Effect of Nail Size, Insertion, and Δ Canal-Nail on the Development of a Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures

Forward-striking technique in simple femoral shaft fractures: a comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

A persistent fracture gap following femoral nailing increases the risk of delayed and nonunion development. A forward-striking technique for reducing the gap in femoral nailing has been described, but its efficacy and therapeutic consequences have not been investigated in comparative studies. We provide the results of a comparative study that investigated the forward-striking technique's efficacy in terms of remaining fracture gaps and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2022, a retrospective cohort study was undertaken on 193 skeletal mature patients obtaining reamed femoral nailing for closed femoral shaft fractures. Comparisons of residual fracture gaps, timing to union, complications and re-operation rates were made between 80 patients (41.45%) undergoing femoral nailing with the forward striking procedure and 113 patients (58.55%) undergoing traditional nailing, accompanied by minimal 1-year follow-ups. In addition, the potential difference between fracture gaps before and after applying the forward striking procedure was compared.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar age, sex, presence of diabetes, smoking status, body mass index and time to surgery. However, the forward-striking group demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative complications, including delayed, nonunion, and the need for re-operation. Conversely, no significant differences were found in time to union (p = 0.222). The forward-striking procedure can significantly reduce residual fracture gaps from 3.99 to 1.66 mm (p < 0.001). No major complications in the forward-striking group including nonunion were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the forward-striking technique effectively reduces residual fracture gap during femoral nailing. The technique not only could be easily performed but is also reproducible. In addition, it can lower the risk of delayed union, nonunion and obviates the necessity for re-operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

A Scoring System for Predicting Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Femoral shaft nonunion negatively affects patient quality of life. Although multiple risk factors have been identified for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, there is no quantitative model for predicting nonunion.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

The study is a retrospective cohort study of patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at two level one trauma centers who were followed to fracture union or nonunion. Patient, injury, and surgical characteristics were analyzed to create a quantitative model for nonunion risk after intramedullary nailing.

METHODS

Eight hundred one patients aged 18 years and older with femoral shaft fractures treated with reamed, locked IMNs were identified. Risk factors including demographics, comorbidities, surgical variables, and injury-related characteristics were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was conducted, and several variables were included in a scoring system to predict nonunion risk.

RESULTS

The overall nonunion rate was 7.62% (61/801). Multivariate analysis showed significant association among pulmonary injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19, P = 0.022), open fracture (OR=2.36, P = 0.02), current smoking (OR=3.05, P < 0.001), postoperative infection (OR=12.1, P = 0.007), AO/OTA fracture pattern type A or B (OR=0.43, P = 0.014), and percent cortical contact obtained intraoperatively ≥25% (OR=0.41, P = 0.021) and nonunion. The scoring system created to quantitatively stratify nonunion risk showed that a score of 3 or more yielded an OR of 6.38 for nonunion (c-statistic = 0.693, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral shaft nonunion risk is quantifiable based on several independent injury, patient, and surgical factors. This scoring system is an additional tool for clinical decision making when caring for patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with IMNs.

Mechanical evaluation of revision surgery for femoral shaft nonunion initially treated with intramedullary nailing: Exchange nailing versus augmentation plating

INTRODUCTION

Exchange nailing (EN) or augmentation plating (AP) has been employed to treat nonunions after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. Although instability is a factor in hypertrophic nonunion, mechanical evaluations have been limited because the contribution of the callus to fracture site stability varies with healing. Our previous study illustrated the potential for evaluation using a finite element analysis (FEA) that incorporates callus material properties. This study aimed to mechanically evaluate revision surgery for nonunions using FEA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A quantitative computed tomography-based FEA was performed on virtual revision models of a patient with suspected nonunion after intramedullary nailing. In addition to the initial nailing model (IN) with an 11-mm diameter (D) and 360-mm length (L), four EN models with D12mm (EN1), D13mm (EN2), D12mm-L400mm (EN3), and D13mm-L400mm (EN4) nails and three AP models with 5- (AP1), 6- (AP2), and 7-hole (AP3) plates were created. As with bone, callus was assigned inhomogeneous material properties derived from density based on an empirical formula. The hip joint reaction force and muscle forces at maximum load during the gait cycle were applied. The volume ratio of the callus at the fracture site with a tensile failure risk of ≥1 (tensile failure ratio) and bone fragment movement were evaluated.

