Plate-Assisted Intramedullary Nailing of Gustilo Type IIIB Open Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures: Does Adjunctive Plate Retention Affect Complication Rate?

What Is the Safe Window from Definitive Fixation to Flap Coverage in Type 3B Open Tibia Fractures? Supporting Plastics and Orthopaedics Alliance in Reducing Trauma Adverse Events (SPARTA)

OBJECTIVES

To delineate whether a "safe" window exists for timing from definitive fixation to definitive soft tissue coverage in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures requiring flap coverage.

DESIGN

International multicenter, retrospective comparative cohort study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred and seventy-three (n = 373) patients who sustained an open tibial shaft fracture requiring flap coverage.

METHODS

We evaluated the deep infection rates based on the timing between the definitive fixation and flap coverage. We determined several intervals of time from the day of definitive fixation (regardless of time from injury) and flap coverage. If performed on the same operative setting these were considered day 0. We evaluated coverage after 2 and 5 days from definitive fixation based on time versus infection rate curve inflection points. We adjusted for time to debridement and antibiotics within an hour.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Deep infection after definitive fixation and flap coverage.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 42.4 years (SD = 18.2) and 270 were male (72.4%). The deep infection rate after flap coverage was 20.6% (77/373). Definitive fixation to flap coverage time of up to 2 days was not associated with an increased risk of infection [relative risk (RR) = 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.37; P = 0.26]. There was an increased risk of deep infection for more than 2 days (RR = 1.59) and >5 days (RR = 1.64).

CONCLUSION

This study observed a "safe" window of up to 2 days between definitive fixation and flap coverage in open tibial shaft fractures requiring coverage before a statistical increase in risk of deep infection rate occurred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of Temporary Intentional Leg Shortening and Deformation for Treatment of Massive Bone and Soft Tissue Defects in Three Patients

Aim

This study describes the intentional deformation and shortening of a limb using external fixation (EF) in three patients with post-traumatic injury tibial defects and to assess the outcomes.

Case description

Three patients with infected non-unions and massive bone and soft tissue defects who were treated with temporary intentional leg shortening and deformation using a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) EF were retrospectively reviewed. The alignment was restored by gradual deformity correction and lengthening after a 2-week interval. No additional surgical intervention was required for soft tissue reconstruction after primary skin closure. Skin closure and good bone alignment were achieved in all patients. The functional outcomes and bone outcomes were evaluated for all cases according to the Paley criteria modified by the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov. All patients showed excellent bone outcomes. Two patients achieved excellent functional outcomes and one had a good outcome. The patient with a good outcome was unable to descend the stairs comfortably.

Conclusion

This technique is suitable for treating massive bone and soft tissue defects and should be considered as a treatment option.

How to cite this article

Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Aikawa T, et al. Efficacy of Temporary Intentional Leg Shortening and Deformation for Treatment of Massive Bone and Soft Tissue Defects in Three Patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):195-201.

Orthoplastic Reconstruction of Type IIIB Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Using Debrided, Devitalized Cortical Segments: Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients who sustained type IIIB open tibial diaphyseal (OTA/AO-42) fractures and underwent orthoplastic reconstruction using mechanically relevant devitalized bone (ORDB) versus those who did not require the use of devitalized bone as part of their orthoplastic reconstruction.

DESIGN

Consecutive cohort study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

The study included 74 patients who sustained a type IIIB open tibial diaphyseal fracture requiring orthoplastic reconstruction over a 4-year period in a major trauma center. All patients underwent a two-stage orthoplastic reconstruction protocol, with the second stage consisting of definitive fixation and flap coverage (free fascial anterolateral thigh flap) in a single sitting. Patients were contacted at a minimum of 30 months to measure HRQoL.

INTERVENTION

Patients requiring ORDB versus those who did not require the use of devitalized bone as part of their orthoplastic reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was HRQoL ascertained using Euro-Qol (EQ)-5D and Short-Form (SF)-36 scores.

