Ulnar Nerve Injury in Pediatric Midshaft Forearm Fractures: A Case Series

Early post-surgical rehabilitation and functional outcomes of a traumatic ulnar nerve injury: a pediatric case report

Background

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) of the upper limb are very common events within the pediatric population, especially following soft tissue trauma and bone fractures. Symptoms of brachial plexus nerve injuries can differ considerably depending on the site and severity of injury. Compared to median and radial nerves, the ulnar nerve (UN) is the most frequently and severely injured nerve of the upper extremity. Indeed, due to its peculiar anatomical path, the UN is known to be particularly vulnerable to traumatic injuries, which result in pain and substantial motor and sensory disabilities of the forearm and hand. Therefore, timely and appropriate postoperative management of UN lesions is crucial to avoid permanent sensorymotor deficits and claw hand deformities leading to lifelong impairments. Nevertheless, the literature regarding the rehabilitation following PNIs is limited and lacks clear evidence regarding a solid treatment algorithm for the management of UN lesions that ensures full functional recovery.

Case presentation

The patient is a 11-year-old child who experienced left-hand pain, stiffness, and disability secondary to a domestic accident. The traumatic UN lesion occurred about 8 cm proximal to Guyon's canal and it was surgically treated with termino-terminal (end-to-end) neurorrhaphy. One month after surgery, the patient underwent multimodal rehabilitative protocol and both subjective and functional measurements were recorded at baseline (T0) and at 3- (T1) and 5-month (T2) follow-up. At the end of the rehabilitation protocol, the patient achieved substantial reduction in pain and improvement in quality of life. Of considerable interest, the patient regained a complete functional recovery with satisfactory handgrip and pinch functions in addition with a decrease of disability in activities of daily living.

Conclusion

A timely and intensive rehabilitative intervention done by qualified hand therapist with previous training in the rehabilitation of upper limb neuromuscular disorders is pivotal to achieve a stable and optimal functional recovery of the hand, while preventing the onset of deformities, in patients with peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb.

The Risk of Nerve Injury in Pediatric Forearm Fractures

UPDATE

This article was updated on July 19, 2023, because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1080, in the last sentence of the Results section of the Abstract, the text that had read "0.05% (4 of 777)" now reads "0.5% (4 of 777)."

BACKGROUND

The risk of fracture-related nerve injury associated with forearm fractures in children is unknown. The purposes of the present study were to calculate the risk of fracture-related nerve injury and to report the institutional rate of complications of surgical treatment of pediatric forearm fractures.

METHODS

Four thousand, eight hundred and sixty-eight forearm fractures (ICD-10 codes S52.0 to S52.7) that had been treated in our tertiary level pediatric hospital between 2014 and 2021 were identified in our institutional fracture registry. Of these, 3,029 fractures occurred in boys and 53 were open fractures. Sex, age at injury, trauma mechanism and energy, fracture type, treatment method, and cause and type of nerve injury were assessed in 43 patients with 44 registered nerve injuries. Patients with nerve injuries were reevaluated to calculate the recovery time. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the risk of nerve injury.

RESULTS

The risk of a fracture-related nerve injury was 0.7% (33 of 4,868). Only 2 injuries were permanent; thus, the risk of permanent nerve injury associated with a forearm fracture was 0.04% (2 of 4,868). The ulnar nerve was affected in 19 cases; the median nerve, in 8; and the radial nerve, in 7. In cases of open fracture, the risk of nerve injury was 17% (9 of 53). Open fractures had an OR of 33.73 (95% CI, 14.97 to 70.68) on univariate analysis and an OR of 10.73 (95% CI 4.50 to 24.22) on multivariate analysis with adjustment for female sex and both-bone diaphyseal fracture. Both-bone diaphyseal fracture (ICD-10 code S52.4) had an OR of 9.01 (95% CI, 4.86 to 17.37) on univariate analysis and an OR of 9.98 (95% CI 5.32 to 19.47) on multivariate analysis with adjustment for age and female sex. Overall, 777 fractures were internally fixed. The risk of nerve injury as a complication of internal fixation was 1.3% (10 of 777). Four of these iatrogenic injuries (including 2 involving the median nerve, 1 involving the ulnar nerve, and 1 involving the radial nerve) were permanent; thus, the risk of permanent nerve injury as a complication of internal fixation was 0.5% (4 of 777).