RESULTS

The tensile failure ratio was 11.6 % (IN), 10.1 % (EN1), 6.3 % (EN2), 10.9 % (EN3), 6.2 % (EN4), 6.4 % (AP1), 7.2 % (AP2), and 7.7 % (AP3), respectively. The bone fragment movement showed an opening on the lateral side with the initial intramedullary nailing. However, both revision surgeries reduced the opening, leading to compression except in the EN1 model. The proximal bone fragments were internally rotated relative to the distal fragments, and the rotational instability was more suppressed in models with lower tensile failure ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

For EN, the increase in diameter, not length, is important to suppress instability. AP reduces instability, comparable to a 2 mm increase in nail diameter, and screw fixation closer to the fracture site reduces instability. This study suggest that AP is mechanically equivalent to EN and could be an option for revision surgery for femoral shaft nonunions.

Risk factors and healthcare costs associated with long bone fracture non-union: a retrospective US claims database analysis

BACKGROUND

Few contemporary US-based long bone non-union analyses have recently been published. Our study was designed to provide a current understanding of non-union risks and costs, from the payers' perspective.

METHODS

The Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used. Patients with surgically treated long bone (femur, tibia, or humerus) fractures in the inpatient setting, from Q4 2015 to most recent, were identified. Exclusion criteria included polytrauma and amputation at index. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of non-union in the 12 and 24 months post-index. Additional outcomes included concurrent infection, reoperation, and total healthcare costs. Age, gender, comorbidities, fracture characteristics, and severity were identified for all patients. Descriptive analyses were performed. Crude and adjusted rates of non-union (using Poisson regressions with log link) were calculated. Marginal incremental cost of care associated with non-union and infected non-union and reoperation were estimated using a generalized linear model with log link and gamma distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 12,770, 13,504, and 4,805 patients with femoral, tibial, or humeral surgically treated fractures were identified, 74-89% were displaced, and 18-27% were comminuted. Two-year rates of non-union reached 8.5% (8.0%-9.1%), 9.1% (8.6%-9.7%), and 7.2% (6.4%-8.1%) in the femoral, tibial, and humeral fracture cohorts, respectively. Shaft fractures were at increased risk of non-union versus fractures in other sites (risk ratio (RR) in shaft fractures of the femur: 2.36 (1.81-3.04); tibia: 1.95 (1.47-2.57); humerus: 2.02 (1.42-2.87)). Fractures with severe soft tissue trauma (open vs. closed, Gustilo III vs. Gustilo I-II) were also at increased risk for non-union (RR for Gustilo III fracture (vs. closed) for femur: R = 1.96 (1.45-2.58), for tibia: 3.33 (2.85-3.87), RR for open (vs. closed) for humerus: 1.74 (1.30-2.32)). For all fractures, younger patients had a reduced risk of non-union compared to older patients. For tibial fractures, increasing comorbidity (Elixhauser Index 5 or greater) was associated with an increased risk of non-union. The two-year marginal cost of non-union ranged from $33K-$45K. Non-union reoperation added $16K-$34K in incremental costs. Concurrent infection further increased costs by $46K-$86K.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-union affects 7-10% of surgically treated long bone fracture cases. Shaft and complex fractures were at increased risk for non-union.