RESULTS

Thirty (n = 30) patients underwent ORDB with the remaining 44 not requiring devitalized bone as part of their reconstruction. The median age was 46.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 29.0], with a median follow-up of 3.8 years (IQR 1.5). The median cohort EQ-5D was 0.743 (IQR 0.222), ORDB 0.743 (IQR 0.195) versus non-ORDB 0.748 (IQR 0.285), P = 0.71. The median physical component SF-36 score was 80 (IQR 50), ORDB 80 (IQR 34.5) versus non-ORDB 77.5 (IQR 58.75), P = 0.72. The median mental component SF-36 score was 80 (IQR 28), ORDB 80 (IQR 21) versus non-ORDB 80 (IQR 36), P = 0.29.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who sustained a type IIIB open tibial shaft fracture and who underwent a 2-stage orthoplastic reconstruction, ORDB does not seem to be associated with inferior health-related quality of life based on EQ-5D or SF-36 scores. The results of this approach should be considered within the strict combined orthoplastic approach in the study unit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acute Compartment Syndrome in Type IIIB Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Using a 2-Stage Orthoplastic Approach

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) in a series of patients with Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures that were treated using a specific 2-stage orthoplastic protocol.

DESIGN

Consecutive cohort study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-three (n = 93) consecutive patients with a type IIIB open tibial shaft fracture (OTA/AO-42) treated using a 2-stage orthoplastic approach, between August 2015 and January 2018. After exclusions, 83 (n = 83) were eligible for analysis.

INTERVENTION

Colloid resuscitation and 2-stage orthoplastic reconstruction of type IIIB open tibial shaft fracture. Stage 1 consists of "3-vessel view" early debridement and temporary internal fixation, with stage 2 consisting of a single-stage fix and flap.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rate of ACS. Secondary outcomes included early/late sequelae of missed ACS, deep infection, arterial injury, nonunion, and flap failure.

RESULTS

Eighty-three (n = 83) patients were included for analysis. The median age was 45.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 35] with a median follow-up of 1.6 years (IQR 0.8). The median number of operations was 2.0 (IQR 4). For the primary outcome, there were a total of 0 (0/83) patients who required fasciotomy or developed early/late clinical sequelae of missed ACS. Six (6/83, 7.2%) patients developed deep infection, 18 patients (18/83, 21.7%) experienced nonischemic arterial injury, 5 patients (5/83, 6.0%) experienced nonunion, with 4 patients (4/83, 4.8%) experiencing flap failure. Diabetes was the only variable associated with deep infection (P = 0.025) and nonunion (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures treated with colloid resuscitation and a 2-stage orthoplastic protocol, which includes early "3-vessel view" exposure and debridement, do not appear to develop ACS. Furthermore, no sequelae of missed compartment syndrome was observed at final follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Definitive fixation of open tibia fractures: Does reopening the traumatic wound increase complication rates?

BACKGROUND

It is unknown if surgical approach or use of previous traumatic wounds for open fracture instrumentation has an impact on patient complications or outcomes. This study sought to compare infection and nonunion rates in the staged treatment of open tibia fractures where the traumatic wound was reopened during definitive fixation versus when they were not.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients at a single institution level 1 trauma center. All patients who had a minimum of 1 year clinical and radiographic outcomes were included. Primary outcome measures were incidence of infection and nonunion. Groups of patients were compared based on surgical approach for definitive fixation.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included - 48 patients received definitive treatment and wound closure during initial management of the open fracture (group 1), 22 patients had staged fixation through new incisions (group 2), and 26 patients had their traumatic wound reopened during definitive fixation (group 3). Rates of infection were 10.4%, 31.8% and 11.5% respectively (p = 0.15). Rates of nonunion were 20.8%, 27.3% and 30.8% (p = 1.0). No statistically significant differences in regards to primary outcomes were found between the staged fixation groups. Multiple logistic regression also showed no difference in infection or nonunion when controlling for known risk factors.

CONCLUSION

For open tibia fractures that underwent staged fixation, no significant differences in infection or nonunion were observed between procedures that involved reopening the traumatic wound versus procedures performed through new incisions. The presence of a distal tibia periarticular fracture was found to be independently associated with infection risk.

Definitive Fixation Outcomes of Open Tibial Shaft Fractures: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To delineate if there were differences in outcomes between definitive fixation strategies in open tibial shaft fractures.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and OpenGrey.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized and Quasi-randomized studies analyzing adult patients (>18 years) with open tibial shaft fractures (AO-42), undergoing definitive fixation treatment of any type.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data regarding patient demographics, definitive bony/soft-tissue management, irrigation, type of antibiotics, and follow-up. Definitive intervention choices included unreamed intramedullary nailing (UN), reamed intramedullary nailing, plate fixation, multiplanar, and uniplanar external fixation (EF). The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation rate. Cochrane risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation systems were used for quality analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effects meta-analysis of head-to-head evidence, followed by a network analysis that modeled direct and indirect data was conducted to provide precise estimates [relative risk (RR) and associated 95% confidence interval (95% CI)].

