Inaccuracies in the Use of the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score: A Systematic Literature Review

Operative management of sacroiliac joint dislocation in children with unstable pelvic fractures - A STROBE-compliant investigation

Objective

Injuries involving severe spinal axial loading may be accompanied by sacroiliac joint dislocations. In children, these injuries are relatively rare, and there is little information on their optimal management in young patients. We conducted a multicentre study to investigate the outcome of surgical treatment of unstable pelvic fracture with sacroiliac joint dislocation in children.

Patients & methods

We assessed the quality of surgical reduction and functional outcome at follow-up in 7 patients (5 girls, 2 boys) with a median age of 6.4 years (range: 4.2-14.8 years). Patients with pelvic fractures and sacroiliac joint dislocations were treated at four international paediatric level 1 trauma centres between January 2008 and August 2023. We applied the Matta criteria to assess the quality of fracture reduction and graded the functional follow-up results using adjusted Majeed score.

Results

At follow-up, 3 patients showed excellent fracture reduction, with 2 patients showing good reduction and 2 patients exhibiting fair fracture reduction according to the Matta criteria. At follow-up visits at a median of 12 months (range: 3-84 months) after the injury, patients achieved a median adjusted Majeed score of 76 (range: 63 to 76).

Conclusions

Unstable pelvic injuries with sacroiliac joint dislocation without comminution can be stabilised with a single iliosacral screw in children. Comminuted pelvic fractures with unstable sacroiliac dislocation require stabilisation with lateral compression screws or plates. In case of residual pelvic instability after internal fixation, an additional external fixator or pelvic hammock should be applied to optimize the stability of fixation.

The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures

PURPOSE

Patient-reported minimal clinically important differences (MCID) provide a standard to compare clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to calculate the MCID of PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Anxiety (AX), and Depression (DEP) scores in patients with pelvis and/or acetabular fractures.

METHODS

All patients with operatively treated pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were identified. Patients were categorized as either only pelvis and/or acetabular fractures (PA) or polytrauma (PT). PROMIS PF, PI, AX, and DEP scores were evaluated at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month intervals. Distribution-based MCID and anchor-based MCID were calculated for the overall cohort, PA, and PT groups.

RESULTS

The overall distribution-based MCIDs were PF (5.19), PI (3.97), AX (4.33), and DEP (4.41). The overall anchor-based MCIDs were PF (7.18), PI (8.03), AX (5.85), DEP (5.00). The percentage of patients achieving MCID for AX was 39.8-54% at 3 months and 32.7-56% at 12 months. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for DEP was 35.7-39.3% at 3 months and 32.1-35.7% at 12 months. The PT group had worse PROMIS PF scores than the PA group at all time points [post-operative, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month scores, (28.3 (6.3) vs. 26.8 (6.8) P = 0.016), (38.1 (9.2) vs. 35.0 (8.7) P = 0.037), (42.8 (8.2) vs. 39 (9.6) P = 0.015), (46.2 (9.7) vs. 41.2 (9.7) P = 0.011)].

CONCLUSION

An overall MCID for PROMIS PF was 5.19-7.18, PROMIS PI 3.97-8.03, PROMIS AX of 4.33-5.85, and PROMIS DEP of 4.41-5.00. The PT group had worse PROMIS PF at all time points. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for AX and DEP plateaued at 3 months post-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Which general functional outcome measure does a better job of capturing change in clinical status in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients? An analysis of responsiveness over the first year of recovery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the responsiveness of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score (PCS) to the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) dysfunction index (DI) in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients over multiple time points in the first year of recovery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred seventy-three patients with surgically treated pelvic and acetabular fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association B or C-type pelvic ring disruption or acetabular fracture) were enrolled into the center's prospective orthopaedic trauma database between January 2005 and February 2015. Functional outcome data were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Evaluation was performed using the SF-36 Survey and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Responsiveness was assessed by calculating the standard response mean (SRM), the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS

Three hundred five patients had complete data for both outcome scores. SF-36 PCS and SMFA DI scores showed strong correlation for all time intervals (r = -0.55 at baseline, r = -0.78 at 6 months, and r = -0.85 at 12 months). The SRM of the SF-36 PCS was greater in magnitude than the SRM of SMFA DI at all time points; this was statistically significant between baseline and 6 months (P < .001), but not between 6 and 12 months (P = .29). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving MCID in SF-36 PCS was significantly greater than the proportion achieving MCID in SMFA DI between baseline and 6 months (84.6% vs 69.8%, P < .001), and between 6 and 12 months (48.5% vs 35.7%, P = .01). There were no ceiling or floor effects found for SF-36 PCS at any time intervals. However, 16.1% of patients achieved the highest level of functioning detectable by the SMFA DI at baseline, along with smaller ceiling effects at 6 months (1.3%) and 12 months (3.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

SF-36 PCS is a more responsive measure of functional outcome than the SFMA DI over the first year of recovery in patients who sustain a pelvic ring disruption or acetabular fracture. This superiority was found in using the SRM, proportion of patients meeting MCID, and ceiling effects. Furthermore, the SF-36 PCS correlated with the more disease-specific SMFA DI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II.