Predictors of nonunion for transverse femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing: a SIGN database study

Introduction

Nonunion is a common postfracture complication resulting in decreased quality of life for patients in resource-limited settings. This study aims to determine how age, sex, injury mechanism, and surgical intervention affect the rate of nonunion in transverse femur fractures treated with a SIGN intramedullary nail (IMN).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using the SIGN online surgical database. All patients older than 16 years with simple transverse (<30 degrees), open or closed, femur fractures treated using a SIGN IMN between 2007 and 2021 were included. Our primary outcome of nonunion was measured with the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (mRUST); scores ≤9 of 16 defined nonunion. The secondary outcome was squat depth. Outcomes were evaluated at follow-up appointments between 240 and 365 days postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used for statistical comparison.

Results

Inclusion criteria were met for 182 patients. The overall radiographic union rate was 61.0%, and a high proportion (84.4%) of patients could squat with their hips at or below the level of their knees. Older age, retrograde approach, and fracture distraction were associated with nonunion, but sex, injury mechanism, and other surgical variables were not.

Conclusion

Poor reduction with fracture distraction was associated with a higher rate of nonunion. Loss of follow-up may have contributed to our overall union rate; however, we observed high rates of functional healing using the SIGN IMN.

Level of evidence

IV.

Retrograde Nailing for Extremely Proximal Fractures of the Femoral Shaft

OBJECTIVES

To report the results of retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) for the treatment of extremely proximal femur fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

63 patients with femoral shaft fractures involving the anatomic region within 10 centimeters of the inferior border of the lesser trochanter, which were treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing.

INTERVENTION

Retrograde intramedullary femoral nail.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to union, nonunion, malunion, and unplanned reoperation.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2020, 63 fractures were followed up to fracture union, reoperation, or a minimum of 1 year clinically. The mean follow-up was 32 months, and 48 (76%) of the patients were followed up beyond 1 year clinically. The mean patient age was 34 years (range 18-84 years), and the mean BMI was 27 (range 14-45) kg/m 2 . Forty (64%) patients were polytraumatized. Clinical and radiographic union was achieved in 59 (94%) fractures after index operation at a mean time to union of 22 weeks (range 9-51 weeks). Delayed union requiring nail dynamization occurred in 1 (2%) instance. Malreduction was noted in 1 (2%) patient with a 12-degree flexion deformity that resulted in nonunion. In total, there were 3 (5%) nonunions requiring revision surgery, 1 treated with retrograde exchange nailing and 2 revised to cephalomedullary nails; all were united after revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrograde intramedullary nailing can be an effective treatment strategy for extremely proximal femur fractures when necessary. Our series demonstrated a high rate of union and a low rate of malalignment and complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is Nail-Canal Diameter Discordance a Risk Factor for the Excessive Sliding of Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery?

Background and Objectives:: There were limited studies which investigated nail diameter as a predictor for cephalomedullary nail (CMN) failure in intertrochanteric fracture (ITF). We aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of CMN in fragility ITF following nail-canal (N-C) diameter discordance. Materials and Methods: From November 2010 to March 2022, we retrospectively reviewed 120 consecutive patients who underwent CMN surgeries due to fragility ITF. We included patients with acceptable reduction and a tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm. The N-C diameter differences both in anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral-view X-rays were measured, and we compared the number of excessive sliding instances and the rate of implant failure between the N-C concordance (≤3 mm) and discordance (>3 mm) group. Simple linear regression was used to determine the strength of the relationship between the N-C difference and sliding distance. Results: The sliding distance showed no differences between the groups in the AP (3.6 vs. 3.3 mm, p = 0.75) and lateral view (3.5 vs. 3.4 mm, p = 0.91). For analyses in the AP view, the AP-concordance and AP-discordance groups had 14 (25%) and 14 patients (22%) with a sliding distance of >5 mm (p = 0.69), while treatment failure occurred in 3 (5%) and 3 (3%) patients, respectively (p = 0.66). For analyses in the lateral view, the lat-concordance and lat-discordance groups had 8 (27%) and 20 patients (22%) with a sliding distance of >5 mm (p = 0.62), while treatment failure occurred in 1 (3%) and 4 (4%) patients, respectively (p = 1.00). Linear regression analyses showed that the N-C difference in either views was not a significant predictor of sliding distance in both the AP (R² = 0.002, p = 0.60) and lateral views (R² = 0.007, p = 0.35). Conclusions: If appropriate fracture reduction and fixation are achieved, the N-C discordance of short CMN does not affect treatment outcomes in ITF.

