Clinical application of back surface topography by means of structured light in the screening of idiopathic scoliosis

Volumetry in Breast Reconstruction: Always New, Always Better?

Although breast surgeries for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes are regularly performed, no focus has been laid on establishing an adequate and reliable volumetry method. While CT and MRI scan represent methods that are already in clinical use, the 3D scan  is a novel and promising tool, easy to use with the possibility to measure the anatomic breast volume in an upright position. Nevertheless, its reliability is broadly underinvestigated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V : This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Moiré topography as a screening and diagnostic tool-A systematic review

Diagnostic investigation can be carried out using non-radiological and non-contact methods. Moiré topography (MT) seems to be a viable alternative to radiographic research in evaluating the spine and/or trunk deviations. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the current knowledge regarding the reliability and validity of Moiré topography as a screening and diagnostic tool. The systematic review was performed from 2010 until March 2021 in the PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, according to the eligibility criteria. This review fulfilled the following criteria according to the PICO system: population (children and adolescents), intervention (MT measurement), comparison (repeated MT measurements, MT compared to Cobb angle or scoliometer), outcome (reliability and validity of MT). Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for further analysis. All the studies were assessed to be of high quality. Included studies found that MT had high repeatability and high intraobserver and interobserver correlation, and correlation between MT parameters and radiographic Cobb angle ranged from moderate to high. The authors reported difficulty in defining the cut-off values for MT parameter (Surface Trunk Rotation-STR), and unsatisfactory sensitivity and specificity of MT examination. The studies did not reveal the advantage of MT as a screening method in the detection of idiopathic scoliosis in comparison to radiograph. Based on the evidence from eight studies, the results indicated moderate evidence for reliability and validity of Moiré topography as a screening and diagnostic tool. There is still no strong evidence for the accuracy of MT.

Assessing clinical trunk change with surface topography: anterior scoliosis correction as a model to evaluate curve progression

PURPOSE

Previous work has suggested that surface topography can be used for repeated measurements of deformity during curve monitoring following an initial radiograph. Changes in deformity during natural curve progression may be subtle. An important preemptive question to answer is whether topography can follow a large change in spine deformity, as in scoliosis correction. We assess the ability of surface topography to track the evolution of spine deformity during anterior scoliosis correction relative to traditional radiographs. Anterior scoliosis correction was chosen for this analysis because it changes the shape of the trunk without leaving a surgical scar and muscle atrophy along the posterior spine.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, 18 patients aged 14.6 ± 2.0 years at surgery were enrolled in a retrospective review of coronal radiographs and topographic scans acquired before and after scoliosis correction. Radiographic and topographic measures for the coronal curve angle before and after surgery were compared.

RESULTS

Surface topography estimates correlate with radiographic measures of the pre- (r = 0.7890, CI = [0.4989 0.9201], p < 0.00001), postsurgical (r = 0.7485, CI = [0.4329 0.9006], p = 0.0004), and the change in the coronal curve angle (r = 0.6744, CI = [0.3028 0.8680], p = 0.0021) due to surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence open for further extension that topography can follow changes in the coronal curve angle comparably to radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Monitoring adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measuring ribs prominence using surface topography device

Due to the danger of repeated exposure to X-rays for patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), reducing the number of radiographs is necessary. By using Surface Topography (ST), trunk asymmetry evaluation could be used. The number of radiographs required can be reduced by 30% when the radio is used only for patients with worsening ST.

HYPOTHESIS

ST is a reliable technique for deformity monitoring in AIS.

DESIGN

Observational prospective study.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of curve progression in AIS is high during a growth spurt and necessitates regular radiographic follow-up, despite the adverse effects of repeated exposure to X-rays.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine a simple and reproducible parameter for deformity monitoring using ST in AIS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive AIS patients with a Cobb angle between 10° and 40° were included. Every 6 months, X-ray and ST acquisitions were performed. Radiographic parameters and the ribs prominence curve calculated from ST were collected. This curve was deduced from the axial rotation of the 100 axial sections of the trunk. We analyzed correlations between the evolution of Cobb angle and the curve.

RESULTS

123 patients were included, 111 girls, 12 boys, mean age 12 years. The measurement of the curve had a good reproducibility (ICC: 0.816). ST differentiated patients with or without increased Cobb. (p = 0.0294).

CONCLUSION

ST is useful for monitoring AIS. This device could reduce the number of radiographs by 30%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Decreased Vertical Trunk Inclination Angle and Pelvic Inclination as the Result of Mid-High-Heeled Footwear on Static Posture Parameters in Asymptomatic Young Adult Women

The influence of high-heel footwear on the lumbar lordosis angle, anterior pelvic tilt, and sacral tilt are inconsistently described in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the impact of medium-height heeled footwear on the static posture parameters of homogeneous young adult standing women. Heel geometry, data acquisition process, as well as data analysis and parameter extraction stage, were controlled. Seventy-six healthy young adult women with experience in wearing high-heeled shoes were enrolled. Data of fifty-three subjects were used for analysis due to exclusion criteria (scoliotic posture or missing measurement data). A custom structured light surface topography measurement system was used for posture parameters assessment. Three barefoot measurements were taken as a reference and tested for the reliability of the posture parameters. Two 30-degree wedges were used to imitate high-heel shoes to achieve a repeatable foot position. Our study confirmed the significant (p < 0.001) reduced vertical balance angle and pelvis inclination angle with large and medium-to-large effects, respectively, due to high-heel shoes. No significant differences were found in the kyphosis or lordosis angles. High-heeled shoes of medium height in young asymptomatic women can lead to a straightening effect associated with a reduced vertical balance angle and decreased pelvic inclination.