Role of triangular osteosynthesis in vertically unstable transforaminal sacrum fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes

PURPOSE

We aim to report clinical and radiological results of triangular osteosynthesis for a homogenous group of vertically unstable transforaminal sacral fractures.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, 22 consecutive patients with unstable sacral fractures were treated with triangular osteosynthesis consisting of iliosacral screw augmented by spinopelvic fixation. Patients were followed up prospectively as a single cohort. Bone union, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 3.1 years (12-76 months). There was one bilateral fracture. Two patients underwent anterior plating for pubic symphyseal disruption. Based on Majeed and Iowa pelvic scores, 13 patients had excellent, seven had good and two had fair clinical outcome. All the patients could perform squatting, sitting cross-legged and kneeling without any restrictions. There were no additional neurological injuries. One patient had non-union of sacral fracture, one patient had deep infection, one patient had marginal wound necrosis and two patients complained of pain related to implant prominence. Two patients had connecting rod backout. All but one patient attained pre-operative work status.

CONCLUSION

Triangular osteosynthesis is a reliable procedure in treating unstable transforaminal sacral fractures. It permits early weight-bearing and facilitates faster functional recovery. Careful attention to details such as sacral dysmorphism, soft tissue injury, implant placement and anterior pelvic injury helps in keeping complications to an acceptable rate.

Floating elbow combining ipsilateral distal multiple segmental forearm fractures: A case report

BACKGROUND

Floating elbow along with ipsilateral multiple segmental forearm fracture is a rare and high-energy injury, although elbow dislocation or fracture of the ulna and radius may occur separately.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 37-year-old woman with open (IIIA) fracture of the right distal humerus with multiple shaft fractures of the ipsilateral radius and ulna with a history of falling from a height of almost 20 m from a balcony. After providing advanced trauma life support, damage control surgery was performed to debride the arm wound and temporarily stabilize the right upper limb with external fixators in the emergency operating room. Subsequently, one-stage internal fixation of multiple fractures was performed with normal values of biochemical indicators and reduction in limb swelling. The patient achieved good outcome at the 7 mo follow-up.

CONCLUSION

One- or two-stage treatment must be performed according to the type of injury; we efficiently used the “damage control principle.”

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Lithuanian Version of the Majeed Pelvic Score

Background and Objectives: There are no valid patient-based pelvic ring function assessment tools in Lithuania. The most widely used instrument is the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), which is proven to be an effective tool for assessing pelvic function after pelvic injuries. The aims of our study were: (1) the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the MPS for the Lithuanian-speaking population, (2) to test the psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version of the MPS (MPS-LT) at follow-up two-time points after pelvic fractures. Materials and Methods: The MPS was translated and culturally adapted. Psychometric properties of the MPS-LT were determined in one patient group (n = 40) at two time-points during follow-up examination from 1.5 to 3 months (mean 2 months) and from 11 to 20 months (mean 12 months). Results: At the mean time of 2 months after trauma, Cronbach’s α of the MPS-LT was 0.65. Correlation of the MPS-LT with the Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS) was r = 0.84 (p < 0.001), and with the Lithuanian SF-36, PCS was r = 0.53 (p < 0.001). At the mean time follow-up of 12 months, Cronbach’s α was 0.86, correlation with the IPS was r = 0.92 (p < 0.001), and with the Lithuanian SF-36, PCS – r = 0.82 (p < 0.001). At the 2-month follow-up, neither floor nor ceiling effects were reached, but at 12 months, 27.5% of patients reached the ceiling effect, while none reached the floor effect. The effect size of the MPS-LT was 1.66. Conclusions: The MPS-LT has limited ability to measure functional outcomes at 2 months after pelvic fracture. In contrast, at the 12-month follow-up examination, the MPS-LT had a good ability to assess pelvic function, and it was sensitive to health changes. The MPS-LT can be used as a pelvic function assessment tool after pelvic fractures for the Lithuanian-speaking population.