A multicenter study of factors affecting nonunion by radiographic analysis after intramedullary nailing in segmental femoral shaft fractures

The factors affecting the outcomes of segmental femoral shaft fractures are currently unknown. We evaluated the outcomes of intramedullary (IM) nail fixation and investigated factors affecting nonunion of femoral shaft segmental fractures. A total of 38 patients who underwent IM nail fixation for femoral shaft segmental fractures (AO/OTA 32C2) at three university hospitals with a minimum 1-year follow-up period were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into union (n = 32) and nonunion (n = 6) groups. We analyzed smoking status, diabetes mellitus, location of the segmental fragment, segment comminution, filling of the IM nail in the medullary canal, residual gap at the fracture site, use of a cerclage wire or blocking screws as factors that may affect the surgical outcome. In the union group, the average union time was 5.4 months (4-9 months). In the nonunion group, five patients required additional surgery within an average of 7.2 months (5-10 months) postoperatively, whereas one patient remained asymptomatic and did not require further intervention. On comparing the two groups, insufficient canal filling of the IM nail (union, 25.0%; nonunion, 83.3%; p = 0.012) and the presence of a residual gap at the fracture site after reduction (union, 31.3%; nonunion, 83.3%; p = 0.027) were significantly different. In the multivariate analysis, only insufficient canal filling of the IM nail was found to be a factor affecting nonunion, with an odds ratio of 13.3 (p = 0.036). In this study, a relatively high nonunion rate (15.8%) was observed after IM nail fixation. Insufficient IM nail canal filling and a residual gap at the fracture site post reduction were factors affecting segmental femoral shaft fracture nonunion after IM nail fixation.

Does nail size or difference between canal and nail diameter influence likelihood of union or time to union of femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing? A retrospective cohort study

Background

This study aims to determine whether nail size or the difference between canal and nail diameter (CN difference) affects the union rate and time of femoral shaft fracture treated with an interlocking intramedullary nail (IMN).

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 257 patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with IMN at a tertiary trauma medical center. All the IMN inserted were the same (Stryker T2 Femoral Nail). The patients were divided into groups based on nail size (10-, 11-, 12-, or 13-mm) and CN difference (< 1, 1–2, or > 2 mm), and union rate and time to union were compared.

Results

The 10-, 11-, 12-, and 13-mm groups based on nail size had 113, 74, 54, and 16 patients, respectively. The overall union rate was 97% (257/265). No significant differences in union rate or time to union were observed among these 4 groups. The groups based on CN differences of < 1-, 1 to 2, and > 2 mm comprised 143, 79, and 35 patients, respectively. Again, no significant differences were noted in union rate or mean time to union among the groups.

Conclusions

Similar union rate and time to union were observed, regardless of nail size or CN difference. This finding indicates that most simple femoral shaft fractures can be treated with a standard, reamed 10-mm IMN. A larger nail insertion is unnecessary and presents more risks; comparatively, the use of a small nail with less reaming is simpler, requires shorter operative times, results in less blood loss, and is less expensive.

Aseptic femoral nonunion treated with exchange locked nailing with intramedullary augmentation cancellous bone graft

Background

Closed reamed locked intramedullary nailing has been the treatment of choice for most of femoral shaft fractures. A high union rate with a low complication rate is generally predictable. For an aseptic femoral shaft nonunion with a prior inserted intramedullary nail, exchange nailing is one of favored surgical techniques for treatment. However, a greatly varied success rate of 72–100% has been reported. To improve the success rate of exchange femur nailing, a modified bone grafting technique was developed. The purpose of this retrospective study intended to evaluate outcomes of such a revised technique.