RESULTS

In open tibial shaft fractures, direct comparison UN showed a lower risk of unplanned reoperation versus EF (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-1.05, P = 0.08, moderate confidence). In Gustilo type III open fractures, the risk reduction with nailing compared with EF was larger (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.01, P = 0.05, moderate confidence). UN had a lower reoperation risk compared with reamed intramedullary nailing (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.4, P = 0.68, low confidence); however, this was not significant and did not demonstrate a clear advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nailing reduces the risk of unplanned reoperation by a third compared with EF, with a slightly larger reduction in type III open fractures. Future trials should focus on major complication rates and health-related quality of life in high-grade tibial shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Three-vessel view debridement of the open tibial fracture: a surgical technique

Adequate debridement of an open fracture is a key component of successful management. Despite having set debridement principles, there is no structured technique available in the literature to guide the surgeon in achieving this. We therefore present a technical note detailing the structured approach to the debridement of any open tibial fracture. Our unit has developed a novel stepwise technique termed locally as the "three-vessel view". Identifying all three primary vessels of the leg facilitates confirmation of inspection of all lower limb compartments thus minimising the risk of missed devitalised tissue or neglected areas of contamination and the potential for consequent disastrous outcomes as a result of inadequate exposure.

Timing of Flap Coverage With Respect to Definitive Fixation in Open Tibia Fractures

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a large, U.S wide, observational study of type III tibial fractures, with the hypothesis that delays between definitive fixation and flap coverage might be a substantial modifiable risk factor associated with nosocomial wound infection.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a multicenter database of open tibial fractures requiring flap coverage.

SETTING

Fourteen level-1 trauma centers across the United States.

PATIENTS

Two hundred ninety-six (n = 296) consecutive patients with Gustilo III open tibial fractures requiring flap coverage at 14 trauma centers were retrospectively analyzed from a large orthopaedic trauma registry. We collected demographics and the details of surgical care. We investigated the patient, and treatment factors leading to infection, including the time from various points in care to the time of soft-tissue coverage.

INTERVENTION

Delay definitive fixation and flap coverage in tibial type III fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

(1) Results of multivariate regression with time from injury to coverage, debridement to coverage, and definitive fixation to coverage in the model, to determine which delay measurement was most associated with infection. (2) A second multivariate model, including other factors in addition to measures of flap delay, to provide the estimate between delay and infection after adjustment for confounding.

RESULTS

Of 296 adults (227 M: 69 F) with open Gustilo type III tibial fractures requiring flap coverage, 96 (32.4%) became infected. In the multivariate regression, the time from definitive fixation to flap coverage was most predictive of subsequent wound infection (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.08, n = 260, P = 0.02) among the time measurements. Temporary internal fixation was not associated with an increased risk of infection in both univariate (P = 0.59) or multivariate analyses (P = 0.60). Flap failure was associated with the highest odds of infection (odds ratio 6.83, 95% confidence interval 3.26 to 14.27, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Orthoplastic teams that are dedicated to severe musculoskeletal trauma, that facilitate coordination of definitive fixation and flap coverage, will reduce the infection rates in Gustilo type III tibial fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Type III open complete articular fractures of the distal humerus: case series outcomes after orthoplastic reconstruction

Background

Open complete articular injuries of this distal humerus are rare injuries which are challenging to manage. The study unit aims to present a small case series of Gustilo-Anderson type III open complete articular fractures which have undergone a single-stage definitive fixation and soft-tissue coverage, presenting their functional outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective case series identifying all type IIIB AO 13-C3 distal humeral fractures from the unit trauma database. The primary outcome was the Oxford Elbow Score. Secondary outcomes included deep infection, nonunion, and reoperation.

Results

A total of six patients were identified, (four open type IIIA, 2 type IIIB). All patients underwent single-sitting definitive fixation and soft-tissue coverage. Mean range of motion arc was 90 degrees. The median Oxford Elbow Score was 35 (range 21-43), representative of mild to moderate arthritis. One patient (n = 1) developed deep infection at 24 months and required reoperation. All patients (n = 6) proceeded to union at the latest follow-up. We present a case report of a 59-years-old patient who sustained a type IIIB, AO 13-C3 distal humeral fracture who underwent single-sitting definitive fixation and flap coverage.

Conclusion

This case series reports that positive functional outcomes representative of mild/moderate arthritis at short to midterm follow-up can be achieved after definitive fixation and soft-tissue coverage in a single sitting, including when the soft tissue is deficient. This is a rare injury which is under-reported in the literature.

