Optimizing Long-Term Outcomes and Avoiding Failure With the Fibula Intramedullary Nail

Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plate Fixation of Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an update of the recent literature comparing clinical outcomes of surgically treated fibular fractures using intramedullary nailing (IMN) with open reduction and internal plate fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

A literature search reporting clinical outcomes after IMN or ORIF of the distal fibula was conducted on PubMed. Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies; studies focusing on clinical outcomes after IMN or IMN and ORIF published before May 11, 2022; studies with at least 5 patients; and studies reporting union rates, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes such as American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Olerud-Molander scores.

RESULTS

Of 2,394 studies identified, a total of 29 studies (4 LOE-I, 2 LOE-II, 6 LOE-III, 17 LOE-IV) were included consisting of 1,850 IMN patients and 514 plate patients. The pooled mean age of IMN patients was 58 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 62, I2 = 42%) versus 57 years (95% CI, 53 to 62, I2 = 49%) in ORIF. Union rates for IMN patients revealed a 99% union rate (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.00, I2 = 20%) versus 97% union rate for ORIF patients (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99, I2 = 0%). Studies that compared IMN with ORIF revealed no difference in union rates (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.02, I2 = 0%). IMN patients showed a 15% complication rate (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.23, I2 = 89%), whereas plate patients had a complication rate of 30% (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.46, I2 = 63%). When comparing studies with both treatments, IMN patients had a significantly lower risk of complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.82, I2 = 50%). The IMN group trended toward a higher mean AOFAS and Olerud-Molander score than the plate group by 4.53 (95% CI, -14.58 to 23.65, I2 = 85%) and 3.54 (95% CI, -2.32 to 9.41, I2 = 76%) points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current literature reveals near equivalence in union rates and a markedly lower risk of complications when comparing IMN with plate fixation. While IMN patients had higher AOFAS and Olerud-Molander scores, these differences were not statistically significant. Notably, subgroup analyses indicated that rates of symptomatic implant and removal of implant were comparable between IMN and ORIF, which may indicate that wound-related complications were reduced in the minimally invasive IMN technique. While the high cost of IMN implants remains a barrier to their widespread adoption, the long-term benefits of reducing complications, specifically associated with wound complications in high-risk populations, may greatly improve quality of care for patients with distal fibula fractures. Additional research and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to fully assess the long-term benefits and economic feasibility of using IMN fixation for distal fibula fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Current concepts in ankle fractures

Ankle fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries. Operative management is performed in unstable ankle fracture patterns to restore the stability and native kinematics of the ankle mortise and minimize the risk of post-traumatic degenerative changes. In this study, we review current concepts in ankle fracture management, including posterior malleolus fixation, syndesmosis fixation, deltoid ligament repair, fibular nailing, and early weightbearing, from both a biomechanical and clinical perspective.

Can CT-based assessment of lateral malleolus anatomy indicate when and how to perform an intramedullary fixation in distal fibula fractures? An analysis of 150 ankles

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to analyse the lateral malleolus morphology with a focus on the shape of the distal fibula for IM fixation of the fibula in infra- and transsyndesmotic fracture patterns. The secondary aim was to propose a treatment algorithm according to the lateral malleolar anatomy.

METHODS

77 healthy, skeletally mature volunteers underwent CT scanning of the ankle. The fibula medullary canal and its cortical thickness were quantitatively analysed at 4 different levels measured from the fibular tip (1.5 cm, 3.0 cm, 4.5 cm, and 6.0 cm). A geometric classification was proposed, and a decision algorithm was developed. Statistical significance was set at a p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

The smallest diameter of the medullary canal of the fibula was at 6.0 cm from the tip of the fibula, in 98.2% of the ankles. The distal fibula can be classified into triangular and rectangular type, according to the cortical thickness index (p < 0.0001). In 16.7% ankles, the internal diameter of the fibula at 6.0 cm was equal or narrower than 3.5 mm (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The shape of the distal fibula as evaluated by CT-guided analysis allows for IM osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus in 83% of individuals. In our study, the smallest diameter of the medullary canal of the fibula was located 6.0 cm from the tip of the lateral malleolus. Coronal CT evaluation is advantageous in indicating which type of IM implant should be used safely for infra- and transsyndesmotic fracture patterns, potentially reducing intraoperative risks.

