Sanders II/III Calcaneus Fractures in Laborers: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Call for Effectiveness Research

Societal burden and quality of life in patients with Lisfranc Injuries

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Lisfranc fractures is rising, along with the incidence of foot fractures in general. These injuries can lead to long-term healthcare use and societal costs. Current economic evaluation studies are scarce in Lisfranc fracture research, and only investigate the healthcare costs. The aim of the present study was to accurately measure the monetary societal burden of disease and quality of life in the first 6 months after the injury in patients with Lisfranc fractures in the Netherlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used a prevalence-based, bottom-up approach. Patients were included through thirteen medical centres in the Netherlands. Both stable and unstable injuries were included. The societal perspective was used. The costs were measured at baseline, 12 weeks and 6 months using the iMTA MCQ and PCQ questionnaires. Reference prices were used for valuation. Quality-of-life was measured using the EQ-5D-5 L and VAS scores.

RESULTS

214 patients were included. The mean age was 45.9 years, and 24.3% of patients had comorbidities. The baseline questionnaires yielded approximately €2023 as the total societal costs in the 3 months prior to injury. The follow-up questionnaires and surgery costs assessment yielded approximately €17,083 as the total costs in the first 6 months after injury. Of these costs, approximately two thirds could be attributed to productivity losses. The EQ-5D-5 L found a mean index value of 0.449 at baseline and an index value of 0.737 at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The total monetary societal costs in the first 6 months after injury are approximately €17,083. Approximately two thirds of these costs can be attributed to productivity losses. These costs appear to be somewhat higher than those found in other studies. However, these studies only included the healthcare costs. Furthermore, the baseline costs indicate relatively low healthcare usage before the injury compared to the average Dutch patient. The mean QoL index was 0.462 at baseline and 0.737 at 6 months, indicating a rise in QoL after treatment as well as a long-lasting impact on QoL. To our knowledge, this is only the first study investigating the societal costs of Lisfranc injuries, so more research is needed.

Calcaneal Fractures Management, Change of Clinical Practice in Recent Years from ELA to STA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Calcaneal fractures are serious injuries that mainly affect young, active people. As a result, these fractures may cause long-term impairment and have a major socioeconomic impact. The current updated systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the functional outcomes, re-operative risk, and complications associated with the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal.

Methodology

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to conduct this meta-analysis. The literature search was carried out using PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the EMBASE databases with the appropriate keywords.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included in this review. The follow-up months were diverse, ranging between 12 and 65 months in sinus tarsi approach (STA) and 12 to 76 months in extended lateral approach (ELA) methods. Time to surgery was shorter for the STA when compared to ELA (MD: 3.48; 95% CI 2.43 to 4.53; p < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed in functional outcomes between STA and ELA (MD: 0.34; 95% CI: -0.37 to 1.04; p = 0.35 > 0.05; I2 = 88%). In comparison to the ELA, the STA has significantly less wound healing complications (RR: 0.20; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.36; p 0.00001; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the STA technique in treating calcaneal fractures was significantly safer and more effective when compared to the ELA methods. The STA method of treatment was found to have a lower risk of complications and an infection rate, as well as a shorter operating and recovery time.

Double Row Fixation is More Costly and Does Not Have Clinical Benefit Over Single Anchor for Insertional Achilles Tendon Surgery

Surgical repair of insertional Achilles tendinosis is indicated in the face of failed conservative measures. Several methods for this repair have been described, and the optimal method is not universally agreed upon. In addition, the cost of medical care is important, and should be considered when determining the surgical repair for each patient. The purpose of this study is to compare implant costs between a single anchor or 4 anchor, double row repair, and evaluate associated outcomes. A retrospective comparative trial was performed for this purpose. The entire study encompassed 110 patients, 78 with a single anchor repair, and 32 with a double row repair. The average implant cost of the single anchor repair was $391.18 ± $272.10 and the double row repair was $1811.2 9 ± $169.47, p < .001. The groups did not have a statistically significant difference in complications (9% with single anchor vs 6.3% with double row, p = 1.0) or revisions 6.4% with single anchor vs 3.1% with double row, p = .67). The only difference in demographics between the groups was that the single anchor group had a higher percentage of female patients (p = .04). While the double row repair has been shown to have favorable biomechanical results, the present study did not show a benefit in complications or revisions and was a more costly repair technique. Surgeons should take these findings in consideration when choosing the repair technique when surgery is indicated.

Economic evaluations in fracture research an introduction with examples of foot fractures

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of foot fractures is increasing. These types of fractures represent the most expensive group of diagnoses in the emergency department. Next to this, the need for economic evaluation studies is growing fast. The aim of this article is to provide healthcare professionals with an introduction to economic evaluation studies in the field of foot fractures.

TYPES OF ECONOMIC EVALUATION STUDIES

Four types of economic evaluation studies exist: cost-minimization analysis (CMA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), and cost-utility analysis (CUA). An economic evaluation study can be either trial- or model-based.

