Incidence of Surgical Site Infections and Acute Kidney Injuries After Topical Antibiotic Powder Application in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

Local vancomycin administration in Orthopaedic Surgery - A systematic review of comparative studies

Background

There is still controversy surrounding the routine use of vancomycin locally in primary orthopaedic surgery procedures. Therefore, the aim of this review is to assess how local vancomycin impacts the rates and microbiology of surgical site infections.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out for all comparative studies comparing locally applied vancomycin to control for primary orthopaedic surgery procedures published before August 14, 2022.

Results

A total of 61 studies with 65,671 patients were included for analysis. Forty-six studies used vancomycin powder, 12 studies with grafts soaked in vancomycin, two studies used vancomycin irrigation, and one study administered vancomycin interosseously. There were 15 studies (of 26) in spine surgery, five (of 14) in arthroplasty, ten (of 11) in sports medicine, and two (of five) in trauma surgery that found statistically significant decreases in overall infection rates when applying local vancomycin. Only one study (in spine surgery) found significant increases in infection rates with local vancomycin application. For spine surgery, local vancomycin application had the greatest proportion of gram-negative bacteria (40.7%) isolated compared to S. aureus (42.4%) in controls. In arthroplasty and trauma surgery, there were increases in the proportions of gram-negative bacteria when vancomycin was added. There were no reported systemic adverse reactions associated with local vancomycin use in any of the studies.

Conclusion

Applying local vancomycin during primary orthopaedic surgery procedures may reduce the rates of infections in multiple different orthopaedic specialties, particularly in spine surgery and sports medicine. However, careful consideration should be applied when administering local vancomycin during specific orthopaedic procedures given the heterogeneity of included studies and breadth of surgeries included in this review.

Level of evidence

Level III. A systematic review of level I - III studies.

A technique for introducing broad-spectrum topical antibiotics during open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures

Postoperative surgical site infections remain a significant and prevalent complication after open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Local antibiotics have been shown to decrease risk of postoperative infection, although recent evidence is conflicting. We provide a consistent and replicable technique for delivering intraoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics in the form of a putty applied directly to surgical implants. With this technique, systemic levels of those antibiotics remain safe and stable.

The Effect of Vancomycin and Tobramycin Local Antibiotic Powder on Surgical Site Infections After Open Treatment of Fracture: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of vancomycin/tobramycin local antibiotic powder (LAP) on surgical site infections (SSIs) after open treatment of fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparative study with propensity matching.

SETTING

The study was set in an urban level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon before and after cessation of routine LAP use were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Deep and superficial SSIs were the measured outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 652 open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon: LAP was used in 36.7% (114/310) of procedures before stopping its use, after which 342 procedures were performed without LAP. Comparison of all procedures performed with and without routine LAP use demonstrated no difference in infection rates, although there was a trend for the group without LAP to have fewer superficial SSIs (proportional difference [PD] -2.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.1% to 0.1%; P = 0.05) and more deep SSIs (PD 3.9%, 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.9%; P = 0.06). Prematch analysis demonstrated that LAP use was associated with external fixation (PD 8.5%, 95% CI, 1.6%-16.2%; P = 0.005), longer operative times (median difference 56.0 minutes, 95% CI, 39.0-74.0; P < 0.0001), greater estimated blood loss (median difference 70.0, 95% CI, 50.0-100.0; P < 0.0001), and no difference in superficial (PD 2.4%; 95% CI, -0.8% to 6.8%; P = 0.07) or deep SSIs (PD -1.6%, 95% CI, -6.2% to 4.1%; P = 0.54). After propensity matching (108 vs. 108) to control for the above differences, the LAP group, compared with the no LAP group, had no difference in superficial SSIs and was less likely to have deep SSIs (PD -8.3%, 95% CI, -16.2% to -0.2%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of vancomycin and tobramycin LAP lowered the rate of deep SSIs after open treatment of fractures on propensity-matched analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?

Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer functional and pain interference PROMIS scores. Orthopaedic infection interventions have been focused on prevention and treatment options. The creation of new modalities for orthopaedic infection treatment can benefit from the understanding of the temporal relationship between bacterial colonization and host-cell integration, a concept referred to as "the race for the surface." Regarding prevention, host modulation and antibiotic powder use have been explored as viable options to lower infection rates. Orthopaedic infection treatment has additionally continued to evolve, with PO antibiotics demonstrating equivalent efficacy to IV antibiotics for the treatment of orthopaedic infections in recent studies. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge.

The Routine Use of Running Subcuticular Closures in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients Does Not Increase Wound Complications

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the routine use of running subcuticular closures (RSC) in orthopaedic trauma patients increases the rate of wound complications and reoperations.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

Urban Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred sixty-six patients undergoing orthopaedic trauma procedures between June 2020 and March 2022.

INTERVENTION

Adoption of an RSC protocol where any incision/wound that could be approximated with interrupted subcuticular 2-0 monofilament sutures was closed with a running subcuticular 3-0 monofilament suture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Wound complications and subsequent reoperations.

RESULTS

With adoption of the RSC protocol, 91.0% of all orthopaedic trauma procedures were closed with RSC compared with 7.5% of the historical control group. There were no observed differences in the rate of wound complications (proportional difference (PD) 6.0%, confidence interval (CI) -2.3% to 14.1%; P = 0.15) or reoperations (PD 5.2%, CI -1.9% to 12.2%; P = 0.14) between the RSC and the control group. Wound complications were not associated with RSC on univariate analysis (PD 7.2%, CI -10.0% to 24.0%; P = 0.41). On multivariate analysis, an ASA>2 (odds ratio (OR) 2.4, CI 1.0 to 5.7; P = 0.03), lower extremity injuries (OR 4.9, CI 1.3 to 17.8; P = 0.01), and open reduction internal fixation procedures (OR 2.8, CI 1.1 to 7.2; P = 0.02) were found to be independently associated with wound complications.

CONCLUSION

RSC for orthopaedic trauma procedures was not associated with increased wound complications when compared a historical cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Do Intrawound Antibiotics Reduce the Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Pelvic and Lower-Limb Trauma Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy of intraoperative topical antibiotics in reducing the incidence of postoperative surgical site infections in pelvic and lower-limb trauma orthopaedic surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A search of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase was conducted for English language studies published from 1946 through September 3, 2021, using relevant keywords.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies reporting on the rate of surgical site infections in adult patients (age 16 and older) who underwent surgical fixation of lower-limb or pelvic traumatic fractures, including both open and closed fractures, with topical intraoperative antibiotics applied to the surgical site before wound closure.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse variance method and random-effects model to assess effect significance and study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven studies were included in the systematic review. Results of the meta-analysis suggested a potential 23% reduction in the odds of developing a deep surgical site infection in patients treated with intraoperative antibiotic powder compared with those managed with intravenous antibiotics alone (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.52-1.13), although the results did not reach statistical significance. Further powered studies including randomized controlled trials would be of great value to validate the results suggested in this study and inform best practice intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in pelvic and lower-limb trauma surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Supratherapeutic Antibiotic Levels and Acute Kidney Injury from Absorption of Topical Antibiotics: A Case Report

CASE

A 96-year-old woman with no baseline renal dysfunction presented with a distal femoral shaft fracture after a ground-level fall. Treatment was with a retrograde intramedullary nail and included placement of topical antibiotics. Postoperatively, she developed acute kidney injury and was found to have supratherapeutic antibiotic levels.

CONCLUSION

This case report demonstrates the risk of clinically relevant systemic absorption along with associated downstream end organ damage with the use of topical antibiotics in certain circumstances. We present this case as an illustration of a rare hazard associated with topical antibiotic use.