Long-Term Post-traumatic Stress Disorder After Orthopaedic Injury: Prevalence and Risk Factors

Enrollment in a Behavioral Health Program Positively Impacts 2-Year Cumulative Survival Rates in Osteochondral Allograft Transplant Patients

Emerging evidence suggests that patients' behavioral health may influence outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT). A comprehensive behavioral health program (BHP) including preoperative screening and education, and postoperative counseling and support, led by a health behavior psychologist was implemented for patients considering OCAT. We hypothesized that patients undergoing knee OCAT and enrolled in the BHP would have a significantly higher 2-year graft survival rate than those not enrolled. Prospectively collected data for patients undergoing knee OCAT enrolled in the lifelong outcomes registry were analyzed. Based on the timing of implementation of a comprehensive BHP to provide preoperative screening and education followed by postoperative counseling and support, BHP and no-BHP cohorts were compared. Treatment failure was defined as the need for either OCAT revision surgery or knee arthroplasty. The Kaplan-Meier method using log-rank tests compared cumulative survival rates. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine the effects of confounding variables on the influence of BHP enrollment on graft survival. A total of 301 patients were analyzed (no-BHP = 220 and BHP = 81). At 2-year follow-up, a significantly lower cumulative graft survival rate was observed for patients not enrolled in the BHP (68.2 vs. 91.4%; p = 0.00347). Adjusting for sex, age, body mass index, tobacco use, tibiofemoral bipolar OCAT type surgery, and nonadherence, patients not enrolled in the BHP were 2.8 times more likely to experience OCAT treatment failure by 2 years after primary OCAT compared with patients in the BHP (95% confidence interval, 1.02-4.98; p = 0.01). A comprehensive BHP contributes to significant improvements in 2-year graft survival rates following OCAT in the knee. Preoperative mental and behavioral health screening and support for shared decision-making regarding treatment options, in conjunction with patient and caregiver education and assistance through integrated health care team engagement, are beneficial to patients pursuing complex joint preservation surgeries. Level of evidence is 2, prospective cohort study.

Donor-recipient age- or sex-mismatched osteochondral allografts do not adversely affect cumulative graft survival rates after transplantation in the knee

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) can be performed without the need for blood-type matching or anti-rejection medications. However, other donor-recipient mismatch variables could influence outcomes. Therefore, it is critical to examine the impacts of sex and age mismatching on functional OCA survival.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data for patients undergoing primary knee OCAT enrolled in a lifelong outcomes registry were analyzed for functional OCA survival based on sex- and age-matched and -mismatched cohorts. Treatment failure was defined as the need for OCAT revision surgery or knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

162 donor-recipient pairs were analyzed; 57 (35.2%) were sex-mismatched and 89 (54.9%) were age-mismatched. Sex-mismatched OCATs were not associated with a significantly different cumulative graft survival rate when compared to sex-matched OCATs (78.9% vs 75.2% p = 0.324). Age-mismatched OCATs were not associated with a significantly different cumulative graft survival rate when compared to age-matched OCATs (71.6% vs 81.5% p = 0.398). When adjusting for sex, BMI, concomitant procedures, and surgery type, age-mismatched and sex-mismatched OCATs were not significantly associated with higher likelihood for treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

By analyzing functional graft survival rates for donor-recipient sex- or age-mismatched OCAs following primary OCAT, the results of the present study support current donor-recipient matching protocols for OCA transplantation in the knee. Based on current evidence, donor-recipient blood-type, sex-, and age-matching are not required for safe and effective primary OCAT in the knee. However, further studies are imperative for defining modifiable variables that further optimize safety and outcomes while maximizing donor tissue quality, availability, access, and use.

Gunshot Trauma Patients Have Higher Risk of PTSD Compared With Blunt Trauma and Elective Populations: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outpatient Orthopaedic Care