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve injury following a pediatric forearm fracture is rare and has an excellent potential for spontaneous recovery. In the present study, all of the permanent nerve injuries occurred in association with open fractures or as a complication of internal fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ultrasound assistance in treatment with elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation in radial and ulnar fractures in children

PURPOSE

Radial and ulnar fractures are one of the most common fractures in children. When closed reduction of fractures fails, elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) fixation can mostly be used under the guidance of fluoroscopy. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ultrasound (US) as assistance for radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs.

METHODS

There were 56 patients with midshaft radial and ulnar fractures included in our hospital from March 2019 to August 2021. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the treatment method, they were divided into the US group (patients treated with US assistance) and the conventional group (C-group, patients treated with fluoroscopy guidance). All patients' clinical data were collected. Operation time, fluoroscopy times, radiation dose, and post-operative complications were analyzed. The elbow function was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index.

RESULTS

There were 26 patients in the US group and 30 in the C-group. The average operation time was 44.5±19.4 min in the US group and 65.1±16.2 min in the C-group. There were significant differences regarding the surgery time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose between the groups (all p = 0.001). The average follow-up time was 13.5±3.1 months. No significant difference was found regarding radial nerve injury, extensor pollicis longus rupture, non-union or delayed union, ulnar nerve injury, or acute compartment syndrome. There was no difference in elbow function at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

US guidance can be adopted for the treatment of displaced radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs. It can significantly decrease fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, and duration of surgery.

Ulnar Nerve Palsy in Both-Bone Forearm Fracture in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report

Closed fractures of both the radius and the ulna are common in the pediatric age group; however, ulnar nerve palsy is a rare complication with this type of fracture. We present a case of a fracture in both forearm bones in an eight-year-old boy. The patient was admitted for closed reduction and internal fixation. Before surgery, he developed signs of ulnar nerve palsy. The surgery took place under general anesthesia without complications. Postoperative recovery took place with signs of ulnar nerve palsy, and he was discharged the following day. After three months, the ulnar palsy completely resolved, and the fracture had healed. This case shows that a physical examination and ulnar nerve function should be assessed pre- and post-manual manipulation so that the patient can be managed properly. When nerve involvement is noted after manual manipulation of the limb, we recommend surgical intervention and fixation. Controlled studies would allow the development of an algorithm for managing similar cases.

Hybrid fixation with ESIN for both bone forearm fractures in adults: A case report and literature review

Objective

Both bone forearm fractures are common in children and rare in adults. The main surgical treatment is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate, while the hybrid fixation of elastic-stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) and the plate has been rarely reported before.

Case report

We report a case of a 29-year-old male patient with both bone forearm fractures. Temporarily closed reduction and plaster external fixation were performed in the emergency room, and the patient was admitted to the orthopedic trauma ward for surgery. The patient underwent open reduction and plate fixation of the ulna and closed reduction and ESIN fixation of the radius. The fractures healing was satisfactory and the internal fixation was removed 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

The hybrid fixation of ESIN and plate is an effective option for both bone forearm fractures in adults.

Detection of Traumatic and Postoperative Nerve Lesions following Upper Extremity Fractures in a Pediatric Cohort Using MR Neurography

INTRODUCTION

 Fractures of the upper extremity are common traumatic injuries in children. Nerve lesions are a rare but typical complication of these fractures. Additional to physical, electrophysiological, and sonographic examinations, magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) can be used to assess the degree and exact localization of nerve damage. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the potential role of this examination technique for children and to test a proposed MRN classification of traumatic nerve injury according to Chhabra in a pediatric cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Pediatric patients undergoing MRN for traumatic nerve injury from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively identified. A total of 12 consecutive patients with sufficient clinical data, an MRN, and if available follow-up examination were enrolled and analyzed.

