Biomechanical Investigation of an Integrated 2-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail Versus a Sliding Hip Screw in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

Biomechanical analysis of tibial plateau posterolateral fracture fragment fixation and introduction of a lateral tibia plateau hook plate system

BACKGROUND

Fixing the posterolateral fragments of tibial plateau fractures has been challenging owing to potential neurovascular injuries and fibular head blocks. Several surgical approaches and fixation techniques have been reported, with distinct limitations. We propose a novel lateral tibia plateau hook plate system and compare its biomechanical stability with other fixation methods.

METHODS

Twenty-four synthetic tibia models were simulated to present posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. These models were randomly assigned to three groups. Group A models were fixed with the lateral tibia plateau hook plate system, Group B with variable-angle anterolateral locking compression plates, and Group C with direct posterior buttress plates. The models' biomechanical stability was evaluated using static (gradually increased axial compressive loads) and fatigue (cyclically loaded from 100 to 600 N for 2000 cycles each) tests.

RESULTS

Groups A and C models exhibited comparable axial stiffness, subsidence load, failure load, and displacement in the static test. Group A model exhibited higher subsidence and failure loads than Group B model. Groups A and C models exhibited comparable displacement at 100 N cyclic loading in the fatigue test. Group C model was more stable at higher loads. Group C model endured the highest subsidence cycle numbers, followed by Groups A and B models.

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral tibia plateau hook plate system provided similar static biomechanical stability as the direct posterior buttress plates and comparable dynamic stability under limited axial loading. This system is a potential posterolateral treatment choice owing to its convenience and safety, in treating tibia plateau fractures.

Proximal Femur Fractures - How Decisive are Reduction and the Chosen Implant?

Proximal femoral fractures are frequent and complex injuries requiring prompt and targeted care. Numerous treatment strategies have been described, some of which have been assessed and clinically implemented clinically. The aim of surgical is always the restoration of a pain-free and stable extremity. Mostly elderly patients are affected and treatment is associated with high postoperative complications and mortality rates. With increasing numbers of patients, the topic is of great medical and economic relevance. In this work, the choice of implants for the osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures - as depending on the fracture type - will be examined, as based on a review of current literature. Standard care includes cannulated screws, sliding hips screws and cephalomedullary nails. In addition, the influence of implant positioning, fracture reduction and additional measures such as cement augmentation are evaluated and discussed. Careful fracture reduction and the quality of implant positioning are paramount in order to avoid complications.

Lessons learned from biomechanical studies on cephalomedullary nails for the management of intertrochanteric fractures. A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The increasing socioeconomic need for optimal treatment of hip fractures in combination with the high diversity of available implants has raised numerous biomechanical questions. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of biomechanical research on the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary devices.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA-P guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed on 31.12.2022. The databases PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched. Scientific papers published between 01.01.2000 - 31.12.2022 were included when they reported data on implant properties related to the biomechanical stability for intertrochanteric fractures. Data extraction was undertaken using a synthesis approach, gathering data on criteria of implants, sample size, fracture type, bone material, and study results.

RESULTS

The initial search identified a total of 1459 research papers, out of which forty-three papers were considered for final analysis. Due to the heterogeneous methods and parameters used in the included studies, meta-analysis was not feasible. A comprehensive assessment of implant characteristics and outcome parameters was conducted through biomechanical analysis. Various factors such as proximal and distal locking, nail diameter and length, fracture model, and bone material were thoroughly evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review highlights the need for standardization in biomechanical studies on intertrochanteric fractures to ensure reliable and comparable results. Strategies such as avoiding varus, maintaining a sufficient tip-apex-distance, cement augmentation, and optimizing lesser trochanteric osteosynthesis enhance construct stability. Synthetic alternatives may offer advantages over cadaveric bone. Further research and meta-analyses are required to establish standardized protocols and enhance reliability.