Fibula Nail versus Locking Plate Fixation-A Biomechanical Study

In the treatment of ankle fractures, complications such as wound healing problems following open reduction and internal fixation are a major problem. An innovative alternative to this procedure offers a more minimally invasive nail stabilization. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to clarify whether this method was biomechanically comparable to the established method. First, the stability (range of motion, diastasis) and rotational stiffness of the native upper ankle were evaluated in eight pairs of native geriatric specimens. Subsequently, an unstable ankle fracture was created and fixed with a locking plate or a nail in a pairwise manner. The ankles showed significantly less stability and rotational stiffness properties after nail and plate fixations than the corresponding native ankles (p < 0.001 for all parameters). When comparing the two methods, both showed no differences in their range of motion (p = 0.694) and diastasis (p = 0.166). The nail also presented significantly greater rotational stiffness compared to the plate (p = 0.001). However, both fixations remained behind the native stability and rotational stiffness. Due to the comparable biomechanical properties of the nail and plate fixations, an early weight-bearing following nail fixation should be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the severity of fractures.

Can Locked Fibula Nail Replace Plate Fixation for Treatment of Acute Ankle Fracture? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The standard surgical treatment for unstable ankle fractures involves open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates. However, ORIF has been associated with several complications, such as soft tissue irritation, wound infection, and nerve injury. Previous studies have shown that closed reduction and internal fixation with locked intramedullary nails (LIMNs) yields satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of ankle fractures and is associated with low complication rates. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is imperative to provide evidence on whether or not LIMN fixation is comparable to or superior than traditional ORIF. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 4 randomized controlled trials involving 359 participants who suffered ankle fractures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that the LIMN fixation group was statistically significant in terms of functional outcomes at the 3-month follow-up and wound-related complications. There was no statistical advantage for patients in the LIMN fixation group in terms of nonwound-related complications, total complications, or mid-term follow-up functional outcomes. There was no statistical difference between the LIMN and ORIF groups regarding operation time and quality of reduction. We believe LIMN fixation is a viable option for the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in both young and elderly individuals.

Percutaneous Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures in Patients With Unstable Ankle Fractures Treated With a Fibular Intramedullary Nail: A Description of a Technique and Review of Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To (1) describe the percutaneous technique used to reduce and fix a posterior malleolar fracture with anteroposterior screws in patients managed with a fibular intramedullary nail, (2) describe the selection of patients to whom this technique can be applied, and (3) report the clinical and patient reported outcome of this intervention.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic orthopaedic trauma center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 65 years (range, 39-90) over a thirteen-year period identified from a prospective database.

INTERVENTION

Unstable ankle fractures managed surgically with a fibular nail and percutaneous fixation of the posterior malleolar component.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary short-term outcome was complications related to posterior malleolar fracture fixation. The primary mid-term outcome was the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score. Secondary outcomes included the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, EuroQol-5D, health, pain, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Thirty of the 32 (94%) posterior malleolar fractures united uneventfully. Postoperative loss of talar reduction occurred in 2 patients (6.3%), which in 1 patient (3.1%) eventually required a hindfoot nail arthrodesis. There were no soft-tissue complications related to the anteroposterior screws or the fibular nail fixation. At a mean follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 1-8), the median Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, EuroQol-5D, health, pain, and satisfaction scores were 80.0, 23.4, 0.85, 80.0, 85.0, and 87.5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous ankle fracture fixation with a fibular nail and posterior malleolar screws results in reliable fracture stabilization, good patient outcomes, and high treatment satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Two-Center, International Trial Comparing the Fibular Nail With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Unstable Ankle Fractures in Younger Patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome of fibular nailing with plate fixation for unstable fractures of the ankle in a cohort of patients under the age of 65 years.