Anatomical reference marks, evaluation parameters and reproducibility of surface topography for evaluating the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surface topography is a radiation-free examination that provides relevant information for the evaluation of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). However, its usage is not standardized, which restricts the applicability of this instrument.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

(a) To identify the anatomical reference markers used on surface topography; (b) to identify the parameters used on surface topography; and (c) to pool correlation and reproducibility results.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted following MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. The methodological quality was assessed according to Brink & Louw appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included for the qualitative synthesis. The most commonly used anatomical reference markers were: the prominent vertebra (C7 or T1), the posterior superior iliac spines (PSISs) and the sacrum (S1). The parameters for the evaluation of the AIS by surface topography are: spinal inclination angle (analogous to Cobb), gibbosity, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, pelvic obliquity, spine length, apex of the curve, C7-S1 distance (frontal plane), and C7-S1 displacement (sagittal plane). Data from eleven studies were metanalyzed and evidenced the correlation of the surface topography with X-ray exams and the reproducibility of the surface topography in the sagittal and frontal planes.

SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of this study recommend the use of a protocol for the application of the equipment. The analyzed studies predict the use of only four markers for anatomical reference. The evaluation of the AIS can be carried out observing nine parameters. Surface topography correlates with radiography when the spinal inclination angle (Cobb angle), thoracic kyphosis angle and lumbar lordosis angle are compared. Also, surface topography presents inter and intra-rater reproducibility in the sagittal plane and intra-rater reproducibility in the frontal plane.

A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Radiation exposure remains a big concern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Ultrasound imaging of the spine could significantly reduce or possibly even eliminate this radiation hazard. The spinous processes (SPs) and transverse processes (TPs) were used to measure the coronal deformity. Both landmarks provided reliable information on the severity of the curve as related to the traditional Cobb angle. However, it remained unclear which coronal ultrasound angle is the most appropriate method to measure the curve severity.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to test the reliability and the validity of several ultrasound angle measurements in the coronal plane as compared with the radiographic coronal Cobb angle in patients with AIS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study included 33 patients with AIS, both male and female (Cobb angle range: 3°-90°, primary and secondary curves), who underwent posterior-anterior radiography of the spine.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were the reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] for the intra- and interobserver variabilities) and the validity (linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman method, including the mean absolute difference [MAD]) of different ultrasound measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients were scanned using a dedicated ultrasound machine (Scolioscan, Telefield Medical Imaging Ltd, Hong Kong). The reliability and the validity were tested for three coronal ultrasound angles: an automatic and manual SP angle and a manual TP angle as compared with the radiographic coronal main thoracic or (thoraco)lumbar Cobb angles.

RESULTS

The ICC showed very reliable measurements of all ultrasound methods (ICC ≥0.84). The ultrasound angles were 15%-37% smaller as compared with the Cobb angles; however, excellent linear correlations were seen between all ultrasound angles and the Cobb angle (thoracic: R²≥0.987 and (thoraco)lumbar R²≥0.970), and the Bland-Altman plot showed a good agreement between all ultrasound angles and the Cobb angle. The MADs of the ultrasound angles, corrected using the linear regression equation, and the Cobb angles showed no significant difference between the different ultrasound angles (MAD: automatic SP angle 4.9°±3.2°, manual SP angle 4.5°±3.1°, and manual TP angle 4.7°±3.6°; p≥.388).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronal ultrasound angles are based on different landmarks than the traditional Cobb angle measurement and cannot represent the same angle values. In this study, we found excellent correlations between the ultrasound and Cobb measurements, without differences in the reliability and validity between the ultrasound angles based on the SPs and TPs. Therefore, the severity of the deformity in patients with AIS can be assessed by ultrasound imaging, avoiding hazardous ionizing radiation and enabling more individualized patient care. It also opens possibilities for screening.

Imaging in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Children with Idiopathic Scoliosis

The paper reviews the current imaging methods in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Radiography is generally used in the initial diagnosis of the condition. Postero-anterior erect full spine radiograph is generally prescribed, and is supplemented by lateral full spine radiograph when indicated. To reduce the radiation hazard, only the area of interest should be exposed, and follow-up radiographs should be taken with as few projections as possible. When available, EOS® stereoradiography should be used. The radiation of the microdose protocol is 45 times less than that of the conventional radiography. Surface topography offers another approach to monitoring changes of curvatures in AIS patients. Recently, 3D ultrasound has been found to be able to measure the Cobb angle accurately. Yet, it is still in the early developmental stages. The inherent intrinsic and external limitations of the imaging system need to be resolved before it can be widely used clinically. For AIS patients with atypical presentation, computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be required to assess for any underlying pathology. As CT is associated with a high radiation dose, it is playing a diminishing role in the management of scoliosis, and is replaced by MRI, which is also used for pre-operative planning of scoliosis. The different imaging methods have their limitations. The EOS® stereoradiography is expensive and is not commonly available. The surface topography does not enable measurement of Cobb angle, particularly when the patient is in-brace. The 3D ultrasound scanning has inherent intrinsic technical limitation and cannot be used in all subjects. Radiography, however, enables diagnosis and monitoring of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It is thus the gold standard in the evaluation and management of scoliosis curves.