COST ASSESSMENT

When assessing costs in an economic evaluation study, three steps need to be made: identification of costs, measurement of costs, and valuation of costs.

PERSPECTIVE OF ANALYSIS

Two main perspectives exist in economic evaluation studies. When using a healthcare perspective, only the potential costs and benefits of an intervention for the healthcare sector are included. The societal perspective includes all potential costs, including societal costs.

SYNTHESIS OF COSTS AND EFFECTS AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

The level of cost-effectiveness can be objectively expressed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). This measure can be plotted in a cost-effectiveness plane and can be compared with existing regional ceiling ratios.

CONCLUSION

Although this article is not a guideline for economic evaluations, we do want to present five tips to consider when performing an economic evaluation. Firstly, when measuring resource use, consult the Database of Instruments for Resource Use Measurements (DIRUM) to find an appropriate instrument. Secondly, when measuring utility values, use the EuroQol questionnaire if possible. Thirdly, when setting up an economic evaluation study, consult the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) database for the appropriate pharmacoeconomic guidelines. Fourthly, consult international guidelines to decide which study design is most appropriate. Finally, when performing an economic evaluation, consult a heath technology assessment (HTA) specialist from the start to ensure methodological quality.

Cadaveric Examination of the Radiographic Safe Zone for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Calcaneus Posterior Facet

Background:

The purpose of this study is to define a safe zone for screw placement on a lateral radiograph of the calcaneus taking into account the lateral to medial convexity of the posterior facet. Such findings may serve to improve surgical quality during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the posterior facet of the calcaneus.

Methods:

Eleven cadaveric calcanei were harvested and the articular margins of the posterior facet were outlined with a radiopaque wire. Lateral radiographs, similar to those used for intraoperative fluoroscopy, of each specimen were obtained and calibrated to a standardized marker. The proximal-to-distal length of the posterior facet was then divided into quadrants. The greatest height difference between the superolateral and inferomedial surfaces outlined by the radiopaque marker were measured in the 2 most posterior quadrants, as screw insertion in this area would be mostly likely to risk screw penetration during ORIF.

Results:

The average distance from the osseous surface to the radiographic marker was 3.3 ± 1.2 mm in the most posterior quadrant (fourth quadrant) and 3.2 ± 1.6 mm in the quadrant just anterior to this (third quadrant). The range for unsafe screw placement was 1.7 to 5.6 mm below the osseous surface in the fourth quadrant and 1.1 to 6.6 mm in the third quadrant.

Conclusion:

Intraoperative radiographic assessment of the safety of subchondral posterior facet screws does not correlate to its osteology. Because of the superolateral to inferomedial convexity of the posterior facet of the calcaneus, overly long screws may appear to be radiographically intraosseous, though in actuality the screw may be intra-articular. On average, screws placed in the fourth quadrant of the facet are at less risk if 3.3 mm inferior to the upper margin of the osseous shadow on fluoroscopic imaging and 3.2 mm inferior in the third quadrant. Though limited by a small sample size, this study sets a foundation for future research into this complex osteology.

Level of Evidence:

Level V, mechanism-based reasoning.

Cost-effectiveness of interventions for musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle are common, yet the cost-effectiveness of the variety of treatments available is not well defined. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to identify, appraise and synthesise the literature pertaining to the cost-effectiveness of interventions for musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for studies presenting economic evaluations of non-surgical and surgical treatments for acute or chronic musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle. Data on cost, incremental cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years for each intervention and comparison were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Drummond checklist for economic studies (range 0-35).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were identified reporting non-surgical interventions (n=10), non-surgical versus surgical interventions (n=14) and surgical interventions (n=12). The most common conditions were osteoarthritis, ankle fracture and Achilles tendon rupture. The strongest economic evaluations were for interventions managing end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, ankle sprain, ankle fracture, calcaneal fracture, and Achilles tendon rupture. Total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, in particular, have been demonstrated through high-quality studies to be cost-effective compared to the non-surgical alternative.

CONCLUSION

Selected interventions for musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions dominate comparators, whereas others require thoughtful consideration as they provide better clinical improvements, but at an increased cost. Researchers should consider measuring and reporting costs alongside clinical outcome to provide context when determining the appropriateness of interventions for other foot and ankle complaints to best inform future clinical practice guidelines.

Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures

Background

Extensile lateral approach had been recognized as the gold standard technique for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) while sinus tarsi approach had been increasingly valued by surgeons and comparative clinical outcome was shown in both techniques. Appropriate decisions could be made by the clinicians with the help of cost-utility analysis (CUA) about optimal healthcare for type II/III calcaneus fracture.

Method

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted in which basic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and health care costs of 109 patients had been obtained and analyzed. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, validated by EuroQol five-dimensional-three levels (EQ-5D-3L), were used to enumerate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost per QALY.