Perioperative peri-implant fracture after osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fracture with the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™): a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures using the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™) has become popular. Nonetheless, cases of perioperative peri-implant fractures have been reported following this surgical technique. The factors responsible for this complication remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated perioperative peri-implant fracture risk factors and incidence, as well as overall outcomes, using the INTERTAN™ system for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients with geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures after INTERTAN™ fixation, with at least a 12-month follow-up period between May 2020 and April 2022 at a single medical institute. The patients' demographic characteristics, fracture pattern, quality of reduction, quality of fixation, nail length, morphology of the femur, and perioperative complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 98 patients, 92 achieved union during follow-up. Twelve perioperative peri-implant fractures (12.2%) were recorded, all of which occurred during or within 1 month of osteosynthesis. Except for one patient who underwent re-osteosynthesis, the others underwent nonoperative treatment, and all achieved union. Multiple regression analysis revealed morphology of the femur with low-lesser trochanter width (odds ratio (OR) 0.532, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.86, p = 0.01) to be the only factor contributing to perioperative peri-implant fractures. When the Youden index was used, the optimal cut-off value was 20.2 mm of low-lesser trochanter width. Low-lesser trochanter width < 20.2 mm was found to be a potential factor causing perioperative peri-implant fractures (OR 17.81, 95% CI 1.67-19.76, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Morphology of the femur with a low-lesser trochanter width smaller than 20.2 mm was found to be the only potential contributor to perioperative peri-implant fractures when using INTERTAN™ for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures. Care should be taken during osteosynthesis, focusing not only on the fracture site but also on the femoral cortex around the implant. Although perioperative peri-implant fractures were observed within one month following osteosynthesis, the majority of these cases were effectively treated without surgical intervention.

Preventing the Slide in High-Energy Intertrochanteric Fractures With Intramedullary Nails

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V.

Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures with Cephalomedullary Nails: Single Head Screw vs. Dual Integrated Compression Screw Systems

Extracapsular hip fractures are very common in the elderly. They are mainly treated surgically with an intramedullary nail. Nowadays, both endomedullary hip nails with single cephalic screw systems and interlocking double screw systems are available on the market. The latter are supposed to increase rotational stability and therefore decrease the risk of collapse and cut-out. A retrospective cohort study was carried out, in which 387 patients with extracapsular hip fracture undergoing internal fixation with an intramedullary nail were included to study the occurrence of complications and reoperations. Of the 387 patients, 69% received a single head screw nail and 31% received a dual integrated compression screw nail. The median follow-up was 1.1 years, and in that time, a total of 17 reoperations were performed (4.2%; 2.1% for single head screw nails vs. 8.7% for double head screws). According to the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex and basicervical fracture, the adjusted hazard risk of reoperation required was 3.6 times greater when using double interlocking screw systems (p = 0.017). A propensity scores analysis confirmed this finding. In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of using two interlocking head screw systems and the increased risk of reoperation in our single center, we encourage to other researchers to explore this question in a wider multicenter study.

Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate if there are differences in outcome between sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary nails (IMNs) with regard to fracture stability.

METHODS

We assessed data from 17,341 patients with trochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures treated with SHS or IMN in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from 2013 to 2019. Primary outcome measures were reoperations for stable fractures (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A1) and unstable fractures (AO/OTA type A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures). Secondary outcome measures were reoperations for A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures individually, one-year mortality, quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-level index score), pain (visual analogue scale (VAS)), and satisfaction (VAS) for stable and unstable fractures. Hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for reoperation were calculated using Cox regression analysis with adjustments for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score.

RESULTS

Reoperation rate was lower after surgery with IMN for unstable fractures one year (HRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.97; p = 0.022) and three years postoperatively (HRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99; p = 0.036), compared with SHS. For individual fracture types, no clinically significant differences were found. Lower one-year mortality was found for IMN compared with SHS for stable fractures (HRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96; p = 0.007), and unstable fractures (HRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.98; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

This national register-based study indicates a lower reoperation rate for IMN than SHS for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, but not for stable fractures or individual fracture types. The choice of implant may not be decisive to the outcome of treatment for stable trochanteric fractures in terms of reoperation rate. One-year mortality rate for unstable and stable fractures was lower in patients treated with IMN. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):274-282.

Selection of internal fixation method for femoral intertrochanteric fractures using a finite element method

BACKGROUND

Failure to fix unstable intertrochanteric fractures impairs return to daily activities.

AIM

To simulate five different internal fixation methods for unstable proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS

A three-dimensional model of the femur was established from sectional computed tomography images, and an internal fixation model was established. Finite element analysis of the femur model was established, and three intertrochanteric fracture models, medial defect, lateral defect, and medial-lateral defects, were simulated. Displacement and stress distribution after fixation with a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA), integrated dual-screw fixation (ITN), PFNA + wire, PFNA + plate, and PFNA + wire + plate were compared during daily activities.