Methods

From July 2011 to March 2019, 48 consecutive adult patients (average, 38 years; range, 19–67 years) with aseptic femoral shaft nonunions after intramedullary nailing treatment were studied. All femoral shaft fractures were initially caused by traffic accidents, which were treated by a closed or open intramedullary nailing technique at various hospitals. The current revision treatment was performed after an average of 2.2 years (range 1.1–6.2 years) from initial injuries. In the surgery, the prior nail was removed and the marrow cavity was reamed widely (at least 2 mm as possible). Sufficient cancellous bone grafts harvested on the trochanteric marrow wall from the inside were placed in the marrow cavity of the junction of nonunion fragments. A new 1-mm smaller size locked intramedullary nail was inserted. Whether the dynamic or static mode of nails were used mainly depended on the nonunion level. Postoperatively, protected weight bearing with crutches was allowed for all patients.

Results

Forty-one patients were followed for an average of 2.8 years (85.4%; range, 1.9–4.5 years) and all fractures healed. The union rate was 100% (41/41, p < 0.001) with a union time of an average of 3.4 months (range, 2.5–5.0 months). There were no complications of deep infection, nonunions, malunions, implant failures or an avulsed trochanter tip fracture. The satisfactory knee function improved from 73.2% (30/41) preoperatively to 92.7% (38/41) at the latest follow-up (p = 0.019).

Conclusions

The described modified bone grafting technique may effectively improve a union rate of exchange femur nailing while the surgical procedure is not complicated. It may therefore be used concomitantly in all aseptic femoral shaft nonunions when exchange nailing is performed.

The Butterfly Fragment in Wedge-Shaped Femoral Shaft Fracture: Comparison of Two Different Surgical Methods

Objective

Our study compared the results of wedge‐shaped femoral shaft fracture following intramedullary (IM) nailing with or without fixation of the third fragment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients presenting with femoral shaft fracture with AO/OTA type 32‐B from 2011 to 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: closed reduction without touching the third fragment and open reduction with fixation of the third fragment. The fragment ratio, fragment length, nail size, dynamization or not, mRUST scores, union rate, and union time were compared between the two groups. Risk factors of non‐union were also investigated, including sex, age, fracture pattern, fracture location, dynamization, nail size, fragment ratio, fragment size, and postoperative fragment displacement.

Results

A total of 80 patients met inclusion criteria, 20 patients with wedge‐shaped shaft femoral fracture were managed with IM nailing and open reduction with fixation of the third fragment. Sixty patients were treated with IM nail without touching the third fragment. The union rate for the fixation and non‐fixation groups were 60.0% and 81.7%, respectively. The mean union time for the fixation group was 19 months vs 14 months for the non‐fixation group. Multi‐regression analysis showed larger nail size (odds ratio: 2.26) and fixation of the third fragment (odds ratio: 0.18) influenced fracture healing.

Conclusions

Fixation of the third fragment in wedge‐shaped shaft femoral fracture results in a longer union time and lower union rate. In the management of femoral fracture with a third fragment, a larger nail size is recommended and fixation should be performed in a closed manner. Fixation of the fragment may achieve better fracture reduction. However, disruption of the vasculature and surrounding structures may further result in nonunion of the fracture site.

Weight-bearing status may influence rates of radiographic healing following reamed, intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures

Objective

To investigate the effect of weight-bearing status on radiographic healing of diaphyseal femur fractures.

Design

Retrospective 1:1 matched cohort study.

Setting

Single-level 1 trauma center.

Participants

One-hundred forty-four (N = 154) patients matched 1:1 in non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) groups.

Intervention

Non-weight bearing following reamed, statically locked intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal femur fracture, generally due to concurrent lower extremity fracture.

Main Outcome Measurement

Postoperative radiographic healing using modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia fractures (mRUST) scores.