SETTING

2 international university trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred twenty-five patients who were 18-64 years of age with an acute unstable fracture of the ankle were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to fixation with a fibular nail (n = 63) or plate (n = 62) and were reviewed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was the Olerud and Molander score at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were the rates of complications and reinterventions.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the 2 groups with respect to the primary outcome measure [mean Olerud and Molander score 78.4 in the nail group vs. 80.2 in the plate group (P = 0.621)]. Wound infections occurred in 2 patients who were treated with a nail and 9 patients who were treated with a plate, but this did not reach statistical significance. No difference was seen in the overall rate of complications and reinterventions between groups [28.6% in the nail group vs. 29% in the plate group (P = 0.955)].

CONCLUSIONS

In younger patients with ankle fractures, no difference was found in the patient-reported outcome between fibular nail and plate fixation at 1 year after surgery. The fibular nail is an effective and safe option for the stabilization of ankle fractures in younger patients, although the benefits associated with reduced wound complications are not as apparent as for elderly patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mathematical Modelling of Destabilization Stress Factors of Stable-Elastic Fixation of Distal Trans- and Suprasyndesmotic Fibular Fractures

Introduction

Specification of possible stress factors destabilizing the fibula stable osteosynthesis by the intramedullary nail with distal blocking and elastic fixation of distal syndesmosis by the thread with endobuttons by mathematical modelling of distal unstable ankle injuries. Material and Methods. We studied the thread tension during the combined stable-elastic fixation of unstable injuries of the ankle joint in cross-syndesmosis fractures of the fibula (B, C Danis–Weber classification), which includes a one-time stable minimally invasive fixation with the intramedullary nail and elastic fixation by the thread with endobuttons. We used a titanium alloy for the intramedullary nail and polyester for the thread. The deformed state was studied using the methods of mechanics.

Results

A model of a fractured fibula blocked with the intramedullary nail and fixed with the elastic thread was developed. A formulation to specify the rational tension forces of the elastic thread depending on the parameters of the fibula and intramedullary blocking nail and on the location of the bone injury was obtained. The effect of foot rotation on the thread tension was investigated. The results of theoretical research should be implemented in medical practice.

Conclusions

A mathematical model of the damaged fibula blocked by the intramedullary nail and fixed with the elastic thread was developed. Dependences for calculation of tension of the fixing thread were obtained. A slight increase in thread tension during foot rotation was found.

Midterm Outcomes of Unstable Ankle Fractures in Young Patients Treated by Closed Reduction and Fixation With an Intramedullary Fibular Nail vs Open Reduction Internal Fixation Using a Lateral Locking Plate

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare midterm radiological and clinical outcomes between closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) using the fibular intramedullary nail (IMN) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using the locking plate for the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in active young patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 204 patients treated with CRIF using the fibular IMN (94 patients) or ORIF using the locking plate (110 patients) were included after at least 3 years of follow-up. The mean patient age was 41.4 years. Radiographic evaluation included the quality of reduction assessed by plain radiography and 3-dimensional (3D)-reconstructed computed tomography as well as the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the ankle assessed by weightbearing plain radiography. Clinical evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score, Olerud and Molander Score, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and visual analog scale pain score as well as complications.

RESULTS

At median follow-up greater than 4 years, we found no significant differences in measured clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. There were significantly fewer postoperative complications in the IMN group than in the ORIF group (9.5% vs 39%, P < .001). However, we did find a greater proportion of radiographically fair or poor reductions in the IMN group than in the ORIF group (P < .001). The poor reductions in the IMN group were primarily related to Weber type C, pronation-type injury, and comminuted fibular and trimalleolar fractures (P < .001). PTOA was also more frequently observed in the IMN group than in the ORIF group (21.3% vs 9.1%, P = .024).

CONCLUSION

Given the current prevailing technologies for fracture fixation, this study suggests that surgeons should consider ORIF for unstable ankle fractures in active young patients with Weber type C, pronation-type injury, and comminuted fibular and trimalleolar fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Current management of trimalleolar ankle fractures

A trimalleolar ankle fracture is considered unstable and treatment is generally performed operatively. Computed tomography is important for the operative planning by providing an elaborated view of the posterior malleolus.

Trimalleolar ankle fractures have a rising incidence in the last decade with up to 40 per 100,000 people per year. With a growing number of elderly patients, trimalleolar ankle injuries will become more relevant in the form of fragility fractures, posing a particular challenge for trauma surgeons.