RESULTS

The maximum displacement and stress of PFNA and ITN were 3.51 mm/473 MPa and 2.80 mm/588 MPa for medial defects; 2.55 mm/288 MPa and 2.10 mm/307 MPa for lateral defects; and 3.84 mm/653 MPa and 3.44 mm/641 MPa for medial-lateral defects, respectively. For medial-lateral defects, reconstructing the medial side alone changed the maximum displacement and stress to 2.79 mm/515 MPa; reconstructing the lateral side changed them to 3.72 mm/608 MPa, when both sides were reconstructed, they changed to 2.42 mm/309 MPa.

CONCLUSION

For medial defects, intramedullary fixation would allow early low-intensity rehabilitation exercise, and ITN rather than PFNA reduces the risk of varus and cut-out; for lateral wall defects or weakness, intramedullary fixation allows higher-intensity rehabilitation exercise, and ITN reduces the risk of varus. For both medial and lateral defects, intramedullary fixation alone will not allow early functional exercise, but locating lateral or medial reconstruction will. For defects in both the inner and outer sides, if reconstruction cannot be completed, ITN is more stable.

Benefit of lag screw placement by a single- or two-screw nailing system in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of two intramedullary fixation devices, the INTERTAN nail and Gamma3 nail, for treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

In total, 165 elderly patients underwent treatment for AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 (INTERTAN group, n = 79; Gamma3 group, n = 86). All patients underwent radiological and clinical investigations and were followed up for an average of 12 months. Age, sex, fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The surgical time was significantly shorter and the intraoperative blood loss volume was significantly lower in the Gamma3 than INTERTAN group (58.2 ± 2.5 vs. 81.7 ± 14.2 minutes and 170 ± 29 vs. 220 ± 16 mL, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in the reduction quality, hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris hip score, postoperative complications, or 1-year postoperative mortality.

Conclusion

Both INTERTAN and Gamma3 nails may be effective for surgical treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. However, the Gamma3 nail was superior to the INTERTAN nail in terms of surgical time and intraoperative blood loss.

Distal locking of short cephalomedullary nails decreases varus collapse in unstable intertrochanteric fractures - a biomechanical analysis

INTRODUCTION

Peritrochanteric fractures are a growing problem and complications relating to operative fixation of these fracture, including varus collapse and screw cutout, are common in elderly osteoporotic patients. We hypothesize that unlocked nails will demonstrate increased varus collapse and inferior construct stiffness in specimens with increased diaphyseal medullary diameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen non-cadaveric osteoporotic biomechanical femur specimens were utilized in this study, with eight specimens having an artificially large femoral canal to represent Dorr C femurs. All femurs were instrumented with a short cephalomedullary nail with and without distal cross-lock screw fixation and had an unstable intertrochanteric fracture created in a repeatable pattern. Specimens underwent cyclic compression to a maximal load of 1000N with segmental motion quantified through the use of visual tracking markers. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis to determine differences between specific groups. Significance was defined as p<0.05.

RESULTS

Unlocked short cephalomedullary nails showed increased varus collapse due to motion of the nail within the femoral canal in capacious femoral canals compared with narrow femoral canals and distally cross-locked nails. The coronal deformation of the wide canal unlocked group (17.9 ^o±2.6^o) was significantly greater in the varus direction than any other fixation under compressive load of 1000N. There was no significant difference in varus angulation between the wide canal or narrow canal locked groups (11.1^o±8.7^o vs. 8.2^o±1.7^o respectively, p=0.267). The narrow canal unlocked group (13.7^o±2.4^o) showed significantly greater varus angulation than the narrow canal locked (p=0.015). The wide canal unlocked group showed significantly greater varus angulation than the wide canal locked group (p=0.003). Motion between the femoral shaft and the cephalomedullary nail (toggling of the nail within the shaft) was significantly greater in narrow or wide canal unlocked specimens, 7.94^o±2.13^o and 10.2^o±1.7^o respectively, than in the narrow or wide canal locked specimens, 2.4^o±0.2^o and 4.2^o±0.5^o respectively (p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Unlocked short intramedullary fixation for unstable peritrochanteric fractures results in increased varus collapse under axial compression. This study supports the use of distal cross-locking of short intramedullary fixation for unstable peritrochanteric fractures in patients with capacious femoral canals secondary to osteoporosis who might otherwise be as risk for varus collapse, device failure, and malunion.