared with a K-L approach. The addition of a trochanteric osteotomy yielded on average 1.6 cm (range, 0.7-2.6 cm) of increased anterior exposure in the K-L approaches and 1.5 cm (range 0.9-3.1 cm) in the Gibson approaches.

CONCLUSION

The Gibson approach did not reliably provide increased anterior exposure compared with a K-L approach in a cadaver model. A trochanteric osteotomy can be expected to add 1-2 cm of increased anterior exposure in both approaches.

Do Acetabular Buttress Augment Pose Risk to the Superior Gluteal Nerve? A Cadaveric Study

Background

Management of acetabular defects in total joint reconstruction can be challenging. Various algorithmic approaches have been developed, with some recommending using posterosuperior acetabular buttress augments for severe defects. The superior gluteal nerve lies in close proximity to their application, and damage to it results in deterioration of hip stability and gait mechanics. There has been investigation into the relationship of the superior gluteal nerve to various anatomic points. To our knowledge, no study exists examining the relationship between the acetabular rim and the superior gluteal nerve for the application of these particular devices.

Methods

Ten adult cadaver specimens were examined. A reproducible technique in relation to the typical placement of a buttress augment was used. From a distance of 20 millimeters (mm) lateral to the greater sciatic notch, the distance from the superior gluteal nerve to the posterosuperior acetabular rim was measured.

Results

The average distance between the posterosuperior acetabular rim and the superior gluteal nerve was found to be 52 mm, ranging from 48 mm to 60 mm.

Conclusion

With proprietary acetabular augments measuring up to 68 mm in length, the superior gluteal nerve could be at substantial risk with placement of these devices. Surgeons should take great care with dissection for and intraoperative placement of these devices, and particularly strive for optimized prosthetic hip stability to mitigate the risk of dislocation from nerve injury. To our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind and provides valuable anatomic and operative knowledge during these highly complex cases.

Superior Gluteal Artery Bleed After Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation

Background: Hip fracture is a common orthopedic condition that leads to many hospitalizations each year. Intertrochanteric femur fractures are commonly treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation. Superior gluteal artery bleed is a rare complication of cephalomedullary nail fixation, especially when the trochanteric approach is used.

Case Report: A 63-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a right intertrochanteric femur fracture after a fall from standing height. Cephalomedullary nail fixation was performed without any complications during the operation. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by decreasing hemoglobin levels despite blood transfusions. Superior gluteal artery bleed with a large hematoma was discovered on postoperative day 4. The bleed was embolized, and the patient was stabilized and discharged.

Conclusion: We found only 1 published report of a superior gluteal artery bleed associated with nail placement. During the operative procedure, guidewire placement requires careful consideration because of the risk of vascular damage. Superior gluteal artery injury, although rare, should be considered in patients with unstable hemoglobin levels after nail placement.

The Stability of the Porous Tantalum Components Used in Revision THA to Treat Severe Acetabular Defects: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

The acetabular components used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat severe acetabular bone defects have high rates of re-revision at mid to long-term follow-up. Early translation of acetabular components used in revision THA is a good predictor of later loosening, and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the most sensitive method to measure migration. The objectives of the present study were to use RSA to compare the migration of the porous tantalum acetabular components used to treat severe bone defects with the previously established acceptable proximal translation threshold of ≤1 mm within 2 years, and to determine the effect on migration of the addition of inferior screws through the component into the ischium or pubis.

METHODS

RSA was utilized to measure the migration of 55 porous tantalum components used to treat severe acetabular defects (28 Paprosky IIIA, 27 Paprosky IIIB; 21 hips with pelvic discontinuity) at a mean follow-up of 4 years (range, 2 to 12 years).

RESULTS

Forty-eight of the 55 components migrated less than the threshold that predicts later loosening (>1 mm) and 50 had not been re-revised at the time of the latest follow-up. Seven components, none of which had inferior screw fixation, exceeded the translation threshold. Of these, 6 were implanted to treat pelvic discontinuity. Of those 6 components, 5 were re-revised for loosening related to patient symptoms. At 2 years, the absolute median proximal translation of components with inferior screw fixation was |0.3| mm (range, |0.1| to |0.9| mm), compared with |0.4| mm (range, |0.03| to |16.4| mm) for those without inferior screws (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

As measured with use of RSA, the majority of porous tantalum acetabular components used in a revision THA to treat severe acetabular defects had acceptable early migration. This predicts good long-term survivorship of these components. The use of inferior screws further improved acetabular component fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.