In patients with osteoporotic trimalleolar ankle fractures and relevant concomitant conditions, further evidence is awaited to specify indications for open reduction and internal fixation or primary transfixation of the ankle joint.

In younger, more demanding patients, arthroscopic-assisted surgery might improve the outcome, but future research is required to identify patients who will benefit from assisted surgical care.

This review considers current scientific findings regarding all three malleoli to understand the complexity of trimalleolar ankle injuries and provide the reader with an overview of treatment strategies and research, as well as future perspectives.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:692-703. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200138

Fibular Rod Osteosynthesis in Ankle Fractures With Compromised Soft Tissue

BACKGROUND

Complications after plate and screw fixation of ankle fractures are frequently reported in the literature, with a higher rate in patients with advanced age, comorbidities, and poor skin conditions. A reduced complication rate has been reported with intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the fibula; however, the indication has been based on the surgeon's preferences. We report the results after IMN in patients with compromised soft tissue exclusively.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients with 72 distal fibula fractures were included in this retrospective study. Information about medical history, the ankle injury, treatment, and complications were collected from the medical records. Additionally, the preinjury and 6-week follow-up radiographs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Postoperative information was available for a minimum of 4.3 years postoperatively or until death. In all, 10 patients had complications related to the nail and required secondary surgery. These included 6 symptomatic hardware issues, 2 construct failures, 1 deep infection, and 1 combined deep infection and construct failure.

CONCLUSIONS

After IMN of the fibula, 14% of the patients required reoperation. Our results support the previous literature suggesting IMN as an acceptable surgical alternative where the risk of complications with plate and screw fixation is considered too high. Compromised soft tissue is one important indication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Case series without control.

Nontraditional Methods of Fibula Fixation

This article explores different nontraditional methods that could be adopted in clinical settings as alternatives to the traditional fibular fixation. Less invasive methods, such as intramedullary nail and screw fixation, might be viable alternatives for managing ankle fractures. These methods might especially benefit patients with poor soft tissue envelopes, low immunity, and poor bone quality. There is minimal soft tissue coverage for most orthopedic implants around the ankle. Various authors have highlighted the importance of minimally invasive surgery as an effective modality for ensuring superior prognosis for ankle fracture surgery or those fractures involving both the distal tibia and fibula.

[Minimally invasive fixation of distal fibular fractures with intramedullary nailing]

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of distal fibula fractures serves as a biomechanically stable and soft-tissue-friendly fixation method in the case of an unstable fracture, poor bone quality, and/or critical soft tissue conditions with restoration of the length, axis and rotation of the distal fibula as well as stabilization of the ankle mortise. The goal is to reduce and stabilize the distal fibular fracture in a quick and stable manner that protects the soft tissues in ankle fractures.

INDICATIONS

Unstable malleolar fractures and fracture dislocations; fibular fractures in combination with distal tibia fractures; critical soft tissue conditions around the ankle.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

No consent to surgery by the patient. Overall critical (life-threatening) general condition preventing surgery to the extremities. Very narrow medullary canal of the fibula (less than 3 mm, depending on the implant).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Percutaneous placement of a guidewire into the distal fibular tip, opening the medullary canal and drilling the medullary canal in the distal fragment. Reduction of the axis by introduction of the fibular nail, with additional percutaneous use of reduction clamps for restoration of fibular length and rotation, if necessary. Placement of distal locking screws over the targeting device while maintaining rotation and length, in addition proximal static locking is mandatory to maintain the length of the fibula. In case of residual syndesmotic instability after fracture fixation, syndesmotic screws are inserted through the fibular nail via the aiming device.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Following surgery, rest and elevation of the injured leg, and local cooling are indicated. Subsequently, mobilization with partial weight bearing (15-20 kg) in an ankle foot orthosis or plaster/cast for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Minimally invasive fibular fixation with an intramedullary nail results in a significantly lower rate of wound healing complications compared with lateral plating. Reported union rates range from 97.4 to 100% with current nail designs. The quality of reduction and functional outcome is comparable to that after plate fixation. A certain learning curve has to be respected.