RESULTS

 In 10 of 12 cases one or more nerve lesions could be identified by MRN using the classification proposed by Chhabra et al. MRN was used to assess nerve injuries, imaging results were compared with clinical course. Clinical follow-up examinations of 10 patients showed an overall good clinical recovery, even in one case with severe trauma and nerve surgery.

CONCLUSION

 MRN as a noninvasive procedure can help in the evaluation of nerve injury, especially for the identification of lower grade nerve damage and to objectify suspected nerve damage in case of uncertain clinical examination results; thus, can help in decision making whether surgical revision or conservative treatment is preferable.

The Management of Missed Median Nerve Laceration After Pediatric Both-Bone Forearm Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

A 12-year-old girl presented with a both-bone forearm fracture after a fall. Fracture healing occurred, but nerve injury was not addressed until 18 months after injury. Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography yielded a median nerve injury, and she underwent nerve reconstruction with sural nerve grafting. She improved but continued to have deficits beyond her 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Both-bone forearm fractures are a common fracture pattern with rare complications. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion with persistent nerve symptoms and consider further investigation, given the importance of early nerve repair.

Rare Presentation of Ulnar Nerve Palsy in Closed Both Bone Forearm Fracture in Pediatric Population

Introduction:

Ulnar nerve injury in closed both bone forearm fracture is rare. Most nerve injuries are neuropraxia and rarely the nerve is trapped or is transected. Most of the time recovery is spontaneous but sometimes requires surgical exploration. We are reporting a case of a 14-year-old boy with closed both bone forearm fracture with ulnar nerve palsy due to entrapment and laceration between ulnar bone fracture fragment.

Case Report:

A 14-year-old boy presented in emergency department elsewhere with a left forearm closed injury due to fall while playing where he was diagnosed with both bone forearm shaft fracture with ulnar nerve palsy and was given an above elbow slab. After 3 days, the patient presented to our outpatient department (OPD) with completely absent sensation over little finger, ulnar aspect of ring finger, and ulnar clawing. No signs of compartment syndrome in the form of tense swelling or stretch pain were seen. There was a suspected ulnar nerve injury for which patient was admitted and posted for fracture fixation and exploration of the nerve in emergency which showed lacerated ulnar nerve trapped in fracture fragment. Open reduction and internal fixation with ulnar plating and radius titanium elastic nailing was done by orthopedic surgeon while ulnar nerve neurolysis and micro repair was subsequently done by plastic surgeon. There was no neurological recovery immediately post-operatively. Patient was discharged after 48 h and called for regular follow-up in OPD to assess fracture union and neurological recovery. There was gradual neurological recovery over the period of time. Complete motor and sensory recovery took place in 4 months.

Conclusion:

Ulnar nerve injury associated with close both bone forearm fracture is uncommon. They are usually associated with a contusion for which the treatment is basically conservative. Immediate nerve exploration and fracture fixation should be reserved for suspicious nerve laceration or entrapment within displaced fracture fragments on radiographs. This prevents delay and also avoids nerve sequelae to occur. Hence, high index of suspicion and complete neurological examination of the patient at first presentation is important to recognize and diagnose the type of nerve lesion early to decide upon the plan of management.

Fracture related ulnar and sciatic nerve transections: a report of two cases and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Case reports, case series, and case control studies have looked at the incidence of complete nerve transection in the setting of fracture and the need for surgical exploration dating back to the 1920s. We present two cases of nerve laceration accompanying traumatic fracture with a thorough review of the literature.

METHODS

We used the following search terms: "ulnar nerve" OR "sciatic nerve" AND "laceration" OR "transection" AND "fracture." Results were reviewed and included for discussion if they specifically reported ulnar or sciatic nerve laceration accompanying traumatic fracture.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 15 papers reporting a total of 10 ulnar nerve lacerations and nine sciatic nerve lacerations. We present two additional cases. The first is a patient with a humerus fracture and complete ulnar nerve transection. The second case is a patient who suffered a femur fracture and complete transection of the sciatic nerve.

CONCLUSION

Nerve laceration accompanying traumatic fracture is rare. We review the reported cases of nerve laceration and present two cases treated at our institution. Though uncommon, nerve laceration should be considered in the setting of traumatic fracture with neurological injury, particularly open fractures.