Depression Screening and Behavioral Health Integration in Musculoskeletal Trauma Care

Preoperative depression screening using PHQ-2 is associated with worse outcomes after ACL reconstruction

Purpose

To determine how screening positive for depression preoperatively can affect patient reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

Primary ACLR patients between May 2020-September 2022 with a PHQ-2 score prior to their surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients older than 13 years of age and with minimum 6-months of follow-up were included for analysis. Patients were categorized as PHQ(+) (PHQ-2 ≥2) or PHQ2(-) (PHQ-2 < 2). Demographics, preoperative and postoperative Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) -Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS), surgical clinical outcomes, and complications were collected and compared. Chi-square tests and independent t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results

A total of 127 patients were analyzed, with 32 PHQ2(+) and 95 PHQ2(-). The PHQ2(+) group had a lower proportion responding "yes" to PASS preoperatively (6.5 % vs. 25.3 %, p = 0.03), at 9 months (47.4 % vs. 72.4 %, p = 0.05), and 12 months postoperatively (42.9 % vs 79.5 %, p = 0.009). PHQ2(+) reported worse PROMIS-PI scores preoperatively, at 6 months, and at 9 months. The PHQ2(+) group reported worse PROMIS-PF preoperatively, at 6 months, at and 12 months. The PHQ2(+) group had worse IKDC scores preoperatively at 9 months and at 12 months. Those screening positive for depression also demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative complications (34.4 % vs. 9.5 %, p = 0.001) and reoperation rates (21.9 % vs. 4.2 %; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

A brief preoperative survey, such as the PHQ-2, can provide prognostic value for patient outcomes after ACLR.

Level of evidence

III-Retrospective cohort study.

Enrollment in a Behavioral Health Program Positively Impacts 2-Year Cumulative Survival Rates in Osteochondral Allograft Transplant Patients

Emerging evidence suggests that patients' behavioral health may influence outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT). A comprehensive behavioral health program (BHP) including preoperative screening and education, and postoperative counseling and support, led by a health behavior psychologist was implemented for patients considering OCAT. We hypothesized that patients undergoing knee OCAT and enrolled in the BHP would have a significantly higher 2-year graft survival rate than those not enrolled. Prospectively collected data for patients undergoing knee OCAT enrolled in the lifelong outcomes registry were analyzed. Based on the timing of implementation of a comprehensive BHP to provide preoperative screening and education followed by postoperative counseling and support, BHP and no-BHP cohorts were compared. Treatment failure was defined as the need for either OCAT revision surgery or knee arthroplasty. The Kaplan-Meier method using log-rank tests compared cumulative survival rates. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine the effects of confounding variables on the influence of BHP enrollment on graft survival. A total of 301 patients were analyzed (no-BHP = 220 and BHP = 81). At 2-year follow-up, a significantly lower cumulative graft survival rate was observed for patients not enrolled in the BHP (68.2 vs. 91.4%; p = 0.00347). Adjusting for sex, age, body mass index, tobacco use, tibiofemoral bipolar OCAT type surgery, and nonadherence, patients not enrolled in the BHP were 2.8 times more likely to experience OCAT treatment failure by 2 years after primary OCAT compared with patients in the BHP (95% confidence interval, 1.02-4.98; p = 0.01). A comprehensive BHP contributes to significant improvements in 2-year graft survival rates following OCAT in the knee. Preoperative mental and behavioral health screening and support for shared decision-making regarding treatment options, in conjunction with patient and caregiver education and assistance through integrated health care team engagement, are beneficial to patients pursuing complex joint preservation surgeries. Level of evidence is 2, prospective cohort study.

Musculoskeletal Pain Management and Patient Mental Health and Well-being

Orthopaedic trauma patients have high rates of psychiatric disorders, which put them at risk for worse outcomes after injury and surgery, including worse pain. Mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety, can affect the perception of pain. Pain can also exacerbate or contribute to the development of mental illness after injury. Interventions to address both mental health and pain among orthopaedic trauma patients are critical. Balancing safety and comfort amid a drug overdose epidemic is challenging, and many clinicians do not feel comfortable addressing mental health or have the resources necessary. We reviewed the literature on the complex relationship between pain and mental health and presented examples of scalable and accessible interventions that can be implemented to promote the health and recovery of our patients. Interventions described include screening for depression in the orthopaedic trauma clinic and the emergency department or inpatient setting during injury and using a comprehensive and evidence-based multimodal pain management regimen that blends pharmacologic alternatives to opioids and physical and cognitive strategies to manage pain.