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been extensively studied in patients who have experienced natural disasters or military conflict, but there remains a substantial gap in knowledge about the prevalence of PTSD after civilian orthopaedic trauma, especially as related to firearms. Gun violence is endemic in the United States, especially in urban centers, and the mental impact is often minimized during the treatment of physical injuries.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do patients who experience gunshot wound (GSW) trauma have higher PTSD screening scores compared with patients with blunt or other trauma (for example, motor vehicle and motorcycle accidents or stab wounds) and those with elective conditions (for example, arthritis, tendinitis, or nerve compression)? (2) Are PTSD scores correlated with pain scores in patients with GSW trauma, those with non-GSW trauma, and patients with elective orthopaedic symptoms?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of adults older than 18 years of age presenting to an orthopaedic clinic over an 8-month period between August 2021 and May 2022. All patients presenting to the clinic were approached for inclusion (2034 patients), and 630 new or postoperative patients answered study surveys as part of routine care. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the orthopaedic condition with which they presented, whether gunshot trauma, blunt trauma, or elective orthopaedic symptoms. Overall, the results from 415 patients were analyzed, including 212 patients with elective orthopaedic symptoms, 157 patients with non-GSW trauma, and 46 patients with GSW trauma. Clinical data including demographic information were collected at the time of appointment and abstracted along with results from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, short screening questionnaire, which uses a 7-item scale scored from 0 to 7 (with higher scores representing worse symptoms), and from the numeric rating scale for pain (range 0 to 10). Both questionnaires were routinely administered by medical assistants at patient intake. The proportions of patients completing PTSD scoring were 45% (95) in the elective group, 74% (116) in the group with non-GSW trauma, and 85% (39) in the group with GSW trauma (p = 0.01). We compared the PTSD scores across the three groups and then dichotomized the scores as a negative versus positive screening result at a value of ≥ 4 with further comparative analysis. The correlation between pain and PTSD scores was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with GSW trauma had higher mean ± SD PTSD scores compared with those who had non-GSW trauma (4.87 ± 4.05 versus 1.75 ± 2.72, mean difference 3.21 [95% CI 1.99 to 4.26]; p < 0.001) and those who presented with elective conditions (4.87 ± 4.05 versus 0.49 ± 1.04, mean difference 4.38 [95% CI 3.50 to 5.26]; p < 0.001). When dichotomized for positive or negative PTSD screening results, patients with GSW trauma had a higher risk of having PTSD (64% [25 of 39]) compared with patients with non-GSW trauma (27% [31 of 116], relative risk 2.40 [95% CI 1.64 to 3.51]; p < 0.001) and compared with patients with elective conditions (4% [4 of 95], relative risk 15.22 [95% CI 5.67 to 40.87]; p < 0.001). Pain scores were correlated with PTSD scores only for patients with non-GSW trauma (ρ = 0.37; p < 0.0001). No correlation with pain scores was present for patients with GSW (ρ = 0.24; p = 0.16) or patients with elective conditions (ρ = -0.04; p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

In an orthopaedic clinic population, the prevalence of positive screening for PTSD was highest in the population sustaining gunshot trauma as compared with blunt or other trauma and elective orthopaedic conditions. Interestingly, pain scores correlated with PTSD screening only in the patients with non-GSW trauma. These differences suggest a substantial difference in the populations at risk of PTSD after trauma. Overall, the psychological impacts of gun trauma are poorly understood. The next step would be to prospectively study the differences and timelines of PTSD screening in patients with GSW trauma in comparison with patients with blunt or other trauma to better define the treatment needs in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder following upper versus lower extremity fractures

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic trauma has been linked to major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Post-injury rates of psychiatric diagnoses and their relationship to various injury characteristics are not well characterized. We aimed to determine the association between orthopaedic trauma and MDD, GAD, and PTSD diagnoses at 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

A national insurance claims database was used to create upper extremity fracture (UEF) and lower extremity fracture (LEF) cohorts, with further stratification by isolated versus multiple fractures. Patient undergoing elective upper or lower extremity orthopaedic procedures served as controls. Rates of post-injury psychiatric diagnoses were calculated. Univariate logistic regression was conducted after matching in a 1:1 ratio based on relevant comorbidities such as psychiatric history. All significant variables were included in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 308,578 UEF patients and 360,510 LEF patients were identified. Within the UEF cohort, the diagnosis rates following either isolated or multiple fractures were identified: MDD (25% to 30%), GAD (10% to 11%), and PTSD (4%). LEF cohort rates were as follows: MDD (30% to 38%), GAD (11% to 14%), and PTSD (4% to 7%). Compared to non-injured controls, both the UEF and LEF cohorts were associated with higher rates of all psychiatric diagnoses. In comparing UEF and LEF cohorts, isolated UEF was associated with MDD, GAD, and PTSD; however, multiple UEF was associated with MDD and GAD, whereas multiple LEF was associated with PTSD.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatric pathology is prevalent following orthopaedic trauma. Even after controlling for psychiatric history, orthopaedic trauma is independently associated with post-injury psychiatric diagnoses and may be more predictive of PTSD and GAD than of MDD. Upper extremity fractures may portend higher psychiatric risk. With negative stigma surrounding mental health and the early role of orthopaedic surgeons in providing care, it is imperative to normalize psychiatric care with patients and discuss warning symptoms that may indicate the onset of psychiatric disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, Level III.

Acute stress disorder in patients with accidental traumatic fractures: What can we do

AIM

To evaluate the potential influencing factors of acute stress disorder (ASD) in patients with accidental traumatic fractures to provide evidence for clinical nursing care.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHODS

Patients with traumatic fractures treated in our hospital from 1 January 2020 to 30 November 2021 were included. The characteristics of ASD and no ASD patients were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 468 patients with traumatic fractures were included, the incidence of ASD was 28.20%. Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≤50 years (OR2.918, 95% CI1.994 ~ 3.421), female (OR2.074, 95% CI1.489 ~ 3.375), AIS-ISS at admission ≥20 (OR3.981, 95% CI2.188 ~ 5.091), VAS at admission≥7 (OR2.804, 95% CI2.027 ~ 3.467), introverted personality (OR1.722, 95%CI1.314 ~ 2.432) and CD-RISC at admission≤60 (OR3.026, 95% CI2.338 ~ 4.769) were the risk factors of ASD in patients with traumatic fractures (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of ASD in patients with traumatic fractures is affected by multiple factors. Medical workers should take early and timely management and nursing measures for related risk factors to reduce the occurrence of ASD.