Results

One hundred nine patients were enrolled in our study including 62 in the ELA group and 47 in the STA group. There were no significant differences between these two groups in mean total cost, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation expense, surgery, anesthesia, and antibiotic expense. The expense of internal fixation materials ($3289.0 ± 543.9) versus ($2630.6 ± 763.7) and analgesia ($145.8 ± 85.6) versus ($102.9 ± 62.7) in ELA group were significantly higher than in the STA group (P < .001, P = .008, respectively). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores showed significant difference at postoperative 3 and 5 days (P < .001). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores and the Bohlers’ and Gissane angle showed no significant differences between the two groups before and after the operation. The cost-effectiveness ratios of ELA and STA were $8766.8 ± 2835.2/QALY and $7914.9 ± 1822.0/QALY respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) of ELA over STA was $32110.00/QALY, but both showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Both ELA and STA techniques are effective operative procedures for the patients with calcaneus fracture. Moreover, STA seems to be more reasonable for its merits including less postoperative pain, and less expense of analgesia as well as internal fixation materials.

Level of evidence

5

Management of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Comparative Study of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery

Objectives

The ideal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures continues to be a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to compare the radiological outcome, cumulative radiation exposure, surgical time, time to surgery, wound healing times and cost involved in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for calcaneal fractures.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 39 calcaneum operated in our unit during 2012 to 2019, of which 20 had undergone ORIF and 19 had been operated upon following MIS.

Results

A total of 39 calcanea (37 patients) were operated, of which 20 had open procedure and 19 had MIS procedure, including one bilateral surgery in each group. Mean age of the patients in the MIS group was 42.18 years (range: 15-68 years) and that of the patients in the open group was 43 years (range: 21-75 years). Of the fractures, 53.84% (n = 21) was Sanders type III, 28.20% (n = 11) was type II and 17.94% (n = 7) was type IV. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean correction of Bohler’s angle and Gissane’s angle between the groups. The mean cost for implant used for each open procedure was £882.79, and the implant cost for each MIS procedure was £142.89. Mean utilisation of cumulative X-ray dose was significantly higher in MIS (0.764 mGy) in comparison to open surgery (0.392 mGy). The average surgical time for MIS was 64.9 minutes and that of open surgery was 106.3 minutes. Average waiting time for MIS was 6.6 days and that for ORIF was 9.8 days. Wound healing was quicker (average 13.4 days) in MIS than ORIF (average 17.2 days). All these differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive calcaneal fracture surgery is quicker and cheaper and can be performed earlier. It is associated with early wound healing, although it requires higher cumulative radiation dose.

Minimally invasive dual incision with mini plate internal fixation improves outcomes over 30 months in 20 patients with Sanders type III calcaneal fractures

Background

Calcaneal Sanders type III or higher fractures traditionally have been treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); however, ORIF has associated complications. We investigated a combination of minimally invasive dual incision and internal fixation using mini plates for treating Sanders type III calcaneal fractures.

Methods

Twenty patients with Sanders type III intra-articular calcaneal fractures with a posterior subtalar articular displacement > 2 mm were included. Surgical outcomes were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and calcaneal geometry, including Böhler and Gissane angles.

Results

The Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and height and length of the calcaneus were increased following treatment. Based on the AOFAS score, 80% of cases had excellent or good outcomes. The mean postoperative VAS pain score was 1.6. Complications such as malunion or a screw positioning deviation occurred in 6 patients, and one patient experienced delayed wound healing. There were no wound infections.

Conclusions

These results indicate that minimally invasive dual incision with mini plate internal fixation may be an effective alternative to ORIF for treating Sanders type III calcaneal fractures. Advantages include improvement of calcaneal geometry and a lower rate of wound infections.

Should the Extended Lateral Approach Remain Part of Standard Treatment in Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open reduction and internal fixation through the extended lateral approach (ELA) in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures and to determine whether this approach should remain part of standard therapy. This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients with 64 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures who underwent surgical treatment through the ELA. Outcome measures were the visual analog scale foot and ankle (VAS FA), the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, surgical site infections (SSIs), and reoperations. We determined the AOFAS score for 40 patients with 42 fractures, and 42 patients with 44 fractures completed the VAS FA questionnaire. The mean VAS FA score was 61.0 ± 23.4 and the median AOFAS score was 83 (range 33 to 100), with 55% good to excellent scores. We found 10.9% superficial SSIs successfully treated with antibiotics. In 4.7% of patients a deep SSI was diagnosed, wherefore premature implant removal was necessary. Patients with an SSI did not have significantly lower VAS FA or AOFAS scores than did patients without an SSI (p = .318 and p = .766, respectively). Implant removal in absence of SSIs was necessary in 17 patients because of pain, and 3 patients needed secondary arthrodesis because of persistent pain. We concluded that the ELA proved to be a safe procedure, and moreover the most common complications did not influence the long-term outcomes of patients. However, recent literature demonstrates that less invasive techniques seem to exceed the ELA with respect to wound complications.