Complications after fibula intramedullary nail fixation of pilon versus ankle fractures

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of the fibula in malleolar ankle fractures has been shown to result in less wound complications then plate fixation. Therefore, IMN fibula fixation may also be associated with lower rates of wound complications when used for higher-risk pilon fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare complications of fibula IMN fixation in pilon versus malleolar ankle fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort comparison was performed at an urban level one trauma center involving fibula fractures in 47 patients with AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 43 fractures and 48 patients with AO/OTA type 44 fractures being treated with fibula IMN fixation. Complications, fibula-specific complications, revision surgeries, and implant removals were reviewed.

RESULTS

There was no detectable difference in complications (27% vs. 23%, 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio (CIOR) 0.5 to 3.2), fibular-specific complications (6% vs. 10%, CIOR 0.1 to 3.5), revision surgeries (4% vs. 4%, CIOR 0.1 to 7.5), or symptomatic fibula implant removals (13% vs. 21%, CIOR 0.1 to 1.6) between pilon and ankle fracture groups, respectively. There was one (2%) fibular nonunion and one wound complication (2%) in each of the fracture groups.

CONCLUSION

Fibula IMN fixation of pilon versus ankle fractures resulted in a similar number of complications. Comparative studies of fibula IMN and plate fixation are necessary to determine if the benefits of fibula IMN in ankle fractures extends to pilon fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort.

The Fibular Intramedullary Nail Versus Locking Plate and Lag Screw Fixation in the Management of Unstable Elderly Ankle Fractures: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison

OBJECTIVES

To compare the biomechanical failure properties of the fibular intramedullary nail with locking plate and lag screw fixation in the management of unstable elderly distal fibular fractures.

METHODS

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs (6 matched-pairs) were studied. A simulated OTA/AO 44-B fracture was created, then randomly allocated within each pair to intramedullary nail or locking plate fixation supplemented with an interfragmentary lag screw. The limbs were secured with the foot rigidly held in 20 degrees of supination, loaded to 700N and subjected to progressive external rotation until failure.

RESULTS

The mean specimen age was 86.5 years (61-97). Mean torque to failure was greater in the intramedullary nail group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.5 N·m vs. 21.6 N·m; P = 0.463). The nail failed at a significantly greater angle of rotation compared with plate fixation (66.5 degrees vs. 53.3 degrees; P = 0.046). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to construct stiffness (P = 0.673) or energy absorbed (P = 0.075). The locking plate specimens failed through plate and screw construct pull off at the implant-bone interface. In contrast, the intramedullary nail specimens failed at the lateral ligament complex, whereas the fracture-implant construct remained intact.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation have similar biomechanical characteristics when tested to failure. The benefits of the minimally invasive surgery offered by the intramedullary nail make it an attractive implant in the management of these patients.

Safety and efficacy of surgical fixation of fibula fractures using an intramedullary nail: a retrospective observational cohort study in 30 patients

Background

Open reduction and internal fixation remains the standard treatment for displaced unstable ankle fractures. Plate fixation represents the most frequently used instrumentation option in fibula fractures and favourable outcomes have been reported. Recently, intramedullary nailing techniques have been suggested as a viable alternative resulting in less soft tissue disruption. The objectives of this study are to describe the surgical technique and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using an intramedullary nail in patients undergoing surgical fixation of their fibula fracture.

Methods

A total of 30 skeletally mature patients with unstable ankle fracture who underwent intramedullary fixation of their fibula fractures from February 2016 to July 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were evaluated using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) at 18 months after surgery.

Results

All patients went on to fracture union. Two patients required a secondary surgical procedure. No patient included in this series developed any wound complications. The mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 was 53.90 ± 13.3 and the mean Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) was 52.63 ± 11.12. The AOFAS subscale scores were 34.67 ± 1.03 for pain, 42.40 ± 0.2997 for function and 9.50 ± 0.2785 for alignment.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates promising outcomes associated with intramedullary nail fixation of unstable fibula fractures. We recommend intramedullary nail fixation of fibula fractures to be a safe procedure with a low complication rate.

Level of evidence

Level 4 retrospective case series.