Results

Groups were well matched on age, sex, race, prevalence of tobacco and alcohol use, diabetes mellitus status, Injury Severity Score, fracture pattern and shaft location, vascular injury, open fracture prevalence, and operative characteristics. Radiographic follow-up was similar between groups (231 vs 228 days, P = .914). At 6 to 8 weeks status post intramedullary fixation, the median mRUST score in the NWB group (9) was lower than that of the WBAT group (10) (mean: 8.4 vs 9.7, P = .004). At 12 to 16 weeks, the median mRUST in the NWB group (10) was again lower than the WBAT group (12) (mean: 9.9 vs 11.7, P = .003). The median number of days to 3 cortices of bridging callous was 85 in the WBAT group, compared with 122 in the NWB group (P = .029). Median time to mRUST scores of 12 (111 vs 162 days, P = .008), 13 (218 vs 278 days, P = .023), and 14 (255 vs 320 days, P = .028) were all longer in the NWB group compared with the WBAT group.

Conclusions

Non-weight bearing after intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures delays radiographic healing, with median time to 3 cortices of bridging callous increased from 85 days in WBAT groups to 122 days in NWB groups. These results provide clinicians with an understanding of the expected postoperative course, as well as further support the need to expeditiously advance weight-bearing status.Level of Evidence: IV.

Do Poller screws effect union in tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing?

INTRODUCTION

Tibial shaft fractures are a commonly encountered challenge presented to orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is often the treatment of choice and whilst effective, complications of delayed and/or non-union can cause significant morbidity and necessitate additional operative procedures. The use of Poller screws during IMN are a recognised way of aiding fracture reduction, however the clinical benefits of this are debated. This study evaluated the outcome of tibial shaft fractures treated with IMN with or without the addition of Poller screws.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing IMN following tibial shaft fractures over a 5-year period. 154 operated tibial shaft fractures were identified, with patients divided into 3 groups - Group 1: IM nailing alone, Group 2: IMN + 1 conventional Poller screw, or Group 3: IMN + 2 Poller screws placed Epicentrically across the fracture site. Data collected included demographics, length of stay, fracture type, position and AO classification grade, operative time, and operating surgeons' grade. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of delayed and/or non-union. Secondary outcomes were differences in rates of infection and additional orthopaedic procedures between the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Overall 139/154 fractures (90.3%) achieved a timely union. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.05) in fracture union between the 3 groups, with 75/88 fractures healing in group 1 (IMN alone) compared to 44/46 in Group 2 (IMN + 1 Poller screw) and 20/20 in group 3 (IMN + 2 Poller screws). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of superficial infection, (p = 0.95) additional procedures (p = 0.23) or deep infection (p = 0.65) between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of Poller screws appear to be a safe and effective adjunct in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures via IMN. Further prospective randomised trials are needed to fully elucidate both the role and potential benefits of Poller screw augmentation in acute lower limb fracture management.

Fatigue Crack Growth and Fracture of Internal Fixation Materials in In Vivo Environments-A Review

The development of crack patterns is a serious problem affecting the durability of orthopedic implants and the prognosis of patients. This issue has gained considerable attention in the medical community in recent years. This literature focuses on the five primary aspects relevant to the evaluation of the surface cracking patterns, i.e., inappropriate use, design flaws, inconsistent elastic modulus, allergic reaction, poor compatibility, and anti-corrosiveness. The hope is that increased understanding will open doors to optimize fabrication for biomedical applications. The latest technological issues and potential capabilities of implants that combine absorbable materials and shape memory alloys are also discussed. This article will act as a roadmap to be employed in the realm of orthopedic. Fatigue crack growth and the challenges associated with materials must be recognized to help make new implant technologies viable for wider clinical adoption. This review presents a summary of recent findings on the fatigue mechanisms and fracture of implant in the initial period after surgery. We propose solutions to common problems. The recognition of essential complications and technical problems related to various approaches and material choices while satisfying clinical requirements is crucial. Additional investigation will be needed to surmount these challenges and reduce the likelihood of fatigue crack growth after implantation.