Standards of open lower limb fracture care in the United Kingdom

Open fractures of the lower limb remain a potentially devastating group of injuries that are challenging to manage. The primary aims of treatment are to optimise limb function and avoid serious complications such as infection and non-union, which are costly for both the patient and healthcare system. The management of these fractures has evolved significantly, and this is evident following the creation of national open fracture guidelines and a formal trauma system. These have served to standardise care for these injuries in the United Kingdom. The aim of this review is to update our colleagues on the current standard of lower limb open fracture care in the United Kingdom, and the impact this has had on patient outcomes.

Evaluation and management of atypical femoral fractures: an update of current knowledge

Atypical femoral fractures are often attributed to the use of anti-resorptive medications such as bisphosphonates (BP). Whilst they have proven effects on fragility fracture prevention, clinical and laboratory evidence is evolving linking BP-related suppression of bone remodelling to the development of atypical stress-related sub-trochanteric fractures (Shane et al. in JBMR 29:1-23, 2014; Odvina et al. in JCEM 90:1294-301, 2005; Durchschlag et al. in JBMR 21(10):1581-1590, 2006; Donnelly et al. in JBMR 27:672-678, 2012; Mashiba et al. in Bone 28(5):524-531, 2001; Dell et al. in JBMR 27(12):2544-2550, 2012; Black et al. in Lancet 348:1535-1541, 1996; Black et al. in NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007; Black et al. in JAMA 296:2927-2938, 2006; Schwartz et al. in JBMR 25:976-82, 2010). Injuries may present asymptomatically or with prodromal thigh pain and most can be successfully managed with cephalomedullary nailing and discontinuation of BP therapy. Such injuries exhibit a prolonged time to fracture union with high rates of non-union and metal-work failure when compared to typical subtrochanteric osteoporotic femoral fractures. Despite emerging literature on AFFs, their management continues to pose a challenge to the orthopaedic and extended multi-disciplinary team. The purpose of this review includes evaluation of the current evidence supporting the management of AFFs, clinical and radiological features associated with their presentation and a review of reported surgical strategies to treat and prevent these devastating injures.

Current updates in management of extremity injuries in polytrauma

Injury-related morbidity and mortality have been one of the most common causes of loss in productivity across all geographic distributions. It remains to be a global concern despite a continual improvement in regional and national safety policies. The establishment of trauma care systems and advancements in diagnostics and management have improved the overall survival of severely injured. A better understanding of the physiopathological and immunological responses to injury led to a significant shift in trauma care from "Early Total Care" to "Damage Control Orthopedics." While most of these algorithms were tailored to the philosophy of "life before limb," the impact of improper fracture management on disability and societal loss is increasingly being recognized. Recently, "Early Appropriate Care" of extremities has gained importance; however, its implementation is influenced by regional health care policies, available resources, and expertise and varies between low and high-income countries. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases on articles published from 1990 to 2020 using the Mesh terms "Polytrauma," "Multiple Trauma," and "Fractures." This review aims to consolidate on guidelines and available evidence in the management of extremity injuries in a polytraumatized patient to achieve better clinical outcomes of these severely injured.

Soft tissue management in open tibial shaft fractures: A comparison of institutional preferences and resultant early clinical outcomes

Aims

To compare results of institutional preferences with regard to treatment of soft tissues in the setting of open tibial shaft fractures.

Methods

We present a retrospective review of open tibial shaft fractures at two high-volume level 1 trauma centres with differing practices with regard to the acute management of soft tissues. Site 1 attempts acute primary closure, while site 2 prefers delayed closure/coverage. Comparisons include percentage of primary closure, number of surgical procedures until definitive closure, percentage requiring soft tissue coverage, and percentage of 90-day wound complication.

Results

Overall, there were 219 patients at site 1 and 282 patients at site 2. Differences in rates of acute wound closure were seen (168 (78%) at site 1 vs 101 (36%) at site 2). A mean of 1.5 procedures for definitive closure was seen at site 1 compared to 3.4 at site 2. No differences were seen in complication, nonunion, or amputation rates. Similar results were seen in a sub-analysis of type III injuries.

Conclusion

Comparing outcomes of open tibial shaft fractures at two institutions with different rates initial wound management, no differences were seen in 90-day wound complications, nonunion rates, or need for amputation. Attempted acute closure resulted in a lower number of planned secondary procedures when compared with planned delayed closure. Providers should consider either acute closure or delayed coverage based on the injury characteristics, surgeon preference and institutional resources without concern that the decision at the time of index surgery will lead to an increased risk of complication.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:481–487.